Blodssvik
Full Member
I won't watch this tournament nor recognize the winner of it. It will be another hole in World Cup history.
But I think it's fair to say (at the risk of being called an imperialist / racist by those who the current system serves) that corruption is far less endemic in the European / Western FAs, so if the power based can be shifted towards those, it should help.You're ignoring the real problem here, corruption in fifa mainly stems from corrupted football associations and they get to vote on everything.
Breaking away from fifa will just create another corrupted organization.
andQatar were subsequently accused of paying Fifa officials £3m to secure backing for its bid.
However, they have now been cleared of wrongdoing, although the report said that there were "certain indications of potentially problematic conduct of specific individuals".
It concluded that payments by former Fifa vice-president Mohamed bin Hammam were judged to be for the disgraced Qatari's personal political interests, not the 2022 bid.
As for Russia, they have also been cleared, although the report noted its bid team made "only a limited amount of documents available for review".
According to the report, the Russian team hired computers that were subsequently destroyed, denying the inquiry access to email accounts.
Responding to the report, Alexey Sorokin, the chief of Russia's 2018 World Cup organising committee, said the country had nothing to hide.
This way no football association outside europe will want to join, at least now they have a say, creating another united nations will only cater for the big guns.But I think it's fair to say (at the risk of being called an imperialist / racist by those who the current system serves) that corruption is far less endemic in the European / Western FAs, so if the power based can be shifted towards those, it should help.
Didn't realize the WC winners needed to be recognized by you for legitimacy.I won't watch this tournament nor recognize the winner of it. It will be another hole in World Cup history.
Pretty much this.Fs, just give it to Australia. Life's too short for this nonsense.
Its hard to see it. Is Blatter actually answerable to anyone? He can do whatever the hell he wants, as far as I can make out - taking him to task seems to be outside the jurisdiction of any specific legal or regulatory body.I just really, really hope that within the next few years (and before Blatter dies, preferably) FIFA gets what is coming to them, and their little world of corruption all comes crashing down. I would be quite content to see Blatter spend the last years of his life in jail.
Cycling says hello!Qatar is a corrupt country and is a disgrace that they are going to host the World Cup after all the corruption acusations we have seen, this is another chapter that show football is the most dirty sport of them all.
Now, there's something funny about the reaction of british press to the whole episode and I find there's a little bit of racism and hypocrisy behind their energetic approach to the issue. The world cup has been hosted by corrupt and totalitarian nations in the past, no one argued when Argentina hosted the world cup in 78 under Videla, while people of argentine where suffering all kinds of tortures and opression. No one argued that the two most corrupt and violent countries of the past century hosted the world cup in 66 and 94 respectively.
The world cup is in esence a corrupt tourtnament hosted by one of the most dirty corporations in the world, the problem this time is that will be hosted by arabs, by the new rich, The problem is not corruption and lack of footballing culture, the problem is that the world cup will not be hosted by us the big boys but by these arabs who just got in the game.
Qatar won because they did what every other nation has done since the invention of the world cup: putting the money on the table, giving money to the big guys so they choose you, it has always been like this.Cycling says hello!
In fairness, its not about England not getting it, just that there is no rational way of explaining how Qatar with its searing heat was the overwhelming winner of the votes.
You probably mean money under the table.Qatar won because they did what every other nation has done since the invention of the world cup: putting the money on the table, giving money to the big guys so they choose you, it has always been like this.
The climate, lack of footballing culture or "corruption" acusations have never been an issue in the past, but is ok if it's between us, not this strange new rich who just got into the party.
That is not what I said either. I am just doing what I can do, which isn't much.Didn't realize the WC winners needed to be recognized by you for legitimacy.
On the contray, I think that FIFA accusing the English FA is a way of shutting down potential further criticism (from the FA, I mean.)Shambles.
The funny thing is, them doing this is then going to open the floodgates from the English FA, bit silly of them really - had they just said yeah nothing to see here then perhaps it could have been swept under the carpet. It's like they WANT the FA/Media to kick up a fuss.
I'm not English though so you guys not getting it has no reflection on me. Ireland wont be at the World Cup no matter where its held!Qatar won because they did what every other nation has done since the invention of the world cup: putting the money on the table, giving money to the big guys so they choose you, it has always been like this.
The climate, lack of footballing culture or "corruption" acusations have never been an issue in the past, but is ok if it's between us, not this strange new rich who just got into the party.
Its hard to see it. Is Blatter actually answerable to anyone? He can do whatever the hell he wants, as far as I can make out - taking him to task seems to be outside the jurisdiction of any specific legal or regulatory body.
The only ones who can hurt him are the sponsors. If you choke off FIFA's money supply - THAT is what would make it come crashing down. So boycotts would be the only way to go, really. If people, not just in England but across Europe and ideally elsewhere, backed out, or if the TV stations were genuinely scared that people werent going to watch it, if viewing figures were going to be totally decimated, Blatter would be gone very quickly.
Its hard to see that happening but it is possible. That kind of mass, grassroots action would be possible to coordinate now in a way it never was before, with Twitter etc mobilising people and making it very clear to everyone how deeply people felt about it.
But as you also say, it isnt clear whether people care as much in other countries about this as we do in the UK. I presume they do, but I dont know.
