What're the chances we'll score 5 goals in one game from open play this season?

MZX7

@Vato @Varun @moses @Hectic @Solius
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
1,975
Location
New York
I see these amazing scorelines teams like City, Arsenal and even Spurs have had in recent times and I wonder if we will see such a thing under the current "philosophy"?

One thing is certain, our defense is a fortress and LvG has certainly improved us massively in this area. The shape of our team when off the ball is incredible (that Arsenal 15 minutes were a mere blip).

Scholes says that coaching the attacking mentality is a tougher thing to do.

Keeping Rooney aside and not involving him in this discussion (as it will only resort to name calling), do we have enough quality to have a scoreline of 5-0 or something like the 8-2 against Arsenal few years back?

Can Martial, Memphis, Mata, Herrera score big? Also, I cannot wait for Schweiny's debut goal for us. Will that happen this season?

Our game could be so exciting. We have a brilliant mix of youth and experience. One of the most balanced sides in terms of player ages. When can we expect us to thrash teams regardless of whether they park the bus or not?

Is it necessary to sign another attacking talent in January given that Memphis isn't coping well enough? Which right winger would suit our gameplay?
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,735
Location
USA
5 goals. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

We ll not be able to score them. The other team would need to put 2 into their nets to make it happen
 

Sunny Jim

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
29,392
Location
Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
Its early morning here, i havent got my coffee yet...so i misread the tittle.

I thought you were suggesting that we have scored 5 open game goals all season which to be frank is more plasuable then scoring 5 in one season ;)


PS i meant i one game :lol:
 
Last edited:

World Game

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
819
Location
Australia
We can but there's no need/no point when you're already up by 2 or 3 goals in a game. Better to just control the game and conserve energy/fitness.
 

pacifictheme

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Messages
7,755
We can but there's no need/no point when you're already up by 2 or 3 goals in a game. Better to just control the game and conserve energy/fitness.
Yep. Latter years Fergie teams were fantastic at "doing enough" and shutting a game down at 2 0 or 2 1 to save energy. Arsenal will beat a team 5 0 then go and lose to West Brom the week after.

Not saying i don't find our style of play boring and frustrating though.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,577
Location
Oslo, Norway
We can but there's no need/no point when you're already up by 2 or 3 goals in a game. Better to just control the game and conserve energy/fitness.
Good thing there is no such thing as goal difference and that it never will prove to be pivotal at the end of the season!
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,070
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
One thing is certain, our defense is a fortress and LvG has certainly improved us massively in this area. The shape of our team when off the ball is incredible (that Arsenal 15 minutes were a mere blip
I wish I shared your confidence. What about Swansea, Southampton and every CL fixture we've played this season? We didn't look very fortress like in any of these games.
 

Lewis.no.9

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
2,077
We can but there's no need/no point when you're already up by 2 or 3 goals in a game. Better to just control the game and conserve energy/fitness.
tell that to City. You must of liked losing the title to them on goal difference before then?
 

Welsh Wonder

A dribbling mess on the sauce
Joined
Dec 11, 2007
Messages
12,230
Location
Wales
We beat Everton 3-0 at Goodison Park. It's not 5 but it's a good scoreline at a difficult ground and all from open play iirc.
 

Lewis.no.9

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
2,077
I wish I shared your confidence. What about Swansea, Southampton and every CL fixture we've played this season? We didn't look very fortress like in any of these games.
well said. People are really overrating our team and more importantly the work Van gaal has done, especially when as you pointed out, there is still an abundance of results as evidence to the contrary.
 

ADJUDICATOR

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
4,658
Supports
THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD
We might score 5 if we faced opposition worse than Sunderland/Ipswich/Brugge, which is of course unlikely to happen in a premier league season. We've put 3 past Liverpool and Everton so it isn't entirely implausible that a bad day from worse teams would see us scoring 5. It'd be a rare event.
 

Invictus

Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018
Staff
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
15,263
Supports
Piracy on the High Seas.
Good thing there is no such thing as goal difference and that it never will prove to be pivotal at the end of the season!
Yep, the conserving energy argument isn't very well founded for league fixtures with cumulative tables. If you have the chance to slaughter the opposition, you go for it. Especially considering how we agonizingly lost the 2011/2012 Premier League Championship on goal difference. Which is followed by goals scored, win record, and then head to head record.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,577
Location
Oslo, Norway
Yep, the conserving energy argument isn't very well founded for league fixtures with cumulative tables. If you have the chance to slaughter the opposition, you go for it. Especially considering how we agonizingly lost the 2011/2012 Premier League Championship on goal difference. Which is followed by goals scored, win record, and then head to head record.
Just looking at our goal scoring/difference records over the past few seasons. We rarely seem to slaughter the opposition anymore. Usually our goal difference isn't the best and on the few occasions it has been best it was more down to our rivals being poor than us being anything spectacular.

