Jim Beam
Gets aroused by men in low socks
Feck off, just feck off. Setting a slow motion and repeating it at a small fraction where Casemiro's leg is bounced from the ball. An absolute joke.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Less than zero.Any chance it gets overturned? Ridiculous really
Bet we don't even have to wait until next weekWhen there's a similar incident next week in another match it won't get given
That's the issue. Doesn't make this one wrong, imo, it makes the others wrongWhen there's a similar incident next week in another match it won't get given
Done the same with us a few times this season, other teams they have different angles, infra red, heat seeking, night vision, drone cam, and player cam. Anything to get them off the hook it appears.Feck off, just feck off. Setting a slow motion and repeating it at a small fraction where Casemiro's leg is bounced from the ball. An absolute joke.
I think the issue is the way he went for the first ball was studs up anyways. Excessive force.I think it's red. Yes he got the ball but he followed through over the top.
Similar actually happened to him against Barca I think and it should have been a red
I dont think it would have been excessive force of he the center of the ball and followed through at a decent height. He hit the top and his leg bounced up out of control.I think the issue is the way he went for the first ball was studs up anyways. Excessive force.
Said the same thing. AgreedHave no real issue with it being a red tbh. He got the ball first but that doesn't really matter all that much, he still caught the opponent in a pretty dangerous way.
The issue is all the other times tackles like that don't get red cards.