Dr. Dwayne
Self proclaimed tagline king.
Liked both Blur and Oasis but Blur edges it for me.
I like this caveat. "I don't like one of the most critically acclaimed bands of all time. But if I mention that other people don't either, my point will still stand.,"Don't like Radiohead at all and I'm not the only one.
Roses are massively overrated by everyone up north. One good album, half of which has dated. Smiths were seminal, but again, Mancs overrate them.80s had the Roses and the Smiths
What utter crap!Verve, love a handful of songs, don't care for the rest. Oasis did one and a half excellent albums. Don't like Radiohead at all and I'm not the only one. Again, like a handful of OCS's songs. Same with Blur. It's not that it's a shit decade, I just don't think it's that good. 80s had the Roses and the Smiths and probably someone else I'm forgetting, plus a load of ace hits on the pop side. Spice Girls represent 90s pop for me but I'd be happy for you to name some others.
OasisVerve, love a handful of songs, don't care for the rest. Oasis did one and a half excellent albums. Don't like Radiohead at all and I'm not the only one. Again, like a handful of OCS's songs. Same with Blur. It's not that it's a shit decade, I just don't think it's that good. 80s had the Roses and the Smiths and probably someone else I'm forgetting, plus a load of ace hits on the pop side. Spice Girls represent 90s pop for me but I'd be happy for you to name some others.
Why? Im absolutely on the moneyDon't know whether Sparky is wumming with his appraisal of Oasis's albums?
Be here now--Vastly underrated, don't read to much into it and don't compare it to the first two albums and it stands well as a kick ass rock album. 8/10
Exactly, its a good album that would have been even better had they not all been coked off their tits the entire timeI was thinking about saying that.
I really liked Be Here Now, the thing that drags it down is it was a lot of bravado and pomp of a band in their prime. If only Noel ever got the chance to do what he said he would and strip it of all the shit overdubbing and crap.
As for Blur, I disliked them back then. Time has let me appreciate them more though, and I do agree with those that say as musicians and song crafters they were always much better. Then again, weren't they educated that way? Overall though, I just think Oasis had the better and more ballsy rock tunes, and having seen both live back in the day, were a better gig too. Though the latter years Oasis were shite live IMHO.
Why? Im absolutely on the money
Exactly, its a good album that would have been even better had they not all been coked off their tits the entire time
I suppose this is one of the great things about music, how two people can listen to exactly the same thing and have such varied opinionsI don't really agree with it, I think you're overrating Be Here Now, Standing on the Shoulders of Giants (which is pretty poor) and Heathen Chemistry (which was a failed attempt and contains some of their worst stuff) whilst criminally underrating their last two. Don't believe the truth is a huge improvement on what they'd done in their three previous albums and Dig out your soul is basically a well constructed, well written and more mature Heathen Chemistry in parts.
Agree with the rest though, I absolutely love Familiar to Millions, one of the rare concerts I have on DVD.
I don't really agree with it, I think you're overrating Be Here Now, Standing on the Shoulders of Giants (which is pretty poor) and Heathen Chemistry (which was a failed attempt and contains some of their worst stuff) whilst criminally underrating their last two. Don't believe the truth is a huge improvement on what they'd done in their three previous albums and Dig out your soul is basically a well constructed, well written and more mature Heathen Chemistry in parts.
Agree with the rest though, I absolutely love Familiar to Millions, one of the rare concerts I have on DVD.
I'm not saying that that's the reason my point stands, I'm pointing out that Radiohead are probably the most polemic band of all time, and you will be aware I'm sure that for their many fans, there are as many people who absolutely hate their music.I like this caveat. "I don't like one of the most critically acclaimed bands of all time. But if I mention that other people don't either, my point will still stand.,"
Roses are massively overrated by everyone up north. One good album, half of which has dated. Smiths were seminal, but again, Mancs overrated them.
I should also point out that the fact that half their tunes are nicked doesn't work in their favour. Glitter, T-Rex, even Coca fecking Cola. Lot of samey chords and solos. But I've said all this before. Great albums, but for me it took a sharp downhill after there. I think it was after here that, in the studio, Noel described Liam as a knobhead at best, and a cnut on meth at worst.What utter crap!
