Riots in Ferguson, St Louis

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,189
Location
Interweb
That is what some people want this to be about. It's unfair to project any of that onto the police officer who was found to be doing his job and acting in self-defense. It's really about a damn fool who got himself shot.

More than anything, the incident reflects a lack of proper respect for authority. We have video footage of this young man rampaging a store, terrorizing his own community, and then attacking a police officer. This man has no respect for civil behavior, his fellow citizens, or rule of law. How anyone can shed a tear or light a candle for this criminal who signed his own death warrant is beyond me. Had he surrendered peacefully he would still be alive (in jail) today.
Is that right? Any one who robs or threatens someone, deserves to be shot at?
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,225
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
That is what some people want this to be about. It's unfair to project any of that onto the police officer who was found to be doing his job and acting in self-defense. It's really about a damn fool who got himself shot.

More than anything, the incident reflects a lack of proper respect for authority. We have video footage of this young man rampaging a store, terrorizing his own community, and then attacking a police officer. This man has no respect for civil behavior, his fellow citizens, or rule of law. How anyone can shed a tear or light a candle for this criminal who signed his own death warrant is beyond me. Had he surrendered peacefully he would still be alive (in jail) today.
You've outlined nothing above which warrants the death penalty. Arguably barely worthy of incarceration. Which is the whole point here. Summary "justice" far in excess of what his actions deserved.

It's not about whether or not he broke the law and deserved some sort of punishment. It's about him being shot dead when there's a very real chance that a different kid, in a different neighbourhood, with different colour skin would have got away with similarly antisocial behaviour with just a slap on the wrist.
 

JackXX

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
3,178
You've outlined nothing above which warrants the death penalty. Arguably barely worthy of incarceration. Which is the whole point here. Summary "justice" far in excess of what his actions deserved.

It's not about whether or not he broke the law and deserved some sort of punishment. It's about him being shot dead when there's a very real chance that a different kid, in a different neighbourhood, with different colour skin would have got away with similarly antisocial behaviour with just a slap on the wrist.
http://wreg.com/2014/11/25/salt-lake-cop-cleared-in-shooting-of-unarmed-white-man/
 

jeff_goldblum

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
3,917

JackXX

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
3,178
I don't know why you are all getting emotional. I just posted a link to a similar case that I found interesting. I have never said I don't believe that there aren't underlying problems in all of this. Quite the opposite actually. I just believe that these cases do indeed have to be treated individually. Here we have a very similar case with a video of what happened. And the police officer was cleared. If anything that guy has done even less than what Brown did if the descriptions are correct.
 

Skizzo

Full Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
12,539
Location
West Coast is the Best Coast
I don't know why you are all getting emotional. I just posted a link to a similar case that I found interesting. I have never said I don't believe that there aren't underlying problems in all of this. Quite the opposite actually. I just believe that these cases do indeed have to be treated individually. Here we have a very similar case with a video of what happened. And the police officer was cleared. If anything that guy has done even less than what Brown did if the descriptions are correct.
Yes but your mistake here was trying to make any connections between what happens to black people, and what happens to whites. I tried earlier...I got the same reaction.

"Show me where this happens to whites"
"here"
"Yeah but not as often! Doesn't count"

Oh...ok :rolleyes:
 

Wonder Pigeon

'Shelbourne FC Supporter'
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
21,634
Location
Forza Shelbourne
Supports
Shelbourne
A few things worth looking at:

Alleged Theft

Autopsy

Darren Wilson

Grand Jury

Police

Protests

Smearing

Stats

Witnesses

 

MikeUpNorth

Wobbles like a massive pair of tits
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
19,939
Where there is overwhelming public interest in a prosecution, the suspect should face trial in an open court. That's how a justice system should work or you end up with this kind of divisive nonsense.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,225
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I don't know why you are all getting emotional. I just posted a link to a similar case that I found interesting. I have never said I don't believe that there aren't underlying problems in all of this. Quite the opposite actually. I just believe that these cases do indeed have to be treated individually. Here we have a very similar case with a video of what happened. And the police officer was cleared. If anything that guy has done even less than what Brown did if the descriptions are correct.
The video's not very clear but it does sound like a case of "suicide by cop" when you read the whole article.

On the footage Taylor can be heard saying “Nah, fool.” Taylor quickly raised his left hand from inside his waistband, lifted his shirt level with his armpit and quickly brought out his right hand. At that time Officer Cruz shot Taylor twice.

