He has not said anything which goes contrary to what ive said.
He categorically says "reorganizing the territories of J&K is legally a separate issue" from 3:00 onwards.
I'll make this simple for you:
1. Parliament cannot legally reorganize J&K i.e. bifurcate and change its status from State to UT until and unless 35A is repealed.
2. Now why is 35A important in this aspect ? See below.
3. 35A was inserted by 1954 presidential order which included the following [
"Provided further that no Bill providing for increasing or diminishing the area of the State of Jammu and Kashmir or altering the name or boundary of that State shall be introduced in Parliament without the consent of the Legislature of that State."]
3. Therefore the parliament could not have introduced the bill to bifurcate and change its status without first repealing it.
4. Now the 1954 presidential order which brought in 35A was repealed through another presidential order which was passed yesterday and i have posted above.
5. Presidential order is not an act of parliament.