Tired....again

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
Ole had the perfect time to get the team some rest in the FA Cup. Under normal circumstances I would say play a strong team but with this silly schedule, Ole being scared to change a winning team for league games and top 4 so close I would've played a second string 11. Not only that our first team took a kicking at Wembley and the game dragged on longer with the headbutts.
This is the key facts the FA cup fixture has depleted the fatigue of the squad further and it was a foolish decision given we lost the game. We would have beaten West Ham if Solskjaer had rested the main 11.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
Ole had the perfect time to get the team some rest in the FA Cup. Under normal circumstances I would say play a strong team but with this silly schedule, Ole being scared to change a winning team for league games and top 4 so close I would've played a second string 11. Not only that our first team took a kicking at Wembley and the game dragged on longer with the headbutts.
And when Ole did rotate for the quarters there was an insane amount of crying on here as why would he feck with a winning team and momentum, play the best players get the job done and then sub was the main thing I kept reading. now he’s done that he’s still getting a slating.

honestly the man can’t win
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,281
Same thing happened last season. We had a flurry of excellent football then tiredness apparently happened and ended the season struggling. We lost 3 and drew 2 of our last 5 games last year, Tottenham got 4th by 5 points. Our last 2 games were against huddersfield and Cardiff, 2 of the 3 relegated teams. We missed out on top 4 because we couldn't beat 2 relegated teams.

Ole just spoke on this recently and said he thinks he fixed the fitness issues. Is it really fitness ?
Between 19 Juni and 22nd July we have played 10 games. In 33 days. That means a game every 3,3 days and including trips to London, Norwich, Birmingham, Brighton, London and London again and you got a picture about players life last month. If you also put into considiration that Solskjaer played pretty much same starting eleven every game it is no wonder that we are little bit tired right now. Fatigue and lack of "right" results makes you also think and doubt sometimes which can effect its psychological status.

Considering we were out of gas last year in March I would say that we are making progress in fitness this year.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
We’ve known since Ole first took over that this team has the mental fortitude to go on a long run of good results under relatively little pressure. What we have major doubts about is their ability to keep getting these results where each game has a huge pressure to perform. We’ve seen what happened in the past when we’ve had what looks like winnable games to secure the CL slots. Dropped points and horrible performances. Doesn’t it seem likely the same thing is happening again?
You’re comparing a normal Season, oles first With this shit storm of a season though and I don’t think that’s fair. This season is way out of the ordinary, every team has lost in this restart phase with united doing the best so I struggle to understand where all the moaning is coming from
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
So has every other team in the league. That’s a weak excuse.
No only Chelsea, Arsenal, City played the same number of matches. Others don't have 2 FA matches.

And it's another thing I'm really furious about. Yesterday the commentator in my channel said that after break all teams who faced us had more days of rest than us. I haven't looked in the schedule but it's true with Chelsea, WH and Leicester at the least.

As I explained above, it's not like all teams played a similar number of matches in 30 days would have the a similar level of fitness when facing each others. The fitness level of a team is heavily affected by the number of days rest before the match. Especially in a congested schedule like the current one. If a team has more days to rest than their opponent surely they'd be fresher. And it's definitely a big advantage.

Why always us who have the smaller number of rest days than our opponent ? Why the feck these FA matches have to be played now instead of waiting until the PL is finished? What the feck those FA guys have been smoking at their offices ? I'm baffled.
 
Last edited:

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
Does it really? Fred and Mctominay are more than good enough said options which could have been used more often.

And this doesn’t explain the matches like Chelsea where we had lost anyway, yet continued to play Bruno.
Fred and mctominay are good grafters but no where near the creativity of Pogba and Bruno. And that’s what people have been crying for for months and years, now we have it and it’s got us into top four spot people are crying that we havnt used the players that couldn’t break down the weaker teams in the first place
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
No it's just an excuse not to blame the manager or players not performing. I genuinely don't think it's ever popped up as an excuse until Ole took over amazingly. Football debate reduced down to fitness :rolleyes:

There was lots of praise when we first came back at how well we'd done to be fitter than every other team. Suddenly all our mistakes are just fitness.
I’ve never known a schedule like this, where EVERYONE has dropped points :rolleyes:
 

RedStarUnited

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
8,138
There does seem to be a pattern forming I agree, but I can't help but feel it's just a coincidence.

