Zlatan and Lukaku together?

Cliche Guevara

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
3,790
Location
Inverness
I remember Conte making it work with Vucinic in the hole and an array of incompetent line leaders in his Juve side, however something tells me we just don't have the box to box midfielders to make it work here. When was the last time we saw a run beyond the forwards from one of our midfielders?
When Pogba wasn’t out injured for ages?
 

EyeInTheSky

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Messages
9,992
Location
On my sofa enjoying pineapple on its own
If Zlatan gives us anywhere near what he did last year, including a reasonable goal return, it’ll work very well.

The biggest problem last season was we were over-reliant on him, for goals and creativity. Imagine bringing roughly that player in now, and everything being bonus?
Yeah, that would be a significant added dimension in our attacking play but also the rhythm of the team in general. I am worried because you never know with injuries like that as it ruins allot of players. I know he is a different type of beast but still... Would like to think that Lukaku in front of him will bring something we did not have last season but you never know when things look great in theory but end up ineffective or worse. I would hope that we give it a few tries rather than throwing out the baby with the bathwater if it takes all our injured players who are coming back some time to get back to full throttle.
 

Lawman

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
10,639
Location
Scotland
Lukaku
Martial Zlatan Rashford
Pogba Matic

Looks exciting to me pace on the wings mixed with braun with Zlatan providing skill and touch and Lukaku adding pace and both being deadly.
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
On paper it looks great, yes you could argue that there could be the temptation for hoofball but the players know there’s more to Zlatan than that and maybe it could slow up the attack but I for one think it could work, stick Rasford and Martial out wide and who knows but I’m a dick and know feck all about football so there is that.
................ Lukaku..........
Martial.... Zlatan....... Rashford

No way jose goes with that but I'm with you... I'd love to see it
 

Sammyjunn

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
10,299
Location
In Smalling's pocket (as every other person)
Excellent strikers but would that be the most immobile strikers duo in recent years?

I do think they could form a great understanding, Rashford, Miki and Martial are often not on Lukaku's wavelength. He is very clever actually in his ideas and Zlatan could help him.
 

buckooo1978

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,772
bad news for Fellaini

Zlatan is Plan B with outrageous skill

If only we had a quarter decent crosser
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
Against teams playing very low I think it can work since we then need more players in the box and having 2 top quality strikers in it can be very positive for us.

In big games though it will not work at all though. Far too little mobility and well just hoofballs will not work either. Mourinho doesn't even play both Martial and Rashford that track back better most of the time. It gives us more options though.

Hopefully Mourinho is not stupid enough to try to shoehorn together. Given that he tried Zlatan plus Rooney that everyone knew would fail I have my doubt though. Mourinho can do stupid things at times like selling De Bruyne, Salah and Lukaku from Chelsea.
 

Darkhorsez

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
3,160
Location
Canada
I’ll be very surprised if Mou starts both for any games. I think it is more likely one or the other being subbed in when we are chasing a game - most likely the sub being Zlatan.
 

Antonedwin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
371
Didn't see Zlatan doing it either last year.
Zlatan needs to be a backup to Lukaku and we should play a proper 10 in the role or give Mata a go till we buy someone in Jan.
We don't have proper 10. Our options are mkhi , lingard , mata . All in poor form while lingard is average

Rooney play as our 10 for the last 3 seasons.
Zlatan is stronger , have better first touch , doesn't always pass to Valencia & fitter than him , i can't see him doing worse than rooney
Don't see Ibrahimovic playing as a #10. We will probably see them playing upfront together in the 3-5-2 though.
He played as 10 or 9 1/2 for 80% of his career
When was the last time we saw a run beyond the forwards from one of our midfielders?
When pogba play
We don't need more than 1 box to box mf

Zlatan with lukaku in front will work. There is no doubt about it
Now Lukaku don't have to be our focal point anymore , he can focus on running in channels
 
Last edited:

SAFicus

New Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Messages
387
...............................De Gea
..............Jones.......Bailly......Rojo
Valencia.....................................Martial/Young
.......................Matic.......Pogba
..............................Fellaini
....................Lukaku.........Zlatan

