- Joined
- Aug 18, 2019
- Messages
- 328
- Supports
- Barnet
I think he could go down as one of the greatest England players ever. He is simply amazing
Not sure about that. He's terrific. One of the best wide players around. But post Messi and co, I don't see him as being the best in the world in the future. Mbappe is there waiting for that crown. And I imagine someone else of that quality would step up by then as well. Sterling is excellent not at at an elite level IMO.Why not? Who else on the scene currently is going to be competing with him once Messi naffs off? Mbappe sure, maybe one of the Dutch youngsters, Bernado Silva? I think Sterling has got every chance, and if you take the big two names out of the mix, I don't see him as being behind any of the other top names right now.
I'd probably put him as the joint second best player in the world right now.
This isn't a video game. Back in reality, Zaha wouldn't get into a team surrounded by that quality of player because he would be deemed a liability next to them. Imagine a front three of Neymar, Messi and... Wilfred Zaha. He'd be out the door pretty fast. So while anyone's productivity would increase in a better team and under a better manager, players like Zaha aren't actually good enough for top class football teams and players like Sterling are.Sterling has had 2 stand out seasons. He has been surrounded by marque players & been managed by who many regard as the GOAT during this time. Is it crazy to believe that Zaha's level would not rise dramatically under similar conditions.
Zaha joined Utd at the worst possible time & was ruined by Moyes. Many bigger names have failed at Utd since SAF left. If Zaha had been under the tutelage of SAF for a few years & surrounded by quality players he too would be targeted by Barca, Real.
Bit much isn't it ? At his age, Rooney had performed miles better. Not to mention the likes of Bobby Charlton and co.I think he could go down as one of the greatest England players ever. He is simply amazing
Pogba isn't all that inspirational. He's no Keane/Vieira (genuine leader) or Messi/Ibra (on pitch inspiration) type figure who carries others with him regardless of dramatic speeches made in the French dressing room. He's a quality footballer but not a leader IMO. In fact at times the fact that he doesn't play with his team mates /poor decision making is his big weakness.Yes he is. Pep has positively structured his game and brought in that consistency and leadership. He is also a goal-scorer, and a match-winner.
However... I do not put him in the bracket of the likes of De Bruyne, Pogba, Aguero, Griezemann quite yet, because I am not sure how inspirational Sterling would be in an average team, whereas those I have named, carry a prescence and ability that lifts all around them, almost immediately.
Nah. He was "good" at Liverpool, but he's gone on another level of consistency at City. He's so much better.People keep pushing this, but Sterling had already been part of a title push with Liverpool, being one of their best players, hence the record breaking transfer to City
How did rooney perform.much better? Also Rooney career ended in his late 20s. I'm not talking about pure stats as rooney was a striker. But Sterling is ranked as high in his position as rooney ever was. I think when everything is done Sterling will pass him by.Bit much isn't it ? At his age, Rooney had performed miles better. Not to mention the likes of Bobby Charlton and co.
I don’t disagree that he’s improved, that’s evident, but I feel like it’s the natural progression of the talent he displayed at Liverpool, sure Pep has played his part, but nowhere near the hyperbolic statements that are often made crediting him with Sterling’s improvement. Look at this thread and it’s full of “the system” posts, and to me that’s just comical.Nah. He was "good" at Liverpool, but he's gone on another level of consistency at City. He's so much better.
He was always considered an elite level talent though. I first saw him at the u17 World Cup for England and it was clear he was top tier. He played pretty much in the same way then too. Consistency often comes with age also.Nah. He was "good" at Liverpool, but he's gone on another level of consistency at City. He's so much better.
To be totally fair, performing to your XG makes you a completely average shooter of everybody who ever takes a shot. So whilst it might not be terrible, It's certainly not good either.Yes, a terrible 20+ goal a season shooter, who just about performs according to his xG.
Rooney's career ended in his early 30s if I'm not mistaken. But he was a smashing player from 18 onwards. Pretty darn good from 16-18 as well. Sterling was good at 18 but then had an average spell after that. Not to mention, despite England being crap at international tournaments and Rooney not excelling and not having the best luck with injuries in and around them, he has a record breaking international career.How did rooney perform.much better? Also Rooney career ended in his late 20s. I'm not talking about pure stats as rooney was a striker. But Sterling is ranked as high in his position as rooney ever was. I think when everything is done Sterling will pass him by.
Don't get me wrong everybody knew he was a huge talent, and he was a good player at Liverpool.He was always considered an elite level talent though. I first saw him at the u17 World Cup for England and it was clear he was top tier. He played pretty much in the same way then too. Consistency often comes with age also.
Agreed, overhyping of some players is getting a bit ridiculous now, would take peak Rooney any time over peak Raheem lad, whole different level.Bit much isn't it ? At his age, Rooney had performed miles better. Not to mention the likes of Bobby Charlton and co.
