VAR and Refs | General Discussion

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
585
You said it yourself though, the Bournemouth player is actively running to try and push the Wolves player prior to the swing rather than interested in the game itself. I'd probably say it's possible to give the goal and give a red to the Wolves player and a yellow to the Bournemouth one.
I don't disagree, it's a weird one
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,520
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
I agree with that as well.

I would say though, that one thing the refs do a lot in the NFL (ok, I'm aware it's more stop - start than football) is they do go and look at the screens a lot more on the sidelines. How many times do you see refs do that in the Prem, despite it being available to them?

I just don't get why a decision will be flagged and then then ref himself, 99% of the time, will just stand there waiting for the decision. Go over to the TV screen and at least look at it yourself, then do what you have suggested, which is talk more. But they barely do it.
And, watch it back in real-time, not slow-mo. Actions can always look dubious slowed down to virtual freeze frame, they need to be viewed in context.
I think the NFL is too stop start to implement that in football. It is bad enough with the 2 minute+ ones now. Imo, having the conversation streamed live over the tannoys in the ground and on TV would firstly eliminate any 'Dean' type situations as he would just look like a moron in front of the world and the fans would push for a decision/have a bit more understanding of what is taking so long. This may also require all grounds to have big screens so the can see what is happening in conjuction with the conversation.

Thanks. Old then, but still a damning statement.

This is bad too:

According to a report from the Daily Telegraph’s Jim White in 2013, Halsey opted not to take a severance payment of £50,000 from the PGMOL upon retiring from officiating, instead taking on a position with BT Sport. Per the piece, the sum is only issued if the referees agree to a “gagging order” to prevent them discussing their officiating days when they retire.
Halsey clearly knows something is wrong and wants to be on the right side if anything ends up in court.

The NFL is a very stop start game. That style of refereeing is never going to work in football. We’re already seen the amount of complaints when decisions take a couple of minutes.

My perspective with offsides would be to accept the on pitch decision unless there is a clear and obvious error offside missed. That means space between the two players. I don’t see the point in measuring millimetres to strike a goal off. That has ruined the excitement of football.
I agree the NFL stop start model will not work in football. I feel the conversion option as I mention above is much better as seen in Rugby.

That said, I loath 'clear and obvious' as it means a VAR has to go 'ok, it is the wrong decision, but is it a really wrong decision'? It just adds a next layer of conjecture.

As for 'toe nail' off sides, if we move to space between the two players or 'daylight' we are only going to end up with situations where a defenders shirt is blowing in the wind, so is playing a player onside from the angle of the camera or something equally ridiculous. For me, just use the semi-automated and along with the current VAR system for offside.

It’s does seem curious that nearly all the professional referees support lower league clubs or bottom half Premier League sides. Anyone would think they lied so they didn’t lose the chance to ref big games.
Indeed.
 

iammemphis

iwillnotaskforanamechangeagain
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
6,011
Location
Hertfordshire
Penalty on Pedro imo, worse one for me was before when the ball hit Walkers hand as he was running with the ball? If that was us you would bet your house on them pulling it back, but from the looks of it they didn't even look at it?
 

CoopersDream

Full Member
Joined
May 30, 2021
Messages
510
Penalty on Pedro imo, worse one for me was before when the ball hit Walkers hand as he was running with the ball? If that was us you would bet your house on them pulling it back, but from the looks of it they didn't even look at it?
Agree with the penalty, should have been one. Did it really hit the hand, though? It looked like it originally, but I can't see the touch looking at the replay.
 

awop

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Newbie
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
4,245
Location
Paris
Supports
Arsenal
They can't even be bothered hiding it. A penalty would have changed nothing but nope, nobody is getting anything.
 

Pughnichi

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
1,635
How on earth is that not a pen. I know the game is done at 4-0 but there’s clear contact. From behind. And no touch on the ball.
 

