Can I ask why we are allowed tweets like this when I got a warning for posting an aggregator without the source article link? Even though it had the source of the information in the tweet?
There’s no source article for this either and it’s from a lesser known journo & a tennis journo at that?
I can understand my warning for the other one but the aggregator one doesn’t make any sense to me when they were allowed before.
These haven’t been taken down either, not calling anyone our or want to get anyone in trouble but, just confused as to why some are allowed and some aren’t and these are from aggregators;
Angelo Mangiante is a journalist, not an aggregator. This would likely be info that he's sourced from his connections (whether they're good or not, we'll see). He was assigned the Roland Garros final, but he's mainly a football correspondent for Sky Sport Italy. He's worked with Di Marzio in Sky Sports for many years, too.
Various aggregators, both good and bad, have twisted and conveyed the incorrect information in the past. utdreport, in particular, has posted some obvious BS on several occasions, and even high-quality aggregators miss some nuance and context in their Tweets. That Evan N'Dicka link? That was fake news, yet it stuck around in the football world for a few days. That's why it's not enough to just point to a journalist or source, especially if they've Tweeted out the information themselves (like Sport Witness did for the Garnacho story).
In terms of why those two Tweets haven't been taken down yet, feel free to report them so that the mods can take them down. I've already done so.
