Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Definitely. Half the senate is under McConnell’s spell.The chinless cnut is powerful enough to sway enough votes, I assume?
I hope it's liver disease.Does his complexion look particularly odd on this photo or is that just me? (I'm colour-blind, I'm really asking.)
I guess you could look at it like that, but he has also now overseen the Democrats gaining the Presidency and both chambers of Congress. It also remains to be seen what the consequences are of going against Trump. Half the base might rebel on him.Turtle is probably the greatest GOP senator in modern history if you look at it from a GOP pov. He has used Trump and now throws him under the bus. He fecking ruthless.
Imagine, from a conservative POV, choosing Trump over McConnell. It could happen though!I guess you could look at it like that, but he has also now overseen the Democrats gaining the Presidency and both chambers of Congress. It also remains to be seen what the consequences are of going against Trump. Half the base might rebel on him.
No. No. No. No. No. I hate that this myth is going around. He literally accomplished nothing legislatively. His only two "victories" are obstructing everything Obama tried to do and pushing through a ton of ultra conservative judges. That's it. If that is a good senate leader than sure, but the job of the Senate is to make laws. He actively prevented his Senate from doing so, no matter the letter after the presidents name.Turtle is probably the greatest GOP senator in modern history if you look at it from a GOP pov. He has used Trump and now throws him under the bus. He fecking ruthless.
The judges thing is massive tbfNo. No. No. No. No. I hate that this myth is going around. He literally accomplished nothing legislatively. His only two "victories" are obstructing everything Obama tried to do and pushing through a ton of ultra conservative judges. That's it. If that is a good senate leader than sure, but the job of the Senate is to make laws. He actively prevented his Senate from doing so, no matter the letter after the presidents name.
He has been effective at his job, though he is no Newt Gingrich in terms of destroying the country via one of the branches of Congress.No. No. No. No. No. I hate that this myth is going around. He literally accomplished nothing legislatively. His only two "victories" are obstructing everything Obama tried to do and pushing through a ton of ultra conservative judges. That's it. If that is a good senate leader than sure, but the job of the Senate is to make laws. He actively prevented his Senate from doing so, no matter the letter after the presidents name.
"Associates say" a lot of things.If he actually convenes an emergency session of Senate before the 19th, then its on.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Oh, nice guy. We are supposed to say RIP and all that bullshit, right?Sheldon Adelson has croaked.
He’s probably the staunchest patron to the Donald, and a mega donor to GOP at large. Would be interesting to see if some GOPers find more freedom to distance themselves from Trump now he’s gone.
Of course. I think most GOP senators who won't have elections till 2024 would go with it. And McConnell is highly respected, the GOP senators do whatever he says (except a few).The chinless cnut is powerful enough to sway enough votes, I assume?
I believe that he cannot do it. The Senate is already in recess, and I think needs unanimous support to stop the recess. That is what I read, at least.So, is he going to look to bring forward the trial so that Trump can actually be removed before the 20th?
Watching CNN earlier and as long as Majority and Minority leaders agree they can call them back. Legislation changed in 2004 I think it was.I believe that he cannot do it. The Senate is already in recess, and I think needs unanimous support to stop the recess. That is what I read, at least.
That would be cool. Removing Trump and banning him for being able to get elected in the future, it would be great.Watching CNN earlier and as long as Majority and Minority leaders agree they can call them back. Legislation changed in 2004 I think it was.
I doubt he would actually run (if healthy and not in prison). Rather, would use the potential of a future campaign to retain as much media attention - and make as much money - as possible.That would be cool. Removing Trump and banning him for being able to get elected in the future, it would be great.
It probably doesn't matter cause he wouldn't win in 4 years anyway, but it would be disgracing him which he more than deserves.
LCWTTR
I am still bitter that these are the same people who pledged to obstruct every nominee and all the legislation of Hillary Clinton because she had another email account.Pretty strong statement tbf.
It’s almost certainly due to pressure from donors.Wow it really feels like the GOP are finding their courage, coincidentally after Trump can no longer tweet and with eight days left of his Presidency.
When you mess with the bull you get the horns and unfortunately that's now not only a Democrat problem it's very much a GOP problem.Its not that easy, his base doesn't care bout some donors.
Sure, but anyone who was a cnut with a spine could have pulled that off. For me the real mark of a Senate titan is the ability to push legislation through. He has not done that, at all, even when R's controlled the House and Pres.The judges thing is massive tbf
The base are fickle morons who will care about what they’re told to care about in less than a year. The donors run the party.Its not that easy, his base doesn't care bout some donors.
I cant see most of the magas voting for another R unless trump explicitly tells them too. Hopefully it does not happen but I really can see him keeping the grift going.The base are fickle morons who will care about what they’re told to care about in less than a year. The donors run the party.