Early in the season we just weren't in good form and were dropping points whether our rivals won or not, so not sure that stat can be that helpful.

Right now both Leicester and Chelsea have taken LESS points than we have in the last 9 games, so are they also bottle jobs with weak mentalities?

I can only speak from my opinion of watching the matches, and to me there's a clear downturn in sharpness/energy/tempo in our play. We don't start the games fast and really get at teams, it's just laboured and they look like they're just in the motions.

I guess we will only really know if once the Europa league games come whether we get the speed back into our play.
Leicester have lost their starting RB, LB and main creator. Chelsea have been defensively bad all season.

And we really need to stop comparing ourselves to Leicester but thats another topic..
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,905
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
The problem is not that they're shit or not good enough, it's that they have returned from lockdown lacking sharpness and form and it is now at a crunch time of the season. Ole gave them a chance vs Norwich and they just weren't up to it at that point. He then brought many of them on in subsequent games, where they showed little, if any, improvement.

The management are stuck between a rock and a hard place: rotate and risk results when we're already at the point of a zero-sum situation vis-a-vis the race for the Top 4, or play our first XI all the way through in the hope that we have just enough within us to make it.

They banked on the latter.
True but you can't just bin everyone as we still need to rotate. You also cannot get sharpness without proper minutes. Bringing someone off the bench with 25 mins to go and 3 goals up isn't a fair judgement of what they are capable of, nor gonna help them get going. Rashford for example was bad at first but played into form.
 

United Hobbit

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
8,956
It was shocking the speed of movement.

Matic should have been brought off for a more energetic Mctimonay or Fred. That was very poor from Ole. The other thing that gets to me is when chasing a game, the amount of needless fouls we concede and invite pressure really annoys me. That is not down to tactics and Ole, just pure lazy play from some of our players.
And the number of times the players seem to just stand and watch as the other team get the ball in dangerous areas, an example of this is yesterday, just before Greenwood's goal, Matic just seemed to stand and watch as the ball went past him as West Ham were attacking at the time, same with one of the Chelsea goals, yes De Gea made the error, and I think it was the one where Williams made the mistake but the central defenders just stood there, at least TRY and close them down/ make the angle etc harder for them.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,816
You’re comparing a normal Season, oles first With this shit storm of a season though and I don’t think that’s fair. This season is way out of the ordinary, every team has lost in this restart phase with united doing the best so I struggle to understand where all the moaning is coming from
The moaning is because after an admittedly impressive comeback, we look like shitting ourselves now that our actual goal is in sight. It's very painful because for a while it looked like we could be back, we could actually make the CL despite a dreadful first half of the season - but the moment that chance became real, our performances collapsed immediately, just like last season.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
That’s another reason for me that goes against tiredness as an excuse. If they’re heavy legged after too many games surely you’d expect that to kick in towards the end of the match, when everyone is at their most knackered?

No matter how physically tired they are, we should be able to at least start the games looking as sharp as the opposition. The fact that the opposite is happening points towards issues other than fatigue. And, just like dropped points in choke games, slow/sloppy opening periods have been a feature under Ole (and with this squad of players) that go back well before the recent fixture congestion.
Not sure on that one. This isn't a Fifa match where you have an energy bar.

If your legs are stiff and heavy before you even start the match, it'll take you a while to wake the muscles up, if anything you might get better towards the 30 minute mark which is almost what we see.

I think the best way to imagine it is if you wake up after a bad nights sleep. In the morning you don't feel fresh and fine and only suffer later, you usually feel slow and laggy in your body and your mind. Only after being awake for a few hours does it pass and you feel a bit more normal again, that happens a bit when you're tired playing sport.

