Im under the impression the new rule was for a yellow in this instance? Since the opposing team will get a penalty? (If the scything occurred in the box of course)
Premier League Gameweek 37
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
Which is why they have to win it this year as they will not get this sort of luck again.
But because the referee allowed the play to continue and Atsu to score no goal was prevented.
You can’t give a red card for denying a goal scoring opportunity when the goal was scored anyway.
This place sounds increasingly like RAWK, with all the conspiracies.
Yeah kick it into row Z under no pressure, that’ll help
Did his arms go up to signal he was playing advantage?
Hope VAR puts an end to it. Seems this season there’s been a big push to help them as much as possible. Definitely suspect.
Except it isn’t a conspiracy if it’s true.
It has been like that for a long time now.
It is rare I say this, but this a time I wish the game was on BT so we could get an immediate expert referee opinion on the decision.
For me it’s a red because he committed a deliberate professional foul to stop the ball going into the net. The fact Newcastle scored from the rebound gave the referee an easy way out, and we know it’s an escape most referees would have taken. It’s ashame Mike Dean isn’t doing this game.
For me it’s a red because he committed a deliberate professional foul to stop the ball going into the net. The fact Newcastle scored from the rebound gave the referee an easy way out, and we know it’s an escape most referees would have taken. It’s ashame Mike Dean isn’t doing this game.
The ref/linesman never signaled for an infringement therefore they never allowed play to continue on. It was simply fortunate that Newcastle were in position to regain possession and score.
Yeah, but there's a difference between crosses of now and yesteryear.
Pumping crosses into the box(which the 2nd goal somewhat was tbf) versus drilled attacks ending in a cross or cutback from the full-back.
Is Robertson a joke to Newcastle or something?
I admire your calmness in face of that stupidity.
They’re certainly a lucky team
I think it happened so fast he didn’t get the chance to do anything, but because the goal was scored he didn’t need to.
If the expert ref said the opposite to what the CAF wants to hear, they'd just disagree with him anyway.It is rare I say this, but this a time I wish the game was on BT so we could get an immediate expert referee opinion on the decision.
For me it’s a red because he committed a deliberate professional foul to stop the ball going into the net. The fact Newcastle scored from the rebound gave the referee an easy way out, and we know it’s an escape most referees would have taken. It’s ashame Mike Dean isn’t doing this game.
The refs in the VAR booths will be the cnuts too fat and out of shape to waddle around for 90 minutes, they'll still be as thick as pigshit.
Thanks mate, just bet everything on Leicester....
Newcastle are ass
Have a wooorrrrdddd. Ridiculous.
Is Lee Dixon on MDMA? "I might start calling him Hendo because I...I just love watching Henderson play" etc.
So what advantage was he playing? The advantage of having a goalbound shot blocked with an arm bounce back to their possession?
That’s there one team across the rest of the entire continent is better? It says nothing about the Premier League.
Yeah. Went on a 2 minute monologue about "Hendo"
No, the new rule is when it is a genuine attempt to play the ball.
If you rugby tackle someone for instance, that would still be a red card
The PL has 2 representatives in the semi-finals (4 in the quarters) which is more than any other league involved in the competition.
That's hardly a poor showing.
http://www.thefa.com/football-rules.../football-11-11/law-12---fouls-and-misconduct
CAUTIONS FOR UNSPORTING BEHAVIOUR
Handles the ball in an attempt to score a goal (whether or not the attempt is successful) or in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent a goal
CAUTIONS FOR UNSPORTING BEHAVIOUR
Handles the ball in an attempt to score a goal (whether or not the attempt is successful) or in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent a goal
He genuinely sounded high and lovey dovey. Weird.Yeah. Went on a 2 minute monologue about "Hendo"
I think if Atsu misses or the ball lands in a way where Newcastle can’t directly score then he gives the red and a penalty.
He has to disallow a perfectly good goal to give a red/penalty based on how the play turned out.
And 2 in the EL semis.
I remember the Barcelona v Arsenal game where Lehman got a red card and Barcelona given a free kick but they could have had a goal.
The referee messed it up big time or as usual letting Liverpool have the game .
If it was any other team but Liverpool, Benitez would be asking the officials why TAA wasn’t sent off.
But he won’t, because he’s a gimp.
But he won’t, because he’s a gimp.
They've conceded 47 goals, we 51. In theory ours is better, but in praxis it's not really here nor there.
So he should have been booked?
Could he not have given the goal and the red card?
I don't think he would he done because he didn't see it.
He'd have given a yellow 100% otherwise
There were rumours Rafa wouldn’t use his usual park the bus tactics against his beloved Liverpool. They have proven to be true. Newcastle are playing a suicidal open attacking game against a much better side. It feels like the fat Spanish waiter has set his team up to make this as easy as possible for Liverpool.