The decision to sell Fellaini

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sir Scott McToMinay

New Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2018
Messages
2,737
Location
Acapulco, Somalia
Rewriting history is not accepting that Fellaini has played brilliantly for us in some games. He has been horrible in some but he was someone who always gave it everything.

Without him we may not have won the EL. Ajax could not get near to him. When we are out of ideas and need a goal now he would have been the best option.
Selling him was not an issue. Not buying a better player is the issue. When we can't break down teams throw in Fellaini and he will cause problems.
He caused problems for everyone even in the World Cup. You don't get to be a regular with Belgium if you are that useless.
Their midfielders looked like school kids next to him, he absolutely dismantled them, it was absolutely hilarious.
 

Thiagoal

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
2,565
The problem yesterday was a total lack of control and passing in midfield. Fellaini wouldn't have solved either problem and it's not herreras best skill either.


Maybe we could have done better with fellaini as the forward in place of greenwood, but that's really scraping the barrel.

We desperately need a good holding player who can pass (like jorginho) or a box-to-box Herrera clone, since mct and Pogba otherwise have too much to do on their own or Pogba gets restricted in a deeper position.
Maybe I was watching a different game, but I thought we controlled the game pretty well! However, all our passes were sideways or backwards until McT came on and introduced the forward pass to the team.
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,715
Maybe I was watching a different game, but I thought we controlled the game pretty well! However, all our passes were sideways or backwards until McT came on and introduced the forward pass to the team.
Pretty sure az had more possession and passes. Most of our moves ended with miscontrol or a bad pass from midfield, especially fred and matic.
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,757
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
The biggest problem with Fellaini is that he thinks he's a midfielder when he should be a striker. He's a great target man. Maybe not to start a game, but there aren't many in the game with better chest control and hold up play when back to goal...
 

Champagne Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
4,187
Location
El Beatle
Fellini is better than Matic, Fred and Pogba in a midfield 2.

But Jose spent 100 million on Matic and Fred. Someone had to be sacraficed and the Glazers were not going to take a 40 million hit on Fred if someone offered 10 million, without giving him a little longer to show his worth, hoping he'll do a Lindelof and go from laughing stock so solid starter.

I think Ed will realize that we urgently need a DLP in January before this team implodes. Sandro Tonali, Longstaff or John McGinn perhaps.

Fellaini won't be mentioned on here ever again if we land a solid DLP in January.
 

Snow

Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
33,453
Location
Lousy Smarch weather
People claiming Fellaini was even half as bad as Fred has been so far... Jesus Christ. Yes he probably wasn't good enough but he single handedly won us a lot of games. Fred has done absolutely nothing so far.
He did not. Don't know why this is a myth that exists. Fellaini's United career was bad.
 

WR10

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
5,644
Location
Dream
The argument in the OP is that the decision was to replace Fellaini with Andreas. That is not true and therefore the point made is invalid. The decision was to get rid of a player that was not congruent with our idea of football. That was a good decision and we were successful at achieving that.

What we haven’t achieved yet is what Ole has been desperately hinting at. Players are to leave but we want to buy to replace.

Our current midfield options is not our end goal
 

RedWat

Full Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2017
Messages
115
100%. Fred is an absolute waste of space. How often did Fellaini lose the ball? not very often from what I remember, he was a neat passer of the ball. Last night Fred might as well have been playing for the opposition.
Whilst Fellaini was one of the least talented members of the Utd squad, he was by far one of the toughest mentally, one of the few players you could count upon when the chips are down, and scored some vital goals for us. I’m sure if he was still in the squad as a plan B we would have more points than we currently have.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,091
Absence really does make the heart grow fonder sometimes. There's no way anyone here could list 10 matches where Fellaini put on a great performance. Maybe 5, tops. Going off recollection only I'd say 1 or 2 MOTMs.

His value was as a target man, never as a holding mid, a deep lying mid, a wide mid nor a creative mid. His value was always a battering ram. What a monster he was in that 4-4 battle when he was still at Everton in the 2011-12 season. He pulled off something like that performance a few times, but not more than a few times.

