Would you sack or keep Ole? (Poll reopened)

Sack or Keep OLE?

  • Sack Ole & appoint new coach ASAP

  • Keep Ole & back him to finish rebuild


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

mark_a

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
1,274
Keep - He's not the problem. Can't turn this around in one window. Several positives last night, though of course you wouldn't know it from the reporting. See the BBC's "Your reaction to United's worse start in 30 years". My reaction is that it was a shame it was a draw as we deserved more, but there were some promising performances. AWB and Martial back and things would pick up, next window you'd hope we'd get some more quality in and in that or next window ship more under-performers out. The ship is going in the right direction, the question is who has the patience? That's the issue. The press doesn't and many "fans" don't either.
 

shaky

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
2,515
Yeah, so? good managers win matches with worse players all the time.
Not at the consistency level that we demand. You'll probably find that the vast majority of "top managers" signed most of their good players rather than creating them out of bad players.
 

GenZRed

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Messages
634
Keep.

If this team looks average against a League 1 side then it will take more than a change of manager to sort them out.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,433
Keep - He's not the problem. Can't turn this around in one window. Several positives last night, though of course you wouldn't know it from the reporting. See the BBC's "Your reaction to United's worse start in 30 years". My reaction is that it was a shame it was a draw as we deserved more, but there were some promising performances. AWB and Martial back and things would pick up, next window you'd hope we'd get some more quality in and in that or next window ship more under-performers out. The ship is going in the right direction, the question is who has the patience? That's the issue. The press doesn't and many "fans" don't either.
Well their not wrong? If results go against us this weekend we could be a point off the relegation zone. We haven’t even had a tough run of games.
 

GwilDor

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
1,892
Location
Norway
Wow, must say i’m quite surprised by the overwhelming lack of patience with some of you guys. While it is obvious we are nowhere near where we want to be atm, at least we have a clear intention and plan forward imo.

When it didn’t work with Mou it was always only gonna get Worse. Ole has been clear that this will take time, its not done in one window to undo the shambles we’ve become. Getting the culture at the club right takes some serious rebuilding, i’m not talking buy 4 new star players(we’ve tried that, didn’t work), we need to find ourselves again as a club, and that means having the type of players here who will have the heart here, not just collect the salary. Getting rid of Lukaku&Sanchez made us worse in the short run, but will be invaluable in rebuilding culture and developing the players who will be our core in the coming years.

Please, lift your heads and look at the bigger picture. This season is not about winning the PL. It never was. It is about positioning ourselves for the future, and the future will be bright. The night is always darkest before the dawn.
 

Icemav

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
1,697
Signings players is a tiny part of what a manager’s job is, there’s a whole lot more into it.
3/3 is way too early to coronate them all as successful, I’m not all that impressed with Maguire so far, Darmian, Bailly, Matic were all considered successful signings at some point, look how that turned out.
Put Ole as a head of the transfer and scouting department and get a real manager in then.
We need a DOF.

For instance Matic was a great INTERIM signing. I was happy we got him at the time but I can go back to my old posts saying we should be looking immediately for a long term replacement and/or understudy interchange player. Chelsea fans already told us his legs would go half way through a season. We knew this and still have not adequately planned around it. And dont get me started about right wingers (has this been discussed for 6 years?)

We are a reactive not proactive club and that lack of foresight is crippling us.
 

Majima

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
4,038
Location
Kami's Lookout
Supports
Ralf Rangnick.
Next game is Liverpool. That has the potential to make it quite embarrassing and hard to ignore.
Next is away to bottom of the table Newcastle then Liverpool. We will be embarasingly near the bottom of the table afterwards if this form continues. Now is not the time for the collective fan base to have their heads in the sand is it?
 

TrueRed79

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
1,902
He's so far out of his depth it's ridiculous. I'm not roaring from the rafters for him to be sacked but he's shown no tangible evidence that he has the required skills to turn this around or build a team to compete. You need to see some form of green shoots to give you hope that he is the man to lead us forward. Sorry but theres none. And please don't tell me he's made three decent signings while getting rid of players that were no longer required.
 

Rory 7

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
7,454
Location
A car park in Saipan
I don't disagree with this, however it doesn't make Ole any kind of blameless.

Yes it's. Ole is a terrible manager, regardless of our opinion on Woodward. Being Ole out camp doesn't necessary makes any of us Woodward or Glazers in. That's kinda naive to think like that.
The whole premise of this 'poll' is keep v sack. IMO sack takes the exact same short-term approach to the running of the club that has us in the place we are.

