Gay footballers | Czech Republic international Jakub Jankto comes out as gay

Olly Gunnar Solskjær

Marxist bacon-hating kebab-dodging Tinder rascal
Scout
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
36,895
Location
dreams can't be buy
It's funny all "liberal" want everyone to come public about what they do in their sex life. Also it's funny that being gay its normal but everyone wants to know what the hell it's happening in the life of someone who is gay. If it's something that no one should care and be accepted why is it important for people to know who or what sex they shag? Do you also ask players to come state if they are straight?
Nobody wants to know who's gay or what they're getting up to in private, they want those who are gay to be able to be open with it if they want to while being treated the same as everyone else.
 

Bruno Marques

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 12, 2017
Messages
486
Location
Setúbal, Portugal
Supports
Vitória de Setúbal
@Bruno Marques : You're missing the point so spectacularly with the sentence "Its funny all "liberal" want everyone to come public about what they do in their sex life" (sic) that I struggle to believe that sentence has been written in good faith.
Well, but that is YOUR problem. You read something and you inserted your feelings on what you read. Believe me it's in good faith. The more we talk about someone has to say what their sexual orientations is the less normal it becomes. Why somone need to come out and say something? Why do they need to come out? They just need to live their life normally has any straight couple does.

Who cares? It's their private life
 

Halftrack

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
3,953
Location
Chair
@Jacob you were right to delete that post.
Now you've made me all curious. Was it homophobic? Were liberals blamed? Did he mention the gay agenda, or complain about having the gay shoved down his throat?
Well, but that is YOUR problem. You read something and you inserted your feelings on what you read. Believe me it's in good faith. The more we talk about someone has to say what their sexual orientations is the less normal it becomes. Why somone need to come out and say something? Why do they need to come out? They just need to live their life normally has any straight couple does.

Who cares? It's their private life
Again you're missing the point. As @Olly Gunnar Solskjær told you, it's not about forcing anyone to divulge anything, it's about gay footballers being able to be themselves openly and without judgement. Should they still prefer to keep it private, then that's their business.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Well, but that is YOUR problem. You read something and you inserted your feelings on what you read. Believe me it's in good faith. The more we talk about someone has to say what their sexual orientations is the less normal it becomes. Why somone need to come out and say something? Why do they need to come out? They just need to live their life normally has any straight couple does.

Who cares? It's their private life
Coming out doesn't neccessarily mean making a big announcement or something. They don't have to come out and specifically announce that they are gay.

Coming out can simply mean being in an openly gay relationship in the same way straight footballers are in openly straight relationships - being seen with their partner in public, being willing to casually acknowledge their sexual orientation, allowing it to be publicly known that they are gay, etc.

The fact that no high profile gay footballer has been able to do so highlights the fact that there is a problem. A problem which means that any footballer making the decision to present themselves publicly as openly gay (in the same way that straight players casually and unthinkingly present themselves as straight all the time) may well feel the need to pre-emptively make a statement acknowledging that this will inevitably be seen as a story. That optional statement isn't what coming out is about though, nor is it what posters here are looking for.
 

Bruno Marques

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 12, 2017
Messages
486
Location
Setúbal, Portugal
Supports
Vitória de Setúbal
Nobody wants to know who's gay or what they're getting up to in private, they want those who are gay to be able to be open with it if they want to while being treated the same as everyone else.
No problem with that. I just think that Gay people are being chased by both sides. the ones against but also the ones that support. It's too much pressure and it comes from everywhere
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,456
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Now you've made me all curious. Was it homophobic? Were liberals blamed? Did he mention the gay agenda, or complain about having the gay shoved down his throat?
He's deleted it tbf, so it doesn't seem right to disclose his true views on the topic in question. fecking hell though, shaking my head after rereading it.
There's defo still a long way to when it comes to LGBT acceptance.
 

Hamnat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
1,527
Location
Texas
Is it the socio economic make up of football clubs fan base that makes it hard for a gay footballer to come out?
It is simply society in general and the "macho" mindset of fans and probably some players. Just read some of the comments here, or during pride month when the teams celebrate/ or try to support pride on social media. The comments are horrible. Now we all know how social media comments can go on any platform. But, if you will examine the vitriol and hate by "fans" in some cases its pretty telling. And it clearly illustrates why it is not easy for a gay player. They probably make the choice I will just stay in the closet focus on my career, make my money earn my trophies. Maybe I will be free to come out after I retire. And that's just an awful thing to think about.

