RedDevil@84
Full Member
It is not bizarre. The agenda seems to be on purpose. And I am pretty sure that the agenda of what to talk about and what not to talk about on TV comes from the bosses.Bizarre
It is not bizarre. The agenda seems to be on purpose. And I am pretty sure that the agenda of what to talk about and what not to talk about on TV comes from the bosses.Bizarre
And another decision where the media reaction will dictate whether the decision was correct or not. Let's see how this one plays out.Another week, another joke decision.
So you can extend your hands now anywhere or make yourself bigger because you don’t know much about it? In that case only blatant intentional handballs are penalties then ala Suarez v Ghana.I'm actually happy with that not being a handball... He didn't know much about it and it didn't really effect play.
Whether it should have been handball by the laws though is a different matter
In my perfect world of pens, pretty much! it'd be stuff like that or what Romero did the other week vs us where he star jumped into a block.So you can extend your hands now anywhere or make yourself bigger because you don’t know much about it? In that case only blatant intentional handballs are penalties then ala Suarez v Ghana.
I love you bro.I'm actually happy with that not being a handball... He didn't know much about it and it didn't really effect play.
Whether it should have been handball by the laws though is a different matter
Absolute moronic goal given for City
Nothing to see here. Had it been us it would have made big fat morning headlines.Absolute moronic goal given for City
It absolutely is, by the current rules.That should be offside, but by the current rules it is not. Blame the rules, not the referees.
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offsideA player moving from, or standing in, an offside position is in the way of an opponent and interferes with the movement of the opponent towards the ball this is an offside offence if it impacts on the ability of the opponent to play or challenge for the ball; if the player moves into the way of an opponent and impedes the opponent's progress (e.g blocks the opponent) the offence should be penalised under Law 12
Could you please clarify what this rule is?That should be offside, but by the current rules it is not. Blame the rules, not the referees.
He wasn't obstructing the view of the goalkeeper, no offside. He wasn't physically interfeering with the goalkeeper so he didn't impact his ability to reach the ball, no offside.Could you please clarify what this rule is?
Not surprising when he himself was a dog shite ref who somehow gained a reputation as favouring Utd despite then giving us no decisions for a decade.Howard Webb,fair play. Somehow made var even more infuriating and useless
It does exactly that. It interfered with Leno's ability to challenge for the ball. Leno cannot move until it passed Akanji so if that isn't interference, I don't know what is. And what makes it worse is that Akanji tried to play it.It absolutely is, by the current rules.
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/lawsandrules/laws/football-11-11/law-11---offside
Ball literally goes past him obstructing the keeper view of the ball there mate.He wasn't obstructing the view of the goalkeeper, no offside. He wasn't physically interfeering with the goalkeeper so he didn't impact his ability to reach the ball, no offside.
He did obstruct and interfere. The dude didn’t even celebrate, he just walked away. He knew it was off.He wasn't obstructing the view of the goalkeeper, no offside. He wasn't physically interfeering with the goalkeeper so he didn't impact his ability to reach the ball, no offside.
I am biased but he was clearly offside and moved towards the ball to try to flick it. That impacts the keeper and hence should definitely be offside.Ball literally goes past him obstructing the keeper view of the ball there mate.
There’s a pic going round of the player kicking / getting out of the way a split second after the ball goes past him. VAR May pause the video and say the ball is already past but I real terms it’s basically a simultaneous actionHe did obstruct and interfere. The dude didn’t even celebrate, he just walked away. He knew it was off.