How much of Ole's success is Mourinho's?

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,352
Location
Ireland
We weren't very good at defending under Mourinho this year, so I'm unsure how that could be attributed to him.
 

JoaquinJoaquin

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
8,609
I'd say a decent amount but not significant enough.

Can't imagine us pulling off a Pogba signing without someone like Jose in charge.

Lindelof started being good at the end of Jose's reign too.

We were not the only ones interested in Lukaku, so Jose might have a hand there as well.

At least from a squad point of view, he deserves credit.

From a footballing point of view, not so much.
You don't think world class players watching the other night wouldn't of been inspired by that?
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,915
People are very reluctant to accept Jose's good points. He would have won the league in his second season but for City having a freakishly good season. He obviously instilled a discipline in players that they still benefit from. He also eventually made them miserable and useless, so that a massive bounce would occur the moment he left. Exactly like at Chelsea.

It's quite clear Ole benefited from all that.
 

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
6,392
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
Jose deserves credit for bringing in some good players. Namely Pogba, Matic, Lukaku, Lindelof and Dalot, so despite some big feck ups in the market like Sanchez, he did some good transfers as well. Other than that, none.

His tactics and man management was a disaster and if he still was at the helm the likes of Pogba, Martial, Rashford and De Gea would probably be on their way out now
 

Kamprad

Full Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2016
Messages
445
It’s actually a hard question to answer. Part of me say zero. Another say none. So somewhere in between I guess.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,253
Location
Not Moskva
Mourinho brought in some good players but, then again, you’d expect that of most managers given the resources United made available.

So, the answer is not much.
 

GodShaveTheQueen

We mean it man, we love our queen!
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Messages
6,435
You don't think world class players watching the other night wouldn't of been inspired by that?
I think the days of players getting just inspired by such things are gone.

Sure you'll see one off exceptions, but unless Ole becomes a household name in world football with a few trophies under his belt, I don't think too much will change w.r.t attracting the absolute top talent from other leagues.

I know, it will take time, which is alright.
 

BazzaBear

Definately Banned
Joined
Jul 23, 2004
Messages
3,393
I would say not a lot. I think a lot of our defensive woes pre-Ole were down to us playing too defensively - too deep. Yes, our defenders have weaknesses, but I feel that a lot of those weaknesses are to do with their reactions and decisions under pressure. Paradoxically, playing very deep to protect them doesn't help this - it means that if something sudden goes wrong, it happens right in our defensive 3rd, and that's exactly what our defense don't cope with well.

Ole has changed entirely how our defense play, and they're much more solid because of it, despite the fact that you'd describe it as much less defensive.
 

TRUERED89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Messages
2,366
Location
England
We attack way more under Ole, meaning less pressure on our back 4, we wont be defending as much. Hence why we look better defensively and have kept several clean sheets after his departure. As far as attacking play goes, Jose deserves 0 credit. Pogba woulda been sold, Martial too, Fellaini would've received a life time contract and Rashford would not have started any games I can almost guarantee that! Herrera was getting feck all mins under Jose too.
 

Mr Anderson

Eats, shoots, leaves
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
24,306
Location
Ireland
Joses style didnt suit the players at his disposal. Suffered same fate as LVG, tried to make his ethos work rather than try work with what players he had. Jose done good in steadying the ship the first 2 seasons, making us relevant again. I did back Jose for long enough, but it started going south for me, last summer. His antics and moaning on tour just soured everything - just wasnt the same. More went on than just Jose, but that's the modern game - it starts and ends with the manager.

Ole has benefited hugely from knowing the club inside out - but by also being "fresh off the boat" as a manager at this level. He's just come in, listened to the players and tried to work with the players in front of him - not implement too much tactics from the off or worry hugely about the opposition. It is all about how we can hurt the opposition. Not to mention the fantastic core wealth of knowledge Ole has as coaches, they've all done fantastic.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,582
Absolute zero.

