Which isn't an insult, it's the equivalent of frogs.I think Brits are quite comfortable with being called 'les rosbifs'.
Which isn't an insult, it's the equivalent of frogs.I think Brits are quite comfortable with being called 'les rosbifs'.
I think European countries all make fun of each other in this way.It's interesting to see how this type of things is casually accepted. Is there any other example where people are comfortable with it?
Oh, in this thread, I meant. Obviously he's getting lots of flak in wider society because for a great number of knuckle draggers in this country he's committing what they consider to be the egregious sins of being a) black and b) not knowing his place.i think I read he’s the most trolled footballer on twitter. Whether that’s just UK or wider, I dont know.
Well technically I was referring to the Frenchmen of the 18th century who coined the name 'Great Britain'. If you choose to be offended on their behalf then that's up to you.I know where it's from, it's still offensive and casually quoted which is rarely the case for other people.
Not in this way, we have knicknames for each others but the surrender monkey part is an american thing as far as I know and not from the people you would like to be associated with. It would be like casually calling germans, Nazis, which no one with a brain would do.I think European countries all make fun of each other in this way.
I'm afraid you'll have to take it up with Groundskeeper Willie.I always wonder where this common wisdom about the French being surrender prone comes from. As far as I can tell, in terms of WW2 it comes from the French being steamrolled by the Nazi juggernaut when standing their ground, while the English celebrated their glorious escape back across the channel. Maybe it's an Irish thing but we have a very different idea of what surrender is.
Which isn't an insult, it's the equivalent of frogs.
Yes, that detail was covered in the link. Interesting though.Actually, the name Great Britain only became official in 1707 (when the Acts of Union brought Scotland and England/Wales into a single political entity). This happened decades after James I died.
The name Great Britain came about because the French used to refer to both Brittany and the Island of Britain by the same name: Bretagne. So when the kingdoms of Scotland and England/Wales united, there needed to be a way to differentiate. The French did this by sticking the word 'Grande' at the beginning of their name for Island of Britain.
Grande Bretagne then calqued into the name Great Britain, giving us what we have today.
I always saw it as a term of endearment. Things change.It's interesting to see how this type of things is casually accepted. Is there any other example where people are comfortable with it?
Back when I joined the caf I was living in France and had that as my location I was regularly referred with that phrase by a at the time caf mod and a highly active user. Casual racism is practically a part of the caf folklore.Not in this way, we have knicknames for each others but the surrender monkey part is an american thing as far as I know and not from the people you would like to be associated with. It would be like casually calling germans, Nazis, which no one with a brain would do.
That's a mental image I may struggle to get out of my head now.You lot of fecking miserable sometimes.
What is wrong with being glad that normal people have stepped up to help the most vulnerable people in society, at a time where those bastards we elected into office turned their back on them? I think it's especially GREAT that a lot of this has happened because of the work of our own Marcus Rashford. Most 22 year old premier league footballers are only interested in themselves and their desires and here we have Marcus working tirelessly to help the needy.
I wanted to take a moment to praise those peoples efforts, in a forum where i'd think it'd be appreciated. Instead some of you lot are going on like i'm sat here spooning with a Nigel Farage sex doll.
The stereotype far precedes and outreaches a mid 90's episode of the Simpsons.I'm afraid you'll have to take it up with Groundskeeper Willie.
Not at all. Quite the opposite. But this is the only thread which makes the focus of the praise broader than Rashford’s own role in the initiative. And I think it’s ok to feel proud/patriotic about the actions of a diverse group of individual fellow citizens while also furious about a government that is forcing citizens to step up on its behalf.Wait, is anyone having a pop at Rashford or the people who have decided to help out? I think for most it's just frustration that it had to come to this rather than being supported by the government themselves.
If only the OP had said something snappy like, " I know that we, as Brits, are still grappling with the negative connotations of our postcolonial identity and, in no way am I intending to ignore the obvious complexities of that identity, but...the acts of these particular people - in isolation - while not making up for the horrors of slavery, could certainly be perceived as positive in some quarters."
Welsh = sheepshaggers etc. If a Welshman got upset about that I’d think he’s a bit of a knob. Cheese eater is kinda funny but I can see why the surrender part offends some, especially with it being so far from the truth.I think European countries all make fun of each other in this way.
If only the OP had said something snappy like, " I know that we, as Brits, are still grappling with the negative connotations of our postcolonial identity and, in no way am I intending to ignore the obvious complexities of that identity, but...the acts of these particular people - in isolation - while not making up for the horrors of slavery, could certainly be perceived as positive in some quarters."
It's not an insult regardless of context, you can use it in an insulting sentence but it's the sentence that is insulting not the terms in isolation. And my question wasn't about the Simpson or the comic value of that scene within the context of the show but the casual and widespread use of that type of rhetoric, it's not that common for other groups of people which I find interesting. Your point about punching upward could be the answer.
It depends on the context. As long as you're punching upwards or sideways - and there's no malicious intent - it's considered fair game. If The Simpsons had said that about a disadvantaged developing nation, it would have been different.