Police were originally called to the convenience store in South Salt Lake to check reports of a person with a gun. Officials said Taylor’s blood alcohol level was .18 percent when he was shot, well above the .08 legal limit. DA Gill said Taylor’s Facebook posts show he was suicidal before the shooting.
Feck me, though, American cops reach for their guns ridiculously quickly. It's no wonder that kids (black or white) are getting killed by police in such high numbers. Racial profiling aside, America really needs to sort its shit out when it comes to regulating guns. The arms war between police and civilians is killing an awful lot of children.
 

FromTheBench

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
10,479
The video's not very clear but it does sound like a case of "suicide by cop" when you read the whole article.



Feck me, though, American cops reach for their guns ridiculously quickly. It's no wonder that kids (black or white) are getting killed by police in such high numbers.
Racial profiling aside, America really needs to sort its shit out when it comes to regulating guns. The arms war between police and civilians is killing an awful lot of children.
Exactly what i said earlier and in this regard stereotypes and biases play a subconcious and concious part too which lead to exaggerated situations compared to population for one community or also people who may look certain way.
 

Eboue

nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
61,227
Location
I'm typing this with my Glock 19 two feet from me
I don't know why you are all getting emotional. I just posted a link to a similar case that I found interesting. I have never said I don't believe that there aren't underlying problems in all of this. Quite the opposite actually. I just believe that these cases do indeed have to be treated individually. Here we have a very similar case with a video of what happened. And the police officer was cleared. If anything that guy has done even less than what Brown did if the descriptions are correct.
Who is getting emotional? Bizarre claim.

Yes but your mistake here was trying to make any connections between what happens to black people, and what happens to whites. I tried earlier...I got the same reaction.

"Show me where this happens to whites"
"here"
"Yeah but not as often! Doesn't count"

Oh...ok :rolleyes:
I know you aren't stupid so why are you deliberately missing the point?
 

naturalized

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
2,056
Supports
nufc
Officer Darren Wilson's story is unbelievable. Literally.

http://www.vox.com/2014/11/25/7281165/darren-wilsons-story-side

Good dissection.
Is it really?

Boiled down to one paragraph, it's:

"Why did Michael Brown, an 18-year-old kid headed to college, refuse to move from the middle of the street to the sidewalk? Why would he curse out a police officer? Why would he attack a police officer? Why would he dare a police officer to shoot him? Why would he charge a police officer holding a gun? Why would he put his hand in his waistband while charging, even though he was unarmed?

NONE OF THIS FITS WITH WHAT WE KNOW OF MICHAEL BROWN

None of this fits with what we know of Michael Brown. Brown wasn't a hardened felon. He didn't have a death wish."

It's a bare denial of one side's account based purely on projections upon Brown. There's no independent investigative commentary there other than: "nah, I think Brown was probably a good guy because he was going to college." That's it.
 

naturalized

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
2,056
Supports
nufc

JackXX

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
3,178
Who is getting emotional? Bizarre claim.



I know you aren't stupid so why are you deliberately missing the point?
I think some people's emotions are getting in the way of having a balanced view on the case. Not that bizarre really.
 

Eboue

nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
61,227
Location
I'm typing this with my Glock 19 two feet from me
I posted a link to a similar case. What's there to disagree about?
Well there is lots to disagree about. I posted an article that directly addressed the differences in the way police treat blacks and whites. You then complained about people being emotional. So I'll ask again, who was being emotional?
 

jeff_goldblum

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
3,917
Is it really?

Boiled down to one paragraph, it's:

"Why did Michael Brown, an 18-year-old kid headed to college, refuse to move from the middle of the street to the sidewalk? Why would he curse out a police officer? Why would he attack a police officer? Why would he dare a police officer to shoot him? Why would he charge a police officer holding a gun? Why would he put his hand in his waistband while charging, even though he was unarmed?

NONE OF THIS FITS WITH WHAT WE KNOW OF MICHAEL BROWN

None of this fits with what we know of Michael Brown. Brown wasn't a hardened felon. He didn't have a death wish."

It's a bare denial of one side's account based purely on projections upon Brown. There's no independent investigative commentary there other than: "nah, I think Brown was probably a good guy because he was going to college." That's it.
Whilst obviously that particular bit of the article is speculative, when you put it in context its a fair point to make. As pointed out in that article (and throughout the resource list @Wonder Pigeon posted) Wilson's account is factually dubious based both of the physical evidence and eyewitness testimony, as well as common sense. There are also clear indications that he's crafted his story to make Brown out as dangerous and a criminal in order to justify why he 'feared for his life', using factors which he didn't have any knowledge of until after the shooting.

