unchanged_lineup
Tarheel Tech Wizard
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
- Messages
- 16,824
- Supports
- Janet jazz jazz jam
No question mark needed at the end of that sentence.His, when he refused to play for the reserves?
No question mark needed at the end of that sentence.His, when he refused to play for the reserves?
So you're saying he "decided" to never play for the first team again when he did something that he's not allowed to talk about in the press but obviously isn't bad enough to rescind his contract?His, when he refused to play for the reserves?
Fair enough.You're missing my point... When you invest in a season ticket, its a huge commitment. Throwing money needlessly after a non-player cause of a fall out seems a tad disrespectful to me, given that the rest of us live under average circumstances and not the crazy wages of all involved at Utd.
As we'd say around these parts, ara stop it wouldya.So you're saying he "decided" to never play for the first team again when he did something that he's not allowed to talk about in the press but obviously isn't bad enough to rescind his contract?
Pathetic!
This is feck all other than LvGs huge ego A-fecking-GAIN!! 3 times 3 clubs 3 countries … Koinkidink?
If "whatever happened" was unprofessional then it's simple! The club would have long ago rescinded Valdes' contract and get rid of him.
End of!
What?As we'd say around these parts, ara stop it wouldya.
That's an improvement.What?
One final thing to add to this - If Man Utd is really such an awful place for Valdes to be, why didn't he move to Besiktas?Oh FFS...
*We've witnessed Alex Ferguson being booed over his treatment of gun-for-hire Carlos 'Man City' Tevez...
*We've seen the club slaughtered for 'brazenly ruining the career of a young Spaniard!' (Herrera, when the first deal fell through)...
*...and now Dickensian orphan Victor Valdes is left outside in the snow, his rosey-cheeked face peering through frosty windows at the toffs and favourite courtiers banqueting on callousness and nepotism; it would take a heart of stone not to laugh...
In other words: 99 times out of 100, the club - and its managers - are in the right, and players who haven't made the grade or have acted unprofessionally or are simply unwanted tend to play the victim while knowing that unthinking fans will support them or at least clamber aboard the bandwagon of personal grudges and biases. Generally, the club and its managers have United's best interests at heart; can we truly claim the same for the likes of Valdes and Tevez?
Have no idea what the feck you are going on about you idiot!That's an improvement.
Nice one.Have no idea what the feck you are going on about you idiot!
I still seriously have no idea wtf you are going on about?Nice one.
It's a shame Valdés isn't still at Barca, I feel himself and this fella would get on great. They could share Social Media Victim Tactics
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/aug/06/luis-suarez-liverpool-arsenal-transfer
I think I have said many, many times. Nice casual racism!I still seriously have no idea wtf you are going on about?
If you disagree with me fair enough, say so!
But please stop making statements like your's is the only opinion that fecking counts and also try to make some sense, then perhaps we can have some dialogue other than your Irish gruntings!
No, you said "As we'd say around these parts, ara stop it wouldya."I think I have said many, many times. Nice casual racism!
Sound. I think you're talking nonsense and are overreacting massively to a total non-story. How's about that?No, you said "As we'd say around these parts, ara stop it wouldya."
You are either confusing me with someone else or just fishing either way you can feck off as you have no intention of doing anything other than winding people up … you are on ignore!
Would have been better put that way in the first place rather than whatever you said … and I think I've laid out my case why I don't think it's an over-reaction as well. Any fans of Bayern that hang out here might back me up that LvG is a fecking genius when it comes to causing problems where they shouldn't exist!Sound. I think you're talking nonsense and are overreacting massively to a total non-story. How's about that?
that maybe but this issue is caused by one person only. ValdesWould have been better put that way in the first place rather than whatever you said … and I think I've laid out my case why I don't think it's an over-reaction as well. Any fans of Bayern that hang out here might back me up that LvG is a fecking genius when it comes to causing problems where they shouldn't exist!
… and who's decision was it to drop Valdes from the first team squad?
Baldesss's.
His, when he refused to play for the reserves?
He was told he could leave but no-one offered the money he wanted so he rather sit and earn a wage doing nothing instead.
He chose to stay. We didn't force him.
Not sure why everyone think it's our or LVG's fault he is "suffering".
As for those that say why didn't we just cancel his contract, I am sure it would've costed us the same amount of money (since he rather stay than take a pay cut) and we run the risk of him joining a rival. How would that make any sense for us to cancel his contract?
Oh FFS...
*We've witnessed Alex Ferguson being booed over his treatment of gun-for-hire Carlos 'Man City' Tevez...
*We've seen the club slaughtered for 'brazenly ruining the career of a young Spaniard!' (Herrera, when the first deal fell through)...
*...and now Dickensian orphan Victor Valdes is left outside in the snow, his rosey-cheeked face peering through frosty windows at the toffs and favourite courtiers banqueting on callousness and nepotism; it would take a heart of stone not to laugh...