There was a case in the early 2000s where the word 'Krauts' was deemed acceptable for the same reason.
Yeah fair enough, in Holland we think the French are arrogant and smell like feet, whereas Europe think all Dutch people are 8ft tall debauched drug addicts.Not in this way, we have knicknames for each others but the surrender monkey part is an american thing as far as I know and not from the people you would like to be associated with. It would be like casually calling germans, Nazis, which no one with a brain would do.
Yeah. 'Surrender' jokes have been around for ages about the French. The Italians are subject to jokes about running away from from battle. Everyone knows a bunch of German soldier jokes. And the Swiss have their own set of punchlines as well.The stereotype far precedes and outreaches a mid 90's episode of the Simpsons.
That part is true and I actually told myself that I shouldn't say it anymore, it's not a good look. Weirdly enough the other place that I associate with it are the states of Washington and Oregon due to several stories in the press.Welsh = sheepshaggers etc. If a Welshman got upset about that I’d think he’s a bit of a knob. Cheese eater is kinda funny but I can see why the surrender part offends some, especially with it being so far from the truth.
as for your thread title @zlattattack, I think it’s clear you weren’t being literal with the great thing, just a way of highlighting Both the work of Rashford and the individuals stepping in to help because of our shambles of a government. It’s just with Britain being so shit its hard to not be pedantic and point out how shite we are.
If only the OP had said something snappy like, " I know that we, as Brits, are still grappling with the negative connotations of our postcolonial identity and, in no way am I intending to ignore the obvious complexities of that identity, but...the acts of these particular people - in isolation - while not making up for the horrors of slavery, could certainly be perceived as positive in some quarters."
I have decided to retire the Willie phrase henceforth, but only on the condition that you provide links...That part is true and I actually told myself that I shouldn't say it anymore, it's not a good look. Weirdly enough the other place that I associate with it are the states of Washington and Oregon due to several stories in the press.
I don’t see it as offensive at all and I don’t think that’s unique to me, it’s almost a part of the cultural fabric. At rugby games it’s pretty common to see inflatable sheep and at Swansea games (after being subjected to sheepshagger chants) you’ll always hear 1-0 to the sheepshaggers from the fans after a goal. I might have a sheltered view though as stadium going fans aren’t really representative of the rest. But I view it as very different to other identity based slurs and more of a genuine joke.That part is true and I actually told myself that I shouldn't say it anymore, it's not a good look. Weirdly enough the other place that I associate with it are the states of Washington and Oregon due to several stories in the press.
That some private businesses are also stepping up?Marcus is doing fantastic work but the country is anything but great.
Private businesses are doing the work of the government during a global pandemic. The minister for children woulder sooner they starve then fed and she and her party were voted in.
What's great about that?
Difference between stepping up and picking up the slack.That some private businesses are also stepping up?
A lot are struggling but doing what they can. It has quite often been the way. Charity is what the govmint rely on.Difference between stepping up and picking up the slack.
Then praise the people and businesses that are doing something. Don't turn it into a dubious praise of a part of the nation which ironically exclude Northern Ireland. Personally I think that it leaves a bad taste because you click on the thread and realize that it's not GB being great but a minority of people doing a great job and are also being lumped with a majority that does nothing and voted for people who are still happy to do nothing.Some miserable people in here.
the government should do more
The general public and these business should be praised and supported.
Both can be true
Its nothing more than a play on words though is it?Then praise the people and businesses that are doing something. Don't turn it into a dubious praise of a part of the nation which ironically exclude Northern Ireland. Personally I think that it leaves a bad taste because you click on the thread and realize that it's not GB being great but a minority of people doing a great job and are also being lumped with a majority that does nothing and voted for people who are still happy to do nothing.
And since I don't want to sound like I'm having a go at the UK, the exact same thing has happened in France since March, benevolents and companies have picked up the slack and provided food and the logistic to distribute it, those people are brilliant and it would be shameful for "France" to take any credit.
Caf gold.If only the OP had said something snappy like, " I know that we, as Brits, are still grappling with the negative connotations of our postcolonial identity and, in no way am I intending to ignore the obvious complexities of that identity, but...the acts of these particular people - in isolation - while not making up for the horrors of slavery, could certainly be perceived as positive in some quarters."
It is a play on words but that play on words will bring reflections and remarks which for a part won't be positive. Unless you expect people to have no reflection.Its nothing more than a play on words though is it?
I don't think it has a big deep meaning, but your point in general is correct.
I don't know, the Americans didn't hang monkeys in case they were French spies. Which they might have been of course, or just French people that looked like monkeys and may or may not have been spies. In any case I take your point, the phrase is unnecessarily offensive to monkeys, who would undoubtedly fight to the death to save the country they love.Not in this way, we have knicknames for each others but the surrender monkey part is an american thing as far as I know and not from the people you would like to be associated with. It would be like casually calling germans, Nazis, which no one with a brain would do.
There is a big difference between praising individuals/organisations working to solve a problem and praising a country which has allowed the problem to manifest.Its nothing more than a play on words though is it?
I don't think it has a big deep meaning, but your point in general is correct.