We all know there are match going fans around the world that would not be supportive as well unfortunately. You hear some say well they should just be quiet about it "we don't care" what they do in private. They just don't ever want to hear about it. Think for a minute if you had to stay in the closet and always worry about "fans" finding out. Being happy and healthy mentally and physically is part of getting the best out of any player. As fans and decent human beings you should want your players to be able to have that mental openness. Be able to share their wins and losses openly with their loved ones.

It is too easy to cover basic homophobia with "I'm not against it" I just don't want to hear about it or see any of it. What do we see at the end of a season when a team just won the league and the players are celebrating a trophy? We see them posing with their families, sharing the love with the spouses, girlfriends, kids. Anyone saying just keep it to yourself is being selfish. Why can't a gay player share the same experience with his boyfriend, husband, their kids? Some would have them be less, to make themselves comfortable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Penna

Strachans Cigar

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Messages
1,137
Inappropriate Content
Based on what you say the only normal behaviour for a penis is pissing and reproduction! Therefore wanking, blowjobs, tit wanks, toe jobs, bum fun.....all not normal? How about sex standing up? That reduces the chance of getting pregnant so that must be abnormal? How about contraception? God no that means you are doing it for fun instead of for reproduction that must be abnormal? How about if you have had the snip or or infertile? No chance of babies so abnormal?
Pissing & reproduction would probably be correct. In terms of what is normal/natural:

Wanking, doesn’t reproduce the species.

Blowjobs, ditto

Snips & contraception, man made, so not natural or normal

Tit wanks, toe jobs, anal sex...of course it’s all developments/embellishments/enhancements to the only basic necessary & normal act of fecking innit? Tits are for feeding infants, toes help balance, arses, well, you get the picture. An awful lot of human sexual behaviour isn’t normal when you think about it is it? All those ‘weird’ fetishes and so on?

Animals? Don’t generally see Monkeys teabagging each other with gas masks & gimp suits on do we down Chester Zoo?

Bum fun? Well of course you have the classic ‘mans man’ who thinks it’s great that his Missus takes it up the arse, but who is also as homophobic as you like. Very hypocritical, as apart from a few hairs, it’s exactly the same act innit? (I know) So no, heterosexual anal sex ain’t normal either.

It’s really really simple. Sticking your dick up someone’s arse is not normal behaviour & the lengths liberals will go to try and persuade everyone else that somehow it is are, quite frankly, ridiculous. I knew it wasn’t normal when I was doing it ffs! If you are happy doing it, and the other party consents that’s all that fecking matters yeah?

You might be *trying* to make the straight majority see it as normal because you are a social libertarian, it doesn’t matter. Because, it ain’t normal. It is an abuse of equipment put simply. Proven by biological design, test & result over one million years.

Or, we could go completely the other way couldn’t we? Because if a significant minority of people do an act it *must be normal* right!? Because in early human ancestory, Rape was normal, Murder was normal, Cannibalism was normal, Paedophilia was normal? And there was no means of policing society back then was there? Or any *artificial* human system for keeping order and us being a (fake) so called civilised society was there? So, nature being nature it was the law of the jungle yeah? Plenty of animals still do these things yeah?

Animals that the liberal community seem very keen on pointing to for evidence of homosexuality being natural?
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Caf’s Law: Anyone vocally opposed to the promotion of out gay players in football under the disingenuous cloak of “why should anyone care?” is only ever a maximum of 9 posts away from pretending to be black to win an argument on the Internet.
Do we win any arguments if we pretend to be awful racist homophobes? Because I'm probably not above it.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
Pissing & reproduction would probably be correct. In terms of what is normal/natural:

Wanking, doesn’t reproduce the species.

Blowjobs, ditto

Snips & contraception, man made, so not natural or normal

Tit wanks, toe jobs, anal sex...of course it’s all developments/embellishments/enhancements to the only basic necessary & normal act of fecking innit? Tits are for feeding infants, toes help balance, arses, well, you get the picture. An awful lot of human sexual behaviour isn’t normal when you think about it is it? All those ‘weird’ fetishes and so on?

