What would SAF do with this team?

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,077
Location
Canada
Absolutely no chance. At no stage did Alex Ferguson put up with a midfield as limited as that. Even our often criticised midfield in his later years was superior to that.
Cleverley and Anderson? Come on. Our midfield was mediocre for years. He just knew how to set them up to perform for the team and pretty much just minimized the impact of the CM's since they were so limited.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,292
Defense is thereabouts. We conceded 43 goals that season. Our defense wasn't good that season. The only good midfielder we had that season was Carrick. We have more quality in midfield now. The only midfielder I'd take from that entire squad then would be Carrick(and he would start obviously now).

Current squad has winners too(albeit on an international level).

The biggest caveat is no RVP and no SAF.
Because we played attacking football. If we were as cautious as this team we’d have conceded less. Carrick and Scholes was a better pair than any we put out now. Even Giggs at that age would be a better starter than most of what we have now.

We’ve one player in the squad who’s won anything of note. And most people would argue he’s one of our biggest problems.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,292
Cleverley and Anderson? Come on. Our midfield was mediocre for years. He just knew how to set them up to perform for the team and pretty much just minimized the impact of the CM's since they were so limited.
They played together for about 4 games. That wasn’t our midfield in 2012/13.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,130
Because we played attacking football. If we were as cautious as this team we’d have conceded less. Carrick and Scholes was a better pair than any we put out now. Even Giggs at that age would be a better starter than most of what we have now.

We’ve one player in the squad who’s won anything of note. And most people would argue he’s one of our biggest problems.
Scholes was completely finished in 2012-2013. He barely even played.

Giggs was pretty much finished too.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,292
Fergie made them winners. Van Persie was a perennial "loser" until he became a "winner" with Sir Alex.

That defence definitely was not better than the players we have now. They were all old and at their ends, capable of some decent performacnes but on the whole did not do well defensively that year. Midfield not even close to what we have now. Don't confuse better coaching for better individuals (unless you think Ole and Sir Alex have pretty much the same impact from a coaching perspective?). Hernandez is and was worse than any of our 4 attackers. Rooney had already declined a bit that season, was still a good player but so is Rashford/Martial/Greenwood/Cavani.

The personnel we have right now are better than what we've had for the best part of the last decade, probably best group we've had since our defensive players declined of that last great Sir Alex side.
He was a 30 goal a season striker. He was just perennially injured.

I disagree on the defence. Evra was still a better player than fat boy, Rio was still better than anything we have now and we had Vidic half the season.

Carrick was a much better player than anything we have in midfield now. Bruno is more of an attacker. Fred and McTominay don’t start ahead of Carrick or a 37 year old Scholes.

Hernandez was what you want a third choice striker to be. A player who can score goals off the bench. It would be nice to have that now. Surely I don’t have to argue that Rooney and Van Persie we’re better strikers than what we have now? Rooney has started to decline, no doubt. Still had 24 goal contributions in 27 games to Martial’s 24 in 32 league games.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,292
Scholes was completely finished in 2012-2013. He barely even played.

Giggs was pretty much finished too.
Missed about 3 months injured but involved pretty regularly before then. Still a better midfielder than McTominay is now for me. That’s possibly me being kind to Scholes but even if I’m wrong, Carrick was still head and shoulders above anything we have in midfield now.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,130
Missed about 3 months injured but involved pretty regularly before then. Still a better midfielder than McTominay is now for me. That’s possibly me being kind to Scholes but even if I’m wrong, Carrick was still head and shoulders above anything we have in midfield now.
Not sure if he'd start over McTominay to be honest(but I don't think McTominay should be a starter either). I'm of course talking about Scholes purely from that season.

I conceded the Carrick point. He'd definitely start for us and would improve us a lot.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,789
Location
india
I mean, the greatest manager of all time replacing an average one? How wonderful would that be!?

