Think Spurs already have deals with some NFL clubs.Spurs must be gutted, no NFL games for them
If the Jags relocate it would almost certainly put an end to Spurs getting any further games after their existing arrangement.Think Spurs already have deals with some NFL clubs.
If there is a London franchise based in Wembley Stadium there won't be many/any other games coming to London. The market will already have been close to saturated, and the NFL will start to look at other waters for their freshest pit of cash (Germany?)Think Spurs already have deals with some NFL clubs.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/amp/football/43906272Mail jumping the gun as per usual.
What? It’s in other places too.Mail jumping the gun as per usual.
You don't see the difference between:What? It’s in other places too.
I don’t agree, the national team should have a home and it should be in the capital. The whole nation should have better and more affordable transport to be able to attend though, but that’s another issue.England playing at different stadiums all round the country was much better anyway.
Completely agreed.I think they should take the deal:
1) Having a national stadium is nothing more than ego and tradition, many other much more successful nations don't have one
2) How many coaches could they train and players could they produce for 800 million? I don't think its outlandish to suggest that this money, if invested properly, could result in tournament wins
3) Many people, once the true cost of Wembley came to light, were of the opinion we shouldn't have bothered and invested the money in the actual game, not bricks and mortar. It was only we were so deep into it we have no choice but to continue. We have the chance now to roll the clock back and for an inflation driven loss of say 100-200 million (its not my money or your money, who really cares)?
So as long as the FA get a clause in the contact to guarantee certain usage (cup finals, England games) for a good duration at a fixed cost, I'd take the deal and focus on the fecking game, not the fecking buildings.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's because our leaders are corrupt. For example, you could sleep with the Prime Minister for 50k, and she'd throw in Boris for free.Everything seems to be being sold off in this country, its' quite sad tbh.
It's true Steve lol I'm surprised the Queen hasn't been sold off yet.That's because our leaders are corrupt. For example, you could sleep with the Prime Minister for 50k, and she'd throw in Boris for free.
50k? I could do with some extra cash. Not sure I'd want to keep and feed Boris thoughThat's because our leaders are corrupt. For example, you could sleep with the Prime Minister for 50k, and she'd throw in Boris for free.
English not British owned landmark despite I'm sure the Scots, Welsh & Irish all paying towards it.Im no brit. But 800m for a landmark british owned pride of the nation stadium sold to foreigner, that big bowl in the heart of capital free to be used as the next owner like... not very good.
800m is alot for the fa but it's pittance in the grand scheme of england.
It's not central London though and it's a bit limited what you can do with it so it's probably a fair value. It's not like buying The Gherkin or the Shard for example.A building that big in London for less £1b can’t see it myself.
She has, she's a floating hotel in Dubai now.It's true Steve lol I'm surprised the Queen hasn't been sold off yet.
Why? To have it as a training ground? A shed? Or perhaps to house all the trophies?We should buy it and transport it up to Manchester piece by piece