It's a problem.
VAR's supossed to overturn clear mistakes and this is something that just doesn't get called in real time. But on the flipside offside isn't really a judgment call - you're either offside or you aren't. So if the technology exists to overturn clear (but not obvious) mistakes, should it be used?
What you see in a league like de Eredivise where VAR is being used for a while now, is that referees are slowly but steadily getting comfortable with it and develop the confidence to simply let the most marginal calls be and let a football match be a football match. Like last week at the PSV game there was an incident with shirt pulling at corners, which is another typical problem in football where you're never going to get a satisfying outcome.
In this case a PSV player's shirt was clearly pulled, but at the same time the player fell down immediately, even before the short pulling actually restrained him/held him back from moving towards the ball. What the referee can do in such a case is directly scream into the microphone that he saw the incident. The VAR's then going to say 'yeah but it's a clear case of grabbing the shirt', after which the referee goes and have a look on the screen. Then, if he has some balls, he'll simply say it wasn't enough for a penalty for me, no foul and play on.
In general I really don't see how the VAR has been ruining the Eredivisie. If anything, it's the best of both worlds. I mean, how many Champions League knock-out stage matches alone have been filled with the most ridiculous and obvious unfair decisions? The occasional marginal neurotic punctual call by a referee seems like a fair price to pay if it pretty much completely helps preventing the most grave and obvious injustices.
Most satisfying thing for me is that it shows how out of the loop a senile corrupt fecker like Sepp Blatter was by being against the use of technology in modern football. His, or FIFA's main argument usually was something about how the discussions and wrong decisions were part of the charm of the game, and the discussions were what makes football so great. Now what I've seen with the implementation of the VAR, there's still easily as much discussion if not more, because plenty of people automatically assume the VAR will somehow be a magical instrument solving everything and then get even more upset than with just regular refereering when they dislike a decision. At the same time obviously the VAR can help prevent about 99% of the most blatant wrong calls, so that's what I mean with the best of both worlds.