What would he do? Firstly he'd probably not end up with a midfield of Fred, Matic and Mctominay. I imagine were talking about peak SAF here. He'd chuck Pogba out. He'd have fullbacks who can attack. He'd embrace Bruno.

And most importantly, he'd get us playing front foot attacking football not this nonsense that Mourinho and Ole love so much. Barring the odd occasion SAF didn't allow Manchester United to play negative football. We were famous for how we played - aggressive, fast, entertaining football. Gosh, I miss the great man. The soul of this football club sadly left with him.

Sigh.
 

archiebald

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
282
Fergie made them winners. Van Persie was a perennial "loser" until he became a "winner" with Sir Alex.

That defence definitely was not better than the players we have now. They were all old and at their ends, capable of some decent performacnes but on the whole did not do well defensively that year. Midfield not even close to what we have now. Don't confuse better coaching for better individuals (unless you think Ole and Sir Alex have pretty much the same impact from a coaching perspective?). Hernandez is and was worse than any of our 4 attackers. Rooney had already declined a bit that season, was still a good player but so is Rashford/Martial/Greenwood/Cavani.

The personnel we have right now are better than what we've had for the best part of the last decade, probably best group we've had since our defensive players declined of that last great Sir Alex side.
The credit for RVP's progress from winger to world-class striker is solely Wenger's credit to claim, let's make no illusions about that. He was already at that level prior to joining us.
 

InfiniteBoredom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
13,670
Location
Melbourne
It’s really hard to judge that 12-13 side midfield
in hindsight, because Carrick played probably his best individual season then, which overall made that nonexistent midfield more effective than our current one, despite the talents we have now at our disposal.

The 43 goals conceded is heavily skewed by conceding 5 against West Brom in the last match day, plus we won the league with 6 games to spare. I would easily, man for man, take the defence we had that season over our current one.

Attack wise there’s no comparison, wingers were pretty shit but between RvP, Rooney, Hernandez and Welbeck they scored more than 70 goals, and as ineffective as they were Valencia/Young back then were still marginally better than Lingard/Mata/James.
 

Web of Bissaka

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
8,553
Location
Losing to Comeback Winning!
Depends on which version of Fergie (pre-2000s total attacking risk taking gambler, mid 2000s balance tactical all rounder, circa 2010s defensive tactical specialist). The different versions happened honestly because of (a) Fergie's motivations (to continue managing or retire, notice how our teams usually drop in performances in the early 2000s, then football getting worse *entertainment wise* 2010s) and (b) his quick impressive adaptations to the generational changes in football.

I'll take the 2nd version (mid 2000s).


1. Improve coaching/trainings.
Firstly he'll bring in a good coach, 2nd assistant to be in charge of the trainings and the whole tactical side of it with his tactical input too of course.
Seriously though we're so rubbish in this aspects, and Ole made no improvements at all to it.. other than the GK coaches due to consequences which we're finally seeing improvements but that may have to do more with player management specifically gk competitions. Silly loyalty. Fergie is also loyal to his staffs, but not the crucial 2nd assistant manager whom he kept on refreshing with newer ones.


2. He'll likely bring in a real #9 first.
This for him is his most important position and normally the first one he "fill-in". All out bid for Kane I assume or convince Haaland to join in? If he couldn't, then he'll likely play Martial there. Yes, and constantly rotate with Greenwood, Cavani etc every game until Martial hit the purple patch again, otherwise constant rotation.