The idea that sacking Ole will fix anything is naive. The problems at this club run much much deeper than Ole.

There is another thread on here titled 'appointing Ole was a mistake'. Thats the place to debate his ability or otherwise.

This thread is overtly about the idea of keeping or sacking - at this point in time.

If you choose sack, you are choosing the same short-term knee-jerk approach that Woodward has been at the heart of for 7 years.

So if you choose 'sack' you are backing Woodward.
 

Wednesday at Stoke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
21,709
Location
Copenhagen
Supports
Time Travel
Next is away to bottom of the table Newcastle then Liverpool. We will be embarasingly near the bottom of the table afterwards if this form continues. Now is not the time for the collective fan base to have their heads in the sand is it?
Yeah I would not be particularly surprised either if they find themselves in the bottom 5 at the end of the month, the schedule is away heavy and young teams don't do well away from home even when all things are right. This feels a lot like Liverpool under Hodgson when they spent half a season close to the bottom of the table.
 

Majima

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
4,038
Location
Kami's Lookout
Supports
Ralf Rangnick.
Stick with we have twisted to many times since Sir Alex retired its time to play the long game.
I would rather carry on twisting than sticking with someone incompetent and way in over their head, that's only taking us in one direction. You'll see in the next month how clear that is.
 
Last edited:

Andrey B

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 12, 2019
Messages
1
I would definitely keep Ole, as a lot of people here said changing managers will not solve our problems. We will just begin the process of rebuilding from scratch and the new manager may have a different view on some players we let go and bring in like for like replacements. We have gone full circle with all types of managers and now some of us even regret letting go of LVG or MOU. LVG was a long-term manager and now some fans including myself believe that if we stuck with him, we would be better off now. We need to just go through this pain period and see where it takes us. There is no quick fix for this mess and clearing it up will a couple of years at least.

The problems are at the ownership and the board level and no manager will do well with this team. At least Ole cleared the deadwood and done what all of us were waiting for. He also signed players for the future, this is something a club will benefit from some years from now. I dont see a point in sacking him until the summer at least, by then we should get an idea what he believes this team should look like. Furthermore, no top managers (or Poch at least) will want to start working here before the season is over.


And to address the point that investors dont care about the performances on the pitch as long as the the revenues keep growing, please take a look at the MU stock performance, i think it reflects that the club is declining on the pitch:


https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/Man Utd/


I can only hope that worsening financial performance will force Glazers to sell at some point and we will get owners who actually care about the club. Until then managerial changes will not have a significant impact.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
Ed won't get the sack though and Glazers won't leave. Ed will outlive a 4th manager he appointed and I'd say that's the biggest problem right now, not the actual manager.
I couldn't agree more. Woodward should have gotten sacked along with Mourinho, that he remains to this day after multiple failed managerial appointments and six seasons without a title challenge to speak of at any point during his tenure, points to the owners prioritzing commercial growth (of which Woodward is King) above success on the pitch.

I honestly believe sacking Ole now will achieve nothing favourable for the club in the short or long-term.
 

Icemav

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
1,697
I can see where you're coming from I agree, it mirrors a lot of what I've been thinking myself.

But under the present strategy, the only people to gain are the shareholders and the Glazers. It's all by design. Because of their reduced investment in the team, they are going to secure their profits and bonuses for each other, even with our revenue growth flatlining currently.

The only people who can't see they're all being taken for a ride under the current arrangement are the fans apparently.
Tbf I think most of the fans are pretty aware that the cheap option was taken and results not being a serious priority (at least short term). A scarier thought is that the owners and management have trulybeen striving for football success alongside the commercial... let that sink in.

Personally though I am not a fan who is prepared to see performances collapse in order for there to be radical change. I dont want us anywhere near the relegation zone ever.

So I really dont feel I have much option apart from pray for Ole and the youth players (plus some lucky future signings) to give us a miracle. And that is what I am doing and they have my support 100%
 

Gator Nate

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
2,159
Location
Orlando, FL
I want to see where we are at Christmas. We've not even played any teams sitting in the bottom six of the table yet.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,150
Location
Where the grass is greener.
At this point I don't really know. When Jose was going downhill it was obvious. Now I just struggle to see a way out whenever Ole does get binned. This whole issue is so much bigger than just him, but he's certainly not going to fix us, so whats the point of him being in charge, even if him leaving will not solve everything.
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
I couldn't agree more. Woodward should have gotten sacked along with Mourinho, that he remains to this day after multiple failed managerial appointments and six seasons without a title challenge to speak of at any point during his tenure, points to the owners prioritzing commercial growth (of which Woodward is King) above success on the pitch.

