Snafu17
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 1,869
How many times does Nicolo Schira need to be posted before people realise that he's a hack.
yeeeey, please be true.
How many times will people fall for his crap?How many times does Nicolo Schira need to be posted before people realise that he's a hack.
When McT has been playing he has been pushing right up as the box to box option but to me I think I’d rather it’s a DM and Pogba or a DM and McT. Not sure if I fully trust McT yet to play the role of DM but he has looked good in pre- season.This vid is fascinating!
Makes me wonder if McT and Matic should be used together... Don't know if it'll work... We need another CDM...
Also shows how Bruno, Dybala and Pogba could all get involved in the action, while we maintain defensive structure.
He's rolling the dice and it's not a bad call. I hope someone spams him continually if he gets it wrong. He needs to pay for his lies!That guy is a fraud, lads. He doesn’t know anything more than us
How many times does Nicolo Schira need to be posted before people realise that he's a hack.
How many times will people fall for his crap?
Remind me never to invite you to a party.That guy is a fraud, lads. He doesn’t know anything more than us
Even signing both, we wont have solved every single problem area. We still need a right winger for sure. Playing Mata and/or Lingard on the right will prevent us from being a top club. We need a holding midfielder to replace Matic. I think Shaw and Lindelof have enough quality to help us compete in the EPL, but I’m not sure of it. Perhaps Dalot provides competition, but I’m not as high on him as others here. All across the squad we lack quality depth. And even amongst these starters, assuming we grabbed everyone, you still have several players starting that aren’t good enough to compete for CL trophies. If they think Bruno is a fit for what they’re doing, and he’s available now, they’ve got to grab him. If Juventus and Dybala are willing to make the swap for Lukaku, and the club think he’s a better fit, then it’s got to be done. We need to increase the overall quality of our squad. Too many players that are not fit to even be squad players on a top European team taking up spots.No way were we going to solve every single problem area in one summer.
He is a bullshitter apparently. Fernandes is overrated. I think he is a back up in case Dybala says no.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He plays in the #10 role and has a natural instinct to pick up loose balls and get into the box to score.Admittedly I've not seen him play enough to judge and YouTube can make a average player a worldie. So what's he best position then? And how and where does he fit into United team??
I’m in Croatia next year. Where do live again?Remind me never to invite you to a party.
Thanks, it hurts how naive I can be sometimes.
Our whole fecking team is overrated.He is a bullshitter apparently. Fernandes is overrated. I think he is a back up in case Dybala says no.
Even more of a reason why we don't want to add anymore of them.Our whole fecking team is overrated.
We've moved up in the world and are replacing overrated with massively overpriced.Even more of a reason why we don't want to add anymore of them.
I'd rather overpriced than overrated.We've moved up in the world and are replacing overrated with massively overpriced.
How can you say that?He is a bullshitter apparently. Fernandes is overrated. I think he is a back up in case Dybala says no.
Did you watch the game vs Liveperool? Liverpool fans were climaxing over his performance and saying not to leave the US without his signature.I´m a little worried that Fernandes is a tod overestimated and that he might not be the hotshot everyone seems to believe he is. He was alright against Liverpool, but he did nothing that Pereira could not do. See for yourselves:
I was also a bit underwhelmed by him in the national league, and thought he did not quite live up to the hype (losing possession a lot). Personally, I´d rather see United signing Erikson, for the same price.
Yeah the player who we've been linked with all summer ans allegedly agreed to sign a week back is back up for the guy that by chance we were offered a swap for a few days ago. We need both. Anyone saying anything else is off their heads.He is a bullshitter apparently. Fernandes is overrated. I think he is a back up in case Dybala says no.
Ok. You caught my typo. Of course it was 4231, I said “double pivot”. It’s a such a smart strategy to argue pretending that the opponent is a dumb kid who doesn’t know anything about football. Enlightening me on how broadcasters picture lineups is another brilliant argument. Pretty primitive.I've watched every pre season game. Weve played a 4231 not a 4321. Did you watch any of them?
