James Milner | Signed for Liverpool

Status
Not open for further replies.

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
20,951
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
Well that would make more sense, but I assumed he would have been in that set-up instead of one of Milner or Henderson.

The diamond doesn't allow for much width however.
That's true, but I'd rather play with two strikers (a new striker and a fully fit Sturridge although I know that's wishful thinking). If we play a 4-3-3 with said midfield, there's indeed a lack of creativity... Both Henderson and Milner are very good passers and make intelligent runs behind the defence though, so maybe it could work. I don't think Can is ready for the holding rol in midfield either, but I hope he gets played in midfield at least because it's clear as day he isn't a defender.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
I actually think it's a good signing for them. He's better than any wide player they currently have, bar Sterling, and they're getting him for free. He also adds experience to the squad.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
City supposedly offered him 160k a week, so that's not why, he obviously wants to play more games.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,428
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Good signing for them. Not convinced his the type of quality needed for them to push into top 4 territory again, but he's definitely a good addition to their/any squad.
 

Nickosaur

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
11,895
Good signing IMO. Milner is underrated and I think playing a bigger role will benefit both him and Liverpool.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,557
Location
Ireland
He's a decent squad player, but Liverpool will really need to do better than his level in regards to first team signings. Shopping in City's junkyard isn't going to get you into the top four.
 

vodrake

Full Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
3,509
Pretty good signing for them, but I have to say I'm happier seeing them bring in someone like Milner to replace Gerrard than some of the unknown quantities but possibly better players that they've been linked to in Midfield such as Kovacic, Pjanic, etc.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,583
Think he's a solid signing for them. Still can't get round them paying him 150k a week though.

I hate how the transfer window reminds us exactly how much these people earn. It's just disgusting
 

Speak

Step up to my misogyny soapbox
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
6,347
Pretty good signing for them, but I have to say I'm happier seeing them bring in someone like Milner to replace Gerrard than some of the unknown quantities but possibly better players that they've been linked to in Midfield such as Kovacic, Pjanic, etc.
I reckon they'll get Kovacic as well. Just a hunch.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
160k a week for Milner...madness
Free transfer though, Milner gets to absorb a lot of the fee into his wages.

Nani is rumoured to be going for £7m. That is because his wages are far higher than any buying club are willing to pay him so we have to give a discounted fee so the buying club can pay his wage.

If Nani was coming to England for the first time after the season he had in Portugal this year the fee would be £25-30m.
 

Dracula

caf plane air-master
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
3,991
160k a week for Milner...madness
I think it gets to the point is more expensive to find a replacement and pay transfer fee. Especially as he's English and they now need ANOTHER homegrown player.

Don't know why people think he will be a wide player for Liverpool, he wanted to play more central and have more games, hence the step down to Liverpool.
 

Rooney in Paris

Gerrard shirt..Anfield? You'll Never Live it Down
Scout
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
36,019
Location
In an elephant sanctuary
I actually think it's a good signing for them. He's better than any wide player they currently have, bar Sterling, and they're getting him for free. He also adds experience to the squad.
I read he's also leaving City cos he doesn't want to play out wide anymore, and wants to have a more central role. What's their midfield gonna look like next season? Henderson-Can-Milner?
 

Angelinho

Full Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
1,178
Decent enough for them. But if Liverpool have any ambitions on re-establishing themselves in the top four, then it's going to take a lot more than Milner.
 

vodrake

Full Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
3,509
Bought him for LWB not for the bench
I think they bought him for Centre Midfield. Wanting to play more centrally was one of the main reasons he rejected the City contract. However, the moment the bad results start coming him I can imagine Rodgers will start sticking him at at LB, RB, RW, LW, Striker and probably Goalkeeper
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
Think it's a good signing for them but if he really wants to play in CM as @Rooney in Dublin claims then I don't know what the feck they're trying to do. Playing with 5 midfielders again?
 

MkPaul

learnt from the best
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
3,290
Location
Manchester
He's a player you'd want in your team but surely Liverpool should be focusing on world class additions that will light them up enough to get them top 4? As we saw last season with them signing over 100mil of squad players, it ain't going to get you champions league football.

Arsenal were like that and it stopped them winning the league. Since the competition for top 4 increased, they were forced to sign big players to keep their spot there, signing the likes of Ozil/Sanchez has done that for them. They now need to take the next step and double it if they want to win the league. Can't win the league with Welbeck & Giroud as your 2 strikers.
 

Orc

Pretended to be a United fan for two years
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,322
Supports
Chelsea
City supposedly offered him 160k a week, so that's not why, he obviously wants to play more games.
Read yesterday that he appeared in the majority of City's matches this past season. Maybe he just wanted to feel more important and valued rather than being under appreciated and surrounded by superstars.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,370
Location
Hope, We Lose
He had a couple of months of good form this season, which is an upturn from the mediocrity of previous seasons. I dont think he's an improvement on what Liverpool have in CM and he'll probably find himself playing wingback again at some point
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
Read yesterday that he appeared in the majority of City's matches this past season. Maybe he just wanted to feel more important and valued rather than being under appreciated and surrounded by superstars.
you'd assume City will spend big this summer though, so he won't play as much.
I think they bought him for Centre Midfield. Wanting to play more centrally was one of the main reasons he rejected the City contract. However, the moment the bad results start coming him I can imagine Rodgers will start sticking him at at LB, RB, RW, LW, Striker and probably Goalkeeper
he's good in midfield too, so that's not a surprise. It's a decent midfield to be fair, far from spectacular, but decent. He'll definitely bring the work horse mentality that their other midfielders are lacking.
 

Orc

Pretended to be a United fan for two years
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,322
Supports
Chelsea
you'd assume City will spend big this summer though, so he won't play as much.

he's good in midfield too, so that's not a surprise. It's a decent midfield to be fair, far from spectacular, but decent. He'll definitely bring the work horse mentality that their other midfielders are lacking.
That's true.

Will be interesting to see how many different positions Brentan sticks him in.
 

IwatUwat

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
3,788
Good signing for Liverpool, if he plays him CM alongisde Henderson, they'll be doing some pressing thats for sure.
 

Pyroblazer

That's a hot jacket, man
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
3,410
Typical Liverpool signing, dreaming about star players and ending up with Milner.
 

BorisDeLeFora

Full Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
He can compete with Markovic and Can for the wing back slots.

He's a good signing and would fit in well in as a shuttler in a 3 man midfield, they'd need a more creative player in there as well though. He could also do a job similar no Matuidi, providing width if Coutinho starts out wide and drifts inside.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,564
He's a player you'd want in your team but surely Liverpool should be focusing on world class additions that will light them up enough to get them top 4? As we saw last season with them signing over 100mil of squad players, it ain't going to get you champions league football.

Arsenal were like that and it stopped them winning the league. Since the competition for top 4 increased, they were forced to sign big players to keep their spot there, signing the likes of Ozil/Sanchez has done that for them. They now need to take the next step and double it if they want to win the league. Can't win the league with Welbeck & Giroud as your 2 strikers.
Problem is that Liverpool at this stage are some sort of “project” at best. They're not in the CL next season. And while they have money, they don't have nearly as much as certain others. So, how are they going to realistically land those top shelf players they need in order to catch up to Chelsea, City, Arsenal and United?

Not easy. Per now all they can do is buy wisely, really. Milner is a decent move for them in that sense. He's a safe buy, unlike the likes of Balotelli and a load of youngsters who can go either way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.