VAR and Refs | General Discussion | Forest go into meltdown

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,276
We’ll see.

For me, this is still a bit bizarre:

1: None of the people in the VAR room noticed the linesman had actually flagged for offside and that the initial decision was to disallow the goal
2: Even though the initial eye check makes it look onside, it’s still a situation where they will use lines, yet no lines are drawn up and the check is almost instantly complete
3: The only dialogue between the VAR and referee is either “check complete”, which would then confirm the on the pitch decision, or something else limited to never actually saying player onside/player offside
4: No one in the VAR room noticed afterwards that the ref didn’t point for the halfway line to signal kick off, or that the Tottenham players were lining up for the free kick
5: After such a monumental feckup, there’s no wiggle room for them to instantly correct the situation due to miscommunication? I mean, we know that they can sort out situations even after the final whistle, but after miscommunication that leads to a goal incorrectly being disallowed they can’t sort it out because the ball is back in play? I mean, i’d understand it if VAR fecked up the lines and called offside, they can’t come back 2 mins later and go “oh we redid the lines he was actually onside”.

We’ll see if they release the actual audio, i think it sounds like an impressive amount of complete feckups happening at the same time
You can’t release audio days later and think people are going to believe it. You do that right away. I’ve always said, if they are going to continiue with this VAR madness atleast have cams and mic on referees and VAR room all the time.
 

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,057
Location
Denmark
Also, the frame rate for current VAR is laughable, go have a chat with Pixar or other Hollywood heads, way to dodgy right now to say when the ball left a players foot when talking millimetres off/onside.
I absolutely cannot believe that they're still making millimetre offside decision when this part is so inaccurate. It just baffles my mind that seemingly no person involved has acknowledged this issue. We're ruling out goals for toenails being offside, yet deciding when to freeze the frame is based on some guy's best guess on a dodgy frame rate. Are they really all too stupid to see this glaring problem?
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
582
I said this about the Casemiro second red last season: VAR should not be used in slow motion for those decisions. Dozens of fouls each match look like leg breakers if you just see a still image. It also means that the way the match is refereed is different: the referee makes decisison in real-time and VAR officials get multiple angles, slow-motion, freeze frame and so forth. It's a complete sham.
I think the Curtis Jones and Casemiro situations are different. Casemiro hits pretty much the middle of the ball and bounces over it with his foot because the Southampton player comes in at the same time and stops the movement of the ball, freak accidents and you see similar tackles weekly, while Jones clearly steps over the ball where it also looks like he’s more or less stepping directly down rather than trying to kick the ball. Looks awkward as feck.

People on here keep insinuating that VAR has only been shit in England, my brother lives in Munich, they hate it, my cousin lives in Spain, they hate it, and I have seen a ton of awful VAR nonsense in CL and EL games which has nothing to do with English officiating.

However get rid of it and the first time a big decision is messed up people will be screaming for it to come back. At the moment, across every area of football fandom you have an utterly insane level of of conspiracy level horseshit/ advanced victimhood mentality with everyone crying that the refs have it out for their team. Take away VAR and that phenomenon just accelerates.

Would be happily rid of it, keep the line tech, and experiment with other improvements such as expanding the officiating team, get 2 or 3 refs on the pitch along with assistant refs. Should have been the starting point to improve the standards before bringing technology into a game with as many interpretive decisions as football throws up.
VAR decisions in the CL and EL have been shit for some time, so it’s hardly just a problem in England. For me, in general, i think the obvious solution is to get rid of the clear and obvious barrier and accept VAR as a tool to reach the correct decisions rather than putting too much emphasis on the decision that was made on the pitch. Things happen quickly on a football pitch and expecting the referee to get a solid overview in every situation, just because he had line of sight, seems meaningless. I think we’d avoid quite a few frustrating situations. I can’t remember who we played, fairly certain it was under Ole, where the opposition scored a goal that was pretty much a clear attack on the goalkeeper. Ref allowed it and VAR didn’t step in as the referee on the pitch had seen the duel and allowed it. Then later in the match, Maguire (i think) fairly won the ball from the goalkeeper and before we tap it in the referee has already blown for a freekick so VAR can’t interveen afterwards anyway. Replay clearly showed the goalkeeper simply fecked up. For me, i think it would be a natural improvement to wait it out, and if a goal is scored communicate with VAR that there was a situation you weren’t completely sure was a freekick or not. Webb has a bit of a hard on for the clear and obvious stuff, wanting decisions to be made on the pitch, but i think it’s doing more damage than good. I still can’t understand how VAR didn’t make sure Nketiah got sent off for that horror tackle attempt against the Tottenham goalkeeper. It’s the very definition of endangering the safety of the opponent the way he jumped in, but because based on pure coincidence he doesn’t snap the goalkeepers leg in half it’s somehow only a yellow.
 

