Static, slow motion zombie passing

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,340
Location
Flagg
They were never going to attack us. The problem was we didn't have any width and there was no space through the middle...but we're a bit short of wingers at the moment.

I thought the passing was very good, apart from when De Gea and the two centrebacks started dicking around as soon as we went a goal up.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
It was like watching Liverpool during Benitez' reign.

Shit on stick.
 

Randall Flagg

Worst of the best
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
45,064
Location
Gorey
Very hard to judge or take much for the game last night.

I think we still desperately need Scholes to play, but it’s who we play along side him is the issue
 

Forevergiggs

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
3,216
Location
Gypsy
I don't like the idea of all three of Fletcher, Anderson and Cleverley starting unless it's a tougher opposition and we need to play possession, extremely defensive football.

I would like one of Ando and Clev paired with Carrick or a fit Fletcher with the Kagawa being one of the three in the midfield. For opposition like yesterday, who are just hell bent on defending and nothing else we need someone who has the ability to make that defense piercing pass through the middle. Someone who can also do little step-overs and has the ability to charge into the box and force the defense to make mistakes. Kagawa is better suited for that than Cleverley.

Also, like you guys already mentioned, we need to play with at least one of our wingers to provide width to spread the field. Yesterday was too narrow and too easy to defend for my liking.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,206
Location
La-La-Land
Very hard to judge or take much for the game last night.

I think we still desperately need Scholes to play, but it’s who we play along side him is the issue
As someone pointed out last week Scholes is not only good for our game and not suited for all opponents we play against.

In general, we are too slow in the build up and there is not enough movement off the ball. Another thing is the attitude that we have which sometimes is just not right - too casual, no urgency in our play and we are not pressing enough
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
In a 4-3-3 the fullbacks need to be the width.

Raf and evra played too conservatively yesterday, but we were clearly wary of their counter attacks.

Some of you are never happy. Run the game and keep possession = boring.

4-4-2, be wide open and score goals/let goals in and people complain we don't keep the ball
 

Randall Flagg

Worst of the best
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
45,064
Location
Gorey
As someone pointed out last week Scholes is not only good for our game and not suited for all opponents we play against.

In general, we are too slow in the build up and there is not enough movement off the ball. Another thing is the attitude that we have which sometimes is just not right - too casual, no urgency in our play and we are not pressing enough
Scholes is suited to play anyone assuming he is fit. We need to work out who plays around him to make it click.
 

Forevergiggs

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
3,216
Location
Gypsy
There is a difference between complaint and observation.

We have not perfected a system yet. Neither of the two approaches is ideal. Perfection lies somewhere in the middle, imo.

I keep repeating it, and will do it once more, we are a team in transition with regards to a 3 man midfield or variations of a 4-2-3-1 formation.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
The joy has been sucked out of this team. We don't play fast, exciting football anymore. We're so fecking boring to watch it's untrue.
True

We've only played decent 45 minutes during this season. That's because Nani, and Rooney were at their best.
 

Ash_G

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
7,402
Thing is that sort of game is perfect for scholes, they were sitting if us completely. Against a team with more ambition who will attack that's where he struggles.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,206
Location
La-La-Land
Scholes is suited to play anyone assuming he is fit. We need to work out who plays around him to make it click.
Not against teams that press us and play fast attacking football. He is perfect for games when the other team sits back and he has the time to distribute the ball and make us play
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,694
Location
india
They were never going to attack us. The problem was we didn't have any width and there was no space through the middle...but we're a bit short of wingers at the moment.

I thought the passing was very good, apart from when De Gea and the two centrebacks started dicking around as soon as we went a goal up.
Yeah, I agree. Yesterday's passing through the central areas coupled with wide players like Nani to run at defenders and open up space is ideal. While yesterday we passed it around much better it didn't do much damage most of the time because they Cruj knew there was no threat from out wide and hence could crowd up the central areas.
 

Randall Flagg

Worst of the best
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
45,064
Location
Gorey
Not against teams that press us and play fast attacking football. He is perfect for games when the other team sits back and he has the time to distribute the ball and make us play
I disagree with this and always have done. Scholes is great at finding space and if he has one or even two mobile midfielders either side of him there should be no problems.
 

hungrywing

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
10,225
Location
Your Left Ventricle
Nice to see how yesterday's lineup is bringing out a lot of intelligent discussion.

I think there's a good reason for all the: "Hmm, this actually looks a bit interesting. What if we tossed a winger in there somewhere?" reactions. Yes, it was against a Cluj side who weren't going to pressure us, but at the same time I think we were one wide player (and him occasionally drifting wide and beating some men and whipping in crosses) away from the caf being almost unanimously positive about last night's display. We definitely have the personnel to play that sort of interchanging system. Hope we see some more of it this season.
 

Devilton

New Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
6,443
Scholes is suited to play anyone assuming he is fit. We need to work out who plays around him to make it click.
No...he's really not.

Scholes is a midfield liability against teams that have energetic midfielders who can sit back and soak pressure when we are attacking but have the pace and awareness to hit us on the counter attack. Spuds did that well in the first half when they overran our midfield with shocking regularity. Other teams will do the same because Scholes offers very little cover in a defensive sense.
 

Devilton

New Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
6,443
The joy has been sucked out of this team. We don't play fast, exciting football anymore. We're so fecking boring to watch it's untrue.
This.

Even against teams that barely attack us we're passing side to side for 20 minutes and constantly going backwards trying to keep the ball but doing feck all in an attacking sense.

People used to say that tiki taka football Barca / Arsenal play is boring and it definitely can be...but we're just as bad, if not worse.
 

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,872
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
It sure is a bother that we slack off so much after a one goal lead.

This always has the potential to backfire but I felt we played quite well over large parts of the game yesterday.

