Man Utd set to appoint Director of Football (when hell freezes over)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,670
Everybody is entitled to their opinion which I 100% respect but I think he could have done a better job here, as he had a hand in bringing Pogba, Kingsley Coman, Fernando Llorente, Sami Khedira and Dani Alves, Mandzukic, Dybala and Miralem Pjanic to the club for fees we could only dream of mate.
As a scout, the people who had a real hand in those deals was Fabio Patrici and of course Beppe Moratta. Juve didn't even see Ribalta as a great loss.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,425
Are people fully aware that appointing a DoF carries just as much risk (if not more so) than our next manager? Majority of the talk seems to be based around this being a situation that can't fail and would automatically improve the club. I'm not convinced.
 

el3mel

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,736
Location
Egypt
Hopefully they get it done quickly before the next appointment. Both this and the new manager will be crucial decisions and we can't feck this up.
 

the chameleon

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
920
Paul Mitchell would fit well.
  • He’s young
  • Successful premier league experience
  • Unlike Monchi, could be a long term person because he’s from Manchester
  • Is modern thinking
 

Eric's Seagull

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
3,707
Location
4-4-2: The Flat One
Surely it’s not as difficult to be shite at the commercial side of things given United’s already high stature. I honestly think he’s a sham all over and would be best replaced completely.
I was thinking of something like that regarding the commercial side. Totally agree with the part in bold and glad something else is thinking along the same lines mate ;)
 

MrBest

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
2,868
Imagine a CEO for any big business performing the way Woodward has, they'd be locked up in a mental asylum.
Not really, has incremental turnover and profit year on year. He is made to be a CEO for a good and service business, just not football.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,314
Are people fully aware that appointing a DoF carries just as much risk (if not more so) than our next manager? Majority of the talk seems to be based around this being a situation that can't fail and would automatically improve the club. I'm not convinced.
It’s become this big thing that will save our club. It will mean nothing if Woodward still decides he knows better. Like he did to the manager in the summer. It can cause as many problems as it solves.
 

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
Are people fully aware that appointing a DoF carries just as much risk (if not more so) than our next manager? Majority of the talk seems to be based around this being a situation that can't fail and would automatically improve the club. I'm not convinced.

The manager would still have a major say in our dealings but in abscense of any one he won't switch off and let other clubs sign players we should be signing. A dof won't have all the power without the current managers consent, with our old board having the same old principles.
 
Last edited:

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
It’s become this big thing that will save our club. It will mean nothing if Woodward still decides he knows better. Like he did to the manager in the summer. It can cause as many problems as it solves.
If toby costed 75 m, Woodward was absolutely right to overrule any of Willian, perisic, maguire, Boateng and toby as well signings for the money they were supposed to cost. Add aurountovic to the list.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,738
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Paul Mitchell would fit well.
  • He’s young
  • Successful premier league experience
  • Unlike Monchi, could be a long term person because he’s from Manchester
  • Is modern thinking
He'd be my choice, also worked with Poch - IIRC?
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
7,187
Plus Paul Mitchell is from Manchester. Some people are hellbent on wanting northern lads running stuff... well here you go! One that is qualified.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
DOF is a shit idea. Just another guy to undermine our next manager. Imagine some guy telling Sir Matt or Sir Alex which players they would have to buy. Worst idea ever. The guy who picks the team should obviously buy the players he needs for his system to work.
You and Jose should work together next!
 

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,336
Location
playa del carmen
Are people fully aware that appointing a DoF carries just as much risk (if not more so) than our next manager? Majority of the talk seems to be based around this being a situation that can't fail and would automatically improve the club. I'm not convinced.
Good post. Ridiculous flippance in here
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
DOF is a shit idea. Just another guy to undermine our next manager. Imagine some guy telling Sir Matt or Sir Alex which players they would have to buy. Worst idea ever. The guy who picks the team should obviously buy the players he needs for his system to work.
Such a shit idea that all elite clubs across Europe have had one for years
 

Ferguson

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
3,930
Location
Seoul, South Korea
In American professional sports the days of one person being both coach and general manager are long gone. And the few recent throwbacks, such as Stan Van Gundy or Tom Thibodeau in the NBA, have proved disastrous.

If the coach is allowed to control transfers and planning, then he tends to go for short term thinking and the club lacks continuity when coaches change.

Also, the job is simply too big these days for one person as the sports have gone global in their recruitment.

In the case of Sir Alex, you had a long term manager capable of thinking long term and United’s league position and market was simpler to understand back then.

But in the period before and after Sir Alex’s retirement, there was no director of football to manage the transition. Not only that, but David Gill retired at the very moment he was needed most.

Ever since, we have had lost transfer windows as managers were indecisive (David Moyes) or living in the past (Van Gaal) or falling out with their players (Mourinho).

