Michael Owen | Not getting a new contract

Are you glad Michael Owen is staying


  • Total voters
    192
  • Poll closed .

Drifter

American
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
68,432
Michael Owen reveals on Twitter he is still searching for new club

Michael Owen says he is still waiting for a "good opportunity" ahead of the new season, but has again said he will not drop down to the Championship.

Ex-England striker Owen, 32, insisted in May he would not retire despite being released by Manchester United after three seasons at Old Trafford.

"If a good opportunity doesn't come my way then so be it," tweeted Owen.

"I know I can still bang them in at the top level. I proved that nearly every time I played for Manchester United."


Owen moved to Old Trafford on a free transfer in 2009, and he scored nine goals in his first season - including the winner in his side's 4-3 victory in the Manchester derby.

His appearances became less frequent in his second year at the club, when he scored five goals in all competitions, before he netted three times in four outings last term.

He made just one Premier League appearance, however, and his last outing was in the Champions League at the beginning of November.

But Owen believes he still has something to offer in the top-flight - and he said he would not consider dropping down a division to join a Championship club.

"At 32, I've still got a few years in me," he said.

"At this stage of my career it has to be something that I'm going to enjoy doing.

"Not being disrespectful when I say I wouldn't play in the Championship. Always said I wouldn't drop down the leagues like some have done.

"After playing for Liverpool, Real Madrid, Newcastle, Man Utd and England, I don't think I would enjoy that football."



At this rate he may be still with us at the start of the season.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,877
If I was him I wouldn't be burning bridges as he's currently doing. The brochure guy is nowhere near to what he used to be.
 

buckooo1978

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,777
He's obviously still a Premier League standard player and he's right to assert it - he'd be a good addition to most squads in the premier league
 

buckooo1978

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,777
I dont see it myself
well last season he scored 3 in 4 appearances

If he gets a bit of luck he could do a decent job and maybe get 15/20 games for a team like Sunderland/Villa/etc

He could also be a good impact sub for most teams

The injuries may have destroyed his explosive pace but he can still finish
 

buckooo1978

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,777
You only play if you're good enough and fit.
I take your point about fitness but Berbatov could barely get a start last season

Berbatov who was top scorer in the league the previous season

Owen's lack of game time says more about our strength in depth up front

Diouf couldn't get a game,went to Germany and did very well

The fact is that when all fit Owen won't be among the 3/4 strikers in a match day squad given the qualities of Rooney/Hernandez/Welbeck/Berbatov
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,482
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
He's an odd little chap. I'm glad he's gone.

He seems to have a slightly inflated opinion of himself. Sure he can get a goal or two but you can't look past his injury record. Any PL club would be taking a huge gamble giving up one of their valuable 25 first-team places to someone who spent so much of the last two seasons unable for selection.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,453
well last season he scored 3 in 4 appearances

If he gets a bit of luck he could do a decent job and maybe get 15/20 games for a team like Sunderland/Villa/etc

He could also be a good impact sub for most teams

The injuries may have destroyed his explosive pace but he can still finish
I actually don't rate his finishing. It's his positioning that's excellent.
 

Hectic

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
75,357
Supports
30fps
Never understood the point of actually getting him, his minimal input/impact was predicted and expected before he came. Yes, he obviously has contributed over his time here, but let's be honest, in the smallest of ways. He seemed a very pointless signing, and even weirder was the decision in giving him the Number 7 shirt, which admittedly I don't care all that much about, but it seemed a bit stupid to hand such an iconic shirt to someone who would barely feature in his time here, something that had to be expected. All in all, I have a lot more respect for him now then I did before, I'm not sure why, but he just seems like a decent professional and good sort, but as a player he seemed, and has largely proved to be, a pointless purchase.
 

buckooo1978

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
13,777
Was never a Manchester United player and should have stuck to clubs mid to low table

The signing was odd - the fact that Fergie extended his contract was odder - he must have seen something in training/limited games he played

Nevertheless some of the mid to lower league teams could make some use of him and there are rumours stoke are in for him I think
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,453
He'll end up at a Premier League side but probably towards the end of the window. It's still early days and most will still be going for their first or second choice targets you'd have though.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,482
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Never understood the point of actually getting him, his minimal input/impact was predicted and expected before he came. Yes, he obviously has contributed over his time here, but let's be honest, in the smallest of ways. He seemed a very pointless signing, and even weirder was the decision in giving him the Number 7 shirt, which admittedly I don't care all that much about, but it seemed a bit stupid to hand such an iconic shirt to someone who would barely feature in his time here, something that had to be expected. All in all, I have a lot more respect for him now then I did before, I'm not sure why, but he just seems like a decent professional and good sort, but as a player he seemed, and has largely proved to be, a pointless purchase.
I can see the point in signing him. At the time, Rooney and Berbatov were our only two strikers - with Welbeck, Diouf and Macheda as potential back-ups, none of whom looked ready for regular first-team football yet. Made sense to get someone in who was an experienced, senior pro yet willing to spend a lot of time on the bench and on a short enough contract that we could cut him loose as soon as one or other of the young 'uns came good.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,940
Location
Dublin, Ireland
he's a goalscorer