I said in my previous post that not all formations are rigid and that players move around the pitch differently as the game develops. It seems you are seeing the player positions and formations I had them in and taken them as gospel and for the rigid sistems you seem to think footballers play in. They dont.
City have Bernardo Silva who plays central behind Aguero (even though the broadcaster show it as wide right) with Sterling wide left and david Silva/De Bruyne in the mix.
This is what the broadcasters show.
Sterling Aguero Bernardo
Silva
gundogan Fernandinho
Bernardo drifts around behind the strikers and in midfield positions. Sterling gets in behind the defenders and plays as a left winger. Aguero drops into #10 to allow space in behind.
Do you understand?
It's about getting players to do a job that works best on the pitch. I repeat its not about rigid formations. What i showed does not mean Bruno will play as a false 9 when the 2 up top drift wide. Bruno also plays very deep and is very good at protecting the back 4.
And would b happy to finish below Everton, wolves probably?Even more of a reason why we don't want to add any more of them.
Oh dear, I'm moving to...to...Mars?I’m in Croatia next year. Where do live again?
Was trying to edit my previous post. Never mind.Ok. You caught my typo. Of course it was 4231, I said “double pivot”. It’s a such a smart strategy to argue pretending that the opponent is a dumb kid who doesn’t know anything about football. Enlightening me on how broadcasters picture lineups is another brilliant argument. Pretty primitive.
Are you interested in truth or just defending whatever you draw? You didn’t explain me who will provide width in your “diamond”. Fullbacks can’t do that all we achieve with our fullbacks out wide - Sad Lonely Young. If forwards provide width, then it’s not a diamond any more. It’s 4-3-3. numbers like 442, 443, etc. describe approximate average position of every player. Also, in diamond you have a DM who is wasted against small deep defending teams. Are you trying to say that your diamond so flexible that MCT will get in the box, then it’s not diamond because he’s average position will be higher. Do you understand?
I really don’t think that the are glued to the circles shown by Sky. Really. I am trying to have a dialogue. It is impossible though.
As for Guardiola, he plays a vey fluid system and his fullbacks can be inverted or wide. Wide players will play wide or tuck accordingly. I have no clue what you are trying to prove by bringing City line up here.
I do wonder if, if we got dybala and fernandes, we'd go for an ultra attacking line up with mctominay or matic at the base, pogba and fernandes playing further up with dybala as a false 9 / 10 with martial and rashford playing as split strikers. Gives tremendous freedom to our front 5, width and with a front 3 like that a lot of options to switch positions during games.Ok. You caught my typo. Of course it was 4231, I said “double pivot”. It’s a such a smart strategy to argue pretending that the opponent is a dumb kid who doesn’t know anything about football. Enlightening me on how broadcasters picture lineups is another brilliant argument. Pretty primitive.
Are you interested in truth or just defending whatever you draw? You didn’t explain me who will provide width in your “diamond”. Fullbacks can’t do that all we achieve with our fullbacks out wide - Sad Lonely Young. If forwards provide width, then it’s not a diamond any more. It’s 4-3-3. numbers like 442, 443, etc. describe approximate average position of every player. I really don’t think that the are glued to the circles shown by Sky. Really. I am trying to have a dialogue. It is impossible though.
As for Guardiola, he plays a vey fluid system and his fullbacks can be inverted or wide. Wide players will play wide or tuck accordingly. I have no clue what you are trying to prove by bringing City line up here.
There is more of a chance of that happening with adding more overrated players no? Mate you're not making any sense. This is absolute silly season where people just jump on a bloody bandwagon. If we do sign him by all means I hope he is a success but there is no reason for people to lose their shit if we don't.And would b happy to finish below Everton, wolves probably?
It’s classic 4-3-3 with Dybala as false 9. If Pogba and Bruno will play 8.5 well (I think PP can do that), Rashford will play as wide as against KBK, James on the right (martial on the right is bold), then it is pretty viable in my view.I do wonder if, if we got dybala and fernandes, we'd go for an ultra attacking line up with mctominay or matic at the base, pogba and fernandes playing further up with dybala as a false 9 / 10 with martial and rashford playing as split strikers. Gives tremendous freedom to our front 5, width and with a front 3 like that a lot of options to switch positions during games.
