Annahnomoss
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2012
- Messages
- 10,101
Good job Joga as well, you had a very good team and against a more narrow formation you'd have been perfect to counter them. Good luck Harms.
Cheers.Good job Joga as well, you had a very good team and against a more narrow formation you'd have been perfect to counter them. Good luck Harms.
Thanks! Great game. Tough luck for you.Good job @harms. Congrats mate, you deserved the win and good luck in your future matches.
Ah well maybe it is time to implement a new rule for the Reality Draft games, your vote as the Grand Master of these game counts as five from now on.Ah feck, every team I voted for lost.
Good game @harms
Hard luck @Joga Bonito
Thanks for the brilliant commentary @Annahnomoss
That's what I assumed throughout and the reason why I emphasised how the playmaking was squarely on Koeman's lap. I could see Blokhin being a problem for him, but since harms wouldn't mention it I left them to it. In practice though, I would have expected Blokhin to do that whatever his instructions, most of these players know their football better than we doThe problem wasn't that you used him the wrong way or anything like that. He's absolutely fantastic in the role you played him. It all started to be a bit ridiculous, when he all of a sudden tracked Cafu and became a hardworking left winger, instead of the brilliant inside left who is your biggest goalthreat. I'd personally would have used him to put pressure on Koeman, that would have been an absolutely perfect role for him and hurt Joga's team a lot more than keeping Cafu from receiving the ball in his own half or whatever Annah described above.
At least he got to participate in this first round after alland the TV replay is interrupted for a commercial break.
Ljungberg's underwear! Wear it with pride!
You do realise that sounds like you were covered in something else.GET IN THERE! Sweden finally mentioned in one of these drafts. And how he posed, that just had the pride Swedes covered in glory for a second.
And he volunteered to be the last penalty-taker also - though, he made sure that it won't be needed.What are the odds Koeman and Mani would miss in the same shootout? Negligible really.
Good win harms, hard luck joga.
MotM: Zubizarreta, so comfortable saving penos he even saved one for joga out of pity.
Yes. 4-0.And he volunteered to be the last penalty-taker also - though, he made sure that it won't be needed.
I'm interested now, did he beat Zenga? @Annahnomoss
Legend!Yes. 4-0.
Yup just read that on the main thread's OP. A newbie to drafts so my bad.... Was always under the impression that the winner gets to choose 2 players he wants from the loser team from the previous drafts.No! There will be a snake draft on all players who gets kicked out I am fairly sure.
Was the rule before but it has been changed for quite a while. Always was extremely imbalancedYup just read that on the main thread's OP. A newbie to drafts so my bad.... Was always under the impression that the winner gets to choose 2 players he wants from the loser team from the previous drafts.
It wasn't really. It actually favoured sides which drafted well to begin with and didn't have any weak links. If you had weak links, yups, you were left hoping you came acrosss an upgrade.Was the rule before but it has been changed for quite a while. Always was extremely imbalanced
Don't really get you here. One of the main purpose of reinforcements is to upgrade, surely?It wasn't really. It actually favoured sides which drafted well to begin with and didn't have any weak links. If you had weak links, yups, you were left hoping you came acrosss an upgrade.
1) It's not equal from the moment it follows a sequence.Don't really get you here. One of the main purpose of reinforcements is to upgrade, surely?
If you and opponent are playing toally different strategies, then the reinforcement round will not help you, but will give another player a big advantage because his opponent is playing similar style. There should be equal opportunity for everyone in these rounds.
Ah, yes, you had Figo. I knew you had your wings sorted from the start though. It was a brilliant team indeed. IIRC my favourite to win from the very start.@antohan
Wrong on Cristiano. He was my very last move before the final. Upgraded Figo for him. Hoped that CR7, Best (4th in the first round pick) and Edwards would have been enough to swing it for me. Di Stefano then behind Van Basten. Amazing team.
I spent ages watching Chile games in '62, trying to make a video with his bad defending, but it was really dull and no one was going to watch it. A FIFA All-Star game at Wembley to mark the centennary, with all the very best players from those days? Awesome! How could you not watch it? And the poor bloke somehow managed to be at fault every single time they scored. BrutalObviously the right back was the weakest link by a mile but there was little said about him all the way through so was hoping i'd get away with it. Besides who would be fit to dig up random videos of some Chilean bloke defending poorly in the 1960s....oh wait
There's a history of teams with crap RBs going far in drafts, I'm sure you remember your old mate Gary KellyHe slacked with his RB though, he kept saying fullbacks weren't important/didn't weigh much... then never managed to find any good ones and it most likely was what cost him the final. One of the things that stopped him getting a good RB was not being able to pick Germans because he had two keepers, both German. Unbelievably bad planning.
Obviously the right back was the weakest link by a mile but there was little said about him all the way through so was hoping i'd get away with it. Besides who would be fit to dig up random videos of some Chilean bloke defending poorly in the 1960s....oh wait