We make the hits. Our fans complain and oppo fans love it.
Is this payed propaganda by any chance. Press always takes a dig at United and Arsenal but not city Chelsea or liv
Transfer Tweets - Summer 2017 | Keep it on topic
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
Spurs should remain adamant, not the right player to give more freedom to pogba at the moment.
Then hand in a transfer request if thats the case. If I was desparate to join then Id be doing everything possible to force the club in to selling me.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I think handing in a transfer request is the very last resort. If the club agree to sell then you forgo any money due. If the club don't agree to sell then your entire fan base now hates you for being a 'mercenary', etc, and you're stuck there. It's a risk.
We also sold Ronaldo, back in 2009. Equally relevant.
The January transfer window is part of the season it splits, not of the next. It's always been that way.
This season our net spend is similar to City's. Januzaj is in fact the only difference of £7-8m.
At least he didn't change his opinion just because he went to a different club.
They always do that. United sign player, price is the euro or $ amount, but quoted in GBP and includes ridiculous add-on's and agent fee's to make it look as high as possible. Other team signs player and the exact opposite is done.
I just find it amusing at this point.
You seem to struggle with the concept of net spend
The argument in the replies
Do I sound like Moh yet?
Catalan media confirming it's on
Anyone who doesn't understand netspend needs to trawl RAWK for a while.
They run netspend accountant courses for beginners.
Tbf to him, why should he write a new article saying the same things, just for a different club.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Always strange when posters here moan about how the media portrays United and how they take digs at you. Whereas if you go to literally any opposition forum the unanimous feeling is that you guys are the media darlings who always get preferential treatment.
Don't see anything wrong with that tbh.
Call me crazy, but I don't think City are signing a 3rd right back
BS... City just bought Walker and Danilo...why would they need Aurier?
Did Delaney post the same article twice or did he alter the first attempt?
If he just posted the same thing again then he deserves all the flack he gets
Edit seems he just aided his google traffic which is fair
If he just posted the same thing again then he deserves all the flack he gets
Edit seems he just aided his google traffic which is fair
That's natural with the amount of coverage we get though, no? We simply seem to get more coverage than most, so our fans will focus on the negative press whereas others the most positive.
Bacca was very good first season and carried Milan really well and all fans liked him. But Milan didnt qualify for Europe that season, and so Bacca ( after having a gentleman agreement with Milan before he signed that they would sell him if they dont make it to europe) asked to leave, and when Milan allowed him to, he only wanted top clubs playing in CL ( some rumours about him going to Arsenal) and wanted a pay increase. No one provided that at the time, some teams like West Ham wanted him and they were in Europe League. He took his time but then decided against joining, and it didnt work out with the other clubs that were interested in him. So he stayed and looked like he doesnt give a shit this past season although he scored some good goals, but had terrible attitude and played with no heart that Milan could have used any other mediocre striker instead and did as good. So yes Milan fans want him out now because he nags so much for something that is basically his fault since he refused to join the clubs that were interested in him, but in his first season in Milan fans really liked him, he was a top player.
Do I sound like Moh yet?
niiice.No mention of United in their article, only Inter, Milan and City.
Call me crazy, but I don't think City are signing a 3rd right back
Danilo deal isn't finalized yet is it ?
They maybe considering Aurier as a replacement for Danilo. Not a must that they're going to sign him.
Are either of the Milan clubs able to sign him? Don't know the specifics of the non-EU rule in Italy but they've both got a few players.
Has a French passport
That's a good question, their rules confuse me. @giorno
Wait, City bought Danilo too. What are they buying, a whole set of FBs?
I thought he did too but apparently he doesn't from what Amoyal and others have said.
Oh really? Dang sorry for wrong info.
That's pretty much what they needed to do given how many they let go.
I think it's something to do with France recognising it as part of Europe and Italy not. He doesn't have a french passport but a (I can't remember the word) part of the world that is recognised as French passport.
The window ain't over yet though pep wants 4 more players
rule is clubs can only add two non-EU players per season to the existing squad(iirc there's no limit to the amount of non-EU players a club can have, only on the amount that can be signed per season).
Juventus right now can't sign Aurier because they already signed Betancur and Douglas Costa. If they sell Betancur(not sure about a loan), than they could sign Aurier
Plus the Michael Keane sell on
Really hope Leicester stick a £70m price tag on him! Fecking Spurs!
Thanks, so Milan and Inter can sign Aurier at the moment.