Jose was a cancer at the club, he brought the whole place down with his negativity.
 

mattunited1978

doommonger
Joined
Jul 17, 2017
Messages
956
None. We'v improved massively defensively under Ole, aswel as in every other department. He isnt riding Joses coat tails in defence, he's improved it.
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
Some seem to think that Ole can turn water into wine and is the second coming of SAF. No, he inherited a good squad that was being mismanaged and managed to their strengths.

This squad is top heavy, the last thing it needed was a defensive manager, Mourinho without a good defense is pointless. We needed a manager that can get the best out of Pogba, Martial, Lukaku and Rashford. Those 4 players on their day are frightening.

We still concede a lot of chances, but instead of sitting back all the time, we provide a consistent threat in attack. Under Ole we have kept clean sheets in 46% of our games, Pool and City have 57% and 61% respectively in the same period. Our ability to stop chances is not good enough, we are putting too much pressure on our forwards, especially Pogba who will not score a goal a game forever.
 

Nickelodeon

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
2,362
Assuming Jose was in charge for the PSG game (second leg), not only would we not have won the game but we would've planned to settle for 0-0, which wouldn't be achieved, making the tie a humiliation.

So this is as much Ole's success as it is Jose's failure. An honest man would look at this and wonder where he went wrong.
 

Needham

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
11,820
Haven't got a calculator to hand but what's the square root of feck all?
 

Fully Fledged

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
16,326
Location
Midlands UK
Speaking for myself but it might be the same for others. When you’ve been in a really dark room and someone turns the light on that light seems a hell of a lot brighter than if it had been at the same level all along.

For me United have been in a really dark place for a long time but now there’s a light and not at the end of a tunnel but shining all around.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,756
Location
The Mathews Bridge
Even Mourinho's disciples like Lukaku and McTominay are playing better under Ole. So none of it. Everything is better now than it was before.

The only player Ole hasn't been able to really help is Sanchez, but I don't think any manager is getting the best out of him now. He looks finished, even though he does often look desperate to prove otherwise.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
He pushed us down and lowered expectations. Not having Mourinho around gave everyone an extra boost. There is of course things Mourinho did which has helped some of the players. Same from every manager, but he was clearly a big failure.
Players like Martial, Pogba,Lingard,Lukaku and Rashford might have been even better without Mourinho.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
To the OP - if OGS has taken over in the summer, then you could argue your point well. We were defensively good last year. This year under Jose, the team were an utter shambles, especially defensively.
 

dogwithabone

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
2,269
In terms of managing Manchester United Ole is just about the opposite to Mourinho on every level it seems, so on that basis absolutely nothing.
 

Intilo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
91
Ole - Mourinho = Attacking football + Simplicity + Trust + Belief + Positivity

I still can't believe it how a team can change in so little time!

.
Bollocks, we don't really play attacking football especially against a team superior than us, the win against Spurs, Arsenal, draw vs Liverpool and yesterday was a very Mourinho-esque performance , He would be proud seeing his philosophy is still being implemented after he left. What Ole brought to us is simply a good positive vibe that enable the player to play to their full potential.
 

JoaquinJoaquin

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
8,609
I think the days of players getting just inspired by such things are gone.

Sure you'll see one off exceptions, but unless Ole becomes a household name in world football with a few trophies under his belt, I don't think too much will change w.r.t attracting the absolute top talent from other leagues.

I know, it will take time, which is alright.
I'm a cynic, and even I don't believe that.
 

Kapardin

New Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
9,917
Location
Chennai, India
We no longer look like a Mourinho team and the new manager bounce argument cannot apply after so much time has elapsed. Ole deserves all the credit.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
Speaking for myself but it might be the same for others. When you’ve been in a really dark room and someone turns the light on that light seems a hell of a lot brighter than if it had been at the same level all along.

For me United have been in a really dark place for a long time but now there’s a light and not at the end of a tunnel but shining all around.
Agree and that is the way he helped us this season. Made everything so bad that the next manager could get momentum from only a little bit of positivity. We have seen it with Mourinho before that after he fecked up bad other managers have done much better after. Leicester did struggle for relegation and then turned it around and used that momentum to win the league.
 