We needed to let him go and move on. The real mistake was in bringing in Fred, hanging on to Matic and hanging on to Mata. McTominay is a promising project and Pereira may or may not come through, but we were never going to get anywhere with Fellaini as a regular starter for us. Could he still be useful as a Plan C sub against clubs like Newcastle and Palace? Perhaps, but if Fellaini was going to be our Plan B this season we were never, ever going to develop a credible Plan A.
 

INeedAbsynthe

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
37
Supports
Liverpool
He’s an awful footballer but a brilliant footballer at the same time.

I’m not even sure how to describe him.

All I know is that myself and every single fan of the opposition hated playing against him despite mocking him at the same time which speaks volume.

Everybody laughed at the fee including your own fans but in the end I think he was well worth the money.
 
Last edited:

KetilOwren88

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2016
Messages
274
Location
Norway
I would rather see us finishing 10th with Greenwood, Garner and Gomes than 6th with Lukaku, Fellaini and Sánchez. They should have been replaced properly, but it’s better to wait for the right player than buying just for the sake of it, which United has done for many years now. Sometimes you have to take one step backwards to take two steps ahead.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,606
Supports
Mejbri
Absence really does make the heart grow fonder sometimes. There's no way anyone here could list 10 matches where Fellaini put on a great performance. Maybe 5, tops. Going off recollection only I'd say 1 or 2 MOTMs.

His value was as a target man, never as a holding mid, a deep lying mid, a wide mid nor a creative mid. His value was always a battering ram. What a monster he was in that 4-4 battle when he was still at Everton in the 2011-12 season. He pulled off something like that performance a few times, but not more than a few times.

We needed to let him go and move on. The real mistake was in bringing in Fred, hanging on to Matic and hanging on to Mata. McTominay is a promising project and Pereira may or may not come through, but we were never going to get anywhere with Fellaini as a regular starter for us. Could he still be useful as a Plan C sub against clubs like Newcastle and Palace? Perhaps, but if Fellaini was going to be our Plan B this season we were never, ever going to develop a credible Plan A.
He showed his value I think when Bailly was mistiming headers and almost injuring himself at every turn, while Lindelof was losing every aerial battle he could muster. Jose put him as a screen against Burnley to deal with the high long balls and he took care of them all, bailing out those two bullied defenders. He definitely had his uses as a squad player. Professional too. I really don't mind us selling him but I do mind not replacing him.
 

pixel

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
665
Location
Lost In Code
Absence really does make the heart grow fonder sometimes. There's no way anyone here could list 10 matches where Fellaini put on a great performance. Maybe 5, tops. Going off recollection only I'd say 1 or 2 MOTMs.

His value was as a target man, never as a holding mid, a deep lying mid, a wide mid nor a creative mid. His value was always a battering ram. What a monster he was in that 4-4 battle when he was still at Everton in the 2011-12 season. He pulled off something like that performance a few times, but not more than a few times.

We needed to let him go and move on. The real mistake was in bringing in Fred, hanging on to Matic and hanging on to Mata. McTominay is a promising project and Pereira may or may not come through, but we were never going to get anywhere with Fellaini as a regular starter for us. Could he still be useful as a Plan C sub against clubs like Newcastle and Palace? Perhaps, but if Fellaini was going to be our Plan B this season we were never, ever going to develop a credible Plan A.
Perfectly put. The reliance on players like Fellaini, Valencia, Young is what has cost us. These are hard working players who will run around. And give the illusion of doing a lot. But that's just what it is. An illusion.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,966
Location
Austria
He did not. Don't know why this is a myth that exists. Fellaini's United career was bad.
How can something be a myth that is a proven fact? Look how many important goals and especially late winners he scored for us. Doesn’t change the fact his allround game wasn’t good enough but Fred has been miles worse so far.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,966
Location
Austria
Absence really does make the heart grow fonder sometimes. There's no way anyone here could list 10 matches where Fellaini put on a great performance. Maybe 5, tops. Going off recollection only I'd say 1 or 2 MOTMs.

His value was as a target man, never as a holding mid, a deep lying mid, a wide mid nor a creative mid. His value was always a battering ram. What a monster he was in that 4-4 battle when he was still at Everton in the 2011-12 season. He pulled off something like that performance a few times, but not more than a few times.

