RedStarUnited
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 8,146
It really showed when we needed to force something and every single one of our crosses was bad. How come we are so bad at crossing?
It has to be something in training for it to be apparent in so many of our players. Maybe it's such a low priority in training, as in we don't do enough of it, or we're told to do things a certain, specific way.It really showed when we needed to force something and every single one of our crosses was bad. How come we are so bad at crossing?
This is it. Everyone constantly moans about crosses, but who the feck are they meant to be crossing to? People here seem to love completely meaningless and pointless whipped in crosses to no one. They still bring up CBJ’s “amazing” crosses which in reality were just smashed across the box to no one and were largely all incomplete and led to feck all.Actually thought our crosses were decent today, there's no real targets to hit outside of set pieces.
I've been saying this for a while. There's too many things we don't do properly, that other lesser teams do quite competently. We might beat them cos we have better individuals. But it does do my head in seeing us mess up what should be basics for proper teams.I used to think it was a fault of the players. But, it's impossible for every single one of our players in multiple positions to be this badly at crossing. It just can't be the case. Even mathematically, one of them would be good at it.
Clearly, we don't prioritise this in training. Either that, or we are practising this in such a strange way that it is having a detrimental effect on the team. E.g. we're coaching them incorrect technique, or asking them to do specific things which is having a negative impact.
I would also say that our passing needs looking at. So many passes take either an age to make it to the next person (especially across the back four, or back four to midfield) or the long passes forward are overhit or terribly aimed. We don't zip the ball around cleanly on the floor like so many other teams do. It's not a surface problem of Old Trafford, because other teams visit and are able to do this.
I think our whole general play needs looking at. I wouldn't even say that there was one area that we excelled in. I think we're generally quite poor at simple passing, probing passes forward, movement, crossing, attacking headers, positional play...there's a lot of work to do.
Ruthless me would say that our coaching staff and setup needs looking at. There are plenty of mid-table clubs in the Premier League who move and generally play better football that we do, with supposedly weaker players. We are simply not coaching our players into better ones.
Agreed. Shaw's crosses are decent enough (although not great of course). We lack good targets across the forward line. Not much better on set pieces. Maguire isn't even that good, and after him it drops off a cliff. Like, who's the second best set piece target? Scott? Don't tell me Pogba.Actually thought our crosses were decent today, there's no real targets to hit outside of set pieces.
I swear it's the weirdest thing. Like Phil Jones taking corners. Its absurd.Shaw's decided that he can cross and take set pieces as soon as Telles joins the squad.
Very well put. It's odd watching United, when you also watch other teams play. Much of the time it's as if our setup doesn't generate the same kind of tempo, angles and overloads you see other teams creating. It's almost as if every player who receives the ball has no preexisting idea about where his teammates will be, and has to invent the wheel every time they make a pass.I used to think it was a fault of the players. But, it's impossible for every single one of our players in multiple positions to be this badly at crossing. It just can't be the case. Even mathematically, one of them would be good at it.
Clearly, we don't prioritise this in training. Either that, or we are practising this in such a strange way that it is having a detrimental effect on the team. E.g. we're coaching them incorrect technique, or asking them to do specific things which is having a negative impact.
I would also say that our passing needs looking at. So many passes take either an age to make it to the next person (especially across the back four, or back four to midfield) or the long passes forward are overhit or terribly aimed. We don't zip the ball around cleanly on the floor like so many other teams do. It's not a surface problem of Old Trafford, because other teams visit and are able to do this.
I think our whole general play needs looking at. I wouldn't even say that there was one area that we excelled in. I think we're generally quite poor at simple passing, probing passes forward, movement, crossing, attacking headers, positional play...there's a lot of work to do.
Ruthless me would say that our coaching staff and setup needs looking at. There are plenty of mid-table clubs in the Premier League who move and generally play better football that we do, with supposedly weaker players. We are simply not coaching our players into better ones.
That sounds more like Mourinho than SAF, if you put it that way.Very well put. It's odd watching United, when you also watch other teams play. Much of the time it's as if our setup doesn't generate the same kind of tempo, angles and overloads you see other teams creating. It's almost as if every player who receives the ball has no preexisting idea about where his teammates will be, and has to invent the wheel every time they make a pass.
