Pep Guardiola: I don't remember SAF's Man United job offer, my English was not good

Florida Man

Cartoon expert and crap superhero
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
13,924
Location
Florida, man
Imagine him trying to play tiki taka with the complete shite of a midfield that was left after Fergie :lol:
What, you don’t think the likes of Cleverley and his Spanish style would kill it in a Guardiola system? :lol:
 

FrenchRed

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2015
Messages
611
Damn it, don't create these type of threads, it still hurts that we chose David fecking Moyes to overhaul our squad. Look at how many years it has set us back.
While I’m very glad we have Jose and not Pep, Moyes really still does stick in my throat.

The damage he did to the club in such a short time is nothing short of catastrophic. The more time passes, the clearer this becomes.
 

RC89

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
3,013
Imagine him trying to play tiki taka with the complete shite of a midfield that was left after Fergie :lol:
I do think though our transfer policy would have been a lot more methodical in that he buys players that can play specific type of football. We ended up buying players who were available and big names i.e. Di Maria & Falcao. Though I was excited about both I have to admit. Falcao at a time when he was injured and we had RVP made no sense looking back now.
 

Will Absolute

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
7,982
Location
Southern Ireland
Yep, he was pretty shrewd. Made a show of going to other managers with half-hearted interest and then announcing Moyes, which made it seem like he had scoured all available options and done due diligence. It was the height of nepotism. Atleast he knows better now.
That would be my best guess as well. SAF isn't shy, and if he really wanted Pep he'd have made himself understood, language barrier or no language barrier.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,795
Location
india
I can't be having this. That means SAF didn't want him and preferred David Moyes on some level. How could that ever have been the outcome of a football genius's decision making process? I think Guardiola had decided on City as his project when his Barca office managers went there. Yes, that means he chose/would have chosen them over United.
Sir Alex sold Stam and admitted to the mistake. Everyone makes them. Even geniuses.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,795
Location
india
Yep, he was pretty shrewd. Made a show of going to other managers with half-hearted interest and then announcing Moyes, which made it seem like he had scoured all available options and done due diligence. It was the height of nepotism. Atleast he knows better now.
I love Sir Alex, and find people comparing and equating Pep and Jose to him amusing (he was a on a different level), but I think this was the case. Sir Alex chose Moyes. He messed up on picking his succesor. All the murmors after Moyes failed just sound like excuses.
 

Mr PG

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
1,514
Tbh this was no way to run a corporation where such major decisions are left to one person. Will never happen again.. the corporate types at the helm will make sure of that.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,849
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
If either Jose or Pep has taken over post SAF we would have won two PL titles by now with the same level of investment.

We went backwards under Moyes and LvG whilst at least having some clearer ideas about how his side should play was very scattergun in the transfer market
 

Nani Nana

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Messages
5,661
Supports
Whoever won the game
Mourinho is twice the manager Guardiola will ever be
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,385
Location
Flagg
Bit weird. So either Sir Alex never offered him the job and now says he did to try and save face for appointing Moyes, or he did and Guardiola didn't understand him? :lol:

I do think he's less of a twat than Jose, but his teams are just as twattish as any Jose side, and he's definitely more weird. A lot of the time though he'll say something that gets misconveyed as twattishness because he just seems to blurt things out.
 

Sayros

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
6,006
Supports
Paris Saint-Germain
Guardiola is just a straight forward guy

He even admitted that Mourinho won the war in Spain between the two of them even though his Barca had more wins than Mourinho's Madrid head to head
Wasn't that his 'puto jefe' rant in the press? He said Mourinho is the puto jefe when it comes to the media and mind-games. I don't see why Pep would mean anything else than that when he has dominated his Madrid side for most of his reign as Barcelona head coach.
 