LochGormanAbú

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
150
Supports
Liverpool
That never happened. In the game you refer to, City had a possible penalty not given, Fabinho then scored from the following counter attack and VAR decided it was a fair goal as they didn't deem it to be a City penalty.

There was no possible Liverpool penalty and no City goal overturned.
fair, the old memory don't be great
 

1988

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2017
Messages
736
Game’s been going downhill for a good while. VAR has accelerated the decline.
Referees and VAR are just too much in focus in it's current state. They dictate the game in a way that's just hard to enjoy. Can't celebrate a goal proper, inconsistent VAR rulings, freeze frames that makes tackles or brawls seem worse. We have some games with 10+ added time and games with 3.

Without VAR there were errors, there was debate, there were wins and losses that felt sickening. But still the game felt more honest and homogeneous.
 

LochGormanAbú

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
150
Supports
Liverpool
:lol: Don’t think I will ever feel as positive about VAR as I do right now.
Except this impacts United's chances of top 4 more than a Liverpool draw/win, unless wanting to see Liverpool not succeed is more important to you then United succeeding
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,609
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
We keep hearing how forwards should have the advantage, more goals etc. To this end I would make the offside rule at least done against the players feet, removes all the angle nonsense, perspective and all that, be a lot more straight forward and give the attacking team bit of an advantage.

Also, the frame rate for current VAR is laughable, go have a chat with Pixar or other Hollywood heads, way to dodgy right now to say when the ball left a players foot when talking millimetres off/onside.

Finally, don't send Ref's to the monitor, it just creates more chance for bias or at least conspiracies. If VAR are sending the ref to the monitor, they believe the ref is wrong, job done, rightly or wrongly, just make that call in VAR with the two officials there.
I think sending the ref to the monitor is fine, but not in its current implementation.

He was always going to send Jones off based on that footage. VAR sent him what would make him side with their judgement, rather than what he would need to make an informed judgement himself. It makes it nothing but theater to send him over for such footage.
 

Longshanks

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
1,784
No, it comes from Garnacho being ahead of Gabriel when the pass was played.
According to the technology, but the technology isn't accurate enough to really tell us that. It's essentially a calculated guess even using the technology for the really tight offside calls.

If they are going to use the technology at hand to make the calls then they need a much bigger MOE because the current one is nowhere near big enough.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,638
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
So the var assumed the goal hadn't been flagged offside, said check over and the ref assumed he meant check over, it is indeed offside.

So why doesn't the var say, 1 second after the ref motions for a freekick. No wait, I mean check over, it's onside.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,038
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Except this impacts United's chances of top 4 more than a Liverpool draw/win, unless wanting to see Liverpool not succeed is more important to you then United succeeding
Meh. It’s a long season.