We needed to let him go and move on. The real mistake was in bringing in Fred, hanging on to Matic and hanging on to Mata. McTominay is a promising project and Pereira may or may not come through, but we were never going to get anywhere with Fellaini as a regular starter for us. Could he still be useful as a Plan C sub against clubs like Newcastle and Palace? Perhaps, but if Fellaini was going to be our Plan B this season we were never, ever going to develop a credible Plan A.
We aren’t developing shit without Fellaini neither.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,981
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
How can something be a myth that is a proven fact? Look how many important goals and especially late winners he scored for us. Doesn’t change the fact his allround game wasn’t good enough but Fred has been miles worse so far.
It wasn't actually the goals he scored himself (I'm pretty sure he didn't score than many winners), but it was the chaos that he caused the opposition in his good games that made him so useful.
 

zenith

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
1,789
Herrera I can still understand but fellaini just had to go. He was symbolic of hoofball football and Jose's pet. Had mourinho been in charge fellaini would be on a new long term contract and people would be bitching about it big time.
 

Bestie07

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2008
Messages
7,906
Location
He went by the name of Wayne Rooney
Our problem is not there players we have let go, as none of them have been pulling up trees since leaving us. Probably AdM was the only one who would have been useful here as a starter. Just because we go on to replace our bad players with even worse ones, doesn't mean the decision to sell these players was wrong. We have to buy better, which we haven't done for about a decade now.
 

NWRed

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
1,177
Now, I didn't like the sight of Fellaini starting games for us, as much as anybody. While he had his uses, he didn't represent what I wanted to see from a Manchester United player. But we appear to have replaced him with Andreas Periera. And to be honest, it's not even a contest. Fellaini is miles better than them based on what we've seen of both thus far.

I don't know what happened behind the scenes but you don't sell disappointing players by replacing them with already in house and much worse ones. Surely Ole was involved in this absurd call? This and Herrera being replaced by Mctominay are two extremely weird pieces of squad building.

I never thought I'd miss Fellaini. fecksake this club.
Replacements were targetted in the summer (Rice and Longstaff) but not signed, and Ole, quite rightly, wasn't willing to sign players he didn't really want.

I also think given McTominay has been our best midfielder this year so far criticism of him is unfair, although I don't think Periera will ever be good enough as a first team United player.
 

RedMilo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
1,317
The decision to sell Fellaini was the right one, we had to move away from using him as our plan B, however not replacing him with a viable Plan B, and to me more importantly, not replacing Herrera in midfield was not the best of decisions the club have ever made.

You look at the quality behind our attackers barring Pogba & McTominay and its just not there.

Matic, Mata, Pereira, Fred & Lingard have been given opportunity after opportunity, the slow play, lack of creativity its frustrating to watch and whilst much has been said about Rashford not stepping up(I agree to a certain point), the service the striker gets in this team is really poor because the midfield is poor.

Fellaini was a physical presence in midfield and a goal threat in the box but he wasn't a Utd player i.e. you wouldn't have seen him anywhere near the team in any of our title winning teams over last 25 years. Herrera is the bigger miss to the way we play because his work rate in midfield, clever play & awareness of the quick pass makes him valuable for our team, very underrated player in my opinion. Its not coincidence our run last season ended with him out of the team.

We need to find new way to be effective with what we have available, but this season based on our options, Id be tempted to throw Garner in and go back to 4-3-3 with him in midfield alongside McT & Pogba. Its not ideal and its nowhere near the Matic-Ander-Pogba midfield we had last season, but with Matic seemingly running in quick sand and the others lacking, we have to find another way.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,794
Location
Trondheim
Fellaini was replaced by McT and it was a good decision. He was bad even as a stop-gap option and I'd rather see a youth player getting a chance. Letting Herrera leave without signing anyone in his place was criminal.
Disagree. Fellaini has uses nobody in the squad has. Both players should still be here though, they are better than most of our current ones
 

JK-27

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
869
The decision to sell Fellaini was the right decision.

The decision to give him a 2 year contract extension in June 2018 at £120,000 a week, to then sell him by January 2019, was a stupid decision. But that's Woodwards 'business sense' for you.
 