The whole criticism of the FA is mainly to try and make it seem like sour grapes if the FA continues to grumble. It's no coincidence that the report levels the most criticism on Fifa's biggest critic. Why does the report not put more into the fact that Moscow banned Garcia from travelling to Russia? That computers disappeared and that everyone of Russia's bid team suddenly forgot how to access gmail? Nothing on Qatar, who have distance themselves from Bin Hammam, despite previously saying he was there biggest asset or the £3 million worth of payments, or the fact that all executive reports suggested Qatar had a high risk (worst) bid that they still won by huge margin. It's a whitewash and a way of trying to shut up the FA, Garcia's statement backs that up.Shambles.
The funny thing is, them doing this is then going to open the floodgates from the English FA, bit silly of them really - had they just said yeah nothing to see here then perhaps it could have been swept under the carpet. It's like they WANT the FA/Media to kick up a fuss.
Even if we look away from the politics of it, regarding Qatar, it still is a bloody disgrace. You can't play football in 50 degrees celcius during the summer, and you sure as hell can't disrupt the club football by moving it to the winter either.Qatar is a corrupt country and is a disgrace that they are going to host the World Cup after all the corruption acusations we have seen, this is another chapter that show football is the most dirty sport of them all.
Now, there's something funny about the reaction of british press to the whole episode and I find there's a little bit of racism and hypocrisy behind their energetic approach to the issue. The world cup has been hosted by corrupt and totalitarian nations in the past, no one argued when Argentina hosted the world cup in 78 under Videla, while people of argentine where suffering all kinds of tortures and opression. No one argued that the two most corrupt and violent countries of the past century hosted the world cup in 66 and 94 respectively.
The world cup is in esence a corrupt tourtnament hosted by one of the most dirty corporations in the world, the problem this time is that will be hosted by arabs, by the new rich, The problem is not corruption and lack of footballing culture, the problem is that the world cup will not be hosted by us the big boys but by these arabs who just got in the game.
It seems like a very flawed argument to say the process is corrupt, but it has always been corrupt so it is wrong to highlight it now. Yes FIFA is corrupt and probably always has been, but the profile of, and money in, the game has risen exponentially in the last 20 years or so, which makes it all the more pressing that it is cleaned up. The Qatar selection brings matters to a head because of its blatant lunacy - the heat conditions, the slave labour conditions etc. What does comparing it to a decision from 1974 prove? Its not just football that has changed since the 70s, the whole world has changed since then.Qatar is a corrupt country and is a disgrace that they are going to host the World Cup after all the corruption acusations we have seen, this is another chapter that show football is the most dirty sport of them all.
Now, there's something funny about the reaction of british press to the whole episode and I find there's a little bit of racism and hypocrisy behind their energetic approach to the issue. The world cup has been hosted by corrupt and totalitarian nations in the past, no one argued when Argentina hosted the world cup in 78 under Videla, while people of argentine where suffering all kinds of tortures and opression. No one argued that the two most corrupt and violent countries of the past century hosted the world cup in 66 and 94 respectively.
The world cup is in esence a corrupt tourtnament hosted by one of the most dirty corporations in the world, the problem this time is that will be hosted by arabs, by the new rich, The problem is not corruption and lack of footballing culture, the problem is that the world cup will not be hosted by us the big boys but by these arabs who just got in the game.
It's ok - if it turns out that he's culpable too, he can drag himself to the FIFA Police Station.The investigator himself questions the summary.
Utter farce.
They should be, I agree. Thought John Oliver did a good job summarizing a lot that's wrong with FIFA and the Qatar WC:why aren't the 1200 deaths being highlighted more?
Reads a bit like an oxymoron.Fifa's independent ethics adjudicator
I'm not saying is wrong to highlight it, I'm just saying this episode shows the hypocrisy of western countries and specially the hypocrisy of british press as always. I'm glad we are seeing now how dirty and corrupt this whole organization is, it has always been, but is funny how it took almost a century to the big clean guys to notice it.It seems like a very flawed argument to say the process is corrupt, but it has always been corrupt so it is wrong to highlight it now. Yes FIFA is corrupt and probably always has been, but the profile of, and money in, the game has risen exponentially in the last 20 years or so, which makes it all the more pressing that it is cleaned up. The Qatar selection brings matters to a head because of its blatant lunacy - the heat conditions, the slave labour conditions etc. What does comparing it to a decision from 1974 prove? Its not just football that has changed since the 70s, the whole world has changed since then.
I just cant see that it is some kind of anti-Qatar or anti Arab racism that is driving this. Rich countries and poor countries have hosted WCs before, yes it was a stitch up between Europe and South America for a long time but we've had WCs in Asia and Africa before now and you didnt see this kind of reaction to it.
Quite.Why does the report not put more into the fact that Moscow banned Garcia from travelling to Russia? That computers disappeared and that everyone of Russia's bid team suddenly forgot how to access gmail?
+1.I am hoping that somehow, if the lawyers and Serious Fraud Office get involved, there will eventually be so much global pressure on FIFA that something, anything, will happen to spark it all off. As I said, it feels like it is starting to reach boiling point now with todays stories, fingers crossed.