YikesSchmeics

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
343
That is given as a pen against any other team in the league. Its so obvious that they have leverage on the referees en masses. Absolutely ridiculous how often they get away with it. Michael Olivers behaviour in City games alone is worthy of an inquest.
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,955
Nudging the ball with your studs = winning the ball. Remember when Lamptey didn't change the direction of the ball and everyone agreed he didn't get enough for a pen? :lol:
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,280
I've not seen a club getting so many decisions against them as we have. Maybe Wolverhampton. How is that not penalty? Was there even a check on that? Not that it would matter.
 

OldSchoolManc

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
2,729
The Coventry backlash begins. Penalty from referee isn’t getting overturned there.
But he doesn’t give it…
 

Catt

Ole's at the wheel!
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
27,898
Location
Norway
I've not seen a club getting so many decisions against them as we have. Maybe Wolverhampton. How is that not penalty? Was there even a check on that? Not that it would matter.
And Forest. But yeah, it's been a lot this season
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,959
Location
W.Yorks
Nudging the ball with your studs = winning the ball. Remember when Lamptey didn't change the direction of the ball and everyone agreed he didn't get enough for a pen? :lol:
He altered the direction more then enough.

Garnacho wouldn't have got the ball as it went straight to a Burnley defender.

You all would have been absolutely furious if that had been given against us.
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,955
He altered the direction more then enough.

Garnacho wouldn't have got the ball as it went straight to a Burnley defender.

You all would have been absolutely furious if that had been given against us.
So if a player dribbles at my opponent i can just pull him down as long at my teammate who was nowhere near the situation gets the ball?
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,304
He altered the direction more then enough.

Garnacho wouldn't have got the ball as it went straight to a Burnley defender.

You all would have been absolutely furious if that had been given against us.
I think it’s a hard one to call. Touching the ball isn’t the same as winning the ball, I’m not sure he wins it, but he does alter it towards the other. Tough one.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,265
I think it’s a hard one to call. Touching the ball isn’t the same as winning the ball, I’m not sure he wins it, but he does alter it towards the other. Tough one.
Didn't Arsenal get one recently where the player grazes the ball and cleaned out Jesus? Don't think he gets enough on the ball. On the other side of it, Garnacho looks to hang his leg there.

But if the logic being applied is the same as some incidents we've seen in other games, then it should be given. We all know that it's made up game by game anyway, so that one goes under, probably not, but seen them given.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,959
Location
W.Yorks
So if a player dribbles at my opponent i can just pull him down as long at my teammate who was nowhere near the situation gets the ball?
Well no because the player wouldn't have made any contact with the ball, it's two completely different scenarios.
 

awop

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Newbie
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
4,245
Location
Paris
Supports
Arsenal
Didn't Arsenal get one recently where the player grazes the ball and cleaned out Jesus? Don't think he gets enough on the ball. On the other side of it, Garnacho looks to hang his leg there.

But if the logic being applied is the same as some incidents we've seen in other games, then it should be given. We all know that it's made up game by game anyway, so that one goes under, probably not, but seen them given.
Yeah, just watching his right leg, it doesn't really move. It just hangs and he falls down. I would not call that a dive but he clearly did not got taken out either. Consistently inconsistent PL.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,959
Location
W.Yorks
Alters the path of the ball and he wouldn't have got to it someone said. You're having a laugh.

This was down to the clear and obvious bollox. Ref didn't give it so they didn't over-rule him. It needs to go.
I mean he literally does!? I'm not sure how that can be argued against, the ball moves in a different direction to where Garnacho played it.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,285
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
One the ball moves I put the defender as favourite you get there, again I don't think that's a wild statement
I don't think it's a given or all that clear cut.

However, they didn't give it because of the clear and obvious thing. If the ref gave it they wouldn't have over-ruled it so I just get annoyed with any of the marginal ones.
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,695
Supports
Real Madrid
I don't think it should be a penalty. But also the foul by Onana is clear and should be punished
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,280
You can't make this up. They love to give penalties against us. They also love to put hands on eyes when it comes to giving us penalties.