SweetRightFoot

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 24, 2019
Messages
372
Fellaini was a very good option for us, like it or not. Good plan B, physical enough, decent target man for DDG to punt it to and he actually wasn't terrible in passing.
Revisionism at its finest. He was a terrible footballer with 3 attributes at most, stamina, height and good chest control. He definitely couldn't consistently pass accurately over 10-15m and only physical in the sense he could jog all game long and make dirty, c*nty fouls. One of the worst United signings in my memory purely down to the amount of games he played and matches ruined. Championship footballer at best. Also, a hair pulling, elbowing, thick as pig sh*t c*nt.

/rant
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,981
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Fellaini was replaced by McT and it was a good decision. He was bad even as a stop-gap option and I'd rather see a youth player getting a chance. Letting Herrera leave without signing anyone in his place was criminal.
McTominay is the Herrera replacement. Just because he's the same height doesn't make him the Fellaini replacement. His game is far more similar to Herrera.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,792
Location
india
So is Fellaini bossing it in China now or what? What is your presumption that the Belgian is better than the likes of Pereira based on? Wishful thinking and our current horrific run of form?

Herrera has also not been some sort of revelation at PSG, has he?
Fellaini being better than Periera is based on their respective performances for us. Wishful thinking and twisting of the clear and obvious facts, is displayed far better by those who actually think Periera is anywhere near as good from what we've so far. And to be honest, from what we've seen so far, seeing any more is a rather revolting thought. And here I thought Fellaini was a pointless player.

I dont care about what Herrera has done for another club. All I know is that he was better than any midfielder we have right now (given Pogba is on holiday holiday/injury/wrong position holiday this season). He wasn't top class but he was still better than the current lot we've been watching.

It's funny, when we signed Matic, everybody was convinced the midfield had been sorted. We had Herrera the harrier, Matic the defensive rock and Pogba the flair midfielder. Since then Matic has fallen off a cliff, Herrera has left the club and Pogba wants to leave the club, and the midfield is miles worse than it was then. Sigh.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,792
Location
india
The problem yesterday was a total lack of control and passing in midfield. Fellaini wouldn't have solved either problem and it's not herreras best skill either.

Maybe we could have done better with fellaini as the forward in place of greenwood, but that's really scraping the barrel.

We desperately need a good holding player who can pass (like jorginho) or a box-to-box Herrera clone, since mct and Pogba otherwise have too much to do on their own or Pogba gets restricted in a deeper position.
I don't miss Fellaini, but we should have got a replacement for him. This is what's wrong, our squad is far too thin because of not replacing players. It's penny pinching and it's not fair on the fans.
I actually don't really believe that we messed up by selling Fellaini. This thread was more aimed at pondering the transition (it's the positive buzz word for every drop in quality, isnt it?) our midfield has made from what we felt was pretty bad to something significantly worse. I realise that we aren't really done (have we even begun?) with that transition, but the interim period and the direction it may suggest is somewhat strange.

And on that note, I do agree that it's the replacement or lack thereof, that is lacking as opposed to the actual sale of the player. But I do find it ironic that Fellaini was essentially sold, due to the sheer technically oaf-like nature of the player more than countering his plan-B usefulness. And then the next season we have the likes of Fred, Periera and sometimes Mata replacing his role - I mean, that's bizarre. Chelsea replaced Matic's role with that of Jorginho, who hasn't been a smashing success but is a good footballer wholly aliged with the vision of their then manage - Sarri. What 'vision' do Fred, Periera and Mata represent? They're as much misfits as Fellaini was and if anything, he had more fire and heart than all three (harsh on Mata I guess he's probably 60 years old). But that's the thing, as per this season, Periera is Ole's vision midfielder. And he's absolutely rubbish. Obviously given another season (doesnt look likely), he would improve on Periera, but given every season is hugely important at a football club like Manchester United, he is the one who decided to consider these footballers as being worthy of a place in the squad and Fellaini to not, so that's that - terrific squad building from Ole. Well done. The fact that anybody can even think of missing a player as mediocre as Fellaini says everything. Sigh.
 

Gopher Brown

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
4,549
He’s an awful footballer but a brilliant footballer at the same time.