From that point, given that Wilson's testimony is clearly unreliable, it's not unreasonable to doubt claims made about Brown's behaviour which contradict what we know of Brown as a person.
 

JackXX

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
3,178
Well there is lots to disagree about. I posted an article that directly addressed the differences in the way police treat blacks and whites. You then complained about people being emotional. So I'll ask again, who was being emotional?
I don't need to call people out. That's not what was intended and if it was I would have done so. I think it's been pretty clear and not too surprising that plenty of people's thoughts have been filled on emotion with this case. Not just in the thread but in general.

No there isn't really much to disagree about. I haven't spoken once on how police treat whites or blacks you are just trying to paint me on one side of the racial argument in which I have had very little opinion on in the thread. I posted a factual article of a similar recent case just to show that it can happen to anyone. It's not some strong opinion I have posted or anything is it?

I've said throughout there's a bigger issue in all of this. I just don't think anyone can act in the way Mike Brown allegedly did and not potentially suffer those fatal consequences. But anyhow I'm happy to change my mind on that if I see evidence that suggests otherwise. I have no agenda either way.
 

Eboue

nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
61,227
Location
I'm typing this with my Glock 19 two feet from me
I don't need to call people out. That's not what was intended and if it was I would have done so. I think it's been pretty clear and not too surprising that plenty of people's thoughts have been filled on emotion with this case. Not just in the thread but in general.

No there isn't really much to disagree about. I haven't spoken once on how police treat whites or blacks you are just trying to paint me on one side of the racial argument in which I have had very little opinion on in the thread. I posted a factual article of a similar recent case just to show that it can happen to anyone. It's not some strong opinion I have posted or anything is it?

I've said throughout there's a bigger issue in all of this. I just don't think anyone can act in the way Mike Brown allegedly did and not potentially suffer those fatal consequences. But anyhow I'm happy to change my mind on that if I see evidence that suggests otherwise. I have no agenda either way.
I'm not trying to paint you in any way. I'm taking issue with your characterization of people as getting emotional, a claim often used by people who think themselves to be supremely rational. Similar to "bleeding heart liberal".
 

naturalized

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
2,056
Supports
nufc
Whilst obviously that particular bit of the article is speculative, when you put it in context its a fair point to make. As pointed out in that article (and throughout the resource list @Wonder Pigeon posted) Wilson's account is factually dubious based both of the physical evidence and eyewitness testimony, as well as common sense. There are also clear indications that he's crafted his story to make Brown out as dangerous and a criminal in order to justify why he 'feared for his life', using factors which he didn't have any knowledge of until after the shooting.

From that point, given that Wilson's testimony is clearly unreliable, it's not unreasonable to doubt claims made about Brown's behaviour which contradict what we know of Brown as a person.
Genuine question, though - what do you mean when you say "what we know of Brown as a person"? Because all we really do know for an unequivocal fact is that he robbed a convenience store for cigars minutes before he encountered Wilson. That's not the behaviour of someone about to go to college, either. What else do we know of Brown as a person? I'm far from fully clued up on the case.

I'll definitely grant you the "Wilson's crafted his story" element though - there's more than a little bit of ex post facto reasoning there.
 

JackXX

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
3,178
I'm not trying to paint you in any way. I'm taking issue with your characterization of people as getting emotional, a claim often used by people who think themselves to be supremely rational. Similar to "bleeding heart liberal".
Looking back at my post I could have worded things better for sure. I just felt the article was relevant.
 

naturalized

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
2,056
Supports
nufc
To be really honest, I was hell for leather on the pro-Brown bandwagon until the video of Brown's father screaming "BURN THIS BITCH DOWN" into a mob, whipping them up into a frenzy, essentially starting the rioting and destruction of innocent property that night, came out. Then the question of "but why would Brown randomly attack a police officer?" got a little bit of an answer in my head.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,225
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
To be really honest, I was hell for leather on the pro-Brown bandwagon until the video of Brown's father screaming "BURN THIS BITCH DOWN" into a mob, whipping them up into a frenzy, essentially starting the rioting and destruction of innocent property that night, came out. Then the question of "but why would Brown randomly attack a police officer?" got a little bit of an answer in my head.
Because he was emotional and angry after having his son recently shot dead by another policeman?