3. Managing the players & Tactics
James => super sub and energy bunny, mini Kanchelskis! won't have problems playing RW.
McT => McTominator every game.
Fred => Fred the Red!
De Gea => back to God mode!
Mag + Lind => 2nd version of Bruce and Pallister
Dean => will play him in CL group stage vs the shit teams with no fear.
Romero => will let him go (sold or loan) easily considering his professionalism and good performances as 2nd keeper over the years, none of this shitty prison-ing.
Greenwood => monster impact subs across all three positions CF, RW and LW
Mata => playing as 2nd choice CAM
Rashford => right wing god


a. Default tactics? 4231

#9
Martial/James -- Bruno -- Rashford
VDB/Fred -- McT(c)
Telles -- Maguire -- Lindelof -- AWB
De Gea


Subs: Greenwood, Mata
Squad: Pogba, Matic, Shaw, Williams, TFM, Axel, Bailly, Rojo, Dean
b. Total attacking tactics? when we're going all out.
1. 433 or 4123, with one holding most likely be VDB/Fred or captain.
2. Replacing AWB with maybe James, TFM, Axel or Bailly (yes their attacking abilities or TFM's speed are really good)
3. 4114 at the last dying minutes.

c. Defensive tactics eg. in Europe or vs top teams?
1. Possibly putting Fred/VDB on the left wing.
2. Highly doubt he'll play 5 defenders system, so it'll be 4231.
3. Shaw instead of Telles is possible.

Rashford, Bruno and McTom will always be in the starting 11, James, VDB, Mata and Fred will be regulars, TFM will play more games, as does Axel being tried out even at LB. Rashford will probably play more as Right Winger to balance our right side, with AWB already providing the defense solidity at the back.

Oddly I can see Fergie dropping Martial to a regular status and Pogba as bench-warmers. And even dropping Shaw..? He wants his FBs to attack, but may be lenient with AWB cause he's young and monster in defense, confident he can improve AWB's attacking abilities. Could also see Fergie loving Rojo, he love mad bastards. Bailly I assume will play more at RB, just my guts telling me. Contrary to popular beliefs, I think he'll get fed up with Jones injuries and kick him out of the team. We're talking about Fergie in his prime here yeah. I honestly don't think he'll be bringing in Cavani nor Ighalo, but if he does, for sure he'll turn them into good 2nd choice #9s.


4. Captain conundrum?
It's very unlikely he'll turn Mag into captain straightaway in his first season. But then who knows - at that time, the choices are very poor (Maguire, De Gea, McTominay, Mata, Matic and Rashford). But remember how at that time McT is performing like crazy, McTominator form basically, and we know how fond Fergie is with McT, so it's highly likely he'll be naming McT as the club captain officially. Long term.


5. A lot of Rotations.
Seriously, he'll do a lot so you won't see our best 11 playing every games.
Our CBs, keeper, captain and real #9 (if we got one) will almost always play every games, bar injuries and the cup games/shit teams in CL.
The rest will be rotated around always, but constantly playing - that's how he got all his squad players to be useful not shit, and get back into best forms quickly. It keeps everyone on their toes, improve squad Morale with enough games and squad competitions, etc.


Just speculation/imagination IMO, based from the little information I know about Alex Ferguson, following this man's great journey.
So definitely I'll be getting many wrongs there.
 
Last edited:

Peyroteo

Professional Ronaldo PR Guy
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
10,884
Location
Porto, Portugal
Supports
Sporting CP
Defense is thereabouts. We conceded 43 goals that season. Our defense wasn't good that season. The only good midfielder we had that season was Carrick. We have more quality in midfield now. The only midfielder I'd take from that entire squad then would be Carrick(and he would start obviously now).

Current squad has winners too(albeit on an international level).

The biggest caveat is no RVP and no SAF.
I think the main difference is that the league is a lot tougher now than it was in 2013. All teams that won the Premier League between 2011 and 2017 would have struggled to compete for the title in these past 3 years imo.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,756
SAF would be challenging for the league title with this team, he did with players like Welbeck, Cleverley playing regularly, semi retired Rio, Vidic, Evra too.
 

pass.pass.pass

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
180
With this squad:
1. Fergie would reach the quarters and semis of the CL regularly.
2. In the PL, he would win two titles in a row and miss out on a third by 1 or 2 points or by GD.
3. Also in the PL, he would get under both Pep's and Klopp's skin (Klopp got rattled by Keane in a studio. Imagine SAF working on him over the length of a season:devil:). They would have the mother of all meltdowns and feck off to be each other's assitants at PSG.
4. In gameplay, McT, AWB, and Shaw would never make more than 3 sideways passes in a game in the oppposition's half. Pogba would either be one of the best midfielders in the world or sold.