Our best period of play where Greenwood scored came directly after half time, and we pulled out some nice quick passing and movement, after that it dipped again. That shows me the rest at half time helped.

I guess we will see what the reaction is like against Leicester, but yet again our opponent is having a weeks rest compared to our 3.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Leicester have lost their starting RB, LB and main creator. Chelsea have been defensively bad all season.

And we really need to stop comparing ourselves to Leicester but thats another topic..
Leicester have won the league more recently than us, and have been ahead of us all season in the table.

Whether you like it or not maybe we are closer to Leicester than you like to accept? I think this is the issue with United fans lately, still thinking we are the best when we arent.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,070
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Not sure on that one. This isn't a Fifa match where you have an energy bar.

If your legs are stiff and heavy before you even start the match, it'll take you a while to wake the muscles up, if anything you might get better towards the 30 minute mark which is almost what we see.

I think the best way to imagine it is if you wake up after a bad nights sleep. In the morning you don't feel fresh and fine and only suffer later, you usually feel slow and laggy in your body and your mind. Only after being awake for a few hours does it pass and you feel a bit more normal again, that happens a bit when you're tired playing sport.
I don’t agree with that at all. If you warm up properly there’s no excuse for legs being stiff and heavy in the beginning of a match. Accumulated fatigue might cause injuries or an inability to dig deep in the closing period but shouldn’t mess us up in the opening period.

It also doesn’t explain our sluggish start against Chelsea in the FA Cup, who had played exactly the same number of games as us.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
True but you can't just bin everyone as we still need to rotate. You also cannot get sharpness without proper minutes. Bringing someone off the bench with 25 mins to go and 3 goals up isn't a fair judgement of what they are capable of, nor gonna help them get going. Rashford for example was bad at first but played into form.
If we did that, we'd be a minimum 4-6 points worse off guaranteed, and we'd be facing having to have all our eggs in the Europa League basket. Again.

Like I said, in an ideal world we'd have likely seen a lot more rotation. It's not like Ole stuck to one lineup all throughout his time here. He has rotated plenty of times. He gave these players a chance vs Norwich and they proceeded to shit the bed. He can't trust them at this point.

The issue is that literally every game has been crucial, there just hasn't been that opportunity to let players like Fred, James and McTominay play themselves into form. Not least when the players they are under were playing so much better. Yes, Rashford played himself into form, but the upside of Rashford playing himself into form is that he's Rashford! James playing himself into form, for example, would be slightly better than an out-of-form Rashford, and that's not intended as a slight on James.

This is why I say lockdown has fecked us, cos it came at a time when everyone in the squad from Bruno and Martial, to McTominay and Fred were playing well and were in good form and rhythm. That all had to go back to zero when restart happened and the squad players, largely because of the circumstances, just have not had the opportunity to catch up.

Also, lest we forget, this is an atypical run-in. Where the games were once spread out over the course of 8-10 weeks, we are doing them in 4-6. No fitness coach at the outset of this season was planning to be in this position, but here we are. Unfortunately for us, our very small squad is being stretched to the limit, and hopefully it should have enough to come through the final game.
 
Last edited:

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
The moaning is because after an admittedly impressive comeback, we look like shitting ourselves now that our actual goal is in sight. It's very painful because for a while it looked like we could be back, we could actually make the CL despite a dreadful first half of the season - but the moment that chance became real, our performances collapsed immediately, just like last season.
So you reply to my post about comparing to last season by comparing it to last season again.

I agree we looked amazing when we started back , but just look at the running Bruno was doing for a start. Everything has slowed down. I agree we looked shut in the last few games, I shouted at the tele that we were last to every second ball, not closing down quick enough etc but I’m really hesitant to lay into anyone with how this *starred season has played out, it’s a joke and players should never have been put in this position
 

King7Eric

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
3,121
Location
Cardiff
Squad depth is poor in the attack but Ole completely mismanaged the midfield. Before the break, we relied on McTominay and Fred, now after the restart he has 0 confidence in them. Yesterday our midfielders were barely running still he didn't do any subs.