Animals? Don’t generally see Monkeys teabagging each other with gas masks & gimp suits on do we down Chester Zoo?

Bum fun? Well of course you have the classic ‘mans man’ who thinks it’s great that his Missus takes it up the arse, but who is also as homophobic as you like. Very hypocritical, as apart from a few hairs, it’s exactly the same act innit? (I know) So no, heterosexual anal sex ain’t normal either.

It’s really really simple. Sticking your dick up someone’s arse is not normal behaviour & the lengths liberals will go to try and persuade everyone else that somehow it is are, quite frankly, ridiculous. I knew it wasn’t normal when I was doing it ffs! If you are happy doing it, and the other party consents that’s all that fecking matters yeah?

You might be *trying* to make the straight majority see it as normal because you are a social libertarian, it doesn’t matter. Because, it ain’t normal. It is an abuse of equipment put simply. Proven by biological design, test & result over one million years.

Or, we could go completely the other way couldn’t we? Because if a significant minority of people do an act it *must be normal* right!? Because in early human ancestory, Rape was normal, Murder was normal, Cannibalism was normal, Paedophilia was normal? And there was no means of policing society back then was there? Or any *artificial* human system for keeping order and us being a (fake) so called civilised society was there? So, nature being nature it was the law of the jungle yeah? Plenty of animals still do these things yeah?

Animals that the liberal community seem very keen on pointing to for evidence of homosexuality being natural?
This should get you banned. If we take homophobia at all seriously here you will be banned for this post.
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
*hears knocking on door*
Please, let that be a serial killer...
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
I would advise any professional footballer in the UK not to come out, at present. If one does then I will be both very excited and terrified. Also, from what I've seen there is little reason to believe this 'Championship player' existed. Who knows.

I have so little interest in the debate as to whether homosexuality is normal, or a choice, or any of that shit. The thing is there's nothing wrong with it. There's nothing to excuse or explain. We don't need to argue that it's totally common or that we have no choice (Born This Way can do one). Because there's nothing wrong with homosexuality.

I think there's a fair few good posts in this thread, in response to the predictable homophobia that we always get when we dare keep a topic on sexuality in the football forum for more than half an hour. I genuinely do appreciate the efforts many of you have made to engage and to educate people but to be honest I appreciate those of you who just told them to feck off more.
 

Halftrack

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
3,953
Location
Chair
Pissing & reproduction would probably be correct. In terms of what is normal/natural:

Wanking, doesn’t reproduce the species.

Blowjobs, ditto

Snips & contraception, man made, so not natural or normal

Tit wanks, toe jobs, anal sex...of course it’s all developments/embellishments/enhancements to the only basic necessary & normal act of fecking innit? Tits are for feeding infants, toes help balance, arses, well, you get the picture. An awful lot of human sexual behaviour isn’t normal when you think about it is it? All those ‘weird’ fetishes and so on?

Animals? Don’t generally see Monkeys teabagging each other with gas masks & gimp suits on do we down Chester Zoo?

Bum fun? Well of course you have the classic ‘mans man’ who thinks it’s great that his Missus takes it up the arse, but who is also as homophobic as you like. Very hypocritical, as apart from a few hairs, it’s exactly the same act innit? (I know) So no, heterosexual anal sex ain’t normal either.

It’s really really simple. Sticking your dick up someone’s arse is not normal behaviour & the lengths liberals will go to try and persuade everyone else that somehow it is are, quite frankly, ridiculous. I knew it wasn’t normal when I was doing it ffs! If you are happy doing it, and the other party consents that’s all that fecking matters yeah?

You might be *trying* to make the straight majority see it as normal because you are a social libertarian, it doesn’t matter. Because, it ain’t normal. It is an abuse of equipment put simply. Proven by biological design, test & result over one million years.

Or, we could go completely the other way couldn’t we? Because if a significant minority of people do an act it *must be normal* right!? Because in early human ancestory, Rape was normal, Murder was normal, Cannibalism was normal, Paedophilia was normal? And there was no means of policing society back then was there? Or any *artificial* human system for keeping order and us being a (fake) so called civilised society was there? So, nature being nature it was the law of the jungle yeah? Plenty of animals still do these things yeah?