Actually, not sure I'm getting your analogy...
 

evra

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
10,858
Location
Bitten by an adder as a baby, the adder died.
To be really honest, I was hell for leather on the pro-Brown bandwagon until the video of Brown's father screaming "BURN THIS BITCH DOWN" into a mob, whipping them up into a frenzy, essentially starting the rioting and destruction of innocent property that night, came out. Then the question of "but why would Brown randomly attack a police officer?" got a little bit of an answer in my head.
Was that his father? Either way he was inciting violence and should be charged.
 

jaimoe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
1,824
Location
the bread basket of the usa.
That ruling doesn't seem to apply here unless you uncritically take Wilson's account at face value, which doesn't seem wise for reasons I've already stated. Regardless of whether he tried to take Wilson's gun in the car, if, as eyewitnesses have stated, he didn't pose a threat to Wilson at the time of the killing shot, Tennessee vs Garner doesn't apply.

Like I said, there's no 'according to the physical evidence' about it. The physical evidence is completely silent on whether Brown at any point tried to take Wilson's gun, any attempt to justify reading it as if the physical evidence unambiguously backs Wilson's account is highly dubious. Since the denial of a trial seems to be on those grounds it seems fair to call foul somewhat.



Tiffany Mitchell, Piaget Crenshaw, Michael Brady, Emmanuel Freeman and 2 unnamed construction workers all call some aspect of Wilson's testimony into doubt. If you include Brian Johnson (who was with Brown at the time and so I didn't count as 'independent'), every single witness who have come forward disputes Wilson's account.
That ruling doesn't seem to apply here unless you uncritically take Wilson's account at face value, which doesn't seem wise for reasons I've already stated. Regardless of whether he tried to take Wilson's gun in the car, if, as eyewitnesses have stated, he didn't pose a threat to Wilson at the time of the killing shot, Tennessee vs Garner doesn't apply.

Like I said, there's no 'according to the physical evidence' about it. The physical evidence is completely silent on whether Brown at any point tried to take Wilson's gun, any attempt to justify reading it as if the physical evidence unambiguously backs Wilson's account is highly dubious. Since the denial of a trial seems to be on those grounds it seems fair to call foul somewhat.



Tiffany Mitchell, Piaget Crenshaw, Michael Brady, Emmanuel Freeman and 2 unnamed construction workers all call some aspect of Wilson's testimony into doubt. If you include Brian Johnson (who was with Brown at the time and so I didn't count as 'independent'), every single witness who have come forward disputes Wilson's account.
"Some aspects".....if this had gone to trial MAYBE, where are you getting this information?
 

antihenry

CAF GRU Rep
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
7,401
Location
Chelsea FC
There's no question that many people wanted Wilson indicted not because he was guilty but because of the opportunity to highlight police brutality especially against African American males. While I feel that Wilson got a raw deal for the way he was portrayed (especially considering he's a younger cop and not necessarily of an older, more racist generation) and that Michael Brown was no saint, Wilson is merely paying the price for his forefathers actions. It was those actions that helped put Michael Brown in the situation to rob a store. Life is unfair and there are no winners in this case.
The African American males get in trouble with police far more often than any other ethnic group by and large because many of them grow up in an environment where respect for the law and order, family values and education are not among the priorities, to put it mildly.

Wilson's forefathers have feck all to do with Michael Brown robbing a store. It's all about taking responsibility for your actions. Political correctness gone mad will be America's downfall. Everyone is bending over backwards, trying really hard not to say anything controversial for fear of being labeled racist, that's what it came down to.

Even if by some miracle you could get rid of every cop on the force who ever had a racist thought or was trigger happy, the situation will not change much because it has little to do with it. The biggest part of the problem lies within black community itself.
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,028
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
To be really honest, I was hell for leather on the pro-Brown bandwagon until the video of Brown's father screaming "BURN THIS BITCH DOWN" into a mob, whipping them up into a frenzy, essentially starting the rioting and destruction of innocent property that night, came out. Then the question of "but why would Brown randomly attack a police officer?" got a little bit of an answer in my head.
Have to agree with this and after watching the CCTV video of Brown pushing the store owner around definitely makes him a questionable character and this does go on and gives credibility that Brown acted the way officer Wilson described. If we do go by officer Wilson's accounts imo he's justified to fire those shots after being provoked, attacked and also warned he will shoot. But on the other hand the officers story seems too convenient to be true. This whole situation is complex and has several issues attached to it such as poverty, opportunities, racism. Because of this the reaction and exposure has not been warranted. The problem is we will probably never find out what actually happened so there is no simple solution.
 