I would disagree. Paul Pogba is an inspirational player. When he plays (and this is the issue..) he has an influence on the game that few players can ignore. France are world champions, with fabulous players, and Pogba is the creative presence on that team. I am not saying they cannot play or win without him. I am saying is he absolutely inspirational to them. He is not like Keane or Viera, so you should not compare like-for-like. The other players you mentioned are forwards. (and this is not a Pogba thread )Pogba isn't all that inspirational. He's no Keane/Vieira (genuine leader) or Messi/Ibra (on pitch inspiration) type figure who carries others with him regardless of dramatic speeches made in the French dressing room. He's a quality footballer but not a leader IMO. In fact at times the fact that he doesn't play with his team mates /poor decision making is his big weakness.
I totally agree that it's night and day but I think it's mostly confidence. For most of his England career it looked like he had none in the shirt, he kind of looked meek really. He's completely transformed into a senior player and leader for us now.Don't get me wrong everybody knew he was a huge talent, and he was a good player at Liverpool.
His movement off the ball especially is so much brighter. Compare his goal scoring now to what it was like before Guardiola.
For England he hadn't scored in something like 2 years? now he's a regular. He's just a much more confident, complete player. Night and day difference.
What?Yes he is. Pep has positively structured his game and brought in that consistency and leadership. He is also a goal-scorer, and a match-winner.
However... I do not put him in the bracket of the likes of De Bruyne, Pogba, Aguero, Griezemann quite yet, because I am not sure how inspirational Sterling would be in an average team, whereas those I have named, carry a prescence and ability that lifts all around them, almost immediately.
I mean, a lack of character (if that's what he has and I don't think it's the case), is not something people generally find very inspirational. But yeah this is for another thread.I would disagree. Paul Pogba is an inspirational player. When he plays (and this is the issue..) he has an influence on the game that few players can ignore. France are world champions, with fabulous players, and Pogba is the creative presence on that team. I am not saying they cannot play or win without him. I am saying is he absolutely inspirational to them. He is not like Keane or Viera, so you should not compare like-for-like. The other players you mentioned are forwards. (and this is not a Pogba thread )
When Pogba loses interest or focus, he makes mistakes and becomes sloppy. Like all players who lose focus. But, but.. when he is focused, he dominates games, against the very best. His poor decision making isn't a lack of footballing ability or footballing brain. That's lack of character.
I would disagree. Paul Pogba is an inspirational player. When he plays (and this is the issue..) he has an influence on the game that few players can ignore. France are world champions, with fabulous players, and Pogba is the creative presence on that team. I am not saying they cannot play or win without him. I am saying is he absolutely inspirational to them. He is not like Keane or Viera, so you should not compare like-for-like. The other players you mentioned are forwards. (and this is not a Pogba thread )
When Pogba loses interest or focus, he makes mistakes and becomes sloppy. Like all players who lose focus. But, but.. when he is focused, he dominates games, against the very best. His poor decision making isn't a lack of footballing ability or footballing brain. That's lack of character.
I know, but that's exactly it: it's literally not below par in the context of xG.To be totally fair, performing to your XG makes you a completely average shooter of everybody who ever takes a shot. So whilst it might not be terrible, It's certainly not good either.
Yea he is. Only on Redcafe.He’s better than Pogba or Griezmann. Both are good players, but overrated.
If peak Rooney was a whole different level to Sterling. Then Rooney was Messi level. If anything you guys are the ones overrating Rooney. Sterling at 24 isn't much if anything behind Rooney at 24. Like I said when it's all done he will be seen the greater player. There will be only one reason Rooney will be seen as greater in this country. But I won't get into thatAgreed, overhyping of some players is getting a bit ridiculous now, would take peak Rooney any time over peak Raheem lad, whole different level.
Agree but you haven’t actually seen peak level Sterling. Injuries permitting he’ll continue to improve for the next 3 years.Agreed, overhyping of some players is getting a bit ridiculous now, would take peak Rooney any time over peak Raheem lad, whole different level.
I agree with this, but Redcafe will not like it.Rooney had his first truly WC season at 23-24 (09/10) and had other 'good' seasons before and after. Sterling is potentially on his 3rd WC season at the same age so I don't see in what sense Rooney was a whole different level.
They're different players but from what they bring to the team, I'd say it's pretty close in terms of their overall level at the same age and probably favour Sterling in the long run if he keeps this up.
His biggest problem has always been his ball striking under pressure or in tight situations, something which I think is easier to train and probably down to a mental block.Don't get me wrong everybody knew he was a huge talent, and he was a good player at Liverpool.
His movement off the ball especially is so much brighter. Compare his goal scoring now to what it was like before Guardiola.
For England he hadn't scored in something like 2 years? now he's a regular. He's just a much more confident, complete player. Night and day difference.