Animals that the liberal community seem very keen on pointing to for evidence of homosexuality being natural?
This is some prime homophobia. And topping it all off with equating homosexuality to rape, murder and pedophilia. You're fecking disgusting. Completely and utterly reprehensible.
 

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,961
This thread perfectly illustrates why it's so difficult for a gay footballer to come out.

In the lower leagues, you don't have the level of separation from the public that top footballers do, and nor can you hide behind wealth. You have a much more intimate relationship with fans. Couple football tribalism to the pervasiveness of homophobia, and it is not a surprise that there are almost no openly gay professional footballers.
 

matt10000

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
1,332
Location
Salford UK
Pissing & reproduction would probably be correct. In terms of what is normal/natural:

Wanking, doesn’t reproduce the species.

Blowjobs, ditto

Snips & contraception, man made, so not natural or normal

Tit wanks, toe jobs, anal sex...of course it’s all developments/embellishments/enhancements to the only basic necessary & normal act of fecking innit? Tits are for feeding infants, toes help balance, arses, well, you get the picture. An awful lot of human sexual behaviour isn’t normal when you think about it is it? All those ‘weird’ fetishes and so on?

Animals? Don’t generally see Monkeys teabagging each other with gas masks & gimp suits on do we down Chester Zoo?

Bum fun? Well of course you have the classic ‘mans man’ who thinks it’s great that his Missus takes it up the arse, but who is also as homophobic as you like. Very hypocritical, as apart from a few hairs, it’s exactly the same act innit? (I know) So no, heterosexual anal sex ain’t normal either.

It’s really really simple. Sticking your dick up someone’s arse is not normal behaviour & the lengths liberals will go to try and persuade everyone else that somehow it is are, quite frankly, ridiculous. I knew it wasn’t normal when I was doing it ffs! If you are happy doing it, and the other party consents that’s all that fecking matters yeah?

You might be *trying* to make the straight majority see it as normal because you are a social libertarian, it doesn’t matter. Because, it ain’t normal. It is an abuse of equipment put simply. Proven by biological design, test & result over one million years.

Or, we could go completely the other way couldn’t we? Because if a significant minority of people do an act it *must be normal* right!? Because in early human ancestory, Rape was normal, Murder was normal, Cannibalism was normal, Paedophilia was normal? And there was no means of policing society back then was there? Or any *artificial* human system for keeping order and us being a (fake) so called civilised society was there? So, nature being nature it was the law of the jungle yeah? Plenty of animals still do these things yeah?

Animals that the liberal community seem very keen on pointing to for evidence of homosexuality being natural?
So are you saying that you think that rape is normal and it is only ‘fake so called civilised society’ that stops you from doing it?
 

Beaucoup

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2016
Messages
1,563
Some absolute nut jobs on either side of the discussion to be fair
 

Jacob

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
25,577
@Jacob you were right to delete that post.
@Jacob you were right to delete that post.
Figured as much, would've loved to see the responses though. I like to trigger discussion.

People have to consider culture and religion before making aggressive claims. For someone brought up in a conservative home, it is not completely outrageous to not think homosexuality is 100 percent OK (on a philosophical/sociocultural perspective).

As in death penalty discussions, there is no right and wrong. It depends on the individual's beliefs.
 

Pagh Wraith

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
4,361
Location
Germany
People have to consider culture and religion before making aggressive claims. For someone brought up in a conservative home, it is not completely outrageous to not think homosexuality is 100 percent OK (on a philosophical/sociocultural perspective).
There is some truth to this. People all too often expect others who don't share their believes to adapt to their thinking overnight (no matter how right they are on the issue). Try convincing a religious person that any belief in God is stupid. I hope it will happen at some point but as I said earlier in this thread, education is a slow process and discussion should always be encouraged.

That being said, there really is no right or wrong on the issue at hand. There is no logical reason to think homosexuality should not be accepted and that has to be pointed out. It's not even about forcing people to embrace 'gay culture' (if such a thing exists). If that is not your thing, then just leave it. Noone is forcing you to like punk or goth subcultures either. But no human being has the right to tell others how to live their lives and discriminate against them based on their sexual preferences. And I would not equate it with the death penalty either. Much as I find it abhorrent and wrong, I would accept that there are arguments for it.
 