Imagine the long balls :nervous:
 

The Red Roman

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
210
Location
Northampton
I think they can work well together because they basically do opposite things. Last season Ibrahimovic was our number 9, he often moved deep from a lone centre-forward role to link play in deep area's. This was great in certain games but ultimately United didn't have enough pace running beyond him to stretch the opposition both ways, which is what Lukaku could provide. I could certainly see Ibrahimovic playing a number 10 role behind Lukaku in a 4-2-3-1 against sides who come to Old Trafford and play deep. I think he would link United's play better in deep area's before getting into the box to join Lukaku and provide us with another penalty box threat from crosses. In the bigger games we could shift to a 3-5-2 and have the combination of hold-up play and threat in the channels with those two together up front. I am excited by these possibilities but the big man will need time to get up to speed so for now he will be an option from the bench.
 

The Mad Manc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
606
Location
Hong Kong
I can see it working with Ibra as a deep lying forward and Lukaku as the advanced striker. Ibra is much better at holding the ball up which would free Lukaku from this role and allow him to use his pace to get in behind. With Pogba's passing ability also coming back into the side I can see this working really well.

Ibra is not a number 10 in the traditional sense. He isn't going to get on the ball, dictate play and open defences with cute little passes. In my opinion, Mata is the only player in our first team that is a proper number 10, but for some inexplicable reason he never gets a game there.
 

El Chino

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
170
He played as a second striker for Capello at Juve behind Trezeguet. He had 16 goals to his name in his first season. There's absolutely no reason why it wouldn't work. What he may have lost in pace can be rectified with better anticipation and movement which comes with experience.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,818
Wasn't sure before but after watching how Mkhitaryan killed so many attacks, I don't think this would be worse move. Zlatan has technical ability to unlock defenses, only drawback would be his lack of work rate which is very important.

Will be interesting to watch when both starts.
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
He played as a second striker for Capello at Juve behind Trezeguet. He had 16 goals to his name in his first season. There's absolutely no reason why it wouldn't work. What he may have lost in pace can be rectified with better anticipation and movement which comes with experience.
Because Zlatan plays exactly like he did when he was 22 and Football has not changed at all since then. Plus Trezeguet was often injured that season so did not start up top together a ton that season.
 

prtk0811

New Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2016
Messages
7,854
The biggest problem last season was we were over-reliant on him, for goals and creativity. Imagine bringing roughly that player in now, and everything being bonus?
Biggest problem was he kept dropping deep as a no 9 so no one was in the box to stretch it and also the balance of mid with no matic type player.
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,786
Don't know if it will be any good but I think Mourinho will start both in the future.
 

TheRedHearted

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
2,679
Location
New York, NY
He’ll come in for a maximum of 15 minutes tomorrow. In 3 weeks he can start. If they are smart that is. But I do agree. Martial, Rashford out wide, three at the back, matic Herrera and Pogba midfield and Lukaku up front with Zlatan behind him. Back three of Rojo, Lindelof and Bially. I know it’s stupid to give Lindelof the start just because of his international performance but that’s just ideally speaking. Young, Lingard, Mkhi subs on the wings (sadly that’s the extent of our depth, specifically in regards o Lingard.
 

El Chino

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
170
Because Zlatan plays exactly like he did when he was 22 and Football has not changed at all since then. Plus Trezeguet was often injured that season so did not start up top together a ton that season.
So you're telling me a man who is famously adaptable cannot revisit a position he had played before. I might add with considerable success for two seasons and at a time when he was much less experienced and still raw.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
Ibra would play a SS/10 hybrid i reckon. His vision is fairly good. Only issue is pace and we all see the likes of mata ozil and all play there.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Ibra would play a SS/10 hybrid i reckon. His vision is fairly good. Only issue is pace and we all see the likes of mata ozil and all play there.
They are far more mobile than Zlatan though. It is not about pace but dynamism. Zlatan covers only 8km per game and that was when he was a bit younger. Your No 10 must be one of the most mobile players in the team, no matter whether employed as a SS or a playmaker. Already before Zlatan United have had the worst work rate among the top 10 (not top 6) teams. With Zlatan it can get only worse.