He should have brought on McTominay, Fred to give some freshness to the team, even Lingard would have added so much.
We were playing a different system before the restart, one that relied more on dynamism through the middle, where the CMs job was to carry the ball with them to push the team forward. Since the restart we have attempted to play our way through the opposition with slick passing and in that regard, both McTominay and Fred represent a step down to Pogba and Matic.

You must have noticed even Pogba has not attempted much to drive through the middle with the ball, something he's quite good at, because we aren't playing like that. The whole team moves forward with the ball systematically. Playing with Fred and McTominay would mean switching through our style of play but most managers are not comfortable doing that in the middle of a game when it's on a knife's edge.
 

SoCross

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
3,571
I don’t agree with that at all. If you warm up properly there’s no excuse for legs being stiff and heavy in the beginning of a match. Accumulated fatigue might cause injuries or an inability to dig deep in the closing period but shouldn’t mess us up in the opening period.

It also doesn’t explain our sluggish start against Chelsea in the FA Cup, who had played exactly the same number of games as us.
Didn’t they have 48 hours more to recuperate though?
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,764
We were playing a different system before the restart, one that relied more on dynamism through the middle, where the CMs job was to carry the ball with them to push the team forward. Since the restart we have attempted to play our way through the opposition with slick passing and in that regard, both McTominay and Fred represent a step down to Pogba and Matic.

You must have noticed even Pogba has not attempted much to drive through the middle with the ball, something he's quite good at, because we aren't playing like that. The whole team moves forward with the ball systematically. Playing with Fred and McTominay would mean switching through our style of play but most managers are not comfortable doing that in the middle of a game when it's on a knife's edge.
So if that's the case then players like Fred, McTominay should be sold this season? I mean what's the point of these players if we can't even trust them against bottom level teams, I dont see any value add keeping them in the side.

Btw I disagree completely with your post. These players are fresh, the players we had on the pitch were on their knees, barely able to jog. We couldn't keep possession as our players were exhausted which means they completely lacked concentration to get even basics right.
 

United58

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
2,190
Location
Ireland
If we draw or win on Sunday, we're the only team in the league not to lose after the restart while also guaranteeing CL football next season (while scoring the most goals?).

This has been a unique end to the season, unlikely to ever be repeated. Given that we've improved our fitness an awful lot since Moyes/LVG/Jose, I can see us finishing next season much stronger. My only worry is a Europa run in August might give us a rough start to the new season (short break).
 

Zlatattack

New Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2017
Messages
7,374
It's because we have a decent first XI but at least 10 passengers in our squad. We cannot rotate and maintain our top level so instead our best players are played to exhaustion.
This. We need to get Sancho to improve our first XI and then really focus on improving the level of the squad.

Also i think where we have options to rotate the Manager is afraid to try them. Against West ham he should have started McT and Fred in midfield and played Pogbaas a 10 first half and Bruno as a 10 in the second half. It would have given us the legs required to control the game.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
I don’t agree with that at all. If you warm up properly there’s no excuse for legs being stiff and heavy in the beginning of a match. Accumulated fatigue might cause injuries or an inability to dig deep in the closing period but shouldn’t mess us up in the opening period.

It also doesn’t explain our sluggish start against Chelsea in the FA Cup, who had played exactly the same number of games as us.
Fair enough, but the proof is in the pudding unfortunately.

If it was only this game i'd say yeah Ok maybe it's mental pressure making us play fatigued, but we haven't looked right since the Southampton game.

Palace we got outplayed but 2 pieces of quality saved us. Chelsea well we don't need to speak about that... Now West Ham too? the whole team looks like it's running in sand.
 