Ikon

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Messages
2,417
Despite what Fergie has said since Moyes got fired, I think Moyes was first choice.
At least we should've offered Pep the job...which it appeared did not happen.
And Jose was definitely ready to take over, when SAF left. .
Since the utter debacle of Moyes, there has been some serious arse covering, but I absolutely am convinced that Moyes WAS number one choice, infact the ONLY choice.
You only have to read some of the comments made by the Glazers, David Gill and Bobby Charlton at the time of his disastrous appointment.
"The search for a new manager has been very short. Alex was very clear with his recommendation and we are delighted that David has agreed to accept the job." Joel Glazer.

It sounds to me as though this is Guardiola's polite way of saying, there was no such job offer from United.
But instead of calling it out as total codswallop, he says he can't remember, and that his English wasn't very good.

If we had truly wanted Guardiola to replace SAF, don't you think a little bit more effort would have been made than a cryptic wink over dinner...?
 

Vialli_92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
2,676
Location
Ireland
Supports
Juventus
Wasn't that his 'puto jefe' rant in the press? He said Mourinho is the puto jefe when it comes to the media and mind-games. I don't see why Pep would mean anything else than that when he has dominated his Madrid side for most of his reign as Barcelona head coach.
Yes but it wasn't just about the football

It was a war and Mourinho mentally won the war against Guardiola and Barcelona
 

Giggs86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,632
Location
USA
Yes but it wasn't just about the football

It was a war and Mourinho mentally won the war against Guardiola and Barcelona
Could you please elaborate? I believe that Barca won more trophies than Madrid and had the edge over Madrid in head to head clashes during their reign.

What war is there to win outside of football? How can you win a 'mental war' if your team goes on to lose on the pitch?
 

Sayros

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
6,006
Supports
Paris Saint-Germain
Yes but it wasn't just about the football

It was a war and Mourinho mentally won the war against Guardiola and Barcelona
I think you really misunderstood what he was saying. He was saying he wasn't going to try to compete with Mourinho in mind games, that's his thing. He was, however, going to compete on the field and thoroughly dominated with his team against Mourinho. If anything, it was about everything but the football.
 

Vialli_92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
2,676
Location
Ireland
Supports
Juventus
I think you really misunderstood what he was saying. He was saying he wasn't going to try to compete with Mourinho in mind games, that's his thing. He was, however, going to compete on the field and thoroughly dominated with his team against Mourinho. If anything, it was about everything but the football.
He never said it publicly

I read an article from guillem balligue that Guardiola admitted to close friends Mourinho beat him and in the end won their war between them

I think it was the fact Mourinho made it into a war and more than just football is what took a big toll on Guardiola and made him go down a road he didn't want to go down

Guardiola is all about football and not politics and mind games he is a purist so getting dragged into a mental war is why I think he considers he lost out to Mourinho in the end
 

Dave_fan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
43
Imagine him trying to play tiki taka with the complete shite of a midfield that was left after Fergie :lol:
If we got Pep instead of Moyes that summer, within 1 year, then we could have most probably ended up with a midfield of Thiago and Kroos
 

Sayros

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
6,006
Supports
Paris Saint-Germain
He never said it publicly

I read an article from guillem balligue that Guardiola admitted to close friends Mourinho beat him and in the end won their war between them

I think it was the fact Mourinho made it into a war and more than just football is what took a big toll on Guardiola and made him go down a road he didn't want to go down

Guardiola is all about football and not politics and mind games he is a purist so getting dragged into a mental war is why I think he considers he lost out to Mourinho in the end
Okay, so basically just a rumor with no real substance behind it. It just doesn't make much sense, Guardiola clearly got the better of Mourinho in their time in Spain, with probably the best spell for a first-time manager ever, so why would you believe that rumor? Balague can be full of it sometimes, although I wouldn't be surprised it took a toll on him. Guardiola seems a bit unstable and constantly on edge, it must be exhausting, and dealing with Mourinho's mind game doesn't help if he's struggling but he's hardly struggled with Mourinho whether it's in Spain or now in England.
 