Of all these things, it's point 3 that makes me really wish that he was still the manager at United.
 
Last edited:

Asger

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
3,766
Win another treble? Would he rotate players more?
One thing is for sure, if we lost the way we did against CP, Spurs, and Gunners, his face would be red and his speech polite but very tense but polite in the post-match interview. Like a volcano about to explode.
Firstly he would never have two defensive fullbacks in Shaw and AWB!
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,757
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
Martial
Bruno
Rashford Van de Beek McTominay Greenwood
Telles Lindelof Tuanzebe Wan-Bissaka
De Gea

Probably lines up with something like this (4-4-1-1) and challenges for the title...
SAF would never take our best defender out of our starting 11. You win games with your best players, not without them. He also wouldn't play Rashford as a winger. He would be a striker. We would also have a left footer on the left wing and a right footer on the right. They might alternate through out the game but for the most part, our wingers jobs would be to provide assists first and goals second, not the other way around.

---------------------------------------------De Gea-----------------------------------------
AWB-------------------Smalling*---------------------Maguire------------Shaw
Bruno----------------McTominay---------Fred-------------------------Telles
-----------------------Martial------------------------Rashford---------------------

Subs: Henderson, Tuanzebe, Lindelof, Matic, Greenwood, VdB, Cavani

*Smalling never would have left the team and Pogba never would have been signed. It would actually be interesting to see what other players we would have brought in with that Pogba money if SAF was still here. I've put Telles at LW because he plays like a classic winger and is left footed. I could also see Bruno playing on the right in SAF's system. It would be interesting to see who we would actually have here if SAF didn't retire...
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,789
Location
india
Firstly he would never have two defensive fullbacks in Shaw and AWB!
Absolutely. Neither would he have two CMs who offer feck all going forward. Yes, SAF had his periods of playing poor players but A) he still won stiff and B) in a career that long and decorated, standards drop here and there. But in general our team was littered with players with attacking qualities.

This thread is actually depressing as all the qualities we had under him are in the bin. Other than youth I guess.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
He'd challenge for the title. It's a very good squad. We have quality in every position. Not performing at this point, is down to the manager and coaching staff. We have all sorts of players who can play a lot of different styles of play, we have quality and depth in every position, at very good ages. There's nothing to hide behind anymore. The players work hard for Ole, but Ole has no clue on how to set them up to press properly off the ball, move off the ball to create gaps and progress up the pitch, no clue on how to instill any style of play that can create chances regularly. If we aren't countering, we are relying on a mistake from the opposition or a low percentage shot to go in. There is nothing else.
But there is something else: VAR Penalties.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
We have a worse defence, a weaker midfield and no Van Persie with Rooney and Hernandez as back up. That squad was better than this. By a lot and it had winners.
Van Persie we have Cavani & Martial
Rooney we have Fernandez & Rashford
Hernandez we have Greenwood
 

Water Melon

Guest
The one and only SAF would challenge for the title for sure.
 

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
Absolutely no chance. At no stage did Alex Ferguson put up with a midfield as limited as that. Even our often criticised midfield in his later years was superior to that.
:lol: our Midfield was diabolical most of the time
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
GK: He'd probably start thinking of replacing DDG by now and use the money elsewhere

RB: Dalot would be brought back and he'll be properly coached, same with AWB. AWB will cover the Wes Brown as right back role
CB: Lindelof and Maguire won't last for long. Sir Alex learnt his lesson about having 2 slow CBs long ago. He'll probably play Maguire and Tuanzebe then he'll add another CB
LB: Telles would play regularly. Shaw will play when Dalot plays

DM: Sir Alex hated anchor men so Matic would be a goner. The guy would tolerate one headless chicken in midfield (Phil, Cleverley, Butt) with preference given to the Scot homegrown talent, so Fred would be a goner as well. We'll sign a DM who offers more to his game then running and tackling
MC: VDB would be a first teamer alongside Bruno. Mejbri would be promoted, Pogba will be kicked out. United would add a midfielder on the cheap, probably someone like Riqui Puig who will accept the bench.