08/09:
Liverpool: 77-27 (+50). United: 68-24 (+44). Chelsea: 68-24 (+44).

09/10:
Chelsea: 103-32 (+71). United: 86-28 (+56).

10/11:
United: 78-37 (+41)
. Chelsea: 69-33 (+36).

11/12:
City: 93-29 (+64). United: 89-33 (+56).

12/13:
United: 86-43 (+43)
. Chelsea: 75-39 (+36).

13/14:
City: 102-37 (+65). Liverpool: 101-50 (+51). Chelsea: 71-27 (+44). Arsenal: 68-41 (+27). Everton: 61-39 (+22). United: 64-43 (+21).

14/15:
City: 83-38 (+45). Chelsea: 73-32 (+41). Arsenal: 71-36 (+35). United: 62-37 (+25).

15/16:
City: 24-8 (+16). Arsenal: 18-8 (+10). West Ham: 22-13 (+9). Tottenham: 16-8 (+8). United: 15-8 (+7).

08/09: 4-0 WBA, 5-0 Stoke, 5-0 WBA, 5-2 Tottenham
09/10: 5-0 Wigan, 4-1 Portsmouth, 4-0 West Ham, 5-0 Wigan, 5-0 Portsmouth, 4-0 Bolton, 4-0 Stoke
10/11: 7-1 Blackburn, 5-0 Birmingham, 4-0 Wigan
11/12: 8-2 Arsenal, 5-0 Bolton, 4-1 Wolves, 5-0 Fulham, 5-0 Wigan, 5-0 Wolves, 4-0 Wigan
12/13: 4-0 Wigan, 4-0 Wigan, 4-0 Norwich
13/14: 4-1 Swansea, 4-1 Villa, 4-0 Newcastle, 4-0 Norwich
14/15: 4-0 QPR
15/16: Nothing as of yet

Counting only league games where we at least scored 4 goals and the winning margin was at least 3 goals.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,498
I would say it's unlikely considering we would have to be playing really well on one of the rare occasions where a team we are playing against doesn't have 10 men behind the ball.

The majority of teams we play against this season seem to want to just camp out in their box and play on the counter.
 

Santoryo

ripping the reward
Joined
Apr 10, 2014
Messages
6,302
Yep. Latter years Fergie teams were fantastic at "doing enough" and shutting a game down at 2 0 or 2 1 to save energy. Arsenal will beat a team 5 0 then go and lose to West Brom the week after.

Not saying i don't find our style of play boring and frustrating though.
Wrong. After that season which we lost to City by goal difference, Fergie bought Van Persie and was eyeing plenty of goals scored. He even went ahead and talk about how important it was for us to start scoring plenty more goals.

We're the last one to be talking about not caring about goal difference, it cost us a title.

And Fergie teams never shy away from scoring if it could be done. One can accuse Fergie later years for playing some boring football to some but one thing that stuck around with Fergie were goals, He loves them which is why he was usually obsessed with buying strikers while neglecting our midfield for years.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,341
tell that to City. You must of liked losing the title to them on goal difference before then?
The issue there was losing 6-1, that's a 10 goal swing. You do that and let it go to GD and you're fecked.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,498
Wrong. After that season which we lost to City by goal difference, Fergie bought Van Persie and was eyeing plenty of goals scored. He even went ahead and talk about how important it was for us to start scoring plenty more goals.

We're the last one to be talking about not caring about goal difference, it cost us a title.

And Fergie teams never shy away from scoring if it could be done. One can accuse Fergie later years for playing some boring football to some but one thing that stuck around with Fergie were goals, He loves them which is why he was usually obsessed with buying strikers while neglecting our midfield for years.
We actually scored less goals the year we won the league with RVP compared to the year before when we lost the league on goal difference though. We did try to score more goals no doubt but it ended up in us actually conceding more goals and our goal difference being 13 goals worse off. So it was maybe counter productive.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,577
Location
Oslo, Norway
The issue there was losing 6-1, that's a 10 goal swing. You do that and let it go to GD and you're fecked.
Had we only lost that game 1-2 then both teams would've ended with 89 points and 89-29 goal difference resulting in a play-off at a neutral venue for the championship. That would have been epic.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,952
Location
France
I'm not sure if you can "force" goals, if you are good enough offensively you will score 5 goals in a game, it won't be a regular occurrence but it will happen. Our team lacks the quality to try it without risking to actually lose the game, we are not balanced, cohesive, powerful and creative enough to do that.
 