Bondi77

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
7,352
The moaning is because after an admittedly impressive comeback, we look like shitting ourselves now that our actual goal is in sight. It's very painful because for a while it looked like we could be back, we could actually make the CL despite a dreadful first half of the season - but the moment that chance became real, our performances collapsed immediately, just like last season.
This is what I have been thinking also;
It seems to me that when we play when we are not expected to win or are not clear favourites we have a good percentage of getting the job done but when we are expected to win in a pressure situation we tend to shit ourselves.
All of the top teams over the years have had big players for big games and Fergie used to say that Mark Hughes was the best that he had.
I just want to see a few of our guys step up and put these mid table teams to the sword on a consistent basis regardless of what stage of the season we are in.
 

King7Eric

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
3,121
Location
Cardiff
So if that's the case then players like Fred, McTominay should be sold this season? I mean what's the point of these players if we can't even trust them against bottom level teams, I dont see any value add keeping them in the side.

Btw I disagree completely with your post. These players are fresh, the players we had on the pitch were on their knees, barely able to jog. We couldn't keep possession as our players were exhausted which means they completely lacked concentration to get even basics right.
Mate I agree with you there that our players looked done for last night. But the issue is hardly any manager implements such a big systematic change in the middle of an important game. They change formations or personnel but the structure of play doesn't change mid-game. Sure Ole could have bought on Fred and McT but then they would have had to play the system we were playing and its not something they excel in. McT was criticized on here for his display against Palace when the poor kid didn't do anything wrong. He was asked to deputize for Matic and he struggled to do that.

This does not mean the 2 of them need to be sold. There have been many matches were we played differently this season and will be many more next season where their style of play will be useful. You are of course free to disagree with me but I don't see what Ole could have done a lot different. We need better squad depth, simple as that. That's why I was shaking my head at posts on here a couple of weeks ago where people were claiming we can go for the title next season and do we really need Sancho and so on. Our first 11 when fit and on form, is very good. But they won't stay fit and on form an entire season so we need impeccable recruitment in the summer before we can talk about this team going on to bigger and better things.
 

POF

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2014
Messages
3,798
We’ve known since Ole first took over that this team has the mental fortitude to go on a long run of good results under relatively little pressure. What we have major doubts about is their ability to keep getting these results where each game has a huge pressure to perform. We’ve seen what happened in the past when we’ve had what looks like winnable games to secure the CL slots. Dropped points and horrible performances. Doesn’t it seem likely the same thing is happening again?
I wish you were wrong but it certainly seems that way. The drop off in performance when the pressure is on is a real worry. For a club where high pressure games come thick and fast, it's worrying how they struggle when the pressure is on.

Fatigue is certainly an issue too but I don't think it would be as significant a problem if they were playing under less pressure.

The biggest issue Ole has just now is Bruno. He has nobody else he is willing to play in that role so Bruno is playing big minutes in almost every game.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,333
This. We need to get Sancho to improve our first XI and then really focus on improving the level of the squad.

Also i think where we have options to rotate the Manager is afraid to try them. Against West ham he should have started McT and Fred in midfield and played Pogbaas a 10 first half and Bruno as a 10 in the second half. It would have given us the legs required to control the game.
Honestly, if it meant getting a world class centre back I'd be happy to pass on Sancho. If it was a straight choice between Koulibaly or Sancho, well that's like asking whether you prefer Lindelof or Greenwood in your first XI. I know who I'm picking.

However, at the very least we need to make sure that our first XI is not full of 8/9 out of 10s and the bench full of 5 out of 10s. Bruno's alternatives cannot be Mata, Lingard and Andreas. Mata's lost his legs, Lingard's lost his head and Andreas never had much of either. When you take Bruno out of our team...well then we become the same team that lost to Burnley etc. We need some 7 out of 10 players who can come in and perform even if the likes of Pogba and Fernandes need a rest.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Honestly, if it meant getting a world class centre back I'd be happy to pass on Sancho. If it was a straight choice between Koulibaly or Sancho, well that's like asking whether you prefer Lindelof or Greenwood in your first XI. I know who I'm picking.