Sort of like...
Rashford--------------------------martial
------------------------dybala
-----Fernandes----------------pogba
------------------------Matic
That is similar to city in a lot of ways. Its not perfect but its about a million times better than what we can currently field. It'd concede but also score a lot. Could be a lot of fun to watch.
Exit: looks like a diamond in that but i'd see it more like a 4123 or a 433.
Technically it’s 433 with a false 9. Dybala would be playing the way Messi did for Barca under Guardiola with Rashford and Martial the David Villa and Pedro.I do wonder if, if we got dybala and fernandes, we'd go for an ultra attacking line up with mctominay or matic at the base, pogba and fernandes playing further up with dybala as a false 9 / 10 with martial and rashford playing as split strikers. Gives tremendous freedom to our front 5, width and with a front 3 like that a lot of options to switch positions during games.
Sort of like...
Rashford--------------------------martial
------------------------dybala
-----Fernandes----------------pogba
------------------------Matic
That is similar to city in a lot of ways. Its not perfect but its about a million times better than what we can currently field. It'd concede but also score a lot. Could be a lot of fun to watch.
Exit: looks like a diamond in that but i'd see it more like a 4123 or a 433.
100%Technically it’s 433 with a false 9. Dybala would be playing the way Messi did for Barca under Guardiola with Rashford and Martial the David Villa and Pedro.
What I love if these two arrive is the flexibility it play 433 with Rashford up top or Dybala as false 9. We could play a solid midfield 3 or 4231. Good options to have instead of a rigid system.100%
Yeah i meant to put martial and rashford thr other way around.It’s classic 4-3-3 with Dybala as false 9. If Pogba and Bruno will play 8.5 well (I think PP can do that), Rashford will play as wide as against KBK, James on the right (martial on the right is bold), then it is pretty viable in my view.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Really? We let go of one of our main midfielders who bought balance to the midfield, and sold one in January, our form with Herrera missing was for every one to see, we lost to relegated teams in the fight for top 4 Matic is a complete deadwood even worse than fellani now in the middle ,The midfield is in abysmal state and you are telling me we should not lose it if we don't sign any more midfielders when we let go two of them from our team, and be happy with an attacking midfielder who's first choice is to stay at juventus and if he is played in his best position unbalances our midfeild and forces our most creative player to play so deep as a pivot where he is very poor and gets found out?There is more of a chance of that happening with adding more overrated players no? Mate you're not making any sense. This is absolute silly season where people just jump on a bloody bandwagon. If we do sign him by all means I hope he is a success but there is no reason for people to lose their shit if we don't.
Again to reiterate, I asked you to not lose your shit about not signing Fernandes. The fact you think that Fernandes should be signed to replace Herrera tells me all I need to know about your understanding of both players attributes and influence on their respective teams. Fernandes is a #10. We obviously need midfielders. I'd rather overpay and bring in a quality #8 or #6 to replace both Matic and Herrera than buy more mediocrity to fill numbers. Wasn't this your question in the first place? I still think Gomes has real quality and should be slotted in as an #8.Really? We let go of one of our main midfielders who bought balance to the midfield, and sold one in January, our form with Herrera missing was for every one to see, we lost to relegated teams in the fight for top 4 Matic is a complete deadwood even worse than fellani now in the middle ,The midfield is in abysmal state and you are telling me we should not lose it if we don't sign any more midfielders when we let go two of them from our team, and be happy with an attacking midfielder who's first choice is to stay at juventus and if he is played in his best position unbalances our midfeild and forces our most creative player to play so deep as a pivot where he is very poor and gets found out?
Done. I’ll be in Dubrovnik some time in AugustOh dear, I'm moving to...to...Mars?
Where in Croatia?
Wanna beer?
Well he could have got far more offensiveAfter replying to a post like that I’m worried about this guy