RW: Sir Alex would sign Adama Traore. He's the sort of powerhouse/creative winger he likes. James will remain as cover. Mata, Lingard and co would be sold.
LW: Rashford and Martial

STK: Sir Alex would play Cavani with Greenwood as cover/competitor.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
GK: He'd probably start thinking of replacing DDG by now and use the money elsewhere

RB: Dalot would be brought back and he'll be properly coached, same with AWB. AWB will cover the Wes Brown as right back role
CB: Lindelof and Maguire won't last for long. Sir Alex learnt his lesson about having 2 slow CBs long ago. He'll probably play Maguire and Tuanzebe then he'll add another CB
LB: Telles would play regularly. Shaw will play when Dalot plays

DM: Sir Alex hated anchor men so Matic would be a goner. The guy would tolerate one headless chicken in midfield (Phil, Cleverley, Butt) with preference given to the Scot homegrown talent, so Fred would be a goner as well. We'll sign a DM who offers more to his game then running and tackling
MC: VDB would be a first teamer alongside Bruno. Mejbri would be promoted, Pogba will be kicked out. United would add a midfielder on the cheap, probably someone like Riqui Puig who will accept the bench.

RW: Sir Alex would sign Adama Traore. He's the sort of powerhouse/creative winger he likes. James will remain as cover. Mata, Lingard and co would be sold.
LW: Rashford and Martial

STK: Sir Alex would play Cavani with Greenwood as cover/competitor.
I like all of your suggestions, but perhaps SAF would play Lindeloff / Tuanzebe instead of Maguire / Tuanzebe. Maguire just seems the slower one, and he doesn’t seem as disciplined as Lindelof. Not much between them though.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
I don’t think he was great tactician, no. I think he was smart enough to minimise his weaknesses by bringing in people with skills he didn’t have himself. By the latter parts of his career, he wasn‘t even that hands on with training. Delegated to others. A skill in itself. As United manager, and I mean manager, he didn’t just coach the 1st team. He has control over many areas of the club. Things we don’t even realise. He was taking on the workload of 10 people. Now there are people for each individual task. He looked after many different areas of the club. He was the Glazer’s greatest asset. He could keep the club wining trophies to appease the fans with a very low net spend during their 8 year working relationship. Success on the pitch while making them very wealthy. A genius.

Football became a lot more tactical in England with the arrivals of top foreign coaches in the early 00’s. Mourinho and Benítez helped influence the league tactically. English clubs became more flexible. We enjoyed our best spell in Europe from 2006-2009 under Ferguson. SF, F, F. Queiroz was huge part of this. United were often naive in Europe in the 90’s and early 00’s.
My last post on this topic as it’s getting repetitive. Again, SAF was a good tactician. Everyone knows how many different tasks he has had. He still was very much involved hands-on. His involvement in coaching and certain other areas got less in his last few years obviously. But this is to be expected. Or do you think the likes of Klopp and Guardiola will have the same involvement in everything when they are 66-71 years old?

What was said about Queiroz was also said about McClaren - great innovative assistant, etc. and we were very successful with him between 1999 and 2001, too.
Football has of course continually been changing. But not only by Benitez or Mourinho. Wenger was the first one who brought changes. Then Mourinho / Chelsea came, then City.
SAF never failed to adapt and kept winning major trophies.