However, at the very least we need to make sure that our first XI is not full of 8/9 out of 10s and the bench full of 5 out of 10s. Bruno's alternatives cannot be Mata, Lingard and Andreas. Mata's lost his legs, Lingard's lost his head and Andreas never had much of either. When you take Bruno out of our team...well then we become the same team that lost to Burnley etc. We need some 7 out of 10 players who can come in and perform even if the likes of Pogba and Fernandes need a rest.
Nice way to put it :lol:
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,764
Mate I agree with you there that our players looked done for last night. But the issue is hardly any manager implements such a big systematic change in the middle of an important game. They change formations or personnel but the structure of play doesn't change mid-game. Sure Ole could have bought on Fred and McT but then they would have had to play the system we were playing and its not something they excel in. McT was criticized on here for his display against Palace when the poor kid didn't do anything wrong. He was asked to deputize for Matic and he struggled to do that.

This does not mean the 2 of them need to be sold. There have been many matches were we played differently this season and will be many more next season where their style of play will be useful. You are of course free to disagree with me but I don't see what Ole could have done a lot different. We need better squad depth, simple as that. That's why I was shaking my head at posts on here a couple of weeks ago where people were claiming we can go for the title next season and do we really need Sancho and so on. Our first 11 when fit and on form, is very good. But they won't stay fit and on form an entire season so we need impeccable recruitment in the summer before we can talk about this team going on to bigger and better things.
Whatever is the system, the basic requirement for anything is players should be able to move, something our players couldn't. What's the point of keeping them on the pitch? Now this might even have impact on leicester game.

With all due respect, you are reaching a bit here with systematic change and everything. We have played 4-2-3-1 all season with double pivot and since Bruno was signed, McT and Fred both played alongside Bruno and did well.

Ole was just scared to make subs, maybe he was happy with the point and didn't want to make any changes proactively.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,764
There article below before restart showed that we had to travel significantly further than other teams in this period even excluding the additional trip to Wembley. It definitely looks like its caught up with us.

https://theathletic.co.uk/1875450/2...-sleep-bournemouth-watford-manchester-united/
Yeah, that's a decent point tbh. Someone said now the teams travel by bus, very busy schedule, travelling by bus, thin squad. No wonder we are struggling in the last few games.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,333
Whatever is the system, the basic requirement for anything is players should be able to move, something our players couldn't. What's the point of keeping them on the pitch? Now this might even have impact on leicester game.

With all due respect, you are reaching a bit here with systematic change and everything. We have played 4-2-3-1 all season with double pivot and since Bruno was signed, McT and Fred both played alongside Bruno and did well.

Ole was just scared to make subs, maybe he was happy with the point and didn't want to make any changes proactively.
The point is it at least puts a bit of fear in your opponent. Other teams fear Bruno. They don't fear the players we have behind him. When we take him off our opposition advance 10-20m. They no longer feel like they need to keep men back, just in case he does something spectacular. We saw it against Southampton, we saw it when we were getting beat by teams like Palace and Newcastle earlier in the season. A lot of teams in the Premier League, not just the top teams but the middle and bottom ranking teams, feel like they can play with freedom against us when our best players are out. Need I remind you we got horribly battered by West Ham earlier in the season? The players many people are talking about rotating in are the players that had us closer to the bottom of the table than the top of it in the winter of this season. Bruno is capable of that one moment of magic that makes opposition full backs that tiny bit more hesitant to go forward. You take him off and you're inviting pressure and we are not that good at resisting pressure.
 

Santoryo

ripping the reward
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
6,302
You’re comparing a normal Season, oles first With this shit storm of a season though and I don’t think that’s fair. This season is way out of the ordinary, every team has lost in this restart phase with united doing the best so I struggle to understand where all the moaning is coming from
Pretty much this.

United is still the team that has done the best since the restart yet you have nonsensical arguments asking why are other teams not feeling the fatigue. How could anyone use that argument when we've done the best out of all the teams in the league since the restart. I honestly also don't even see the issue here. Ole gambled with playing the same team to get him to this position(3rd) going into the final game, and the gamble has worked so far given our destiny is in our own hands.

