Danny Boi
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2014
- Messages
- 1,183
Showed in 10 minutes what he can contribute this season.Good besides the goal aswell
Upset that Memphis got #7 instead of himWhy was he holding up five fingers on one hand and two on the other? The score was 3-1
Such horse shit. He's a great player to have, get over yourself.Fellaini can be effective but that doesnt mean he enhances the team, I still subscribe to the view that he isnt united quality but for his efforts last year, I am not as keen to have him out as I initially was so in that respect he has changed my opinion of him.
Exactly, don't really see him in our midfield as starter. But he is the perfect man up front for games like that and a great plan B to have.Great option to have in scenarios like that. You know exactly what's going to happen but it's so hard to stop.
Acknowledging Depay's cross, maybe?What a cool guy. What's with the seven as a celebration? If I recall correctly, same thing Carrick had made after his goal recently...
Could be, but don't think so. Could've just go to him and thank him properly.Acknowledging Depay's cross, maybe?
Seconded. The footballing purist snobs can say what they like - when on his game, he is almost impossible to defend against.United quality. Deal with it.
Well done to Fellaini, cant argue he is effective as per my original quote.Such horse shit. He's a great player to have, get over yourself.
I know what you mean and you right. But there's just something about Fellaini, he'll defy logic because he is unique and don't forget about those entangables fueling the big guy.How did I know this would be the reaction because he came on and scored? Look I'm happy for him but can we have some kind of perspective here please? It was against a 10 man Brugge. All these calls for him to start are over the top.
He's a good plan b, he's a good option on nights like tonight to keep the opposition penned in when they are clinging on. But he's not first team quality. He's not an out and out striker so who in the team does he replace? Given Pedro looks set to join.
He's an option from the bench I don't dispute that. In some games we have to have a plan b when teams look to park the bus. But he's not a choice from the start. We need to aspire to play better football and he's not the player to do that.I know what you mean and you right. But there's just something about Fellaini, he'll defy logic because he is unique and don't forget about those entangables fueling the big guy.
And last season he did well against plenty of 11 man teams, including away to Liverpool (well, 1st half against 11 anyway) and at home to City. So what's your point? Not that I necessarily think he should always start, but statements like this are ridiculous.How did I know this would be the reaction because he came on and scored? Look I'm happy for him but can we have some kind of perspective here please? It was against a 10 man Brugge. All these calls for him to start are over the top.
He's a good plan b, he's a good option on nights like tonight to keep the opposition penned in when they are clinging on. But he's not first team quality. He's not an out and out striker so who in the team does he replace? Given Pedro looks set to join.
My point is let's not go mad by shouting for him to start in the future. Yes he scored an important goal but he did only have 8 touches of the ball so there does need to be some realism. Again I stress, he's got a big part to play as a squad player.And last season he did well against plenty of 11 man teams, including away to Liverpool (well, 1st half against 11 anyway) and at home to City. So what's your point? Not that I necessarily think he should always start, but statements like this are ridiculous.
Liverpool, City and Spurs knew what they'd be getting from him last season. Inspite, they could not deal with him, could they?He's generally only effective when he's used sparingly instead of starting all the time where the opposition are able to adjust their tactics to deal with him. If he's used as a situational sub, I think will get the best out of him.
I guess Fellaini wanted to express he would have scored 7 goals if played from the start.What a cool guy. What's with the seven as a celebration? If I recall correctly, same thing Carrick had made after his goal recently...
Think he when Moyes signed him I thought it was decent business. OK we overpaid but I'm used to that. But I thought he'd add real bite in midfield whilst providing a threat from set pieces. Fellaini himself said he feels that his best position is DM.Weird that according to the experts on here, he was a shit buy by Moyes and not the kind of player that'd fit in Van Gaal's "philosophy". Of course I'm not proclaiming him to be some Moyes masterstroke, but it does show how much some people here know.
And yet, he made every single one of those 8 touches count/useful... I don't want to turn this into yet more Rooney bashing (as I thought he was alright yesterday) but, even if people claim that we play in a system that doesn't suit a striker/don't creat enough for a striker, you've still got to make the most of any time you do get on the ball, and he simply isn't doing that at the moment.My point is let's not go mad by shouting for him to start in the future. Yes he scored an important goal but he did only have 8 touches of the ball so there does need to be some realism. Again I stress, he's got a big part to play as a squad player.
Agreed.Great option to have in scenarios like that. You know exactly what's going to happen but it's so hard to stop.
But what a trick though... and a trick that's won him 2 Champions LeaguesIn some ways he reminds me of Inzaghi. Jeez he was one of the less talented players I've ever seen at top flight and he was a one trick pony (ie he would stay very close to the defensive line and then either use his pace to outrun opposition or his actor's skills to get a foul/penalty), however it was god damn difficult to defend against.
Let me add the following to the well-crafted post of OP: I don't think that playing Fellaini as a starter means necessarily moving to "this option", namely crossing the ball until he heads it home. And, if I understand OP correctly, that's not what he meant. The hold-up play, the aerial threat and the physicality of Fellaini are very much needed throughout the match and they don't translate into "crosses". If you may recall, Fellaini played a big role in our win against City, which was perhaps our biggest win of the season. But we didn't play crosses all game long and he contributed to the goal of Mata by out-muscling his defender on the left flank. The use of crosses last season came mostly when United was desperate for a goal (e.g. West Ham), but not really when we're either leading or early in matches.I'd rather see more speed of thought and movement up front from our other players. We're on the path to playing some slicker football if we express ourselves more. We shouldn't resort to this option yet.
He was a regular during our best spell of last season, where he was excellent against Spurs, City, Liverpool and Chelsea. They dont come much harder than those fixtures. Not saying I want him to be in the starting XI every week, but I dont see how its a mad idea when he pretty much was in the starting XI for most of the second half of last season. There are times when it looks like the opposition have no idea what to do with him. He gets himself about so much.I'll just say for those wanting to see Fellaini become a regular in our starting XI and see him leading our attack, "Be careful what you wish for". Not that I think that even LVG would be mad enough to actually go through with such a plan.
Fellaini, our Duncan Ferguson