Vialli_92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
2,676
Location
Ireland
Supports
Juventus
Okay, so basically just a rumor with no real substance behind it. It just doesn't make much sense, Guardiola clearly got the better of Mourinho in their time in Spain, with probably the best spell for a first-time manager ever, so why would you believe that rumor? Balague can be full of it sometimes, although I wouldn't be surprised it took a toll on him. Guardiola seems a bit unstable and constantly on edge, it must be exhausting, and dealing with Mourinho's mind game doesn't help if he's struggling but he's hardly struggled with Mourinho whether it's in Spain or now in England.
He turned the games into a hatred that had never been seen before

It's quite obvious why he thinks Mourinho won the war between them

Like I keep saying it wasn't about the results that made Guardiola think that
 

mark_a

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
1,274
The press love Pep, so he can spout all his crap & they lap it up. He was looking a bit of a clown last season, but now is his time to shine. Or shite, whichever.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
Would have loved Pep at Utd. His brand of football is what you would pay to watch.He has a style of play and sticks to it, home or away.
 

TheRedHearted

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
2,674
Location
New York, NY
I think Ferguson mentioned, Pep didn’t understand, Ferguson got offended and didn’t further it since he figured he wasn’t into it.
In other words, we got Moyes because of a mistake of communication and some ego.
Sounds like a Twilight Zone episode to me
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
A fully functioning Mourinho side will dominate the PL for a decade at a club like United - we've always shown we're willing to stick by our mangers if they're worth it.

Guardiola's here for one more season. He'll win one or two titles and maybe a CL. After that, City will take on a second tier manager (only Pep and Jose are tier 1 at the moment).

Picking Mourinho over Guardiola will result in more success by 2027, imo. It's difficult to accept right now, but I'd rather have a top class manager who's enamoured with the club.

Pep's got his team following his orders much quicker, but that's because he and Pellegrini shared a lot in common. By contrast, LvG and Mourinho couldn't be any more different. I accept that Moyes was a bad choice in terms of his overall ability, but in terms of style, he wasn't the worst option because he only needed to keep SAF's momentum going (which he failed at, tbf). By taking on LvG after Moyes, we fecked up the continuity and set back Mourinho's eventual revolution.
 
Last edited:

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
A fully functioning Mourinho side will dominate the PL for a decade at a club like United that's willing to stick by him.

Guardiola's here for one more season. He'll win one or two titles and maybe a CL. After that, City will take on a second tier manager (only Pep and Jose are tier 1 at the moment).

Picking Mourinho over Guardiola will result in more success by 2027, imo. It's difficult to accept right now, but I'd a top class manager who's enamoured with the club.

Pep's got his team following his orders much quicker, but that's because he and Pellegrini shared a lot in common. By contrast, LvG and Mourinho couldn't be any more different. I accept that Moyes was a bad choice in terms of his overall ability, but in terms of style, he wasn't the worst option because he only needed to keep SAF's momentum going (which he failed at, tbf). By taking on LvG after Moyes, we fecked up the continuity and set back Mourinho's eventual revolution.
:lol:
 

SirAF

Ageist
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
37,649
Location
Okay, so basically just a rumor with no real substance behind it. It just doesn't make much sense, Guardiola clearly got the better of Mourinho in their time in Spain, with probably the best spell for a first-time manager ever, so why would you believe that rumor? Balague can be full of it sometimes, although I wouldn't be surprised it took a toll on him. Guardiola seems a bit unstable and constantly on edge, it must be exhausting, and dealing with Mourinho's mind game doesn't help if he's struggling but he's hardly struggled with Mourinho whether it's in Spain or now in England.
They won one La Liga each during that period when they both were there, right? Fair enough Guardiola won the CL in Mourinho's first season.
 

Denis' cuff

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7,771
Location
here
Pep poached by arabs whilst at Barca. Accepts offer he couldn’t refuse.

Suddenly develops stress to avoid breach of contract. Takes gardening leave in NYC whilst arabs lay out the ground work with no expense spared.

Fergie attempts to recruit him in NYC. Too late. Project already underway, recruitment has begun, and Pep claims he didn’t understand his accent whilst hist bank balance goes nuclear.

Always been a fan of the berts and will stay there forever. Who could blame him?

