I have no problem with Damien editing my post. I've got a lot of respect for Damien and he's a great guy.Wonder why Damien edited the post to remove the tweet from that BS account
It's not petty argument, the rules are clear to avoid posting tweets from BS/fake accounts.
He included the link where it was from though, don't see the problem in this one instance.
He didn't, when he posted it was from https://twitter.com/UtdXtra_ (that's when I replied saying that' a fake account)
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yikes, I’d be surprised if Arsenal get him if those are the real expected fees.
I think Lampard is smart enough not to take it just yet. It’s designed for him to fail if he goes next season.
Why aren't we in for this guy? Every time I see him he's so pacey and recovers the ball so quickly in defence. He'd be my second choice defender to sign after Koulibaly (Can't see De Ligt coming)
People need to settle down. It’s not a big deal.
Think it would be the best time to take it for him. He isn't under pressure of signings and gets to work with the Chelsea youth who he'd undoubtedly know better than most. There won't be a mountain of expectation on him and it will be a rare circumstance where the club would prefer to see their talent pool organically grow which pulls power away from bigger names in the dressing room.
Once a blue
€100m is the new €30m.
How will you react with Young starting as captain of Manchester United the most successful team in the PL and the biggest club in the world?
Oh I can see where you're coming from, and as I said meant no offense to any accountants on here. I'm just saying that in my experience, balance sheets are not the most accurate reflection of a company's liabilities and assets. I don't know what UK law is like, but it is a fundamental tenet of U.S. corporate law that businesses have the right to re-value their assets - what this leads to is a much murkier picture of a company's financial standing.
He was almost ours, everything was done and we messed it up.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Fancy elaborating?
But but .. no experience!
He's just awful as a DM, prone to lapses in concentration and doesn't have a high ceiling. Weird you'd like him at United.
Well he’s just 20 and if we buy him, we can get good 10 years from him. I personally don’t think Romero is good enough to be first choice and don’t have much of an idea about Henderson other than what I have read here. If you ask me, we should sell Romero and DDG for 40,50 million and buy this lad, promote Henderson to #2 (if he’s ready) and Grant can be third choice.
Please no, not Donnarumma. Looks like he should be good but really isn't that good.
He's not been great at Milan but then again no one has. Worth a punt if we get similar money for Dave.
Nah he’s just not very good.
We don't need to replace De Gea this summer, but we do the following.
He's still decent. Had a full blown strop and downed tools last season because he wasn't allowed to leave.
Ex-players! Joke of a club! Turk urr jubs!
Just go on Twitter if you really want to see BS tweets as that's all you will get, at least on here you know most of the time it's a solid source and there won't be any rif raf.
When we were first in for Bruno Fernandes I wasnt all that keen, then City entered the race and I changed my mind. This is the exact opposite situation.
I’ve always been curious about footballers as assets on a balance sheet. How are they held? Surely not as fixed assets with straight-line depreciation, because it’s meaningless. They should be held effectively like investment properties and be subject to impairment and revaluation. Take Harry Maguire for example. Bought for 17M, next year his fair value is around 65M. Or alexis Sanchez. Bought effectively for nothing. What is he revalued to ? (And don’t say nothing cos he’s useless). Any accountants out there familiar with with the accounting rules for players?
Not even Piatek?
He has been quite inspired since he came in. Almost fired them to a CL spot.
Is he open to a move or Milan open to selling?
