Brwned
Have you ever been in love before?
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2008
- Messages
- 50,849
In City's usual setup, he plays as a fullback when they're out of possession and a centre mid when they're in it. If he was a great fullback who was just so influential on the ball it required this hybrid role, I'd kinda get it. But he doesn't seem great at some of the basic fullback things.
In terms of the conventional fullback responsibilities, he doesn't seem that good. He loses his runners often, isn't a great defender 1v1, and gives the ball away in dangerous areas playing out from the back far more than his team-mates. When he gets into midfield he's a really incisive and inventive passer, a great dribbler, makes great runs through the middle and strikes a good ball.
It just seems like his nominal role highlights his weaknesses and mitigates some of his strengths, all for some contrived tactical sophistication. Does anyone else find it weird?
In terms of the conventional fullback responsibilities, he doesn't seem that good. He loses his runners often, isn't a great defender 1v1, and gives the ball away in dangerous areas playing out from the back far more than his team-mates. When he gets into midfield he's a really incisive and inventive passer, a great dribbler, makes great runs through the middle and strikes a good ball.
It just seems like his nominal role highlights his weaknesses and mitigates some of his strengths, all for some contrived tactical sophistication. Does anyone else find it weird?