If we sign Alexis, do we still go for Griezmann in the summer?

Status
Not open for further replies.

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
I think we will still sign another striker but not Griezmann. Dybala is a good shout, so is Icardi. In the summer the priority will be CM and a LB
 

Shiva87

Full Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,854
Location
Mumbai, India
Yes absolutely. Griezmann will be the no.10 and Sanchez the right winger. Lingard and Griezmann can rotate for that spot! Right now, we don't have a proper no. 10 but Lingard is really growing into that role.
 

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
Assuming we sign Alexis Sanchez, do you guys think that's out attack sorted and Martial and Rashford will continue to share games or will we make another splash in the summer and perhaps go back in for Griezmann?

I guess a lot depends on how far we go in Europe but Griezmann is relatively cheap (for this market) and obviously a world class player in his prime. Signing him would be a real sign of intent but would obviously hinder the development of two of the best young players in the game.

I'd personally rather we invest in other areas (new LB perhaps or a midfielder) but if we sign Ozil for free and Shaw keeps up his form but we end the season trophy less I can see us going in for Griezmann. I'm not sure Barca would be in for him given they have Dembele, just signed Coutinho and of course you've got Dracula and that Messi fella. Perhaps City because Pep needs 20 world class forwards or even Real Madrid could be in for him but I suspect we'll be keeping a close eye on things too.
Honestly I would pick Sanchez over Greizmann.Greizmann will need to adapt to English football and I"m not sure if he would fit into a Mourinho team,Sanchez would just be perfect.Hes 3 years older than Greizmann but he's built like an Ox and if he can give us 3 good seasons,then we should all be delighted with that....
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,265
Location
Manchester
I'm not sure what the plans are. I've always been a Lukaku advocator and fan, but I think with the way we're heading Griezmann would be better for us up top. That's not gonna happen though, so it's a tough one now. He could still be a second striker while playing in another position, but I'm not sure what that position would be, specially as we don't know where Alexis will play if he comes.
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
Not for me, I think they're too similar. I think we would have bigger priorities to spend our cash on - namely another top central midfielder and both full back positions.
 

diplomat

New Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
638
Location
Bulgaria
I think getting Sanchez means we are saving money for a third top CM. There is no one in the first 11 I would swap for Griezmann right now, assuming Sanchez is one of the starters for us.
 

Jeffthered

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,734
I think we leave Griezmann alone, unless he shows an absolute and genuine desire to join Man Utd.

But I see him at Barca.
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,265
Location
Manchester
Yes absolutely. Griezmann as the 10 with Sanchez wide right and Martial left please.
This would be pretty awesome, although isn't Pogba playing his best football when he's in an advanced role, negating the 10?
A lot of people saying Sanchez doesn't work on the right too, but that was only in one team so doesn't necessarily mean he won't now.

I'd love to see them all working well together, but it's tough to see what the best route is right now with our attack, at least until we know where Sanchez would play.
 

Williams1960

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
109
Sanchez would be brilliant. Jose seems to have let the flair players play a bit more and he could be a massive hit.

Would work well alongside lukaku with mata, pog and magic shielding.
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,120
Even if we don't get Sanchez Griezmann should not be a target for us. If reports are to be believed and we are getting Sanchez in a straight swap for Mkhi and aren't spending a transfer fee then I still expect, and hope, for us to get another attacking player, i'm hoping for someone like Pulisic, I don't think we need to replace Ibra considering Martial, Rashford and even Sanchez can play upfront aside from Lukaku. Slot in a CM and a RB/LB and I think it would be a good transfer window.
 

Ødegaard

formerly MrEriksen
Scout
Joined
Feb 23, 2011
Messages
11,474
Location
Norway
If we sign Sanchez, I think we still need a #10/AM/CM that can create something in order to keep us from being overly relying on Pogba.
Pogba is and will be our best midfielder, so I don't expect us to go buy a Pogba v.2, but when Pogba is out or needs a rest we should have a creator to play either in midfield or at the 10 so our "penetrating attackers" can actually be fed to some extent. Rashford, Sanchez, Martial and even Lukaku has pace to run in behind and counter-attack, but only Sanchez and Martial will be able to create on their own.
I believe Mourinho agrees with this, and that is why we're reportedly interested in Özil. Because despite him being a "luxury" player, he's a creator we can get on a free that can do that job when Pogba is out.