CG1010

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
3,687
Remember how poor we were defensively at the start of Ole's reign (yes it's a reign!). And how progressively we have improved. We conceded 29 in 17 matches pre-Ole and now we have conceded only 9 in the last 12. Ole has also spoken about how he fixed the midfield to reduce the chances conceded. De Gea has probably never done as little as in last 5 years (barring the Spurs game).

Definitely the credit for defensive strength has to go to Ole and the coaching staff and nobody else. Certainly not Jose who said we can't play attacking because the state of the defense.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,959
If mou wasn't so destructive and incompetent then ole would have never managed us. That's all
 

Milo2035

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Messages
227
First of, I want to be clear that I'm one who was strongly against Mourinho's appointment. In fact, I had not been posting ever since he was made manager, not even when we won the "treble". To me, Mourinho is the
antithesis of what Man Utd is, and I'm relieved as anyone when he was finally sacked.


Our recent victories where we won with less possession and less shots has elicit a lot of comments on the irony of it, that Ole's team are more success at Mourinho's football than Mourinho is at Utd.

This struck me - how much of the current defensive organisation and solidity is down to Mourinho, which Ole inherited?

Case in point, when Roberto Martinez took over Everton from Moyes back in 2013, his first season was seen as a huge success. Everton while still being solid defensively, which is a hallmark of Moyes' reign, were now also good at moving the ball forward. Everton finished that season above us for the 1st time ever since EPL started. I remembered people also using this to deride Moyes for holding Everton back (given how shite Moyes were for us during that season).

However subsequently, Martinez's Everton began to fall apart in the following seasons. It soon became apparent that Martinez has inherited a team that was very well drilled in defensive play by Moyes. Once the Martinez has fully changed Everton to his style, it was very clear that his Everton were an exact mirror of Martinez's Wigan - exciting going forward but porous at the back.

So this comes back to my title - how much of our current defensive play is down to the remnants of Mourinho's training? Will Ole be truly tested (god damn I hate myself for typing this) once he has a full preseason with the team?
I thought I was the only one. I said Jose would ruin this club and as a result was kicked out of a local United supporters club on FB.
Now I can only laugh at those fools.
 
Last edited:

Ishdalar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
3,351
Location
Spain
Supports
Barcelona
Oh God, it's the return of 'He built the foundations!'
*blubs*
Wait until United win 4 Champions Leagues in the next 5 years and you're asking him to come back by 2025
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
50,084
Location
W.Yorks
He does - but not for reasons that are positive for Jose.

Jose put us in such a negative place, anti-Manchester United place, that it was actually the perfect environment for Ole to come in with his brand of positivity and "we are Manchester United" mantra... so really, Ole does owe some success for being the complete anti-Jose.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
:lol: This thread

If anything our defence began improvement under LVG. Let's credit him with Ole's terrific results too. Fecksake.
LVG did buy Martial, Shaw and Herrera! He gave Lingard a lot of time. He also played Rashford when we had everyone out with injuries and it worked! Foundations!

Mourinho did buy Lukaku, Pogba, Matic and Lindelöf! He also didn't sell any amazing players really so didn't feck the squad up! Foundations!
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
If mou wasn't so destructive and incompetent then ole would have never managed us. That's all
That is the good thing with Mourinho at least. He either wins or mess it up so bad in terms of man managemen that he gets fired and the new guy get a bounce effect.

He is not just doing bare minimum and sticking around for too long. LVG almost did the second thing, but it might have been a blessing that City did get the top 4 spot over us.
 
Last edited:

Minimalist

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
15,091
Nothing of significance.

We might have been in better shape without the damage he caused in the first half of the season.
 

beedoubleyou

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
1,337
Location
Manchester
Why does someone always make a thread like this? Whatever happened to that prick who claimed the Europa League was Van Gals victory?
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,976
He gets credit for bringing in Pogba, Rom, lindelof, dalot and Matic.