Definitely Maybe---all time classic album, easily in the best 20 albums ever 10/10
Whats The story---See above 10/10
You just named a fecking lot of bands I've never heard of. I can't be alone on that (though perhaps in this thread I would be).paul weller
pulp
The manics
In conclusion---The 90s ruled.
Since this originally was a britpop thread, is it taken for granted that we're only talking about British music when making statements such as these?Ocean Colour Scene's 4 good songs were probably all in the top 10 rock tracks of that decade. Ahead of their time with a lot of the sound mixing too. Shame they never kept it up. They were much better than Oasis.
Were they any of:Ocean Colour Scene's 4 good songs were probably all in the top 10 rock tracks of that decade. Ahead of their time with a lot of the sound mixing too. Shame they never kept it up. They were much better than Oasis.
I suppose this is one of the great things about music, how two people can listen to exactly the same thing and have such varied opinions
So were Led Zepplins and they still rocked.I should also point out that the fact that half their tunes are nicked doesn't work in their favour. Glitter, T-Rex, even Coca fecking Cola. Lot of samey chords and solos. But I've said all this before. Great albums, but for me it took a sharp downhill after there. I think it was after here that, in the studio, Noel described Liam as a knobhead at best, and a cnut on meth at worst.
You just named a fecking lot of bands I've never heard of. I can't be alone on that (though perhaps in this thread I would be).
Again, I probably overrate it slightly due to the fact it was the first album Id ever queued up before the store opened to buy, the same day I left for one of the greatest holidays of my life, and it was the soundtrack to those 10 days A similar thing happened with Alanis Morrisettes jagged little pillI don't think Be Here Now is a bad album, just to clarify, I like it a lot. I'd have given more like a 7/10 though, I just felt Sparky kind of went over the top as I think it does have some problems.
Definitely, it was just to exchange opinions. But that's why I asked whether you were wumming beforehand, I didn't want to give my opinion just to be answered that you were on the wind-up!
They were all pop groups from the 90sWere they any of:
The Circle
Day We Caught The Train
Riverboat Song (who doesn't know this tune?)
Hundred Mile High City (Three Lions theme tune, belter)
Free My Name
?
They would be the five I've liked enough at some point to download.
By the way Sparky, I was asking you to name pop groups/songs from the 90s.
Yes, imho they are one of those bands that fall into the category of "deserved to be bigger than they were"Since this originally was a britpop thread, is it taken for granted that we're only talking about British music when making statements such as these?
And maybe it's just me, but while all the other bands mentioned in this thread are fairly wellknown (well, some obviously hugely famous), OCS I've never heard about. Is it a band who never made any sort of splash outside of Britain? At least much less so than all the bands listed by sparky. (And let's be honest, most of those bands listed are very forgettable bands that now only holds sentimental value for those who listened to them in their youths.)
Again, I probably overrate it slightly due to the fact it was the first album Id ever queued up before the store opened to buy, the same day I left for one of the greatest holidays of my life, and it was the soundtrack to those 10 days A similar thing happened with Alanis Morrisettes jagged little pill
Yeah I've only just gone 20, so I wasn't really hearing this music til a few years after it was released. My mum still tells me how I did Jarvis Cocker's 'I Spy' thing with my fingers, I'll only have been about 4 Also that I became transfixed after seeing 'him' on stars in their eyes. Oasis came around the late 90s too I'd imagine. But we didn't really have much else by Oasis in the car (this was pretty much my only access to music at the time), so I didn't really stumble upon much else until I was about 16. Same with loads of other bands actually - Roses, Smiths etc.So were Led Zepplins and they still rocked.
Out of curiosity how old are you? (not in order to mock, I do have what I think is a valid point ) For those who would have been anywhere between 14 ish to 33 ish through the whole Britpop thing, it was more than just music, for the first time in a longtime it was cool to be british, the 80s were over along with Thatcherism, we suddenly had a new wave of british music and filmmakers and artists after being force fed American crap like grunge and hair metal for years, it was just generally a great time, and Ill admit that in part is why I probably overrate anything to come from Britain between 93-99.........
