Bergkamp is overrated.

KM

I’m afraid I just blue myself
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
49,788
I think moaning about the list is a bit strange. The voters(including me) are mostly young and have only voted on the basis of players they have watched regularly. Hence the old timers might find that the players in 90's and 00's are overrated as compared to players in 80's or older.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
Nah Ronaldo was better. He had everything.
So does Cristiano? I'm not a Cristiano fanboy by any means, but he has the greatest goals to minutes ratio of any player in the history of Real Madrid. Di Stefanio, Sanchez, Puskas, Raul and yes, even Luis Ronaldo. Those that say Brazillian Ronaldo was better are just wearing those childhood nostalgia specs a litttle too tightly imo.
 

Sewelly The Geordie

Full Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2010
Messages
3,477
Location
The palm of Mike Ashley's hand
So does Cristiano? I'm not a Cristiano fanboy by any means, but he has the greatest goals to minutes ratio of any player in the history of Real Madrid. Di Stefanio, Sanchez, Puskas, Raul and yes, even Luis Ronaldo. Those that say Brazillian Ronaldo was better are just wearing those childhood nostalgia specs a litttle too tightly imo.
Ronaldo was the absolute perfect combination of pace, power, dribbling ability, ball control, natural skill and lethal finishing. Not to mention having excellent vision (better than Cronaldo and probably Messi in that department). Without the injury I reckon he'd be considered the greatest of all time.

Plus he's the greatest WC goalscorer ever, lest us forget.
 

Wonder Pigeon

'Shelbourne FC Supporter'
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
21,641
Location
Forza Shelbourne
Supports
Shelbourne
Bergkamp was pretty damn good. His partnership with Henry is right among the top of the best I've seen.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
Ronaldo was the absolute perfect combination of pace, power, dribbling ability, ball control, natural skill and lethal finishing. Not to mention having excellent vision (better than Cronaldo and probably Messi in that department). Without the injury I reckon he'd be considered the greatest of all time.

Plus he's the greatest WC goalscorer ever, lest us forget.
Pace aside, Messi and Cristiano both surpass L.Ronaldo in all those things.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
Have to agree with Sewelly on the Ronaldo thing. When you see him as a youngster it's ridiculous how good he was and he's right when he says he had everything. If anything, I'd say that he could've been even better than he eventually was.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,217
Location
Montevideo
So does Cristiano? I'm not a Cristiano fanboy by any means, but he has the greatest goals to minutes ratio of any player in the history of Real Madrid. Di Stefanio, Sanchez, Puskas, Raul and yes, even Luis Ronaldo. Those that say Brazillian Ronaldo was better are just wearing those childhood nostalgia specs a litttle too tightly imo.
Cristiano is a great player and lately he also has a better record in the big games but I don't care much for records amassed in a two-horse race (who cares if he scores five against Almería?).

Ronaldo was absolutely immense though. On the big stage I would always rather have peak Ronaldo than peak Cristiano.

I wouldn't put it down to mentality or workrate. In fact the opposite, Cristiano probably tries too hard to shine while Ronaldo just shone brightly while clearly enjoying every minute of it. He was pure genius.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,854
So does Cristiano? I'm not a Cristiano fanboy by any means, but he has the greatest goals to minutes ratio of any player in the history of Real Madrid. Di Stefanio, Sanchez, Puskas, Raul and yes, even Luis Ronaldo. Those that say Brazillian Ronaldo was better are just wearing those childhood nostalgia specs a litttle too tightly imo.
Worth pointing out that Di Stefano wasn't a forward by any means and was far more influential in the build-up than Cristiano's ever been. Even at that his record in his first 4 seasons at Madrid was 124 in 140. Not that you were suggesting Ronaldo's a better player than Alfredo.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
Have to agree with Sewelly on the Ronaldo thing. When you see him as a youngster it's ridiculous how good he was and he's right when he says he had everything. If anything, I'd say that he could've been even better than he eventually was.
If and buts are pointless arguments, imo. C.Ronaldo and Messi are better now than L.Ronaldo ever was.
 