But like some have mentioned our FBs need to get forward more if we play without wingers.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
What the feck is the complaining about here?

We were away from home in a competition that we got knocked out of last year for being totally inept. We are notorious for playing cautiously away from home and dragging out the wins/draws we need in the CL and that's exactly what happened last night. The only thing wrong with the performance was the defense, who were shambolic at times.
 

Adebesi

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
19,159
Location
Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
Cina is right. Exciting games in the CL group stages featuring Manchester United are a collectors item these days and have been for some years. We did the job and looked completely in control. For exciting games and attacking football, this was never the right place to look.
 

Talking Vulture

He's shit, move on.
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
4,310
Location
In with the Leeds scum
Twiggs - apart from 45 mins v Spurs and arguably the CC game v Newcastle, how much good football have we actually played? And v Spurs, we were forced into attacking, we didn't play like that because we wanted to. We'd have been just as shit to watch if we went in at half time 0-0
 

Devilton

New Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
6,443
good football?

Has anyone been watching our defense or midfield lately?

On what planet is that considered good?

Name one player besides Scholes in our midfield who has been good...Anderson, Clev, Carrick, Valencia, Nani have all been ok. That's about it. Giggs has been poor.

The same is true for our defense. Besides Rafael who's been good? Rio, Evans have been ok that's about it. Evra has been gash...

It's only in attack we have a few really good / great players...and even there i'd be hard pressed to say Hernandez or Welbeck have been wowing us with their performances.

People say we've been good and i'm not quite sure if we're watching the same team to be honest.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
The last time we got into the final we were boring as feck in the group stages despite playing well in the league, including (if I remember correctly) two really boring draws against Rangers and Valencia, which is what prompted Randall Flagg to make his thread.

We dominated the game yesterday and other than terrible defending from some of our defenders we had no real issues, which is a far cry from the joke performances we saw last season.
 

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,872
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
I was referring to last game where most of our team looked promising.

Okay it was against cluj but I think it was a positive development the way we played yesterday especially because we have been so bad the games before that.

So if recently refers to our last game I'd say they are right but if recently includes our last handful of games of course we haven't been good, not even okay most of the times.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,340
Location
Flagg
I didn't see the issue with last night. You generally don't get exciting games against teams that defend with every player on the edge of their own box, even when they're losing.

Our passing and tempo was actually pretty good I thought...a lot better than it generally has been in the previous games league and champions league games. What we were missing was anoyne to stretch the game out wide. Evra kept cutting inside for some reason, which didn't help.

The only annoying thing was we got slack just when they started tiring and leaving gaps everywhere.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
Quite a few of the people moaning about our performance last night are also people who didn't like the idea of us playing without wingers, cause it's so against club policy and all.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
Quite a few of the people moaning about our performance last night are also people who didn't like the idea of us playing without wingers, cause it's so against club policy and all.
Well at least they're consistent.

I'm not happy with our performance last night, for one reason: we stopped playing football after taking the lead. That seems to be a club policy as well, a fecking retarded one.
 

KingEric7

Stupid Conspiracy Enthusiast Wanker
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
24,005
You can understand people sort of wondering what we were doing just walking round with the ball and not showing much adventure. I suppose there was probably a bit of caution given the worry of conceding a late goal to a team that were so obviously quite poor in a competition that we really bollocksed up last year.

We need to sort out our willingness to move forward with the ball and our movement off it though, no doubt. These are very simple things that would improve us tenfold.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,956
Location
Editing my own posts.
I was pretty happy with last night. Some of the "shit on a stick, sucking the life out of football" complaints are fecking retarded if you don't mind me saying.

We've been notoriously awful in midfield lately, with everyone (rightly) blaming our static central mid and reliance on wingers, so we tried something completely different and it looked like the germ of something interesting. It wasn't perfect, and it's not going to happen overnight, but with the important partnerships of Rooney & RVP/Ando & Clev not having a huge amount of game time together, I was heartened by their performances and when it did click, it clicked well. Certainly compared to the predictable dirge of the last few weeks.

Suck a dick haters.
 

londonredmaniac

I suffer delusions of grandeur
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
18,656
Location
Mid life crisis
It's always going to be diificult when you have 11 behind the ball!

I thought Clev found himself in some great positions.
 

INF-AMOS

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
1,723
Location
Closet Muppet
That was Kagawa's kind of game last night, would have prefered him to Ando with Cleverley and Fletcher sat just behind.
 

Bross

Noggie Pez Dispenser
Joined
May 14, 2011
Messages
9,162
Location
Chillin with Giggsy at the Retardment Castle
We need to play something like this:

Rafael - Evans - Ferdinand - Evra
-----------Carrick-------------
---------------Anderson
Valencia-----------Kagawa
----------Rooney
----------------- RVP

One winger for width so we dont end up congesting the middle like yesterday. We cant play two out and out wingers if we want to utilize our front 3 of Kagawa, Rooney and RVP to the max.

And no Scholes - Carrick partnership. That just leads to a huge gap between them and the attacking players that the opposition midfield can use to do whatever they want.
 

Care_de_Bobo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
2,375
Good away performance I thought, Cluj are no pub team as some would have you believe and considering we've got another big game at the weekend it's not surprising we just played keep ball once we took the lead, especially considering the amount of defensive injuries we have at the minute.

You have to remember as well that Fletcher, Anderson, Cleverley, Rooney and Hernandez haven't played that much football recently and were playing in a pretty unfamiliar system which I though they adapted to quite well especially in the first half. Anderson actually contributed right up until the final whistle as well which is progress for him.

I agree that we haven't been at our best pretty much all season but I have no complaints after that performance considering last years campaign.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
We were hardly playing one of Europe's elite teams to make much of a judgement from that performance.

I want the orgasmic United back, once in a while.