We restarted the league in 5th place, we then gambled playing the same starting line up to get us the best possible results which they did and now we're going into the last game having overtaken 2 teams and sitting on third. I mean hasn't it worked so far. Sure we're looking tired but we're now in a far better position than where we started, so the gamble has paid off.

We are third, picked the most points since restart yet this place is having a full meltdown as if we haven't done anything good for ourselves to get us in our current position. This place is incredible :lol:
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,070
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Fair enough, but the proof is in the pudding unfortunately.

If it was only this game i'd say yeah Ok maybe it's mental pressure making us play fatigued, but we haven't looked right since the Southampton game.

Palace we got outplayed but 2 pieces of quality saved us. Chelsea well we don't need to speak about that... Now West Ham too? the whole team looks like it's running in sand.
Another piece of evidence against tiredness being our main problem. That was our 6th game after the restart. Surely to feck they can manage 6 games in 4 weeks without falling apart, physically? I would also argue you could see warning signs against Bournemouth, our 4th game after the restart. Our brilliant attack bailed us out but we were lethargic and dozy as feck for large parts of that game too. Especially - yet again - in the opening period. Are we supposed to put that slow start down to tiredness too?
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,764
The point is it at least puts a bit of fear in your opponent. Other teams fear Bruno. They don't fear the players we have behind him. When we take him off our opposition advance 10-20m. They no longer feel like they need to keep men back, just in case he does something spectacular. We saw it against Southampton, we saw it when we were getting beat by teams like Palace and Newcastle earlier in the season. A lot of teams in the Premier League, not just the top teams but the middle and bottom ranking teams, feel like they can play with freedom against us when our best players are out. Need I remind you we got horribly battered by West Ham earlier in the season? The players many people are talking about rotating in are the players that had us closer to the bottom of the table than the top of it in the winter of this season. Bruno is capable of that one moment of magic that makes opposition full backs that tiny bit more hesitant to go forward. You take him off and you're inviting pressure and we are not that good at resisting pressure.
Before the lockdown, we had midfield of McTominay and Fred, along with Matic. All 3 were rotated and when Bruno was signed we were just 3 points behind Chelsea. So with Fred and McTominay we weren't close to bottom half.

If we go by that, we had midfield of McTominay and Fred when we won against Spurs, City and few other top teams.

Again same point, what's the point of these players if we can't even trust them against West Ham? I didn't say drop Bruno and play these players, we should sub him out when he didn't have anything left in the tank. He has played 4 games in 9 days and with his work rate and not a proper recovery day, how can we expect him to play at his best?

Ole's man management is very good but his squad management is poor. He doesn't know how to rotate.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,590
Does this not apply to the teams we dropped points to recently ? How come they're not tired.

Tiredness is a shit excuse.
I'm not saying it's the main reason but you can't watch our midfield and say they're not tired. Chelsea for example had 2 extra days rest. So they would've been more refreshed.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,333
Before the lockdown, we had midfield of McTominay and Fred, along with Matic. All 3 were rotated and when Bruno was signed we were just 3 points behind Chelsea. So with Fred and McTominay we weren't close to bottom half.

If we go by that, we had midfield of McTominay and Fred when we won against Spurs, City and few other top teams.

Again same point, what's the point of these players if we can't even trust them against West Ham? I didn't say drop Bruno and play these players, we should sub him out when he didn't have anything left in the tank. He has played 4 games in 9 days and with his work rate and not a proper recovery day, how can we expect him to play at his best?

Ole's man management is very good but his squad management is poor. He doesn't know how to rotate.
I should have been time specific when I said closer to the bottom half, there was a time in the winter when we were down in 14th place.

Facing West Ham presents very different challenges to facing the top teams. Psychologically, for the top teams we tend to be more up for it. Sadly we've adopted the game raiser, underdog mentality in most of those games. Tactically there are also a number of other challenges. Much of our success against top teams has been based on defending deep, being aggressive and countering at speed. That's exactly what the mid table teams mostly try to do to us. Fred and McTominay would have offered little against the low block West Ham used last night. We know that because we've struggled to break low blocks all season.