Cheesy

Bread with dipping sauce
Scout
Joined
Oct 16, 2011
Messages
36,181
If and buts are pointless arguments, imo. C.Ronaldo and Messi are better now than L.Ronaldo ever was.
Messi probably is, but I'd say C. Ronaldo hasn't completely suprassed L. Ronaldo just yet. He might by the end of his career though.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
Messi probably is, but I'd say C. Ronaldo hasn't completely suprassed L. Ronaldo just yet. He might by the end of his career though.
155 appearances 160 goals



His European record at Madrid is also (2010-11 aside), always a goal a game or better.
 

alastair

ignorant
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,310
Location
The Champions League
I've got to say, I preferred Henry myself.

There was just something about him that set him apart from Dennis. Maybe it was the youthful spirit, the explosion of pace, the panache, the arrogance. Such a Gallic charm.

Dennis was still a legend though.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
Messi and Cronaldo have better goalscoring stats in La Liga. Don't think anybody is arguing that.

I don't think they are better footballers than Ronaldo was. Certainly not the latter.
Messi easily is. Cristiano is also imo.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
58,119
Location
Krakow
I would have him on a similar level to Zidane over his career, if he is in the top 13 players to ever play the game is hard to say but suppose it's what you are looking for. Personally I would say what Scholes has done over say 16 years makes him a better player than Ronaldinho for what he done over 4 years although you do have to say for them 4 years he was one of the great players so people will always judge these things differently.
I love Scholes but there's no way he belongs to the top 20 footballers that ever played the game.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
Actually, pretty easy to forget Ronaldo scored 47 in 49 for Barcelona as a 20 year old. A Barcelona team that wasn't the force the current day version or Real Madrid are.
Fair point. That season aside he never reached those heights again. We shouldn't excuse him just because he got injured multiple times after that. Football isn't about "maybe"
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,686
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Fair point. That season aside he never reached those heights again. We shouldn't excuse him just because he got injured multiple times after that. Football isn't about "maybe"
The injuries explain why he never got close to replicating his early career form.Not an excuse because no one is at fault but to come back from them and still perform the way he had, for me in a way it's more impressive that the amazing consistent goalscoring Cristiano is producing
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
I missed one thing. His world cup performances in 2002 neared those heights. Bloody hell, he was magnificent. I still think on a consistent basis, C.Ronaldo and Messi are better.

:confused:

He was even better at Inter.
Goal scoring wise, no.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,217
Location
Montevideo
155 appearances 160 goals

His European record at Madrid is also (2010-11 aside), always a goal a game or better.
Yet overall he just won La Liga once.

Ronaldo won everything there was for a player to win, both in terms of tournaments and individual honours.

I'm not one to bring up cups and individual honours but feck me if "goals per game" spurts are the measure of a greatest ever player.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
Yet overall he just won La Liga once.

Ronaldo won everything there was for a player to win, both in terms of tournaments and individual honours.

I'm not one to bring up cups and individual honours but feck me if "goals per game" spurts are the measure of a greatest ever player.
Portugal are a good nation but they'll never reach the heights that Brazil reached between 1994-2002 and seeing as both Ronaldo's are forwards, I'd say goals per game are a huge measuring stick. Also, you're excluding Ronaldo's trophies at United? 3 leagues and a european cup?
 

Ronaldo No.9

Redcafe FIFA Champion 2010
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,300
Location
''Ronaldo was the attacker more difficult to tackl
I missed one thing. His world cup performances in 2002 neared those heights. Bloody hell, he was magnificent. I still think on a consistent basis, C.Ronaldo and Messi are better.



Goal scoring wise, no.
He developed his game further at Inter became more of a trequartista, in the 97/98 season he added over 20 assists aswell as the goals he scored.

He didn't score as many goals because the Italian league was far more defensive and had most of the worlds best defenders.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
But you see, he scored less goals!

Cristiano would have scored 60 goals a season in the Serie A in the 90s, just like he does in the SPL. Sorry, La Liga.

Oh for feck sake.
It's not like a Michael Owen/Bergkamp situation. Both Ronaldo's are easily in the top 10 players to have ever played the game, both complete forwards. So in this case I'd argue that goals are a important measure.

Over the course of their entire careers isn't Ronaldo's record better than Cronaldo's, both for club and country?

(since Lynk likes stats so much)
Few issues with that. L. Ronaldo's career is finished, and he played in lesser leagues.
 

paceme

Golly Gilmore
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
12,934
Location
“What’s the matter, lager boy, scared you might ta
Yet overall he just won La Liga once.