Living without a Director of Football was a luxury afforded for a while by SAF and by continued club success, but this time around they will have realized that the hiring of a Director of Football must precede the hiring of a new manager.

Woodward was not enough of a football man to naturally fill that need, nor was it clear that it was even in his job description to take over the kind of decision-making that had always belonged to Sir Alex. This time they need to start with clearly defined roles and a clear division of labor.
 

AgentP

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
4,957
Location
Chennai
In American professional sports the days of one person being both coach and general manager are long gone. And the few recent throwbacks, such as Stan Van Gundy or Tom Thibodeau in the NBA, have proved disastrous.

If the coach is allowed to control transfers and planning, then he tends to go for short term thinking and the club lacks continuity when coaches change.

Also, the job is simply too big these days for one person as the sports have gone global in their recruitment.

In the case of Sir Alex, you had a long term manager capable of thinking long term and United’s league position and market was simpler to understand back then.

But in the period before and after Sir Alex’s retirement, there was no director of football to manage the transition. Not only that, but David Gill retired at the very moment he was needed most.

Ever since, we have had lost transfer windows as managers were indecisive (David Moyes) or living in the past (Van Gaal) or falling out with their players (Mourinho).

Living without a Director of Football was a luxury afforded for a while by SAF and by continued club success, but this time around they will have realized that the hiring of a Director of Football must precede the hiring of a new manager.

Woodward was not enough of a football man to naturally fill that need, nor was it clear that it was even in his job description to take over the kind of decision-making that had always belonged to Sir Alex. This time they need to start with clearly defined roles and a clear division of labor.
Spot on. I hope we get someone with a good track record.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Given the choice between working under a DOF or working directly under Woodward, I'd prefer the manager work under a DOF.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,891
Plus Paul Mitchell is from Manchester. Some people are hellbent on wanting northern lads running stuff... well here you go! One that is qualified.
Imagine we announce it on MUTV with all former players around. Woodwards comes on stage and he says

"Ladies and gentlemen I wish to announce our DOF. In fact he's already in the audience. Here's the hint. He's English, erm actually a local lad. He's young, a former player and time and time again he proven to be very knowledgeablel"

Sky cameras move quickly towards Gary Neville

"Let me present you, Paul Mitchell"

Id kill to see Gaz's face after that.
 
Last edited:

AgentP

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
4,957
Location
Chennai
The manager would still have a major say in our dealings but in abscense of any one he won't switch off and let other clubs sign players we should be signing. A dof won't have any power without the current managers consent, with our old board having the same old principles.
That won't work. What's the use of a DoF if the manager can overrule him.
 

AndyJ1985

New Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
8,954
I actually think Wenger would be a fantastic sporting director. Very intelligent man and excellent at spotting potential.
 

Eric's Seagull

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
3,707
Location
4-4-2: The Flat One
Are people fully aware that appointing a DoF carries just as much risk (if not more so) than our next manager? Majority of the talk seems to be based around this being a situation that can't fail and would automatically improve the club. I'm not convinced.
You may not be convinced in us getting a DoF but I think we need someone in with a plan to steady the ship after the crap we have been served up since Sir Alex retired.

There is always a chance of it not going to plan but I would rather a good DoF in who knows what he is doing and has a proper plan for the next say 4-5 years. Rather than keep Ed in charge who has new clue about the football side and seems like he wants to just bring in the next big game manager give them hundreds of millions and when that doesn't work start again.

I've been saying for a while that I think the DoF will be one of the most important appointments in our history as I don't want to see us becoming then new Liverpool.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
In American professional sports the days of one person being both coach and general manager are long gone. And the few recent throwbacks, such as Stan Van Gundy or Tom Thibodeau in the NBA, have proved disastrous.

If the coach is allowed to control transfers and planning, then he tends to go for short term thinking and the club lacks continuity when coaches change.

Also, the job is simply too big these days for one person as the sports have gone global in their recruitment.

In the case of Sir Alex, you had a long term manager capable of thinking long term and United’s league position and market was simpler to understand back then.

But in the period before and after Sir Alex’s retirement, there was no director of football to manage the transition. Not only that, but David Gill retired at the very moment he was needed most.

Ever since, we have had lost transfer windows as managers were indecisive (David Moyes) or living in the past (Van Gaal) or falling out with their players (Mourinho).

Living without a Director of Football was a luxury afforded for a while by SAF and by continued club success, but this time around they will have realized that the hiring of a Director of Football must precede the hiring of a new manager.

Woodward was not enough of a football man to naturally fill that need, nor was it clear that it was even in his job description to take over the kind of decision-making that had always belonged to Sir Alex. This time they need to start with clearly defined roles and a clear division of labor.
Great post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.