I do believe that us getting Sanchez ends our run at Griezmann due to Griezmann being another player needing to be fed, but I believe it opens us up to buying a different kind of player, a more creative kind like for example Dybala (assumptions based on what I've read, not what I've seen).
Not that I believe we'll sign Dybala, I still believe we'll go for Özil in order to have more money to spend on upgrades elsewhere (mainly LB, RB & potentially CB).
 
Last edited:

VancouverUtdFan

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2017
Messages
2,514
Supports
Canucks + NE Patriots
Regardless of whether or not people want him, to answer OP: yes we still can go for a Dybala or AG or Ozil type even if we get Sanchez.

It would mean playing a mid2 more often than not to fit all the players but it’s not at all a bad thing when you can do so with those many world class players in your lineup. If José really wanted to, he could start Martial on the bench the games he wants to play a mid3 with priority obviously going to Sanchez + AG/Dybala/Ozil first. I feel United will still look to add a world class no10/SS in the summer as well as a CM to compliment Pogba+Matic in a mid3 regardless of what happens this January window.


433
Sanchez——Lukaku——AG/Dybala/Ozil
Pogba———Matic———NEW CM
Shaw—Bailly—Jones—Valencia

4231
———————-Lukaku
Martial——AG/Dybala/Ozil——Sanchez
—————Pogba——Matic
Shaw——Bailly——Jones——Valencia


...I’d honestly really love a lineup like that. Not just for the obvious reasons of having so many world class players in attack. But because the attack would be abnormally fluid/interchangeable on top of how fast and skilled it would be. No real set positions / number of players able to play multiple positions comfortably. Would be a headache for any opposing team+manager to predict and hold off. Sanchez able to play the right side as well as he plays the left, and if need be centrally behind the striker. AG/Dybala/Ozil all able to play centrally behind the striker as well as out wide on the right. Pogba able to sit back alongside Matic or play upfront more freely in a mid3.

AKA Lukaku (ST), Matic (DM), Bailly (CB) are really the only 100% sure set players in a single position. The rest are able to play multiple positions which would give us a lot of unpredictability, leaving opposing sides guessing and on their heals prior to kickoff just about every given match.
 

reddaz71

New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
960
Location
Cheshire
Would not think so. suspect we will be signing Ozil and hopefully a world class midfielder to replace both Carrick and Fellaini.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,339
Best possible outcome of Sanchez is that we'll finally get rid of Ronaldo returning rumors. They were starting to do me :mad:
 

simplyared

Full Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2017
Messages
4,442
Location
somewhere ouside the UK
Agree with another member on this thread; can't see Mourinho going for Griezman (1.75m) after bringing in Sanchez (1.69m). Seems against his principles having too many shorty's in the side.
 

diplomat

New Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
638
Location
Bulgaria
Regardless of whether or not people want him, to answer OP: yes we still can go for a Dybala or AG or Ozil type even if we get Sanchez.

It would mean playing a mid2 more often than not to fit all the players but it’s not at all a bad thing when you can do so with those many world class players in your lineup. If José really wanted to, he could start Martial on the bench the games he wants to play a mid3 with priority obviously going to Sanchez + AG/Dybala/Ozil first. I feel United will still look to add a world class no10/SS in the summer as well as a CM to compliment Pogba+Matic in a mid3 regardless of what happens this January window.


433
Sanchez——Lukaku——AG/Dybala/Ozil
Pogba———Matic———NEW CM
Shaw—Bailly—Jones—Valencia

4231
———————-Lukaku
Martial——AG/Dybala/Ozil——Sanchez
—————Pogba——Matic
Shaw——Bailly——Jones——Valencia


...I’d honestly really love a lineup like that. Not just for the obvious reasons of having so many world class players in attack. But because the attack would be abnormally fluid/interchangeable on top of how fast and skilled it would be. No real set positions / number of players able to play multiple positions comfortably. Would be a headache for any opposing team+manager to predict and hold off. Sanchez able to play the right side as well as he plays the left, and if need be centrally behind the striker. AG/Dybala/Ozil all able to play centrally behind the striker as well as out wide on the right. Pogba able to sit back alongside Matic or play upfront more freely in a mid3.

AKA Lukaku (ST), Matic (DM), Bailly (CB) are really the only 100% sure set players in a single position. The rest are able to play multiple positions which would give us a lot of unpredictability, leaving opposing sides guessing and on their heals prior to kickoff just about every given match.
So you believe we have to keep on spending north of 200 million each summer on superstar players? What do we do with Lingard, Rashford, Martial, Mata? What about Pereira coming from loan?

