MonkeysMagic
Full Member
I’d take a draw here...both teams are catchable so third place not out of question for us. First things first, we need to win our home games and also handsomely to imprive GD.
Fernandinho.Xhaka is pulling a Kante today, cannot get booked.
InjuredWhere's Winks?
A player doesn't have to touch the ball to be offside, if theyre challenging for it, which Kane was, that's offside.That's exactly what I was thinking, Kane didn't have any influence on the ball at all. Mustafi just shoved him.
I think the offside law needs to be revisited, as since VAR came in etc everyone's getting confused over what is and isn't offside.
As for this one, I'm confused to whether it should be or shouldn't be. Could be argued Kane affected play but could be argued he didn't so it's a hard decision
No it doesn't.
The rule is
I don't know why people keep saying the opposite if they haven't read the laws.
- an offence is committed against a player in an offside position who is already playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the offside offence is penalised as it has occurred before the foul challenge
He has a magic spell on
Fernandinho likes this post.
You don't have to touch the ball to be interfering.Since Kane didn't touch it was he still offside? I imagine that if he headed it the flag would go up. Otherwise the foul is before? I don't know this for sure.
Where's Winks?
No qualms from me!Fernandinho.![]()
Injured.Where's Winks?
Injured.Where's Winks?
I am a pedantic fecker.Don't be a pedant. I know he can give offside but not from the position he was in. He has to go with the assistant there as he's directly behind play.
Dunno, didn't see it. I'd be interested to hear. Because the rules state the exact opposite of what people here are saying.Was the offside player doing the bold in the City/Schalke game? If not then that's the discrepancy explained.
Special ability: ground roll
Yellow boots of strength.
- Passive ability;
+3 on not getting booked.
Never mind squeaky voices it is squeaky bums we want .Why do scousers have squeaky voices? No it isn't the opening line of a joke.
Good point.It seems soft because it's not given often.
The guy in the Schalke game was nowhere near the ball, meaning he wasn't actively challenging for the ball and thus not offside. That is similar to an off-the-ball offense, for example like if someone punches a player who's nowhere near the ball but in an 'offside position'.Dunno, didn't see it. I'd be interested to hear. Because the rules state the exact opposite of what people here are saying.
Special ability: ground roll
A player doesn't have to touch the ball to be offside, if theyre challenging for it, which Kane was, that's offside.
Essentially as soon as a player attempts to go for the ball they're offside.
You go with that
Next time you see a kid with one, walk up ton him or her and tell them that
You just know he will do something a bit stupid and moving him to RB doesn't change that.That replay is damning, Mustafi....
He's a striker, if he isn't affecting the play on a set piece he's not doing his job .That's exactly what I was thinking, Kane didn't have any influence on the ball at all. Mustafi just shoved him.
I think the offside law needs to be revisited, as since VAR came in etc everyone's getting confused over what is and isn't offside.
As for this one, I'm confused to whether it should be or shouldn't be. Could be argued Kane affected play but could be argued he didn't so it's a hard decision
Special ability: ground roll