Ronaldo won everything there was for a player to win, both in terms of tournaments and individual honours.

I'm not one to bring up cups and individual honours but feck me if "goals per game" spurts are the measure of a greatest ever player.
To be fair he was playing in a brilliant Brazil side and a Madrid team with Zidane, Figo and Beckham in it.
 

Ronaldo No.9

Redcafe FIFA Champion 2010
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,300
Location
''Ronaldo was the attacker more difficult to tackl
Over the course of their entire careers isn't Ronaldo's record better than Cronaldo's, both for club and country?

(since Lynk likes stats so much)
Sao Cristovao: 15 / 15
Cruzeiro: 56 / 58
PSV: 55 / 57
Barcelona: 47 / 49
Inter: 41 / 55
Brazil squad: 39 / 47

Goals/Apps

Those are Ronaldo's stats before he suffered his second injury in April 2000.
 

Lynk

Obsessed with discrediting Danny Welbeck
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
14,976
Sao Cristovao: 15 / 15
Cruzeiro: 56 / 58
PSV: 55 / 57
Barcelona: 47 / 49
Inter: 41 / 55
Brazil squad: 39 / 47

Goals/Apps

Those are Ronaldo's stats before he suffered his second injury in April 2000.
Pretty sure those stats are wrong. He had well over 50 appearances for Cruzeiro. And he never broke the goals per game ratio at either Inter or Barca.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,217
Location
Montevideo
Portugal are a good nation but they'll never reach the heights that Brazil reached between 1994-2002 and seeing as both Ronaldo's are forwards, I'd say goals per game are a huge measuring stick.
I said everything there was to win, not just two WCs, two Copa America's and one WC runner-up place.

But while we are at this judging forwards on goals stuff... Ronaldo is the top WC goalscorer ever. While Cristiano doesn't play for Brazil he did get seven games on the way to a fourth place in 2006 and should have had more than four games in 2010 if he turned up. Eleven games overall, two goals. One against Iran, the other North Korea. You couldn't make it up.

Also, you're excluding Ronaldo's trophies at United? 3 leagues and a european cup?
Since you were banging on about goalscoring records I discarded those as his poor seasons, much like you discard Ronaldo at Inter.
 

JazzG

Resident Arse.
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,682
No doubt Ronaldo was better than Messi or C.Ronaldo imo, he was something else. He played in a La Liga which was far more competitive than the current offering and then went to Serie A which was possibly the strongest league in the world at the time and tore into the so called best defenders in the world. Messi and C.Ronaldo are special players but they are playing in a very weak league imo. Even after all his injuries he came back imo half the player he was, went to Real Madrid and was still banging in 30 goals a season there.

Some people are missin he point. Ignore that other thread now, the point being made is that I feel he is overated. He was a fantastic player but the hype and hysteria surrounding him sometimes -for me- goes a little too far, and I think nostalgia often influences people opinions on him.

As an overall player how could you argue he is better than Van Persie? Van Persie now hitting his prime scored close to 40 goals after his injury free season last time round. Something Bergkamp, an attacker, got no where near. Granted they are different players. However even the things people claim Bergkamp excelled at and is superior to Van Persie at -I.e technical brilliance- Van Persie is absolutely top draw and world class at. Yet the movement, goal scoring, influence and over all threat; Van Persie wins hands down.

Yet Van Persie as of now is nowhere close to being mentioned in people's top 25, even for the 17 year olds.

Maybe he will be in the future...
:lol:

I guess going by that logic Adebayor is better than Bergkamp as well.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,217
Location
Montevideo
Oh for feck sake.
It's not like a Michael Owen/Bergkamp situation. Both Ronaldo's are easily in the top 10 players to have ever played the game, both complete forwards. So in this case I'd argue that goals are a important measure.
It's not just how many but the tactics and quality of opposition. La Liga is currently a great hunting ground for flat-track bullies.

As above, 2006 Portugal made the semis and played for the third place, his sole goalscoring contribution was the one goal against fecking Iran.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,217
Location
Montevideo
To be fair he was playing in a brilliant Brazil side and a Madrid team with Zidane, Figo and Beckham in it.
He was also a beast at PSV, at Barca, at Inter... Everywhere he went he was phenomenal, but no, it was the other players. Right.