Probably by the same logic under which he is being prosecuted. If it were such an open and shut case of him being innocent, the prosecutor wouldn't waste their time in the first place.Here are the facts as we know them today:
- Zimmerman did not know Martins race when he made the call, so profiling is not in play.
- Zimmerman did not make a racial slur so it was racially motivated.
- The dispatcher did not order Zimmerman to do anything, they asked but they have no jurisdiction
- No one saw the confrontation start, so it is not know who threw the first punch.
- The ONLY eye witness saw Martin on top Zimmerman attempting to beat him up, and Zimmerman was screaming for help.
- Martin was shot once in the chest at close range seconds later.
- A Police officer observed Martin had a bloody nose and cut on the back of his head.
- Doctors confirmed Zimmerman had a broken nose and a cut on his head, and after enhancement police are visible of the police video.
- Zimmerman is 5’9” and around 180lbs, Martin was 6’0” and 160lbs.
All other things like character and dodgy witness that didn’t see anything are not going to help the prosecution. So how does a jury find a man guilty based on what we know?