The Greatest Footballer of All Time

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
For me the GOAT's pool should consist of Pele, Maradona, Cruyff, Beckenbauer, Di Stefano, Messi and fat Ronaldo.

The others are just a notch below - C.Ronaldo, Eusebio, etc.

The margins are pretty thin of course so there's always something to disagree on.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
For my money none of Fat Ronaldo, Ronaldinho or Zidane make the cut. Ronaldo and Ronaldinho had hampered careers (for various reasons) that stopped them properly fulfilling their true potential, while Zidane just wasn't that good.
 

Shamwow

listens to shit music & watches Mrs Brown's Boys
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
13,969
Location
Spiderpig
These players such as Pele, Maradonna and Messi are just seem to be so far beyond their peers that I dont know how you can compare them against each other without them having played at the same time. Boring answer I know.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
These players such as Pele, Maradonna and Messi are just seem to be so far beyond their peers that I dont know how you can compare them against each other without them having played at the same time. Boring answer I know.
It's the right answer though.
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
If we move beyond what they did on the pitch though then you could argue that Cruyff is even better. Obviously a legend in his own country and arguably had more influence on modern football than any other single person.
Yeah, we could.
 

Kasper

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
3,584
Supports
Hansa Rostock / Bradford City
Ability - Messi
Legacy - Pele
So yeah, I'd be Pele for me, I think in those GOAT debates the most important point is the relative strength of the player compared to the level of his era and while Messi is great, Pele was better in that sense (+had more success, 3 WC is just unbelievable).
 

Vialli_92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
2,672
Location
Ireland
Supports
Juventus
Ability - Messi
Legacy - Pele
So yeah, I'd be Pele for me, I think in those GOAT debates the most important point is the relative strength of the player compared to the level of his era and while Messi is great, Pele was better in that sense (+had more success, 3 WC is just unbelievable).
I personally think Maradonna's legacy of the WC win in 86 trumps everyone else. It was a solo effort at times by him on the journey to lifting the WC.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,420
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
I will never understand why fat Ronaldo is rated above C. Ronaldo in these discussions.

Anywhooo. The best I've seen is Messi. The old folk tell me Maradona was better. I'll go with what they said.
 

Theon

Lord of the Iron Islands
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
13,289
Maradona, Pele and Messi stand out as the three greatest in this discussion.

I think you can make an argument for all three but personally I would go with Messi.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Maradona or Messi.

Pele didn't do it in a proper league.
The league he played in was arguably more competitive than the two horse drab la liga over the last decade or so. If doing it in a competitive league is the reason then Maradona comes ahead of anyone, he played in the toughest league of all time and won it without playing for one of the top teams.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,210
Location
Hollywood CA
Its probably best not to choose a greatest footballer of all time - all the players who get discussed shouldn't have to come in 2nd to others who mostly played in different eras. Instead there should be a pantheon of the best - maybe 10 or 12 players who are regarded as among the greatest for different reasons.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,312
From watching grainy clips, looking at the stats, and hearing anecdotes, it has to be Pele.

With my own eyes, Luis Ronaldo, albeit only for about two years. Never seen anyone look on such a different level to those around them.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Its probably best not to choose a greatest footballer of all time - all the players who get discussed shouldn't have to come in 2nd to others who mostly played in different eras. Instead there should be a pantheon of the best - maybe 10 or 12 players who are regarded as among the greatest for different reasons.
From the OP:

I completely realise that in a truly global sport that has run for more than a century there are numerous factors that would contribute to one's greatness and it is always difficult to point out just one name, which is why this is nothing but a light-hearted casual exercise to observe the spread across the forum. It's basically if you had to take one name as the greatest ever, who would it be. Doesn't need to go extremely academic in the explanation of justification of it.
 

Deleted member 101472

Guest
I wonder how long it will be before a new player lays a claim to being the GOAT. I can't think of anyone currently who would even come close so we will see what the future holds .

Messi is the GOAT for me , with maradona close behind . For some reason, pele has never really excited me , and given a choice of a 30 min YouTube video of pele greatest goals and 30 mins of messis " almost " great goals , I would watch the latter every time. I feel like he's the most transending individual ever to play the game, yes he has been part of some of the greatest club sides ever assembled but he still looked so many levels above his teammates . I hope by the time he retires it can be somewhat more unanimous.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,420
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Its probably best not to choose a greatest footballer of all time - all the players who get discussed shouldn't have to come in 2nd to others who mostly played in different eras. Instead there should be a pantheon of the best - maybe 10 or 12 players who are regarded as among the greatest for different reasons.
I refer you to my classic thread, "Tiers of Greatness".
 

