Lance Uppercut
Guest
You've now got one saying a transfer can happen. Oops.You've got reputable journalists saying similar things.
You've now got one saying a transfer can happen. Oops.You've got reputable journalists saying similar things.
So they shouldn't have voted for him on the basis that he was going to bite someone else in 3 months time?The same English journalists who are criticizing him now will be the same ones who will vote for him in the FWA awards.
Training on his own would drive him mad due to lack of human flesh. So that's all good.
Why would they not? The only question is if him being transferred means him taking part in a football related activity technically.Can FIFA ban a player from moving clubs? This is going court I would imagine.
This is exactly right. Great point.Liverpool bought him knowing he had bitten a player. They stood by him when he did it again. Now he's done it AGAIN they can have no complaints that it has had a detrimental effect on them. F*ck 'em.
Yeah but who would? A player who is effetively useless until the new year. No training, no pre-season. He won't be playing for anyone until December at the earliestHe can be transfered now apparently.
And...?You've now got one saying a transfer can happen. Oops.
When will this guy be thread banned?absolutely SHAMEFUL-DESPICABLE-CRIMINAL DECISION
1 should have been ONE match and then no more than 10.000 bucks, and that's about it
clearly the scapegoat of the british frustration, I feel ashamed
FIFA: gangsters, Blatter, please die
The player has to sogn a contract as well which he cant do.Surely the dippers would be allowed to transfer him as it's a ban that applies to him and no the club.
The transfer is the sale of the ownership of a players contract to another club, the player being a commodity rather than someone taking part in footballing activities. They are just selling a dormant player.
As good a player Sanchez is (and I'd kill to have him here) he isn't a direct replacement for Suarez. Also I can't see him leaving anyway personally, not this summer.. don't think clubs will accept the ban etc.How? I'm not arsed at this point if he goes providing we get Sanchez in return. I don't think the club will sell him for a cut price though.
Shouldn't you be happy that Suarez can't move? You get to keep him, happy times!You've got reputable journalists saying similar things.
I'm desperately looking for a white text here.absolutely SHAMEFUL-DESPICABLE-CRIMINAL DECISION
1 should have been ONE match and then no more than 10.000 bucks, and that's about it
clearly the scapegoat of the british frustration, I feel ashamed
FIFA: gangsters, Blatter, please die
Well, it's down to him to admit the problem and seek help. The thing is, he doesn't see himself as having done anything wrong and this will only further feed his sense of injustice. He sees himself as the victim.I feel this is slightly excessive. Happy he has been punished, his bizarre action deserved it, but it seems an arbitrary and longer than required length. It also fails to solve the root of the problem. We should not be surprised if Suárez engages in this behaviour again, because there is a problem with this player who has already proven that banning him does not rectify his mistakes.
Fully expecting Suárez to engage in such behaviour in the next years, it is inevitable, and a true shame to see.
How long is his contract?How? I'm not arsed at this point if he goes providing we get Sanchez in return. I don't think the club will sell him for a cut price though.
So your bullshit about FIFA not knowing if he can be transferred or not is bullshit.And...?
ANYTHING football related.Does this mean Liverpool can't register him for the PL or CL, surely that comes under administrative activity?
And...?
Not at all, did you listen to the press conference? They said they were unsure and they had to check with their lawyers.So your bullshit about FIFA not knowing if he can be transferred or not is bullshit.
Yep, Just say they will be reviewing things before commenting further...Have liverpool issued a statement yet ?
Not unless he's wearing his muzzle.He can train anywhere he wants that's not a football premises under the auspices of the FA, e.g. the local gym or a public park, or his back garden.
but surely that counts as administrative activity?He can be transfered now apparently.
make your requestWhen will this guy be thread banned?
You wont find one, that guy has been wumming all over the place.I'm desperately looking for a white text here.
Agreed.Seems fair punishment to me TBH. Maybe slightly lenient but fine.
Can see why Liverpool will feel hard done by as Incident happened in a FIFA tournament and they still have to pay him.
Interesting precedent.
So you are still going with this? FIFA don't know? They seem pretty sure to me.Not at all, did you listen to the press conference? They said they were unsure and they had to check with their lawyers.
Liverpool bought him knowing he had bitten a player. They stood by him when he did it again. Now he's done it AGAIN they can have no complaints that it has had a detrimental effect on them. F*ck 'em.