According to TM, he is already a United player since 1.7.2019Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/mateo-mejia/profil/spieler/682588
According to TM, he is already a United player since 1.7.2019Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Your missing the point. It’s not conceivable that Lukaku cannot play for us next season. He’s played enough games under Ole. It would be like Real Madrid being desperate to sell Isco. I’m sure they are happy for him to leave but it’s not a necessity which means they will just let him go for cheap. We don’t need to get rid of him. So any club interested pay the price!!If you don't think Ole wants a different kind of striker in I dunno what you've been smoking. If we go into next season with Lukaku we're not making top 4 and Ole knows this.
Of course he won't come out and say it, but United aren't particularly fighting to convince Lukaku to stay like Pogba for example. And according to reports we already have a deal for Ben Yedder lined up to replace Lukaku. That deal going through will be the difference between us making top 4 or not.
That’s silly isn’t it. With your logic even if Ole wanted him Inter could still not afford him. So explain to me how we are in a weaker position?See what happens when this club keeps making stupid drastic actions and selecting managers with different styles from the one before everytime, our bargaining power for getting rid of Lukaku is weak because it was made obvious that Solskjear doesn't fancy him, this club need to get its act together and build the attack around Lukaku's strengths next season and bring in a competent winger or two because benching him for most of next season in favour of Rashford being our main striker is going to decrease his sell on value even more next summer and then we will have to end up in an even weaker bargaining position to get any where near decent money for him and he will handicap the team setup next next season when we he's called up on considering he doesn't fit the style Solskjear wants to implement.
That's exactly the kind of thing I expect from Woodward.I thought our first offer of £70m was rejected?
Now we have reduced the offer £60m? I get there is bonuses included, but there is no way Leicester accept £10m less than the first offer, no matter what the bonuses are.
So you want to bring in new wingers to suit his style for a season, so that he can maintain his value. What do we do with the wingers once we've sold him? Aren't you just suggesting the same thing you're complaining about?See what happens when this club keeps making stupid drastic actions and selecting managers with different styles from the one before everytime, our bargaining power for getting rid of Lukaku is weak because it was made obvious that Solskjear doesn't fancy him, this club need to get its act together and build the attack around Lukaku's strengths next season and bring in a competent winger or two because benching him for most of next season in favour of Rashford being our main striker is going to decrease his sell on value even more next summer and then we will have to end up in an even weaker bargaining position to get any where near decent money for him and he will handicap the team setup next next season when we he's called up on considering he doesn't fit the style Solskjear wants to implement.
Good. I am happy if this is trueSimon Stone: Belgium forward Romelu Lukaku looks increasingly likely to be staying at Manchester United.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It had been expected Inter Milan would try and sign Lukaku. However, there has been no bid tabled so far. Even if one were to be, United would want in excess of the £75m they paid Everton for him two years ago....the club would not allow the second most expensive player in their history to leave without making a profit.
I know it sucks, buddy.Too bad his head isn't slabby enough for United. If he works on his head slabiness, maybe, one day, he can join us.
100 thousand a week from a small club in England .....If the TV bubble burst in England then half the clubs in England will be out of business within a few years....Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
My point was his transfer is no more relevant than a league 1 transfer. I am interested in them both. The original poster (might have been you, no idea) was rather tediously moaning about fridge chutney.Why are you in the transfer tweets thread if you aren’t interested?
Mixed feelings about the Conte loving cnut.Good. I am happy if this is true
I think that it is good move. In some way it is how Lyon president dealt with Levy in Ndombele transfer.That's exactly the kind of thing I expect from Woodward.
The TV bubble will burst, no way big clubs will continue to accept getting same shares like smaller ones. The Market is just so.100 thousand a week from a small club in England .....If the TV bubble burst in England then half the clubs in England will be out of business within a few years....
Not so sure of that. Our first (reported)offer was 70, now it's 60+20I think that it is good move. In some way it is how Lyon president dealt with Levy in Ndombele transfer.
Maguire is good but there are better defenders than him. And except us and maybe City, who would be crazy to spend that much money on him? This season or next?
Sounds ridiculous but this time i think that buying club has advantage. Maguire wants to leave, Leicester can earn huge money and buying club can buy other players on that position. So " now i will give you 60, next week 50 and after that i will walk away. Good luck with unhappy player."
The 70m wouldn’t be 70m in one go. It too would have been an initial fee and add onsNot so sure of that. Our first (reported)offer was 70, now it's 60+20
Anybody know much about this player please?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Especially as Bournemouth were utterly skint not that long ago, and had buckets out at games in the lower leagues begging for money!100 thousand a week from a small club in England .....If the TV bubble burst in England then half the clubs in England will be out of business within a few years....
Less than half what Rashford is onI'm sorry, how much?!?
On the pro side, we've basically not had a functioning attack, and still don't have any right sided threat.Really hope Lukaku staying is true.. Genuinely think he'll score more if we didnt defend so shit.. which made us play deep/not attack ..
There is no point letting him go.. stay on.
If average premier league strikers are now on 100k it's a new level of sickening.Less than half what Rashford is on
Genius!What a moron! That DT guy posted a 12-min vid announcing the signing of Kieran Tierney to Arsenal saying how happy he was about the signing, how Tierney will fit into the team and slating Celtic and Scottish football in general....only the guy has NOT signed.
DT had already made the video days ago but got his upload dates wrong. Think he's pulled it now.
14 goals and 12 assists last season in the Premier League alone, playing for Bournemouth, is far more than average.If average premier league strikers are now on 100k it's a new level of sickening.
Madness..I'm sorry, how much?!?
If we go on just stats, Lukaku has been a fantastic signing, with his 42 goals and that.14 goals and 12 assists last season in the Premier League alone, playing for Bournemouth, is far more than average.
He contributed to 26 of Bournemouth’s 56 goals.
Yeah.. can't be having players get too much of that money the clubs earn. Those are for the owners and the shareholders to enjoy.Madness..
It's the that which makes him unsuitable to be a United striker.If we go on just stats, Lukaku has been a fantastic signing, with his 42 goals and that.
Lukaku is a good goal scorer and I think we should keep him, unless we have a very good replacement in mind. He plays for Man United though so he is expected to do more on the ball, considering the £75m fee and his £250k week salary. His all-round play lets him down.If we go on just stats, Lukaku has been a fantastic signing, with his 42 goals and that.
Do we really want to get rid of Lukaku? We are wafer-thin upfront, can certainly use Lukaku as plan B.The difference being we want to get rid of Lukaku and Leicester and Newcastle don't wanna lose Maguire and Longstaff respectively.
Is this the financial genius of Ed?
And we all moan about Shaw and Rashford’s salary. A Mid table club with a 15k seater stadium can pay an average striker £100k a week. Football really has gone mad.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I think it’s pretty obvious we wanna replace him but don’t want to sign someone as that’ll push lukaku’s price down.Do we really want to get rid of Lukaku? We are wafer-thin upfront, can certainly use Lukaku as plan B.
Personally if we bought a natural right winger both flanks would provide service into the box which would help Lukaku score goals. Looks like yet again we are going to ignore that wing.It's the that which makes him unsuitable to be a United striker.
So we just need somebody to knock it down for kaku as he's got a head like a 50 pence piece.Personally if we bought a natural right winger both flanks would provide service into the box which would help Lukaku score goals. Looks like yet again we are going to ignore that wing yet again.
Brexit means brexit oleTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date