Eboue

nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
61,227
Location
I'm typing this with my Glock 19 two feet from me
To be really honest, I was hell for leather on the pro-Brown bandwagon until the video of Brown's father screaming "BURN THIS BITCH DOWN" into a mob, whipping them up into a frenzy, essentially starting the rioting and destruction of innocent property that night, came out. Then the question of "but why would Brown randomly attack a police officer?" got a little bit of an answer in my head.
Step father, not father.
 

jaimoe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
1,824
Location
the bread basket of the usa.
There have been significant protests all over the US, and only in Ferguson has there been significant property damage. For the sake of argument, let's assume all the protesters in Ferguson have resorted to violence. That is only a small percentage of the protests that have happened all over the country. Any one who forms perceptions based on the looters is being simple minded at best.
Well excuse me, I guess protestors walking on to an interstate highway causing people to run off the road, risking life and limb is just a stroll in the park. That happened where I live.

What kills me is the protestors disappear until it is newsworthy and then they're out there punching their fists in the air and shouting .
 

naturalized

Full Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
2,056
Supports
nufc
Because he was emotional and angry after having his son recently shot dead by another policeman?

Actually, not sure I'm getting your analogy...
Sorry, typed that in a rush. I meant that I was completely in tune with the attitudes expressed in the Vox article prior to the release of the verdict - "why would an innocent, college-bound kid randomly attack a police officer? The cop must be lying!" And then I saw Brown's father shouting, screaming, inciting a frenzied mob to violence and the picture got a whole lot murkier for me.

I completely get that it's irrational, and has nothing to do with Michael Brown himself - I do feel a little bit dirty thinking this way, to be honest, but there's an old saying about apples not falling far from trees.



from 0:40, father is the guy in the green/white shirt with his pants swagged to his knees.

Was that his father? Either way he was inciting violence and should be charged.
He was absolutely inciting violence. If I were a Ferguson shopkeeper I'd be fecking outraged. Grief is only a defence so far.
 

Eboue

nasty little twerp with crazy bitter-man opinions
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
61,227
Location
I'm typing this with my Glock 19 two feet from me
The African American males get in trouble with police far more often than any other ethnic group by and large because many of them grow up in an environment where respect for the law and order, family values and education are not among the priorities, to put it mildly.

Wilson's forefathers have feck all to do with Michael Brown robbing a store. It's all about taking responsibility for your actions. Political correctness gone mad will be America's downfall. Everyone is bending over backwards, trying really hard not to say anything controversial for fear of being labeled racist, that's what it came down to.

Even if by some miracle you could get rid of every cop on the force who ever had a racist thought or was trigger happy, the situation will not change much because it has little to do with it. The biggest part of the problem lies within black community itself.
Family values? Easy there Sarah Palin. You are trying to make education an issue but Michael Brown was going to college. Poverty begets crime and systemic brutalization of the community by the police force is hardly likely to engender respect for said police.
 

antihenry

CAF GRU Rep
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
7,401
Location
Chelsea FC
Family values? Easy there Sarah Palin. You are trying to make education an issue but Michael Brown was going to college. Poverty begets crime and systemic brutalization of the community by the police force is hardly likely to engender respect for said police.
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize he was a college student, that makes all the difference. What was his major, robbing stores and attacking police officers?
 

jaimoe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
1,824
Location
the bread basket of the usa.
There have been significant protests all over the US, and only in Ferguson has there been significant property damage. For the sake of argument, let's assume all the protesters in Ferguson have resorted to violence. That is only a small percentage of the protests that have happened all over the country. Any one who forms perceptions based on the looters is being simple minded at best.



feck you jack, I'm alright



And?

Rodney King said it best, why can't we all just get along?
Why can't minorities be treated equally in society?[/QUOTE]

My question would be why a suspected criminal expects to be treated equally. If a cop says get on the ground, fecking do it, If you are innocent you'll walk away. If you are not, pay the price for your stupidity and move on.

As for minorities not being treated equally, people do not treat each other equally and never have so get over it or do something about it. If you expect me to be impressed by liquor stores being looted forget it. How does that inspire one to go, well they got fecked so I could see looting to prove their point?

I am all for transparency in all cases but the legal system did its job, whether well or not is subject to interpretation. The grand jury reviewed days of testimony and evidence which none of us, including you, were privy to, yet you want to rush to judgement.The US Justice system is not perfect but what legal system is? be patient and let civil courts take an extended look at this, it will happen. Spare your bombast and rhetoric for the pulpit.

Bet your last dollar that there will be other legal action and the "truth", whatever that may be will come out.

I think most people get along just fine with each other; black, white, brown, yellow, purple we all just get by. I'm not going to leap to any assumptions, just going to let it unfold.