Liverpool lose will never not be fun. Watching Liverpool lose due to an outrageous officiating error is about as good as it gets.
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
582
You can’t release audio days later and think people are going to believe it. You do that right away. I’ve always said, if they are going to continiue with this VAR madness atleast have cams and mic on referees and VAR room all the time.
No idea if they need the refs involved to sign off on releasing the audio or not. I wonder what they do with the video overlay that they show in the stadium and on tv during checks, if it’s shown in the VAR room during/after,

Maybe it is such an insane combination of stupidity on every level, but i do think it’s strange that no lines were drawn up and that their check was over almost instantly. Again, normally we see clearer situations being verified, Diaz being onside isn’t that obvious to the point where there’s no need for lines to verify it, but maybe the VAR is insanely good at instantly measuring things with his eyes, just awful at actually communicating it.

I like a bit of a scandal, right now it feels like too many coincidences happening at the same time
 

Who gives a...

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 21, 2018
Messages
105
Var is just ridiculous. I watched both the live league cup games during the week and they were so much better to watch knowing you could celebrate goals immediately and fouls weren't going to be looked at in case they could pull up a still shot of something looking dangerous. Every time a goal is scored, it's now at least a 30 second wait just in case it's being checked for something.

If Var can't rule out human error then we should go back to the original human error of on field referees. At the moment all we are getting is a more game flow interrupting, protracted form of human error, that also manages to disconnect fans and players from a pretty important moment of a football match....celebrating a goal as the ball hit's the net.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,255
I think sending the ref to the monitor is fine, but not in its current implementation.

He was always going to send Jones off based on that footage. VAR sent him what would make him side with their judgement, rather than what he would need to make an informed judgement himself. It makes it nothing but theater to send him over for such footage.
They did the same with Casemiro last year.

Showed the still of him holding the Palace player, and the one where his foot connected with the player rather than the entire flow of the challenge.

It's delivered in such a way to make sure the referee gives the red card.
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,364
Location
UK
They did the same with Casemiro last year.

Showed the still of him holding the Palace player, and the one where his foot connected with the player rather than the entire flow of the challenge.

It's delivered in such a way to make sure the referee gives the red card.
Sports entertainment.
 

Ananke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
1,432
Location
Manchester
It’s a bit of a shambles start to the season for officiating…I’m confused how they’re getting worse rather than better?

They should be on the top of their game due to the initial errors but instead it’s like a car crash pile up.:houllier:
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,351
It’s a bit of a shambles start to the season for officiating…I’m confused how they’re getting worse rather than better?

They should be on the top of their game due to the initial errors but instead it’s like a car crash pile up.:houllier:
It has gotten much worse since Webb became in charge of PGMOL. He seems to giving the refs and VAR different instructions every few weeks and they end up looking more clueless than usual.
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,276
It has gotten much worse since Webb became in charge of PGMOL. He seems to giving the refs and VAR different instructions every few weeks and they end up looking more clueless than usual.
I don’t think it is any different how we are being treated. We get same wierd and crazy decisions against us and I would say it is 1 of 15 decisions for us. 14/15 are against us.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,351
I don’t think it is any different how we are being treated. We get same wierd and crazy decisions against us and I would say it is 1 of 15 decisions for us. 14/15 are against us.
Webb got his position in 2022 and I would say we have been getting worse decisions than usual since.
 

Bale Bale Bale

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
2,252
Supports
Spurs
Exactly, thank you. He wouldn't have flagged a similar situation if Son scored that. Something's not quite right. Then Darren 'makes a mistake' straight after, or something. Yeah, all above board.
Son literally had a goal flagged for offside in the 2nd half, it was even the same linesman :lol:
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,276
Webb got his position in 2022 and I would say we have been getting worse decisions than usual since.
I can’t say why people feel that way. I think it could do with it is starting to affect other teams that are more media darlings and it is more in the light.
However my opinion is that this is not new when it comes to us. We have for long time and still are getting crazy decisions against us. Pretty much every gameweek. We are not good enough team in first place but club shouldn’t accept being denied to even have chance.
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,798
They should have just stuck with the lines drawn in the wrong place excuse, as what actually happened is even more ridiculous.

Surely he thought it was a bit odd when there were no mad celebrations after the shot went in.
 

SteveCoppellFan

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
866
It is and always has been a job for the boys scenario.