In other words: 99 times out of 100, the club - and its managers - are in the right, and players who haven't made the grade or have acted unprofessionally or are simply unwanted tend to play the victim while knowing that unthinking fans will support them or at least clamber aboard the bandwagon of personal grudges and biases. Generally, the club and its managers have United's best interests at heart; can we truly claim the same for the likes of Valdes and Tevez?
One final thing to add to this - If Man Utd is really such an awful place for Valdes to be, why didn't he move to Besiktas?
Ah yes, because something like they tried to alter the contract just before he signed it or something something.... "said a source close to Valdes".
Funny that, isn't it? A source close to Valdes, making him out to be the victim yet again.
Valdes is no victim. Why didn't he leave and go to Besiktas when he could have, if he's so persecuted here? You never answered that.that maybe but this issue is caused by one person only. Valdes
http://talksport.com/football/liverpool-transfer-blow-injured-valdes-train-man-united-141023120484But Van Gaal, whose goalkeeping coach Frans Hoek also worked with Valdes at Barcelona, was happy to give the three-time Champions League winner the opportunity to recover from the injury at United's state of the art training ground in Carrington.
However, United confirmed on Thursday that Valdes had accepted an invitation from manager Louis van Gaal, with the Spaniard set to continue his recovery with the club before training with the first team.
A statement the Red Devils’ official website read: “Manchester United manager Louis van Gaal has offered the 32-year-old former Barcelona goalkeeper Victor Valdes a chance to complete his rehabilitation from a knee injury and to work his way back to fitness with the club.
If this is the case then we should have simply terminated his contract. If he's a toxic influence then it's naive to assume he isn't spending time with the other Spanish players during their off time anyway.I've heard from a few people involved in the club that unsurprisingly the problem with Valdes wasn't just about his refusal to play for the u21s. He also had multiple rows with members of staff and with Hoek in particular and refused to do things he was asked to do in training because he thought he knew better but the final straw was when he began undermining Hoek with the other players. He was toxic to have around the squad so was removed from the first team picture but the club still have to fulfill their contractual obligations such as providing him with training. The sooner he's out of the club the better.
Why are you earning a salary from the club?
Haha the state of some of the posts on the first couple of pages.
You know nothing and you should stop spreading your stupid agenda against LvG whenever you can. These are shit posts that contribute nothing to the topic.So you're saying he "decided" to never play for the first team again when he did something that he's not allowed to talk about in the press but obviously isn't bad enough to rescind his contract?
Pathetic!
This is feck all other than LvGs huge ego A-fecking-GAIN!! 3 times 3 clubs 3 countries … Koinkidink?
If "whatever happened" was unprofessional then it's simple! The club would have long ago rescinded Valdes' contract and get rid of him.
End of!
What a great thread
Yeah but...CHARITY!!!I've heard from a few people involved in the club that unsurprisingly the problem with Valdes wasn't just about his refusal to play for the u21s. He also had multiple rows with members of staff and with Hoek in particular and refused to do things he was asked to do in training because he thought he knew better but the final straw was when he began undermining Hoek with the other players. He was toxic to have around the squad so was removed from the first team picture but the club still have to fulfill their contractual obligations such as providing him with training. The sooner he's out of the club the better.
It's starting to get a bit farcical. Regardless of the details of what really happened, I doubt this is increasing our appeal with potential future signings (although money obviously is the key motivator for signing with us.)Poor guy has been hung out to dry. I know he's still on good money but money doesn't bring happiness and being treated that way is just plain wrong.
If that's true, then feck Valdes. But I wonder why the club can't come out and say that.I've heard from a few people involved in the club that unsurprisingly the problem with Valdes wasn't just about his refusal to play for the u21s. He also had multiple rows with members of staff and with Hoek in particular and refused to do things he was asked to do in training because he thought he knew better but the final straw was when he began undermining Hoek with the other players. He was toxic to have around the squad so was removed from the first team picture but the club still have to fulfill their contractual obligations such as providing him with training. The sooner he's out of the club the better.
Club doesn't really comment on individual players and last time the press asked van Gaal about Valdes was in preseason when we were trying to get him off the books. If the rows etc were true, then van Gaal saying about the rows would just make it harder to get rid of him as other clubs wouldn't touch him, which in the end happened thanks to the Besiktas move collapse.If that's true, then feck Valdes. But I wonder why the club can't come out and say that.
Yeah, you're probably right. Honestly just wish the whole thing would go away, despite it being morbidly amusing.Club doesn't really comment on individual players and last time the press asked van Gaal about Valdes was in preseason when we were trying to get him off the books. If the rows etc were true, then van Gaal saying about the rows would just make it harder to get rid of him as other clubs wouldn't touch him, which in the end happened thanks to the Besiktas move collapse.