Zlakaku could work against poor opposition because you don't need a high work rate to beat such teams, especially at home.
 

buckooo1978

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,772
Happy Zlatan Day everyone.......

I for one am very excited - his return along with Pogba is exactly the shot in the arm we need after the last series of games were awful

a good win today and we can rebuild momentum
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
I'm intrigued. I'm thinking they will be a handful for the back line and open spaces for our pacey wide players.

Fellani, Zlatan, Ron, Matic, Pogba - can't wait.
 

IAmAWinner

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2016
Messages
1,293
Shame the Perisic deal didn't go through, his crosses have given many assists to midget Icardi this season, imagine what he would do with Ibra, Lukaku and big man Felli in the box, assists for days.
 

settembrini

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
3,283
He played as 10 or 9 1/2 for 80% of his career
Not that much and not for a long time now.

Besides Mourinho has always been clear that he wants his #10s to contribute defensively and help the midfield. That's why he wouldn't play Hazard there for Chelsea and why he won't play Mata there for us. Ibrahimovic will be played as a striker this season, same as last season and when they were at Inter together.
 

EyeInTheSky

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Messages
9,992
Location
On my sofa enjoying pineapple on its own
Zlatan at PSG, despite his crazy goalscoring record, was basically their number 10 and main creator.
Their are still so many who think he can't play as a 10 or he's not a good option or just people generally oblivious that's his actual main position for the majority of the clubs he has played for. Despite being phenomenal as a 10 at WC level and winning every league he's played in. He even did an interview saying exactly that and it's his best and preferred position. Yet people still persist...
 

Mcking

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
6,015
Location
Nigeria
They could play together in a 352, but that will mean Rashford and Martial will inevitably struggle to get enough minutes to continue their development and justify them being here. Our lack of quality wingbacks with solid if not fantastic delivery makes it near improbable we will continue permanently with that formation anyway.
That is the case too in a 442 too. It could be a great remisence to the two-striker era but for our lack of a genuine winger(s) capable of whipping in crosses if not getting chalk on his/their boots - which is a necessity in a two-striker formation.
Our current wide options, Martial, Rashford, Mkhitaryan and Mata are all inclined to come infield meaning it will be a 4222, but we don't have the luxury of rampaging fullbacks to play that formation; and in the case of Rashford and Martial, a 424, a formation that has hardly been tried nor trusted in the Premier League.
All points to Jose's favourite 4231, meaning Zlatan will be giving the luxury if not restricted to the No.10 role behind Lukaku. Although he's got great technique, but there're doubts he has the creative awareness, mobility and vision to permanently and consistently pick out passes from that position.
Zlatan in the No.10/SS role in the De Piero and Baggio mold is probably the way to play him together with Lukaku; and uncomplicated by our lack of a genuine No.10 and the fact it will allow Martial and Rashford to continue their campaign as the battle for a dominant spot on the LW heats up, it looks the best bet.
Martial and Rashford should be encouraged to stay wider and provide crosses too, to compensate for our wide deficiency.
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,356
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Their are still so many who think he can't play as a 10 or he's not a good option or just people generally oblivious that's his actual main position for the majority of the clubs he has played for. Despite being phenomenal as a 10 at WC level and winning every league he's played in. He even did an interview saying exactly that and it's his best and preferred position. Yet people still persist...
Because not many were actually watching him prior to Utd if we are being honest
 

Zlaatan

Parody Account
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Messages
3,789
Location
Sweden
Not that much and not for a long time now.

Besides Mourinho has always been clear that he wants his #10s to contribute defensively and help the midfield. That's why he wouldn't play Hazard there for Chelsea and why he won't play Mata there for us. Ibrahimovic will be played as a striker this season, same as last season and when they were at Inter together.
He played as a nr.10 for roughly the last decade for Sweden and 4 out of the last 5 years at club level.