I know that Bruno needs a rest but, psychologically, when he is subbed it provides a boost to our opponents. We saw it against Southampton. Most sides feel like Bruno is the main threat and once he's gone it raises their belief they can beat us.

I don't think Ole doesn't know how to rotate. I think, rightly, he has very little faith in the squad options he has beyond the first XI.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Another piece of evidence against tiredness being our main problem. That was our 6th game after the restart. Surely to feck they can manage 6 games in 4 weeks without falling apart, physically? I would also argue you could see warning signs against Bournemouth, our 4th game after the restart. Our brilliant attack bailed us out but we were lethargic and dozy as feck for large parts of that game too. Especially - yet again - in the opening period. Are we supposed to put that slow start down to tiredness too?
Yes that would have been fine, but after a tough Southampton game we had 3 days to recover, then 2 days to recover again against Chelsea.

Southampton after our game went and lost to Brighton, we don't have that luxury, we have to keep winning.

You understand that whatever happened prior to that doesn't have much benefit. People keep saying "they've had 3 months off" like it's a good thing.

Go and play 4 games of football in 8 days and then tell me if you're able to perform at your maximum the next week. No amount of rest before that period would help you recover any faster, it's just too much too soon.

In hindsight we should have rotated players for either the Palace or Chelsea game. Even this West Ham match we didn't HAVE to win, we should have just let the first team have a whole week to prepare for Leicester.

That's my opinion anyway, we've played the same 11 pretty much every game for the last 2/3 weeks with only resting them when subbed early (if at all possible) and it's just not been enough.

People like Fred/Mctominay/James/Mata have been pretty under used.
 

King7Eric

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
3,121
Location
Cardiff
Whatever is the system, the basic requirement for anything is players should be able to move, something our players couldn't. What's the point of keeping them on the pitch? Now this might even have impact on leicester game.

With all due respect, you are reaching a bit here with systematic change and everything. We have played 4-2-3-1 all season with double pivot and since Bruno was signed, McT and Fred both played alongside Bruno and did well.

Ole was just scared to make subs, maybe he was happy with the point and didn't want to make any changes proactively.
There's a huge change between how we are playing now and how we were playing with McT and Fred in midfield. I never said they can't play well with Bruno, but the issue is we are playing a system different from what we were playing earlier. Why else don't you think the coaching staff doesn't start them and insists on playing Matic?There are numerous ways of playing in a double pivot and Pogba/Matic combo plays totally differently compared to the Fred/McT combo.
 

Ralph1386

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
3,440
Chelsea rotated a bit last night and lost.
United haven't rotated much in the league and haven't lost, the moment we did, the fa cup, we lost.
Who's injury is down to over playing?

Every team is in the same boat, we have played one more game than any other team.
Tiredness at this stage is just an excuse.
Chelsea lost to the best team in the league and better squad, not because they rotated and played Giroud/Willian instead of Abraham/Pulisic. They managed to score three - against most other teams that would have been enough to win.

I just said earlier that we do not have have a good enough squad at the moment to rotate and compete on all fronts. Which is why we should pick our battles wisely. So thanks for reiterating my point with the fa cup example.

Most people here seem to think that we should have rested the first 11 against Chelsea on Sunday. I understand that you disagree but we’re not supposed to agree on everything.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,799
Chelsea lost to the best team in the league and better squad, not because they rotated and played Giroud/Willian instead of Abraham/Pulisic. They managed to score three - against most other teams that would have been enough to win.

I just said earlier that we do not have have a good enough squad at the moment to rotate and compete on all fronts. Which is why we should pick our battles wisely. So thanks for reiterating my point with the fa cup example.

Most people here seem to think that we should have rested the first 11 against Chelsea on Sunday. You clearly disagree but it is what it is
You mean the best team in the league that arsenal just beat?