Hammerfell

Full Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Messages
7,778
Figured as much, would've loved to see the responses though. I like to trigger discussion.

People have to consider culture and religion before making aggressive claims. For someone brought up in a conservative home, it is not completely outrageous to not think homosexuality is 100 percent OK (on a philosophical/sociocultural perspective).

As in death penalty discussions, there is no right and wrong. It depends on the individual's beliefs.
I'm not putting anyone's religion or beliefs ahead of my own right to exist the way I am, thanks.
 

Jacob

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
25,577
I'm not putting anyone's religion or beliefs ahead of my own right to exist the way I am, thanks.
Mate, nobody said anything about stopping gay people from doing what they love. You think I'd start eating meat (I'm vegan) just because someone else says you have to?

Our social, demographical and economical system is based on other premises than homosexuality. This is not an argument against homosexuality though, it is rather an argument for heterosexuality.
 

EngimaMK

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 23, 2018
Messages
645
Pissing & reproduction would probably be correct. In terms of what is normal/natural:

Wanking, doesn’t reproduce the species.

Blowjobs, ditto

Snips & contraception, man made, so not natural or normal

Tit wanks, toe jobs, anal sex...of course it’s all developments/embellishments/enhancements to the only basic necessary & normal act of fecking innit? Tits are for feeding infants, toes help balance, arses, well, you get the picture. An awful lot of human sexual behaviour isn’t normal when you think about it is it? All those ‘weird’ fetishes and so on?

Animals? Don’t generally see Monkeys teabagging each other with gas masks & gimp suits on do we down Chester Zoo?

Bum fun? Well of course you have the classic ‘mans man’ who thinks it’s great that his Missus takes it up the arse, but who is also as homophobic as you like. Very hypocritical, as apart from a few hairs, it’s exactly the same act innit? (I know) So no, heterosexual anal sex ain’t normal either.

It’s really really simple. Sticking your dick up someone’s arse is not normal behaviour & the lengths liberals will go to try and persuade everyone else that somehow it is are, quite frankly, ridiculous. I knew it wasn’t normal when I was doing it ffs! If you are happy doing it, and the other party consents that’s all that fecking matters yeah?

You might be *trying* to make the straight majority see it as normal because you are a social libertarian, it doesn’t matter. Because, it ain’t normal. It is an abuse of equipment put simply. Proven by biological design, test & result over one million years.

Or, we could go completely the other way couldn’t we? Because if a significant minority of people do an act it *must be normal* right!? Because in early human ancestory, Rape was normal, Murder was normal, Cannibalism was normal, Paedophilia was normal? And there was no means of policing society back then was there? Or any *artificial* human system for keeping order and us being a (fake) so called civilised society was there? So, nature being nature it was the law of the jungle yeah? Plenty of animals still do these things yeah?

Animals that the liberal community seem very keen on pointing to for evidence of homosexuality being natural?
What an absolute testicle you sound.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,158
Location
Manchester
Pissing & reproduction would probably be correct. In terms of what is normal/natural:

Wanking, doesn’t reproduce the species.

Blowjobs, ditto

Snips & contraception, man made, so not natural or normal

Tit wanks, toe jobs, anal sex...of course it’s all developments/embellishments/enhancements to the only basic necessary & normal act of fecking innit? Tits are for feeding infants, toes help balance, arses, well, you get the picture. An awful lot of human sexual behaviour isn’t normal when you think about it is it? All those ‘weird’ fetishes and so on?

Animals? Don’t generally see Monkeys teabagging each other with gas masks & gimp suits on do we down Chester Zoo?

Bum fun? Well of course you have the classic ‘mans man’ who thinks it’s great that his Missus takes it up the arse, but who is also as homophobic as you like. Very hypocritical, as apart from a few hairs, it’s exactly the same act innit? (I know) So no, heterosexual anal sex ain’t normal either.

It’s really really simple. Sticking your dick up someone’s arse is not normal behaviour & the lengths liberals will go to try and persuade everyone else that somehow it is are, quite frankly, ridiculous. I knew it wasn’t normal when I was doing it ffs! If you are happy doing it, and the other party consents that’s all that fecking matters yeah?