GimmeAKitKat

Four Brown Fingers
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
517
Location
Old Trafford, Manchester
Early goals are usually required for big scorelines. Get early goals to force the opposition to attack to try and get back into the game, then exploit that for more goals.

We currently dont look to score at all in the first half, we play safe possession first half, try to tire the opposition out abit and take a chance if its handed to us on a plate. Then second half we press more hoping the tired opposition will make mistakes and if not they'll be less effective on the counter.
 

The United Irishman

"Martial is championship material at best"
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
2,870
Location
Birmingham
I see these amazing scorelines teams like City, Arsenal and even Spurs have had in recent times and I wonder if we will see such a thing under the current "philosophy"?

One thing is certain, our defense is a fortress and LvG has certainly improved us massively in this area. The shape of our team when off the ball is incredible (that Arsenal 15 minutes were a mere blip).

Scholes says that coaching the attacking mentality is a tougher thing to do.

Keeping Rooney aside and not involving him in this discussion (as it will only resort to name calling), do we have enough quality to have a scoreline of 5-0 or something like the 8-2 against Arsenal few years back?

Can Martial, Memphis, Mata, Herrera score big? Also, I cannot wait for Schweiny's debut goal for us. Will that happen this season?

Our game could be so exciting. We have a brilliant mix of youth and experience. One of the most balanced sides in terms of player ages. When can we expect us to thrash teams regardless of whether they park the bus or not?

Is it necessary to sign another attacking talent in January given that Memphis isn't coping well enough? Which right winger would suit our gameplay?
With each passing game I grow more disillusioned with our style of play, by now I thought everything would click, and we could score for fun, but in reality we are regularly going through 30-40 minute periods without creating any chances. I can't see a 5-0...Not under LVG.
 

quackattack

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
896
Yes, lets just win 1-0, because barca, bayern and rm dont know what they are doing!
 

facund

Full Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
1,353
We would need to already be ahead and have the opposition go down to 10 men to even stand a chance of this. Still incredibly unlikely as we just don't seem to have the appetite for it these days. Brugge was probably our best chance to do so this season as their defending was beyond ropey.
 

marlowe78

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2011
Messages
4,624
We scored 4 against City last year and have a better squad now so I don't feel it's as implausible as people think. But you have to play with the intent to score that many. We don't do that.
 

SammyUnited_83

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
3,199
About the same as 'What are the chances of us coming from 1 down to win 2-1 with 10 minutes to go'.

Chances - 0.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,154
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I would say it's unlikely considering we would have to be playing really well on one of the rare occasions where a team we are playing against doesn't have 10 men behind the ball.

The majority of teams we play against this season seem to want to just camp out in their box and play on the counter.
And why not? We will predictably play everything in front of them.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,675
Location
The rainbow's end
Tbh i would prefer five 1-0 wins in the upcoming five fixtures with a relatively increased percentage in the clear cut chances created pg statistics. It would be a much better sign that we're heading towards the right direction than winning a single game by five goals. It would not be pleasing to the eye for many United fans but it would be a proof that that team is slowly starting to have an identity on the pitch and that we've found a formula to win our matches.

Yes we beat Arsenal 8-2 in 2012, so what? We were a team in form and Arsenal were missing a lot of players due to injuries. As far as i recall, our tactics in that season - the let's try to imitate Barca's high lines and pressing but with not having the right personnel attitude - lead us to conceding six from City, caused an early CL exit and led to a rather unsuccessful season.

Of course we can score 5 goals in a game. We could have scored 5 or 6 against Tottenham and City last season. We're at the stage where, if the opposition offers us spaces, we can outscore them. When the spaces aren't there and we have to create them for ourselves, that's when the problems emerge. And until then we'll have to depend on good defensive displays to win matches, whether we like it or not.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,523
We've scored 3 goals in league games 4 times this season out of 10 games.
5 goals isn't that far fetch.
 

Sigma

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
10,428
I hope the response to the thread has jinxed tomorrow. We'll score 5.







5-6
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,078
Location
?
My main issue isn't really with our finishing, Like Van Gaal keeps saying. We don't create enough clear cut chances. After every match that we haven't managed to win, he says something along the lines of "We need to finish our chances" or "the luck with our finishing wasn't there, but we created enough" but i find myself disagreeing.

When we find ourselves with clear openings, we usually put them away. The problem is the amount we create. Unless you're Ruud Van Nistelrooy, you're always going to miss the odd chance, so 1 or 2 per game isn't enough. To routinely have games where you don't register a shot on target until 50, 60, 70 minutes is usually going to see you struggling for goals.