Basa1987
Full Member
'We are United' sounds much better than 'We are Man Utd'.
Simples
Simples
Ive said whats on my mind...your a bellend, well that was my opinion before, but, after reading your subsequent posts ive changed my mind, you are actually an enormous bellend.maybe my subsequent posts have given a bit of clarity on the quoted text and you may actually want to say whats on your mind and perhaps get a better insight as to why i said it and the context in which it was said has been confirmed to be regarding Melburnians and i know its a facht that Man Utd ignorance happens a lot in Asia and N America. places i have been to before and also a huge influence over my thoughts regarding Man Utd have been from the Redcafe forums.... i have been a looong time lurker on here mate
Oh god not this again- even Mockney's OP cannot kill off this bloody topic.And btw, African-Americans fought racism partly by devaluing racist words like "nigger".
They didn't wet their crotches like some bitches here. They knew exactly what they were doing.
Man-yoo-are................ a fecking wanker if that s all you can come up with.. which was to insult me twice.... yeah great contribution to the thread and your inability to comprehend the diversity of the term 'Man Utd' and accept the fact that the majority of people here don't like it being used over United, or in my case, in any context. I dislike the term and it pisses me of when people use it ignorantly.... yeah what happens in public makes me a bellend. Man.you're..... gonna stay off my radar, because people like you don't bring any value to these boardsIve said whats on my mind...your a bellend, well that was my opinion before, but, after reading your subsequent posts ive changed my mind, you are actually an enormous bellend.
I know, it's one of those things that certain fans really give a shit about and I've absolutely no idea why. Nobody who says it means it in a negative or derogatory way. It's just what many call the club. Many children especially.Why would anyone care? I call the club "united", anyone else can call them whatever they want. It doesn't affect me.
But even if it is, does it matter?nah the way i see it is that its used by rivals and should not be used by the club,fans or anyone connected in any way
Then you should probably read the first post and realise it was used by our own fans and by journalists in a non-derogatory manner way before any rivals used it.nah the way i see it is that its used by rivals and should not be used by the club,fans or anyone connected in any way
not all liverpool fans are bad, theres some on here that are "sound as a pound" they even set up a thread on munich last weekYep, looks like i was wrong on this one. I wont use it, but by all means go for it.
Although as a footnote i would say that just because things were once "ok", doesnt mean they always are, Liverpool offered us players after Munich, would they do that now?
I realise thats a crap example, so apologies, but im just trying to make the point that things change.
'Course it's not insanely offensive. It's a neutral term when it isn't pronounced "manure", and it has been used for years.When Fergie was on 'Who wants to be a millionaire', the term Man Utd was used several times in a row in front of him, without him thinking twice about it.
Should be enough evidence for the internet-myth believers, that it's not insanely offensive.
Fergie was on "Who wants to be a millionair"! I had not friggin idea. Have to see that nowWhen Fergie was on 'Who wants to be a millionaire', the term Man Utd was used several times in a row in front of him, without him thinking twice about it.
Should be enough evidence for the internet-myth believers, that it's not insanely offensive.
I'm sorry, I completely disagree with this. It very much IS a case of proving the history, because the whole point of this exercise was to stop the quasi-bullying of people for using the word, by people pretending to be "annoyed or upset" due entirely to a fake mythology, which they used as a stick to simultaneously show off their fandom and beat others with.Whether it makes a difference, what was originally offensive or not, it doesn't matter.
It's a matter of consideration at the end of the day. It's accepted by pretty much everyone to use United, Manchester United etc. It's not really accepted by many to use Man Utd as a term, it annoys or upsets others, so really, considering we all support the same team, why use it?
It's not really a case of proving or using history to prove if the term was used by our own, or what it meant. It's just a case of using another word, to not upset the masses who feel differently. It really isn't that hard, or too much to ask for.
Agree 100% with Mockney. All this bollocks about Man Utd being derogatory term really does my head in. I always refer to us as UNITED (well 99.9% of the time) but have no problem with people saying Man Utd, have said it a few times myself. What I don't need is some teenage/foreign keyboard warrior preaching to me on what's right or wrong. I've been a match going UNITED supporter for nearly 40 years so I can call our club what I like.I'm sorry, I completely disagree with this. It very much IS a case of proving the history, because the whole point of this exercise was to stop the quasi-bullying of people for using the word, by people pretending to be "annoyed or upset" due entirely to a fake mythology, which they used as a stick to simultaneously show off their fandom and beat others with.
I don't use the term, and agree it that Utd or United should take precedent, but anyone who's actually "annoyed or upset" by the usage is most definitely in the wrong, and "the masses" don't really give a feck.
Would love to read about the history of it. Just once more, ok?I have grown tired of explaining the history about that term to fellow United and Non-United fans in India and asking them not to use it. But people ignore. That doesnt mean they use it for same purpose for which we hate, it is just that they have grown comfortable with it. I choose to ignore them nowadays.