promoted teams usually have trouble getting enough goals to stay up, they could do worse than look at Owen
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,940
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I can see the point in signing him. At the time, Rooney and Berbatov were our only two strikers - with Welbeck, Diouf and Macheda as potential back-ups, none of whom looked ready for regular first-team football yet. Made sense to get someone in who was an experienced, senior pro yet willing to spend a lot of time on the bench and on a short enough contract that we could cut him loose as soon as one or other of the young 'uns came good.
precisely

Im sure Fergie knew precisely how many games he could expect from Owen and where he expected to use him. He knew that he was getting a good experienced Pro, who has scored goals at every level he's played at

His movement is superb and im sure Welbeck learnt a lot from that
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,921
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
It would obviously come down to wages but a mid to lower table club could do a lot worse than have him in their side even if it's for 15-20 games a season. I'd fancy him for 8-10 goals which would put him amongst the top scorers.
 

el eric

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
4,795
Location
Sunny Dublin
He's doesnt need the money ( he's a nice set up with his stables ect ) so only playing top level is his decision really and it a fair one to make. Probably better off going out at the top that fading out through the lower leagues or going like robbie fowler and travelling the world playing in shitty leagues.
 

Adebesi

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
19,159
Location
Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
Never understood the point of actually getting him, his minimal input/impact was predicted and expected before he came. Yes, he obviously has contributed over his time here, but let's be honest, in the smallest of ways. He seemed a very pointless signing, and even weirder was the decision in giving him the Number 7 shirt, which admittedly I don't care all that much about, but it seemed a bit stupid to hand such an iconic shirt to someone who would barely feature in his time here, something that had to be expected. All in all, I have a lot more respect for him now then I did before, I'm not sure why, but he just seems like a decent professional and good sort, but as a player he seemed, and has largely proved to be, a pointless purchase.
Greetings, Nail. Allow me to introduce a very good friend of mine, Head.
 

Denis' cuff

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7,775
Location
here
I think he's reaping the benefits of being burned out at Liverpool when he wasn't fully developed. If you've ever seen the movie "El Cid", that was Michael Owen, practically playing on crutches. Desperate club. Not the only player either. Tragic waste and misuse of an outstanding player.
 

Hectic

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
75,357
Supports
30fps
I can see the point in signing him. At the time, Rooney and Berbatov were our only two strikers - with Welbeck, Diouf and Macheda as potential back-ups, none of whom looked ready for regular first-team football yet. Made sense to get someone in who was an experienced, senior pro yet willing to spend a lot of time on the bench and on a short enough contract that we could cut him loose as soon as one or other of the young 'uns came good.
I didn't see it. In theory, it sounded great, but the problem was his fitness. He was always going to have problems with injuries, I couldn't see him as reliable back-up. He did play a fair few games in that first season mind, but I still think we could have done without him. To be honest, his attitude and expense meant that the decision was really trivial, it certainly didn't hurt to have him at the club, and he has definitely helped our younger strikers there is no question there. I think if we were really looking at cover for a bare strikeforce, we could have been a bit more adventerous than Owen, but how realistic that is is another question, as mentioned he came with perks. He's had so many injury problems throughout his career though, I'm not sure how much you can actually rely on him for anything, it was only ever really going to be a case of keeping the bench warm.
 

WR

Frankie Barwell ITK
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
15,581
Location
Well done he’s 13
I think his self-inflated opinion of himself is his regret of never having the career he could have had. It's as if he's trying to make up for his injuries and poor career choices by pretending he can still offer a lot to top clubs. He's clearly not satisfied with how his career has panned out and is seemingly trying to re-prove himself.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,482
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I didn't see it. In theory, it sounded great, but the problem was his fitness. He was always going to have problems with injuries, I couldn't see him as reliable back-up. He did play a fair few games in that first season mind, but I still think we could have done without him. To be honest, his attitude and expense meant that the decision was really trivial, it certainly didn't hurt to have him at the club, and he has definitely helped our younger strikers there is no question there. I think if we were really looking at cover for a bare strikeforce, we could have been a bit more adventerous than Owen, but how realistic that is is another question, as mentioned he came with perks. He's had so many injury problems throughout his career though, I'm not sure how much you can actually rely on him for anything, it was only ever really going to be a case of keeping the bench warm.
I guess the logic was that he'd never played as back-up before. I presume Fergie thought using him sparingly might make him less likely to spend the whole time crocked. He could give him a long time to recover between games and have a low threshold for making him rest if he had a niggle. Obviously that didn't turn out well but meh, hindsight.
 