I’m not even sure how to describe him.

All I know is that myself and every single fan of the opposition hated playing against him despite mocking him at the same time which speaks volume.

Everybody laughed at the fee including your own fans but in the end I think he was well worth the money.
All my football non-Man Utd supporting friends really rated him. It used to bemuse me quite a lot.
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,935
Andreas has been a winger this season so I would rather say Ander and Fellaini were not replaced at all
 

fps

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
5,524
Fellaini should never have been signed, and I'd forgotten he played for United. He is a better option than many of our current midfielders and strikers.
 

Le Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2017
Messages
1,441
The biggest problem with Fellaini is that he thinks he's a midfielder when he should be a striker. He's a great target man. Maybe not to start a game, but there aren't many in the game with better chest control and hold up play when back to goal...
His best phase at Everton was playing support behind the striker, where he could pivot and pitching in with goals, which is why I was confused Moyes himself used him in a different role.
Say what you will but at least it always felt we could score with him on the pitch. These days it's the other way around.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
It wasn't actually the goals he scored himself (I'm pretty sure he didn't score than many winners), but it was the chaos that he caused the opposition in his good games that made him so useful.
Spot on. Look at the EL Final. He destroyed Ajax. Then the Juve game. They panicked so much that three of them including the keeper went for Fellaini and the ball and scored an own goal.
The question is not about selling Fellaini. But not replacing him so at this current moment in time he is a better midfield player than either Matic or Fred or Mata. Games where right now we cannot break down teams, throw in Fellani and he will create chaos and panic in the opposing box.
It is how managers use these kinds of players. No one would say Johan Cruijff would use long balls. But he does. When things get desperate when he was at Barca, he would throw in a tall CF called Salinas and pump the ball into him ala Fellaini.
 

Amerifan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
986
No one seemed to rate him, except our managers. Either the three of them were nuts or the commentators were. I know which my money is on. As a target for set pieces Fellaini was valuable and hasn’t been replaced.
 

SweetRightFoot

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 24, 2019
Messages
372
No one seemed to rate him, except our managers. Either the three of them were nuts or the commentators were. I know which my money is on. As a target for set pieces Fellaini was valuable and hasn’t been replaced.
We've got a lad called Harry now who's an inch shorter but doesn't perpetually give away fouls and somehow is twice the footballer while playing at CB so not sure what you're on about here.
 

Snow

Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
33,453
Location
Lousy Smarch weather
How can something be a myth that is a proven fact? Look how many important goals and especially late winners he scored for us. Doesn’t change the fact his allround game wasn’t good enough but Fred has been miles worse so far.
Fact? Look at the facts and try to perpetuate the myths.
 

Amerifan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
986
We've got a lad called Harry now who's an inch shorter but doesn't perpetually give away fouls and somehow is twice the footballer while playing at CB so not sure what you're on about here.
A headed goal every 36 games vs every 17 games. So yeah, they’re equivalent. :houllier:
 

SweetRightFoot

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 24, 2019
Messages
372
A headed goal every 36 games vs every 17 games. So yeah, they’re equivalent. :houllier:
No, I'm saying Harry is much better because he can actually play football, you know, like contribute to the team rather than making dirty fouls, giving up the midfield and making us play Burnley/Stoke route one football.

As if your defending him by claiming 2 goals a season while being utter sh*te is better than 1 goal a season being one of the top CB's in the league. :houllier:
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
It's how you use a player to get an advantage over the opposition.
That's why most managers like Fellaini. The problem with Jose was that Fellaini became plan A.
If he was such a terrible player he would not have played for Belgium for such a long time.
 

Djorkaef

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 13, 2018
Messages
12
Ole just did what the fans asked: get rid of Fellaini and Lukaku immediately, because they "don't fit the club and they never did and they never will!".

As a Belgian I followed up on the comments on these 2 players every week here. And yes there were also a lot of people saying that getting rid of Fellaini and Lukaku, could only bring a positive effect, even if nobody else came in.

Allowing other players to grow, giving space for the talented youngsters. Well you got what you wanted. Happy now? Now I can see the fans are out of ideas, so that must mean Ole is also out of ideas.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.