Finally, one main reason SAF liked different assistants was to bring freshness and new ideas to the club. Usually at most other clubs a manager stays for a few years so the new manager will automatically bring changes.
But if you have a long term manager and long term CEOs then the changes need to be brought in by the assistant/coaching staff.
SAF being continuously successful with so many different assistants actually confirmes that it was always his game plan and tactics, which of course the assistants helped implementing. There are exceptions for example the Barca games in 2008, where SAF accepted a different approach suggested by Queiroz (who by the way apart from 1 season was also at United when we got beaten in the CL between 2003-2007 - including one group stage exit).
Last but not least, at least both McClaren and Queiroz couldn’t even buy any kind of attacking play, let alone scoring so many goals regularly. That was all SAF. McClaren and Queiroz however brought some structure and defensive shape to the team (but again, funny how Queiroz could manage one knockout win against Barca when our team and defence including goal keeper were at their best, but failed to get us past Madrid and Milan in 2003, 2005 and 2007 as well as out of the group in 2005/06). I am not only blaming him for these defeats but I feel if he gets so much credit mainly due to the Barca games then he should also be questioned when we failed with him as assistant.
Anyway I am not going to post again on this topic as everything has been said by now.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
I like all of your suggestions, but perhaps SAF would play Lindeloff / Tuanzebe instead of Maguire / Tuanzebe. Maguire just seems the slower one, and he doesn’t seem as disciplined as Lindelof. Not much between them though.
I doubt Sir Alex would waste 80m on Maguire. However since he's there, then I think that the old man would play him

a- the club spent 80m on him. He'll try and make it work
b- Maguire is at least decent in air and is physically strong

What Sir Alex would probably do is to sell Lindelof quickly to make money out of it. He'd buy a fast CB (Konate? Upamecano?), he'll promote Tuanzebe and Mengi and I can see him add Evans on the cheap.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,133
Location
Dublin, Ireland
He made Tom Cleverley and Phil Jones in midfield work, I’d bet on him making Pogba work as well.
I wouldn’t. They were hardworking and surrounded by a balanced team otherwise.
Pogba is a square , trying slowly, pondering how to fit in that around hole. He’s a luxury on top that’s messing the unit equation
 

MancunianAngels

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
2,506
Location
Manchester
Supports
FC United
Challenge for the title.

This squad has more talent than our 2012-2013 title winning team.

Mix in SAF's genius and we'd challenge for the title.
Does it have more talent? They perhaps have more potential but very few of them have done it consistently yet. That team in 2013 was still very good and had managed 89 points in two successive seasons.

Granted 3 of the back 4 were getting on a bit but was that team as bad as everyone made out?

We were also close to knocking Madrid out of the Champions League before the Nani red card.

In 2013/2014, Fergie or even Mourinho would have taken that side to at least challenge for the title.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,077
With what we had available yesterday, probably something like

------------------de gea
Williams-tuanzebe-Maguire-shaw
--------‐mctominay--matic
Vdb--fernandes--rashford
-------------------cavani

With a full strength side though I think the only changes would have been rashford on the right wing, martial on the left wing, telles at left back, vdb next to matic and fergie likely would not have loaned dalot out and been used as his first choice right back as he also loved Rafael despite his defensive short comings.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,440
We had a team of win at all cost characters under SAF. This lot couldn't care less. Challenge for the title, you're having a laugh.
 

MetoTTT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 22, 2018
Messages
2,812
Location
France
Absolutely no chance. At no stage did Alex Ferguson put up with a midfield as limited as that. Even our often criticised midfield in his later years was superior to that.
Djemba x2 and Kleberson?
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
Pogba gone.

McT and Fred midfield.
Martial Bruno and Rushford up front.
Telles, Shaw, Lindelof, Maguire and AWB.

Thats our best team. Forget about individuals, thats our most balanced team.
Sir Alex always had exceptional CMs in them. As time went he reduced the work rate (ex Keane and Ince) in favour of more creativity. Workrate in CM became something a donkey can do (ex Cleverley) in specific times to cover for a lack (an ageing Giggs/Scholes). There's no way Sir Alex would play with a midfield made up of Fred and McT.