Yeah very much the same sort of thing I would sayYeah I've only just gone 20, so I wasn't really hearing this music til a few years after it was released. My mum still tells me how I did Jarvis Cocker's 'I Spy' thing with my fingers, I'll only have been about 4 Also that I became transfixed after seeing 'him' on stars in their eyes. Oasis came around the late 90s too I'd imagine. But we didn't really have much else by Oasis in the car (this was pretty much my only access to music at the time), so I didn't really stumble upon much else until I was about 16. Same with loads of other bands actually - Roses, Smiths etc.
I think there's a similar thing with 80s music. Roses weren't about the music, it was about the attitude. This is Madchester. It didn't matter that Ian Brown couldn't sing, it was about the attitude. I think that carried down to my generation, who happened to actually like the music. So their popularity was retained.
Annoyingly, some go way over the top. When they got back together, there's people from that era going mad, and rightly so; they'd waited two decades for this reunion. Then there's my age who've heard them for two years pretending they've been through it all themselves.
Also she was so fecking hot!Didn't Be Here Now prematurely get ***** from Q and like 9/10 NME.......before both ended up consistently calling it a letdown issues later..
Echobellys King of the Kerb prob the best song of the britpop era. GOAT
I agree with the polemicism. I hate Kid A, despite their fans insisting it's a work of genius. I genuinely think it's hard work to get through. I still acknowledge they're a great band though. And one, like Blur, that have adapted and experimented and done so with great success. In Rainbows is a masterpiece IMO.I'm not saying that that's the reason my point stands, I'm pointing out that Radiohead are probably the most polemic band of all time, and you will be aware I'm sure that for their many fans, there are as many people who absolutely hate their music.
The Smiths were a great band. Their classics have stood the test of time and Morrissey, as much as I think he's a giant inflatable wanker, was a perfect mouthpiece for a certain type of disillusioned 80s kid, and Marr & him complimented each other very well. But only Brits, and largely northern Brits, will ever rate them as among the biggies. The Roses were before my time slightly, and - as someone who didn't experience their scene (as I did Blur & Oasis's for example) I don't get the reverence. There are only a handful of songs I think stand up well now. Fools Gold being the obvious one. Both were more original than Oasis it must be said.You can say it's one good album, but for me it's above Definitely, Maybe and on a par with What's The Story. Excellent album start to finish. Their second album, although it was in the 90s was still good in parts, but nowhere near as good. I'll also point out that I'm not a Manc, though it doesn't necessarily make you wrong. As you say, they were seminal.
It's hard to do a comparison without disparaging Oasis, but I assure you I loved them as a 14 year old (but then I did also love Garage at that age!) But as a lot of people have said, with age and a greater exposure to and appreciation of music comes the opinion that they were the right band at the right time, whereas Blur (and I'm sounding like a superfan, I'm really not. I probably have about 5 blur songs on my iTunes) were a far more talented and lasting group.I should also point out that the fact that half their tunes are nicked doesn't work in their favour. Glitter, T-Rex, even Coca fecking Cola. Lot of samey chords and solos. But I've said all this before. Great albums, but for me it took a sharp downhill after there. I think it was after here that, in the studio, Noel described Liam as a knobhead at best, and a cnut on meth at worst.
I did like best of Ocean Colour Scene but let's be honest, they were as retro and derivative as you can get.Ocean Colour Scene's 4 good songs were probably all in the top 10 rock tracks of that decade. Ahead of their time with a lot of the sound mixing too. Shame they never kept it up. They were much better than Oasis.
Couldn't agree more about The Stone Roses, less about The Smiths. Talk Talk were far superior to both (obviously very different music, but superior nonetheless.)I like this caveat. "I don't like one of the most critically acclaimed bands of all time. But if I mention that other people don't either, my point will still stand.,"
Roses are massively overrated by everyone up north. One good album, half of which has dated. Smiths were seminal, but again, Mancs overrate them.
I agree with you, genuinely. No telling what they could have done if Ian didn't get clinically fed-up.Joy Division were the best northern band and I won't stop saying it until someone agrees with me.
Except Led Zeppelin actually just entirely stole songs from other bands.