The mark of the man.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,662
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
A fully functioning Mourinho side will dominate the PL for a decade at a club like United - we've always shown we're willing to stick by our mangers if they're worth it.

Guardiola's here for one more season. He'll win one or two titles and maybe a CL. After that, City will take on a second tier manager (only Pep and Jose are tier 1 at the moment).

Picking Mourinho over Guardiola will result in more success by 2027, imo. It's difficult to accept right now, but I'd rather have a top class manager who's enamoured with the club.

Pep's got his team following his orders much quicker, but that's because he and Pellegrini shared a lot in common. By contrast, LvG and Mourinho couldn't be any more different. I accept that Moyes was a bad choice in terms of his overall ability, but in terms of style, he wasn't the worst option because he only needed to keep SAF's momentum going (which he failed at, tbf). By taking on LvG after Moyes, we fecked up the continuity and set back Mourinho's eventual revolution.
Honestly I think both Pep and Mou aren't long term trainers. What makes you think Mourinho will build you more success for the future? It's definitely not his track record, since he's never stayed for more than a few (3?) seasons at any of his clubs. Same with Pep, even though he's successful where he goes, he leaves after a few years, either needing a sabbatical (being an insane person is tiring I guess) or a change of scenery.

That being said, I don't think having the same manager for twenty years is a prerequisite for success, look at Bayern, Barcelona and Real, they switch managers quite often and seem to do well. The staff behind the manager DoF, TD and what not should be stable, the guy shouting at the lads from the sidelines can switch up every few years just fine. The lads themselves change all the time too, so why can't the trainer?
 

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,262
Location
Australia
Honestly I think both Pep and Mou aren't long term trainers. What makes you think Mourinho will build you more success for the future? It's definitely not his track record, since he's never stayed for more than a few (3?) seasons at any of his clubs. Same with Pep, even though he's successful where he goes, he leaves after a few years, either needing a sabbatical (being an insane person is tiring I guess) or a change of scenery.

That being said, I don't think having the same manager for twenty years is a prerequisite for success, look at Bayern, Barcelona and Real, they switch managers quite often and seem to do well. The staff behind the manager DoF, TD and what not should be stable, the guy shouting at the lads from the sidelines can switch up every few years just fine. The lads themselves change all the time too, so why can't the trainer?
Whilst I agree with that point - those clubs are seemingly run very differently to us. Their transitions are much more seamless as they have a plan. They recruit specific types of players and managers to match their systems. It's why a DOF or someone in that regard is so important in today's game - it's something I think we are lacking.

Like you yourself said, I don't see either Jose or Pep staying long, they'll both win some shit then move on. If we are to go off evidence though, I don't think the club will make the right sort of recruitment. Their decisions seem to be short-sighted evident by the Moyes, to Lvg, to Jose progression.

The way I see it is we either have a manager who stays for a long time and overlooks the whole footballing aspect of the club ala SAF or we adopt a much more modern scheme and bring in a DOF or something of the sort, which will give us an identity and allow us to recruit managers and players who suit that specific style.
 

Lougie86

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 28, 2015
Messages
101
Location
Scotland
Supports
Partick Thistle
Can't stand Pep, never have been able to. The guys got a screw loose.

Don't get me wrong I'm not saying he's a bad manager, his teams play some fantastic football but as a personality I can't bear the man.

I've always like Mourinho, even at Chelsea when he was taking titles from us. I don't know, I think I like the win at all costs style.

But Pep, no. Even if he'd become our manager and we had played that football I would never have warmed to him.
 

Gentleman Jim

It's absolutely amazing! Perfect even.
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Messages
3,154
Location
Salford
Supports
city
He turned the games into a hatred that had never been seen before

It's quite obvious why he thinks Mourinho won the war between them

Like I keep saying it wasn't about the results that made Guardiola think that
You are forgetting (or ignoring) the battle Pep was fighting with the Barca board. His allies had gone (Laporte, Soriano, Txiki) and the new regime were marginalising him. That was as a great a factor as Jose and Real's achievements in Pep's decision to get the hell out of Dodge.