Yet he scored what was voted best premier league goal ever a couple of years later and won a few more trophies playing a key role in the teamThe only thing peaking with Rooney past the 09 season was his waist.
crazy talkUmm.. yes you do.
Yep, he’s clearly got intelligence combined with fantastic physical qualities. Deadly combination!His biggest problem has always been his ball striking under pressure or in tight situations, something which I think is easier to train and probably down to a mental block.
Like Mbappe I think his greatest attributes are his game intelligence and off the ball movement. Combine that with his technical ability and pace, you have a very dangerous player. Even at 18/19(?) Liverpool already trust him enough to play him in multiple attacking positions and he generally did well in them.
Compare that with players like Rashford and Martial who are still struggling to find their true position in football. This guy can play on any wing and even as the SS. Just depressing really.
Not long ago Liverpool fans were arguing what was Sterling's best position, whether playing him as winger is better than playing him at the tip of diamond. They didn't have same discussion in the season before when Sterling had good season with Suarez next to him and they smashed all the teams. Young players integrate well in good functioning team.His biggest problem has always been his ball striking under pressure or in tight situations, something which I think is easier to train and probably down to a mental block.
Like Mbappe I think his greatest attributes are his game intelligence and off the ball movement. Combine that with his technical ability and pace, you have a very dangerous player. Even at 18/19(?) Liverpool already trust him enough to play him in multiple attacking positions and he generally did well in them.
Compare that with players like Rashford and Martial who are still struggling to find their true position in football. This guy can play on any wing and even as the SS. Just depressing really.
Sterling was quality as a 10, quality as a left or right winger at the ages of 17-19 what sepertes him from those players isn't only to do with a functioning team, but his intelligence, he is a far more intelligent player than any of those players, even Martial who is his equal physically and technically.Not long ago Liverpool fans were arguing what was Sterling's best position, whether playing him as winger is better than playing him at the tip of diamond. They didn't have same discussion in the season before when Sterling had good season with Suarez next to him and they smashed all the teams. Young players integrate well in good functioning team.
Not comparing their abilities btw, Young players struggled in the teams which was a broken team, even Sterling did.
I still remember CAF laughing at him, calling him average and what not. I remember Liverpool fans saying how Ibe is better than Sterling when he didn't have good season at Liverpool. Now he is at whole different level and there is no comparison between them.Sterling was quality as a 10, quality as a left or right winger at the ages of 17-19 what sepertes him from those players isn't only to do with a functioning team, but his intelligence, he is a far more intelligent player than any of those players, even Martial who is his equal physically and technically.
The scary thing about Stirling is that yes his shooting is something that can be improved upon, however he has scored I believe 35 goals this calander year so far, so what will he be like when his shooting does improves. He is still improving unlike Salah & Mane, prime Salah was the season before last I believe Stirling has now surpassed Salah/Mane form wise and we still haven't seen prime Stirling yet.Yes, a terrible 20+ goal a season shooter, who just about performs according to his xG.
We won titles with the likes of Cleverly & Chadwick. SAF even had his own son in the team. No team is made up of 11 marque players. It was also SAF that signed Zaha. If he didn't think he was good enough for Man Utd then why would he have signed him.This isn't a video game. Back in reality, Zaha wouldn't get into a team surrounded by that quality of player because he would be deemed a liability next to them. Imagine a front three of Neymar, Messi and... Wilfred Zaha. He'd be out the door pretty fast. So while anyone's productivity would increase in a better team and under a better manager, players like Zaha aren't actually good enough for top class football teams and players like Sterling are.
Sterling at 18/19 years old is as good as or even better than Dembele and Vincinus when they made step up to La Liga. I don't think many thought that way.We won titles with the likes of Cleverly & Chadwick. SAF even had his own son in the team. No team is made up of 11 marque players. It was also SAF that signed Zaha. If he didn't think he was good enough for Man Utd then why would he have signed him.
If anyone post 17/18 had said Sterling was good enough for the likes of Real & Barca they would have been declared insane. It's no coincidence that his elevation coincided with the arrival of Pep & the huge spending spree that brought in the likes of KDB, B Silva & Sane to add to the likes of Aguero & D Silva. Zaha on the other hand has been playing under the likes of Pardew & Hodgson & playing alongside Townsend & Benteke.
It reminds me of a certain Portuguese player.We won titles with the likes of Cleverly & Chadwick. SAF even had his own son in the team. No team is made up of 11 marque players. It was also SAF that signed Zaha. If he didn't think he was good enough for Man Utd then why would he have signed him.
If anyone post 17/18 had said Sterling was good enough for the likes of Real & Barca they would have been declared insane. It's no coincidence that his elevation coincided with the arrival of Pep & the huge spending spree that brought in the likes of KDB, B Silva & Sane to add to the likes of Aguero & D Silva. Zaha on the other hand has been playing under the likes of Pardew & Hodgson & playing alongside Townsend & Benteke.