What about our wage budget, which if I remember correctly is the biggest in England atm? Adding Sanchez, Ozil/AG/Dybala and a new top CM, that is probably around 800-900k per week, it isn't financially advisable to spend and risk so much money, in my opinion.
 

VancouverUtdFan

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2017
Messages
2,514
Supports
Canucks + NE Patriots
:lol::lol:. You really see jose playing with that 3 plus striker?
Why not? He famously played CR7-Ozil-ADM with Benzema up top in a 4231 with Madrid all the time. I don’t see how this would be much different. And when he played 433 he’d drop ADM, move up Ozil into his spot on the right and insert Diarra in the midfield.

Don’t get what’s so funny ...but yea :)
 

JK-27

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
869
There's no place in the starting line-up for Griezmann, he plays as a central striker. Unless Jose suddenly doesn't want to play 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3, where would Griezmann fit in?
 

VancouverUtdFan

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2017
Messages
2,514
Supports
Canucks + NE Patriots
So you believe we have to keep on spending north of 200 million each summer on superstar players? What do we do with Lingard, Rashford, Martial, Mata? What about Pereira coming from loan?

What about our wage budget, which if I remember correctly is the biggest in England atm? Adding Sanchez, Ozil/AG/Dybala and a new top CM, that is probably around 800-900k per week, it isn't financially advisable to spend and risk so much money, in my opinion.
No player we have gotten was anywhere close to 200M nor would AG or Dybala. Martial keeps starting other than the odd games we’d play 433 since 4231 would be the favoured formation - which he absolutely fits in. Rashford keeps developing as he hasn’t proved much and stays a primary sub. Mata likely leaves. Lingard despite his recent form becomes a primary bench option as Rashford is and essentially takes Mata’s spot. Pereira isn’t starter material so he’s either going to get limited minutes or will be loaned out again.

Wages will more or less balance themselves out with players leaving ...Zlatan will be gone. Mikhi gone. Carrick gone. Darmian gone. Fellaini and/or Mata gone. A central defender will likely be gone, as well as Romero.
 

Minimalist

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
15,091
Don't think so. Just bulking out the squad at that point - unless Martial gets shifted.
 

goin4glory

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
5,033
Location
Crushing Souls.
This would be pretty awesome, although isn't Pogba playing his best football when he's in an advanced role, negating the 10?
A lot of people saying Sanchez doesn't work on the right too, but that was only in one team so doesn't necessarily mean he won't now.

I'd love to see them all working well together, but it's tough to see what the best route is right now with our attack, at least until we know where Sanchez would play.
Pogba plays fine in a midfield 2, the fact that we rely on him to be our main creator says much more about Miki/Mata/Lingard than it does about his best position. I do agree he's played his best in a midfield 3 though.

:lol::lol:. You really see jose playing with that 3 plus striker?
Maybe not in games vs elite opposition but yes absolutely. In the last month alone we've drawn with Southampton/Burnley and Leicester. Griezmann is a world class attacking player in a position we need, is a clear upgrade on Mata/Lingard/Miki and has a release clause of 85m, if he didn't have a clause how much do you think he'd be worth?
 

Swift Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2017
Messages
882
No, I do not want Griezmann anymore. I think Sanchez is a much better fit for PL and our team. I will rather focus on specialist RW.

People keep on talking about showing the intent with these mega signings, I do not think we need to do that any more..We signed Zlatan, Pogba, ADM, and now Sanchez likely on the way..that is more than enough display of intent. More than showing intent, we should focus on making our team more balanced.
 

ZAGREB RED

Guest
Doubt it, if Sanchez comes now and Ozil in the summer, Griezmann is unlikely.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
29,312
Location
Croatia
Why not? He famously played CR7-Ozil-ADM with Benzema up top in a 4231 with Madrid all the time. I don’t see how this would be much different. And when he played 433 he’d drop ADM, move up Ozil into his spot on the right and insert Diarra in the midfield.

Don’t get what’s so funny ...but yea :)
It is funny because you have 4 attackers in squad who don't play defence. Ozil and di maria are more midfielders than wingers or attackers. These 4 are pure attackers. And we are talking about mourinho. Who is mad on his wingers because they don't track back
 
Status
Not open for further replies.