I honestly believe sacking Ole now will achieve nothing favourable for the club in the short or long-term.
I read somewhere that recently during sponsors briefing or whatever that's called one of the main topics was how does official app work in China...
 

Majima

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
4,038
Location
Kami's Lookout
Supports
Ralf Rangnick.
Is the name calling necessary?
I agree, that was a poor choice of words, I never meant to insult him, for that I apologise.

Incompetent and way in over their head would be a more appropriate term to use. Fixed my post.
 

Majima

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
4,038
Location
Kami's Lookout
Supports
Ralf Rangnick.
Yeah I would not be particularly surprised either if they find themselves in the bottom 5 at the end of the month, the schedule is away heavy and young teams don't do well away from home even when all things are right. This feels a lot like Liverpool under Hodgson when they spent half a season close to the bottom of the table.
The thing is we haven't even had a tough run of fixtures yet. Newcastle have had a hard run and look where they are. It's easily done and I can see us mirroring their form easily given what we're witnessing.

We're definately on course to emulate Liverpool's season under Hodgson.

There's over 80% of the season still to play though, the season doesn't have to be written off yet again, if we are willing to make the difficult decisions to stop it.
 

John Blund

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
1,214
I'm sticking to keep. I don't see us having better alternatives up our sleeves. I do believe our playstyle has changed - once again we loose point to a personal error or a missed penalty. After Arsenal scored, we took over the game again and created some chances. I believe Ole will turn this around, and I also believe he'll get enough time to do so. Unless the players start slamming him in the media.

I struggle to see what Jesse offers as our #10 if we disregard his rather high pressing at times.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,339
No point in sacking him now with no alternatives available. He's doing what he could with a depleted squad. Would like to see Ed resign before Ole does.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,718
Just off the top of my head Martyn Pert, Andrew Meredith, Michael Clegg, Ed Leng, Charlie Owen have all come to the club in the last six months suggesting the club know changes needed to be made, so just because the club aren't shouting it from the rooftops restructuring is going on and will no doubt carry on, and the scouting network has had a serious overhaul as well.
Martyn Pert's experience spans with Bahrain, Vancouver white caps and Cardiff during Ole's glory days. Andrew Meredith started in Hockey then he moved into football in Australia only to land a job with mighty St Pauli. Micheal Clegg's only experience in coaching came under Roy Keane whilst at Sunderland. That was quite glorious isn't it. Ed Leng experience in football was at Melbourne Australia and Spurs academy. Charlie Owen was promoted from the U18s. This 'restructuring' is in line with that of Carrick (no coaching experience whatsoever), Mckenna (U18 experience with Spurs and us), Phelan (Sir Alex's cone maestro whom Ole picked while rotting with Central Coast Mariners) and of course Ole, the guy who had been disastrous in any permanent job he had as EPL permanent manager.

We're probably not shouting it from the rooftops because there's really nothing to shout about. No wonder the team stinks of inexperience and naive tactics.
 

ChrisNelson

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
3,514
You really shouldn’t feel that way, and you’re probably not alone.
You can still love Ole the United legend and not back Ole the failing manager, the two should never be connected or else we’d be in serious trouble.
I think once someone represents you as a player with such distinction and achieves so much, it would be impossible to ever turn on him the way many fans turned on Jose.

His only connection was as manager, he had nothing of MUFC about him previously, and we all knew it was a 3-ish year project and would at some point end the way it did.

With Ole it's different, the people that don't think it's the right appointment will still get behind his team a lot more than if it was anyone else.

Who knows, that factor might help us turn a corner at some point. Look at Steve Bruce - he's a local lad to Newcastle but never played for them and if Alan Shearer was manager right now I think it would be a different story. In a similar way, over time they made Benitez almost an honorary Geordie and he was untouchable.

Can't fans be strange :).
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
And I'm yet to see anyone suggesting an alternative in this point of time. There was Howe and Allardyce which I don't consider a serious suggestion.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,323
He's so far out of his depth it's ridiculous. I'm not roaring from the rafters for him to be sacked but he's shown no tangible evidence that he has the required skills to turn this around or build a team to compete. You need to see some form of green shoots to give you hope that he is the man to lead us forward. Sorry but theres none. And please don't tell me he's made three decent signings while getting rid of players that were no longer required.
Why not? Is it not relevant? You say that he has shown no evidence of being able to build a team but he has. Maguire & AWB look like very good additions, and the punt on Daniel James looks like a good one too.
 

