Sigma
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2015
- Messages
- 10,428
Who's better right now?
I would have David Luiz over Stones
I would have David Luiz over Stones
Both decent with the ball and both shite at defending. I think the comparison is quite apt.Lazy comparison that's often made when they're not alike at all.
That would make Stones better than Ferdinand as well since he never lost 6-1.Stones because he has never lost 7-1.
Stones because he has never lost 7-1.
Lazy comparison that's often made when they're not alike at all.
I can't believe Luiz is 29.Luis £35M/4 years = £9M per year.
Stones £48M/12 years = £4M per year
Stones is half the cost of Luis and also the much better player.
YepStones and it's not even close
Yep
Not even a question for me
I also think stones will go on to be a world class defender. He is already looking better in his short spell at city
Yep
Not even a question for me
I also think stones will go on to be a world class defender. He is already looking better in his short spell at city
I'm not EnglishHow I wish you'd see with your English tinted (if that's the right word) glasses off, Stones > Luiz? Never in a million years as of now and I'm a Man Utd supporter from Asia so no bias but Chelsea have had a bettter deal than Man Cty.
The question is who is better right now? So the potential, longevity etc doesn't matter on that question.I'm not English
I would take the young defender with bags of potential anyday over a 29 year old ex player who isn't getting any better and at times is a liability
I actually quite like David Luiz. He is a a good footballerThe question is who is better right now? So the potential, longevity etc doesn't matter on that question.
Every time I watch David Luiz play I feel that with a bit of luck I could have been a professional footballer... and I was really shit !!!!