You might be *trying* to make the straight majority see it as normal because you are a social libertarian, it doesn’t matter. Because, it ain’t normal. It is an abuse of equipment put simply. Proven by biological design, test & result over one million years.

Or, we could go completely the other way couldn’t we? Because if a significant minority of people do an act it *must be normal* right!? Because in early human ancestory, Rape was normal, Murder was normal, Cannibalism was normal, Paedophilia was normal? And there was no means of policing society back then was there? Or any *artificial* human system for keeping order and us being a (fake) so called civilised society was there? So, nature being nature it was the law of the jungle yeah? Plenty of animals still do these things yeah?

Animals that the liberal community seem very keen on pointing to for evidence of homosexuality being natural?
Oh feck off you piece of shit.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,158
Location
Manchester
Figured as much, would've loved to see the responses though. I like to trigger discussion.

People have to consider culture and religion before making aggressive claims. For someone brought up in a conservative home, it is not completely outrageous to not think homosexuality is 100 percent OK (on a philosophical/sociocultural perspective).

As in death penalty discussions, there is no right and wrong. It depends on the individual's beliefs.
The reasons for a person's belief that homosexuality is "not 100% ok", whether religious or otherwise, are entirely irrelevant, they are wrong.

And yes, there unequivocally is right and wrong in this "debate".
 

Jacob

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
25,577
The reasons for a person's belief that homosexuality is "not 100% ok", whether religious or otherwise, are entirely irrelevant, they are wrong.

And yes, there unequivocally is right and wrong in this "debate".
What you think is right and wrong couldn't mean less to me. People have opinions and they won't change simply because someone tells them that they're wrong. I'm not against homosexuality, certainly not on an individual level. I'm against the idea that I should be OK with things because people tell me it's right.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,158
Location
Manchester
What you think is right and wrong couldn't mean less to me. People have opinions and they won't change simply because someone tells them that they're wrong. I'm not against homosexuality, certainly not on an individual level. I'm against the idea that I should be OK with things because people tell me it's right.
I don't know what you mean by "on an individual level" but you very clearly have a problem with homosexuality and that makes you wrong whether you like it or not.
 

Jacob

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
25,577
I don't know what you mean by "on an individual level" but you very clearly have a problem with homosexuality and that makes you wrong whether you like it or not.
What I mean is; whether someone is gay or not carry less important to me than what you think is right or wrong - i.e. zilch. It's their business. That doesn't change the fact that people can still have opinions about it.

E.g. I don't care if you play football during your spare time. I can still think the sport as such might have questionable elements though.

Have you played Witcher 3? Remember the dwarfs at the Gwent tournament that got pissed off because somebody had introduced a new (Skellige) deck of cards to the traditional game? Well, that's all fine and dandy but the introduction did affect the strategy for original players using the traditional decks.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,158
Location
Manchester
What I mean is; whether someone is gay or not carry less important to me than what you think is right or wrong - i.e. zilch. It's their business. That doesn't change the fact that people can still have opinions about it.

E.g. I don't care if you play football during your spare time. I can still think the sport as such might have questionable elements though.

Have you played Witcher 3? Remember the dwarfs at the Gwent tournament that got pissed off because somebody had introduced a new (Skellige) deck of cards to the traditional game? Well, that's all fine and dandy but the introduction did affect the strategy for original players using the traditional decks.
Yea, those opinions you are are so desperately trying to justify are called homophobic opinions.
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,456
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Figured as much, would've loved to see the responses though. I like to trigger discussion.

People have to consider culture and religion before making aggressive claims. For someone brought up in a conservative home, it is not completely outrageous to not think homosexuality is 100 percent OK (on a philosophical/sociocultural perspective).

As in death penalty discussions, there is no right and wrong. It depends on the individual's beliefs.
I understand that if you grew up in a very conservative home, homosexuality now being broadly accepted will take some getting used to.

My father was very old fashioned and although a lovely guy in most ways, he was a homophobe and a tad racist. East Yorkshire/Hull was one of the whitest places on earth in the 1970s/80s, but after moving away from there and actually mingling and working with different people, travelling etc you lose those old prejudices and realise how stupid they are.

Some of the issues you mentioned were rooted in the most deep-rooted bigotry around homosexuality, eg gay people will try and convert on the fence people etc...There is a right and wrong as far as those views are concerned.