Sir Scott McToMinay

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2018
Messages
2,737
Location
Acapulco, Somalia
And I'm yet to see anyone suggesting an alternative in this point of time. There was Howe and Allardyce which I don't consider a serious suggestion.
A caretaker till the end of the season which is a write off either way, and meanwhile work behind the scene to sort out a permanent manager for the summer.
Someone with the right ideas, with a style or play, innovative tactically, someone who hasn’t peaked yet, something we haven’t tried before, someone who could hopefully turn us into a dominant and proactive side.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,083
No point in sacking him now with no alternatives available. He's doing what he could with a depleted squad. Would like to see Ed resign before Ole does.
No alternatives, we are man United, we are still able to flex our muscles and if a team like Leicester were able to get a good manager like Rodgers from celtic halfway through the season then why wouldnt we be able to get a manager of his quality better at this point in the season?
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
I voted keep, if I thought the board would remove Woodward from his position along with Ole, hire an experienced DOF and a manager like Nagelsmann who would play exciting, attacking football and continue the development of players like Greenwood, Axel, Gomes and James, I'd be all for it, but this board will keep Woodward and probably hire a pragmatist like Allegri who wont want to bother with those young players and we'll be back in Joseville, no thanks.

What identity we had under LVG exactly?
Methodocal possession, it was very borng but you could see what he was trying to do, he just didn't have the players for it but was too stubborn/arrogant to realize it. Ole seenmed to have a style of play at the start of the season but it disappeared after 3 or 4 games, same last season where by the end of the season we were unrecognizable from the high pressing, high energy, quick tempo team Ole started out playing.
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
A caretaker till the end of the season which is a write off either way, and meanwhile work behind the scene to sort out a permanent manager for the summer.
Someone with the right ideas, with a style or play, innovative tactically, someone who hasn’t peaked yet, something we haven’t tried before, someone who could hopefully turn us into a dominant and proactive side.
Lots of things it seems. Any names perhaps who checks all the boxes you mentioned?
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
I voted keep, if I thought the board would remove Woodward from his position along with Ole, hire an experienced DOF and a manager like Nagelsmann who would play exciting, attacking football and continue the development of players like Greenwood, Axel, Gomes and James, I'd be all for it, but this board will keep Woodward and probably hire a pragmatist like Allegri who wont want to bother with those young players and we'll be back in Joseville, no thanks.



Methodocal possession, it was very borng but you could see what he was trying to do, he just didn't have the players for it but was too stubborn/arrogant to realize it. Ole seenmed to have a style of play at the start of the season but it disappeared after 3 or 4 games, same last season where by the end of the season we were unrecognizable from the high pressing, high energy, quick tempo team Ole started out playing.
He didn't have the players cause he made shit transfers yes. Methodical possession didn't achieve anything nor it would in the long run.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,339
No alternatives, we are man United, we are still able to flex are muscles and if a team like Leicester were able to get a good manager like Rodgers from celtic halfway through the season then why wouldnt we be able to get a manager of his quality better at this point in the season?
Problem at Leicester was just the manager. Rest of their club is all pulling in the same direction. Ours it's not. A good manager alone will not able to bring us to top. We need structural changes to happen, Ed to diminish his power and bring in a DOF. DOF sit down and give a thought of what type of play style we are going to play and what manager suits the style. Then comes the change in manager.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,323
Martyn Pert's experience spans with Bahrain, Vancouver white caps and Cardiff during Ole's glory days. Andrew Meredith started in Hockey then he moved into football in Australia only to land a job with mighty St Pauli. Micheal Clegg's only experience in coaching came under Roy Keane whilst at Sunderland. That was quite glorious isn't it. Ed Leng experience in football was at Melbourne Australia and Spurs academy. Charlie Owen was promoted from the U18s. This 'restructuring' is in line with that of Carrick (no coaching experience whatsoever), Mckenna (U18 experience with Spurs and us), Phelan (Sir Alex's cone maestro whom Ole picked while rotting with Central Coast Mariners) and of course Ole, the guy who had been disastrous in any permanent job he had as EPL permanent manager.

We're probably not shouting it from the rooftops because there's really nothing to shout about. No wonder the team stinks of inexperience and naive tactics.
Nice bit of googling there. It must have really meant something to you to post your latest moan to do that much googling.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,268
Location
Tool shed
And I'm yet to see anyone suggesting an alternative in this point of time. There was Howe and Allardyce which I don't consider a serious suggestion.
So people have suggested alternatives. Pretty sure there were other names like Allegri, Nagelsmann, and Blanc mentioned, too.

I also don't see how Howe isn't a "serious" suggestion when he is clearly a far better manager than the one we currently have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.