Grylte
"nothing wrong with some friendly incest, bro"
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2014
- Messages
- 15,422
They don't seem to care where the ball was going before they start celebrating 
It's kinda nuts either way once the ball goes through their legs.
I do however back up the point you're trying to make when it goes to goalies. Messi for example hit it low and hard at Courtois, I honestly don't think he was aiming for in between his legs regardless of how good his finishing is. To ''nuts'' a keeper you have to hit it at them, no striker ever tries hit it at the keeper. In fact if they did they wouldn't be a good striker.
So ya, there is no such thing as a nuts on a keeper when shooting/scoring a goal.
Putting the ball through the keeper's legs is not a nutmeg. For it to be a nutmeg you have to get the ball back.
Where does the term nutmeg come from?
People are basing this 'having to get the ball back' bullshit on Panna which is a game with its own rules.
Putting the ball through the keeper's legs is not a nutmeg. For it to be a nutmeg you have to get the ball back.
This is wrong. Many players have been quoted over the years saying that they've often intentionally tried to shoot between the keeper's legs. This stuff gets done in training sessions too.
Also Fifa Street. 15 years ago when I was 10, we all used to refer to nutmeg as getting the ball back.
Fifa Street knows nothing. This is a travesty.
That link that Zlatattack posted a few posts up states that it the player has to regain the ball for it to be a nutmeg.
In a way to resolve the dispute why not have two tiers for it:
- Nutmeg - Have to get the ball once you've played it through opponents legs
- Meg or 'Megged' - Putting it through opponents legs i.e. he just needed to meg the keeper there.