You hear the recordings and its " can you check this please mate " and " ok thanks mate " etc.

Apparently, you cannot bring in ex players to use VAR for whatever reason, probably to protect their fellow colleagues.

What we need is non refs and properly trained professional people specifically for VAR.

If they then completely mess up a few times then they just lose their job like any normal person, this does not happen when its a job for the boys scenario, they will bunker down and protect their own.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,168
Location
Manchester
Meh. It’s a long season.

Liverpool lose will never not be fun. Watching Liverpool lose due to an outrageous officiating error is about as good as it gets.
Yea, true, until you realise the reaction it’ll cause moving forward in terms of ref decisions for them.
 

Bale Bale Bale

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
2,252
Supports
Spurs
They should have just stuck with the lines drawn in the wrong place excuse, as what actually happened is even more ridiculous.

Surely he thought it was a bit odd when there were no mad celebrations after the shot went in.
Their reasoning is just unfathomable to me. I really thought that they just saw Diaz was clearly ahead of the full back(Porro) and went "check complete", whilst missing Romero playing him on in the middle. It still would have been totally egregious but less so than what they've come out with.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,741
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
So we’ve been on the shit end of about 5 harsh VAR calls already this season and about 3 have been clear errors which have examples either the week before/same week/week after of being called in another team’s favour.

Despite this I genuinely cannot remember a single time a commentator or pundit has admitted that we have been hard done by on any single decision and often the decision is omitted from highlights and not even discussed and it stinks to high heaven.


Regarding this offside incident, there is no way Howard Webb can omit it from his VAR review show and I refuse to believe that they would re-record the VAR incident to back up their story because the amount of people that would have to be involved for that conspiracy to be true is ridiculous and would end in jail time so it’s fair to believe that the explanation they are giving is the truth.
 

Ananke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
1,432
Location
Manchester
So we’ve been on the shit end of about 5 harsh VAR calls already this season and about 3 have been clear errors which have examples either the week before/same week/week after of being called in another team’s favour.

Despite this I genuinely cannot remember a single time a commentator or pundit has admitted that we have been hard done by on any single decision and often the decision is omitted from highlights and not even discussed and it stinks to high heaven.
It’s disgusting isn’t it. Liverpool get a bad call against them (and it really was) and it’s literally the talk of town with a written apology, refs standing down from duty, with most likely any 50/50 decisions to go their way for the foreseeable future, all the media jumping to defend them and how well they played.

They brush anything against us under the carpet like it never happened.
 

Mb194dc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
4,673
Supports
Chelsea
The offside mistake was pretty criminal. How can they miss the last defender. Then again Liverpool had so many calls going in their favour.

That game v Wolves last year, the Lukaku offside in the league cup final, no red for VVD stamp last year, no second yellow for Milner v City iirc.

It does even out, nearly I guess.
 

erikcred

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2022
Messages
1,744
Except this impacts United's chances of top 4 more than a Liverpool draw/win, unless wanting to see Liverpool not succeed is more important to you then United succeeding
Welcome to cafmoon. You'll get used to it. Blue jerseys are on backorder.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,614
Location
Manc
VAR has pros and cons, but for me it has killed celebrating a goal...pausing a few seconds to check if the linesman has raised a flag doesn't stop any enjoyment.

But waiting 2 minutes for VAR to check a goal just completely changes how I watch football...how we have settled on a system like this is bonkers.

Plus the amount of good goals that are being disallowed is just crazy...right or wrong no one is going away from grounds congratulating the officials for disallowing a beautiful worked goal because the players shoulder was 2 pixels ahead of the defender.
 

stw2022

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
3,687
I don't get the use of the term "human error". It's as if we think VAR is some ultra advanced artificial intelligence system whose perfections are blighted by bumbling humans.

VAR is a human looking at a screen talking to another human on a football pitch. We need to stop thinking of this as "technology"
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,206
Hang on, did var think it was onside but didn't realise the linesman signalled it offside now?
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,168
At this point, I don't know who's having a worse season, the referees or United.