Spoony

The People's President
Joined
Oct 27, 2001
Messages
63,273
Location
Leve Palestina.
I didn't see it. In theory, it sounded great, but the problem was his fitness. He was always going to have problems with injuries, I couldn't see him as reliable back-up. He did play a fair few games in that first season mind, but I still think we could have done without him. To be honest, his attitude and expense meant that the decision was really trivial, it certainly didn't hurt to have him at the club, and he has definitely helped our younger strikers there is no question there. I think if we were really looking at cover for a bare strikeforce, we could have been a bit more adventerous than Owen, but how realistic that is is another question, as mentioned he came with perks. He's had so many injury problems throughout his career though, I'm not sure how much you can actually rely on him for anything, it was only ever really going to be a case of keeping the bench warm.
I'm with you, Hecto. I reckon Fergie actually thought he'd have played considerably more times than he did, which is why he was given the number 7. But yeah pointless signing, I rather we'd spent that cash on someone less prone to being crocked.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,940
Location
Dublin, Ireland
considering at the time we had Rooney & Berba as our main strikers, Chico and Welbeck developing im just wondering who you guys thought we should be bringing in? Owen served a purpose, play when the others needed a rest, and to help develop the young uns. I repeat, i bet Welbeck and Chico learnt a lot from observing his movement
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,635
I didn't really agree with the signing, but I reckon Pogue's right in terms of Fergie's reasons. I'm sure he thought that if he only played every other game or less he'd be much less prone to injuries. Sadly his body is so fecked that he only has maybe a dozen games in him a season if he's lucky.
 

Hectic

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
75,357
Supports
30fps
I'm with you, Hecto. I reckon Fergie actually thought he'd have played considerably more times than he did, which is why he was given the number 7. But yeah pointless signing, I rather we'd spent that cash on someone less prone to being crocked.
Same here. That for me was the indicator we planned to use Owen a hell of a lot more than we did, otherwise we simply would not have put such an iconic shirt anywhere near him. Why would we give the Number 7 shirt to someone who would barely feature? It seemed like a strange one really, there was always a question of fitness and injury, because it had been evident at Madrid and of course before that. Hindsight is a great thing though, and perhaps he could have had a stronger impact if he'd been fitter, but that's the risk you take when you sign known crocked players, much like why we wouldn't take it Saha in a few years time if we were light on strikers, because he is unreliable. I'd like to know from other players what it's been like to train with and around him though, perhaps that sort of thing is invaluable to developing youngsters.
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,785
Location
Mumbai
Its a mixed bag really. It surely made sense in terms of getting a proven experienced goalscorer on the cheap. But his injury record was always going to be tricky and in the end, his injuries meant he didnt play as much of a part as everyone expected. Was always going to be a risk and with our record with injuries, not really a surprise it didnt work out great.

Still think youngsters like Welbeck and Hernandez would have learnt a lot from him. Rooney too actually. Owen's ability and sense to be at the right spot at the right time is brilliant, must have passed it on.

Giving him the No 7 really irked me though. With the players that had held the jersey before him, Owen getting it was weird. But then Ronaldo's imapct and hype meant whoever picked it next was going to be scrutinized and compared to him so probably a good idea not to give it to one of our regulars.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,921
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
I'm with you, Hecto. I reckon Fergie actually thought he'd have played considerably more times than he did, which is why he was given the number 7. But yeah pointless signing, I rather we'd spent that cash on someone less prone to being crocked.
I think giving him the Number 7 was more about talking the stigma off the number following Ronaldo than expecting Owen to live up to it.
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,785
Location
Mumbai
Same here. That for me was the indicator we planned to use Owen a hell of a lot more than we did, otherwise we simply would not have put such an iconic shirt anywhere near him. It seemed like a strange one really, there was always a question of fitness and injury, because it had been evident at Madrid and of course before that. Hindsight is a great thing though, and perhaps he could have had a stronger impact if he'd been fitter, but that's the risk you take when you signed crocked players, much like why we wouldn't take it Saha in a few years time if we are light on strikers, because he is unreliable. I'd like to know what it's been like to train with and around him though, perhaps that sort of thing is invaluable to developing youngsters.
I actually think he'd have gotten the jersey regardless. The entire media hype around Ronaldo and his huge impact on us the last couple of seasons he was here meant whoever got the jersey would have been scrutinized and compared to him. Could be the reason it was given to him rather than a young regular who might not take the attention too well.
 

Hectic

Full Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
75,357
Supports
30fps
Obviously, and for most the number of a shirt is irrelevant, but that's not to say United haven't played up to the effect over the years.