Except on the counter of course, where we have regularly seen some excellent first time passes to create dangerous opportunities. But then again - from a purely logical point of view the counter patterns should be by far the easiest to coach, given how you much space you can assume as a baseline. Now as I'm writing this, I wonder if that's at least part of the explanation for why we do well against some of the big sides. Because we actually train counterattacking patterns much more than them, and unlike most teams forced to think in these terms for their attacking patterns, we actually have a lot of very talented players to execute that kind of plan with.
So we end up with a "small club strategy" so to speak executed by much better players than you normally see in those teams fighting for their survival in the league, by trying to be tough to beat and dangerous on the break.
It's beyond embarassing now.It really showed when we needed to force something and every single one of our crosses was bad. How come we are so bad at crossing?
This. Slow in thought, weight, speed and invention. It is now becoming tumescent.I used to think it was a fault of the players. But, it's impossible for every single one of our players in multiple positions to be this badly at crossing. It just can't be the case. Even mathematically, one of them would be good at it.
Clearly, we don't prioritise this in training. Either that, or we are practising this in such a strange way that it is having a detrimental effect on the team. E.g. we're coaching them incorrect technique, or asking them to do specific things which is having a negative impact.
I would also say that our passing needs looking at. So many passes take either an age to make it to the next person (especially across the back four, or back four to midfield) or the long passes forward are overhit or terribly aimed. We don't zip the ball around cleanly on the floor like so many other teams do. It's not a surface problem of Old Trafford, because other teams visit and are able to do this.
I think our whole general play needs looking at. I wouldn't even say that there was one area that we excelled in. I think we're generally quite poor at simple passing, probing passes forward, movement, crossing, attacking headers, positional play...there's a lot of work to do.
Ruthless me would say that our coaching staff and setup needs looking at. There are plenty of mid-table clubs in the Premier League who move and generally play better football that we do, with supposedly weaker players. We are simply not coaching our players into better ones.
Shit tactic but yet, the two best teams in this also happen to have the two best crossers in the league.This is it. Everyone constantly moans about crosses, but who the feck are they meant to be crossing to? People here seem to love completely meaningless and pointless whipped in crosses to no one. They still bring up CBJ’s “amazing” crosses which in reality were just smashed across the box to no one and were largely all incomplete and led to feck all.
Another one is everyone losing there shit about Telles at PSG, ignoring the fact all his good balls in were actually corners, not crosses. PSG were shit aerially and we actually had people on the box for corners. In open play we didn’t, hence why he only completed one cross in play and that was to the edge of the box. Shaw had a better cross that match to Martial. No surprise it was straight after a corner too.
There was a perfect example against I think Newcastle. Ball was deflected out left and Shaw lined up to hit it back in first time. Only to look over his shoulder to see Martial and Pogba sprinting towards him for a short pass and Rashford on the far right top corner of the box. Leaving a grand total of 0 people picking up a spot for a cross. So why exactly would he fecking cross it then?
Not to mention it’s also just a pretty shit tactic to begin with. Don’t understand everyone’s love for random crosses all match.
And Mane/Salah/Sterling are?Cross to who? Our forwards arent rhe player u cross too
Why is he taking corners then? I mean, you have a great header of the ball in Cavani waiting for a decent ball, and he doesn’t beat the first man. It’s really hard to be this bad at taking corners, he must practice a lot.Shaw is pathetic. The way he can’t even beat the first man on the corner is mental. League 2 players better crossers than him.
sad but trueYes it is down to coaching. United is the only team I have seen that seems not to practice corners. I mean look at all the top teams and they have a variations that seem to work. Ours is only one way and that is try to put it on the head of Maguire who is going to head over the bar.
The two best teams have the two best of everything in the league. They have the best crossers because they are the best teams. Not the other way round.Shit tactic but yet, the two best teams in this also happen to have the two best crossers in the league.
Considering how bad we are at creating chances. Crosses would add so much to our chance creation. Like I said earlier, with 5 minutes to go, we ended up recycling the ball uselessly for about 6 minutes before we did anything.
Hate to be that guy but there you go, 2 goals in 2 games from crosses....The two best teams have the two best of everything in the league. They have the best crossers because they are the best teams. Not the other way round.
1.6% of crosses are scored from. Key passes from crosses are only scored 11.9% of the time compared to the total percent of key passes leading to goals of 14.1%.
It’s a low percentage shit tactic to rely on. Working the ball into the box is far more effective.
And like I said, which you conveniently seem to have ignored, we never have anyone in the box. So randomly pumping in crosses won’t add to our chance creation at all, let alone “so much”.