How can you say PSG take nothing away from clubs that earned it? Would the next in line not have won the Ligue 1, or entered Europa League, if they hadn't gone berzerk and bought big players like Zlatan, Cavani, Mbappe, Neymar?
PSG was a big french club of name before the take-over, but they hadn't been anything noteworthy since the 90s and was basically a forgotten club. Had they not been where they are now, the next clubs in line, would have succes from income and money to build a succesful foundation on. Instead these clubs get shafted (some of them are owned by sugar-daddies like Monaco, Nice, Bordeaux, etc yes).
While I agree that sugar-daddied clubs are becoming the norm, and Leicester and Montpellier don't deserve it as much, as say if Bournemouth won the league, the scale of them are nothing near the state-owned clubs. That's the difference. The state-owned clubs have endless money, Leicester and Montpellier have a similar amount to spend of a middle/sub-top-club. Mind you, I'm not a big fan of these clubs neither, but these example was mentioned to say that "miracles" occur with or without the big state owned clubs. I could have said Herfølge in the Danish league in 2000, but those two are some of the most commonly known.