Kinsella

Copy & Paste Merchant
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
2,762
I will never understand why fat Ronaldo is rated above C. Ronaldo in these discussions.
I suppose because the ability he showed in his prime, or rather before his injuries, was ahead of anything Cristiano Ronaldo displayed.

Cristiano's longevity and consistency over the course of his career will put him ahead of his namesake for most or many though.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Cool - my answer is I don't have one name as choosing one would undermine the accomplishments of the others. That's why I proposed a pantheon of all time greats instead.
That is what is normally done and in theory comparisons across any players make no sense let alone the greatest ones which is why this is not a serious thread where naming one player would mean you are holding him ahead of others or undermining the others, just the name you'd pick if you had to pick one, based on personal preferences, whatever you value in football or anything else. Fair enough if some are still reluctant.
 

HabeasC

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
3,600
Anderson
  • Won the champions league (Pele never did this)
  • Won the PL (Messi hasn't done this)
  • Won the Brazilian Serie B (Ronaldo and Messi haven't done this)
  • Won a bronze medal at the olympics (not done by any of the others), Messi only won gold.
He was also the golden boy, which Ronaldo never won.

I don't like these threads...
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,953
Location
Occupied Merseyside
I say it every time this debate is brought up: George Best would have skinned every other player on the list and then gone back and skinned them again for the craic.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,420
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
I suppose because the ability he showed in his prime, or rather before his injuries, was ahead of anything Cristiano Ronaldo displayed.

Cristiano's longevity and consistency over the course of his career will put him ahead of his namesake for most or many though.
I think the first point is debatable. I think C. Ronaldo's longevity has made people forget how devastating he was at his best.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,210
Location
Hollywood CA
That is what is normally done and in theory comparisons across any players make no sense let alone the greatest ones which is why this is not a serious thread where naming one player would mean you are holding him ahead of others or undermining the others, just the name you'd pick if you had to pick one, based on personal preferences, whatever you value in football or anything else. Fair enough if some are still reluctant.
None of the above should also be an option.
 

Nogbadthebad

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
5,452
Location
Wolverhampton
Pele had the greatest career, but I'll always think that Best and Garrincha were able to do things with a football no one else has ever done, I'd say either of them could be argued as the most naturally skilled of all time.
 

Raul Madrid

Full Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
3,457
Di Stefano, Pele, Maradona and Messi are the best four players ever IMO. It is very difficult to say who is the best though, because of them playing in different eras. It is nowhere near as easy as comparing Messi to Ronaldo, who both play in the same league, in similar teams that get over 90 points most seasons, score over 100 goals and go far in all competitions.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
On board with Bestie's name. Would be my 'hipster' pick if you wanna call it that. Obviously there's United bias in it but there was nothing he couldn't do and at club level he did it against the best, unfortunate to be born in a country that had no chance at International success.
 

Charlie Foley

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
18,387
I'd agree with @.Rossi re Ronaldinho somewhat. I wouldn't say he's the greatest player ever, or even in my lifetime. His longevity ultimately lets him down. I do think however that he had the highest peak level of any player I've ever seen.
 

Deleted member 101472

Guest
On board with Bestie's name. Would be my 'hipster' pick if you wanna call it that. Obviously there's United bias in it but there was nothing he couldn't do and at club level he did it against the best, unfortunate to be born in a country that had no chance at International success.
This would hold more weight if Gareth bale hadn't just appeared in a euro semi final with Wales
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
This would hold more weight if Gareth bale hadn't just appeared in a euro semi final with Wales
Firstly, Bestie played for Northern Ireland. Their international team at the time in comparison to the rest of the national teams were further behind than Wales was to the other European teams this year. Lastly, Wales wouldn't have a chance of winning the World Cup even now, just like N. Ireland didn't have a chance to win a WC then. What I meant was had Bestie played for a stronger team like the rest of the names in this thread have (mostly Brazil, Argentina) then he would have a better standing in the game. There have been several underdog successes over the years which have nothing to do with the fact that N. Ireland back then were not in contention for any success. Their rest of the squad was not as good as one you'd want for a star player to carry, as is seen with most underdog teams who may not have a star studded line up but still have credible players who would give enough support to the one or two top players in the team for them to reach anywhere. Either ways, there's no question that Best would have had a bigger reputation had he played for a stronger nation that regularly challenged for international honours, regardless of what Wales did.