Neutral
BTV
So long DACA.
Nearly a million ppl...
Such a hateful motherfecking coward
Nearly a million ppl...
Such a hateful motherfecking coward
So long DACA.
Nearly a million ppl...
Such a hateful motherfecking coward
Trevor Noah, Stephen Colbert, Seth Meyers and John Oliver are all excellent at it.Anyone else addicted to youtube videos slagging off Trump? Its like a new form of entertainment, so much material, such easy comedy.
Trevor Noah, Stephen Colbert, Seth Meyers and John Oliver are all excellent at it.
Uh oh! Is this clown headed to D.C. for a job in the Trump administration? I sincerely hope not. He's pure evil mixed with stupid.
A positive. Well done.
Nice story but it's not working like that. Narratives are easy to find what matters is the proof beyond them and this video doesn't do anything in this regard. And to state that it explains "#TrumpRussia" is at best misleading and at worst straight fake news.
I must have missed the bit where the host of that video stated he was doling out hard evidence of collusion and coordination. I could have sworn he started and ended the video by saying "IF Putin and Trump made a deal what might it look like" and in-between listing out a series of facts.
The video simply points out that a number of Trump's actions go against the interests of America and its allies and in fact benefit Russia. The host is offering an explainer for people who may not have been paying attention to the consequences of Trump's seemingly baffling actions on the global stage.
Fake news is a phrase that is recklessly thrown around these days and almost never used correctly. If that video had offered deliberately misleading claims or outright lies (you know, the things Trump does everytime he opens his mouth) then it might be applicable but that's not what happened here.
(And please don't say "I was referring to random twitter guy who posted that when I said fake news" because random twitter guys tweet is vague and can be interpreted as simply "a good way to explain the suspicions around Trumps actions". Plus he's just random twitter guy.)
Also the part about Russia sanctions is just bad reasoning, apparently Trump hasn't delivered on lifting sanctions because he has to cope with the supsicion in America about Putin. Err ... ok, mind reader.
Trump has stated on numerous occasions that he wants to lift the Russian sanctions. He has fought more being added and was publically angered when they were. To add to all that Trump has been caught lying countless times about Russia, his business dealings (or lack of them) in Russia and his relationship with various Russian figures, including Putin himself. His own Son has been caught in a huge lie about secret emails and meetings with former Russian spies and he will have to testify about it too. Sorry, but it doesn't take, nor does one need to be a mind reader, to work out Trump is lying and extremely evasive over the whole Russia thing.
You are right, it won't do anything against Trump, but that isn't its intention at all. It's basically just a video showing people who refuse to believe that there is any wrongdoing going on, what could be happening. The video clearly states throughout "what if" and doesn't actually make any firm accusations because it's not meant to be proving anything to get Trump in trouble in any way, but it is meant to be used along with other evidence to sway those who are adamant Trump is completely innocent in all of this, when it is perfectly clear to anyone who cares to look, that he most definitely isn't.
Again, I agree with regards to Trump but I disagree with the notion that something with that kind of flawed thinking is going to sway anybody who really wants to look into things.
My main issue with the video is that the reasoning used is really weak because of two things: limited context and speculating. The conclusion of flawed reasoning might still be right, but only by accident. And with right I don't mean that «Trump and Putin have something going on» but a bit more specific. In the current clima of contradicting opinions on everything and decreasing respect for the truth it's setting a bad example imo.
So he is a random twitter guy ... still jumping the ship with his comment. I wasn't complaining that the video is lacking proof, because as you say correctly that wasn't the intention. I was merely pointing out the fact that videos like this are nice to kill time but won't do anything against Trump.
Still there is a few things wrong with the video, as it is explaining things that Trump did in domestic affairs and on the global stage with a very limited (not to say biased) context. For example Trump's exit of the Paris Climate accord, which seems to be mostly about domestic interests in fossil fuels, not Russias export. Also the part about Russia sanctions is just bad reasoning, apparently Trump hasn't delivered on lifting sanctions because he has to cope with the supsicion in America about Putin. Err ... ok, mind reader.
Stuff like this just makes you loose credibility. Even moreso in a case like Trump where you don't need to speculate about things as there is enough amateurish action going on all the time.
Increasing chatter that Tillerson will resign fairly soon....
So credibility in what sense? They are getting their news from Facebook and Twitter too, watching videos and reading posts infinitely worse.Stuff like this just makes you loose credibility.
Your mistake is that you are confusing the audience, with people 'who are going to look into things'. In comparison to videos out there... I just don't see the issue.I disagree with the notion that something with that kind of flawed thinking is going to sway anybody who really wants to look into things.
'Heeling'
FEMA says they'll be there for years... Tens of thousands of people still in shelters... Tens of thousands of homes still underwater...100,000 homes have varying degrees of flood damage.
But, Texas is 'heeling' fast!
That's right Texans. He considers the people of Lone Star State as obedient dogs.
If the Russians are so opposed to the Paris Agreement, why did they sign on for it?
Nice story but it's not working like that. Narratives are easy to find what matters is the proof beyond them and this video doesn't do anything in this regard. And to state that it explains "#TrumpRussia" is at best misleading and at worst straight fake news.