UK General Election - 12th December 2019 | Con 365, Lab 203, LD 11, SNP 48, Other 23 - Tory Majority of 80

How do you intend to vote in the 2019 General Election if eligible?

  • Brexit Party

    Votes: 30 4.3%
  • Conservatives

    Votes: 73 10.6%
  • DUP

    Votes: 5 0.7%
  • Green

    Votes: 23 3.3%
  • Labour

    Votes: 355 51.4%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 58 8.4%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 3 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 9 1.3%
  • SNP

    Votes: 19 2.8%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 6 0.9%
  • Independent

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Other (BNP, Change UK, UUP and anyone else that I have forgotten)

    Votes: 10 1.4%
  • Not voting

    Votes: 57 8.3%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 41 5.9%

  • Total voters
    690
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,187
Location
Manchester
As someone said, it's really the Lib Dems can feel aggrieved about it and it's hard to feel any sympathy for them. But seriously, with 11% of the vote they'll have 1.6% of the seats. That's insane.

(also, Tories have a clear, 56% majority with 43.6% of the vote)
It is ridiculous. Can you share any links to the figures?
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,833
The Polish are only one group of immigrants. Immigration from countries outside of the EU increased significantly under Blair and a lot of these people over time brought their families, including elderly parents, with them.
Well the post I replied to was talking about EU citizens. Considering that his is labelled by all and sundry as a Brexit election, it's not unreasonable to limit immigration talk to EU citizens - after all, Brexit has little to do with non-EU migration.
 

Redlambs

Creator of the Caftards comics
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
42,335
Location
Officially the best poker player on RAWK.
Yeah he obviously needs to go.To be fair to him it doesn’t sound like he’s trying to lead Labour any more, he just doesn’t want to quit and leave a vacuum. Probably because as leader he hopes to have a bit more of a say in the selection process
This is what worries me.
Yep, that's the problem. He should walk and now.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,187
Location
Manchester
I voted labour, but I’ll say this: at least such a large majority means an end to the rudderless Britain we’ve seen since the coalition. It’s all on Boris now, and he’ll have no excuses if he doesn’t deliver.

I’m also hoping such a massive defeat means labour will have to rethink and come back stronger. Hopefully everyone has had enough of shouting at eachother, and we can actually get back to something resembling normality once brexit is out the way. As despite all the arguing, not every Tory is a heartless bastard who hates the poor, and not every labour voter is a millennial hipster with no idea about economics. I’m a bit sick of all the noise tbh, so hopefully everyone calms down a bit.
If they don't deliver they'll just lie again.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,899
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Bla bla Thatcherite bla bla.

Not just Corbyn who needs to go, pretty much the entire Shadow Cabinet needs binning off.
It’s going to be a fight with Momentum isn’t it?

I want Starmer to take the reins with a pragmatic approach where he gives a sensible front to the party once more while keeping Momentum in the conversation in the background.

Just as I'm writing this Starmer pops up on the BBC and is asked about the Leadership. His response says to me that he wants it.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,899
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Billy big bollocks on now letting us know he stood up to Corbyn and saw all this coming.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,214
It’s going to be a fight with Momentum isn’t it?

I want Starmer to take the reins with a pragmatic approach where he gives a sensible front to the party once more while keeping Momentum in the conversation in the background.

Just as I'm writing this Starmer pops up on the BBC and is asked about the Leadership. His response says to me that he wants it.
I'm not sure about this. Part of me thinks you're going to need to expunge the Corbyn/Milne tendency completely, and that means you need a fighter. Does Starmer have the stomach and passion for it? The other part thinks maybe that wing will finally shut up and let the pragmatists get on with it, but I'm not sure that's likely (or likely to succeed with the electorate). So maybe you still need a fighter.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,899
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Is there any upside to this for the non wealthy U.K. folk?
Struggling to see it, tbh.
Well a lot of people seem to be genuine when they say they don’t care how much it hurts the UK as long as we leave the EU.

Lets hold them to that.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,899
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
St Ives coming in. I used to play Sunday league with Andrew George
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,413
So you're saying that even now, seventy-four years later, the UK is suffering the effects of World War 2 and therefore cannot afford to raise taxes?

Because compounding or not, that is utterly ridiculous. Lots and lots of countries managed to rebuild after World War 2 and have high taxes. Your point simply doesn't stand up to even the slightest bit of scrutiny.

fecking hell, even the likes of Poland and Hungary have recovered well enough from World War II by this point - and these countries had no Marshall Plan but had 40 years of Soviet rule instead! The idea that rebuilding after World War 2 still hinders the UK economically... it's bonkers.
What are you talking about? You're taking 2+2 and getting 11.

Scandinavia thrives on a socialist model because they were able to set up for it after WW2. We were not, so we can forget adopting that model. We can raise taxes but with 60%+ of the population receiving welfare and 30% dependent on it, there is only so far we can go. Taking it too far inhibits the private sector growth that pays for it, and the only region that has managed to have both high taxes and an unhindered private sector is you guessed it... Scandinavia.
 

Oo0AahCantona

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,344
No one isn't concerned about children or the homeless. However momentum/Labour supporters tried to convey the message that if you voted Tory you were actively looking to kill these people. Its a horrible message, rightly rejected.
Whether you were actively looking to or not, that's what your vote endorses and more importantly empowers, each individual cross in the conservative box is the death knell for the most vulnerable and marginalised people in our society, let alone the majority of the population who don't seem to realise they're in the midst of a class war they are losing on all fronts.

Its that simple and the fact it isn't taken on board by the very people its there to protect is the clarification we live in a democracy by name only.

Tony Ben had a 4 stage criteria for democracy to function in that the quantifiable metrics needed to be improving; being a healthy population, an educated population, an informed population and one free of fear. where i'm sitting its abundantly clear most of those are failing and it shows.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,214
It isn’t a fix, the same happened for Brexit, Trump etc social media including the cafe aren’t the popular opinion. My social media was all labour, vote labour, tories bastards etc yet at work, the people who rarely make statements online were voting Tory.
Talk, as they say, is cheap.
 

nimic

something nice
Scout
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
31,990
Location
And I'm all out of bubblegum.
As someone said, it's really the Lib Dems can feel aggrieved about it and it's hard to feel any sympathy for them. But seriously, with 11% of the vote they'll have 1.6% of the seats. That's insane.

(also, Tories have a clear, 56% majority with 43.6% of the vote)
Your electoral system is bonkers.
 

MikeUpNorth

Wobbles like a massive pair of tits
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
19,944
I'm not sure about this. Part of me thinks you're going to need to expunge the Corbyn/Milne tendency completely, and that means you need a fighter. Does Starmer have the stomach and passion for it? The other part thinks maybe that wing will finally shut up and let the pragmatists get on with it, but I'm not sure that's likely (or likely to succeed with the electorate). So maybe you still need a fighter.
Yeah, I think you're right. Corbyn's style of politics is not one of compromise. Someone needs to cleanse the party of the all bullshit hard left politics.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,214
Whether you were actively looking to or not, that's what your vote endorses and more importantly empowers, each individual cross in the conservative box is the death knell for the most vulnerable and marginalised people in our society, let alone the majority of the population who don't seem to realise they're in the midst of a class war they are losing on all fronts.
I think the problem for Labour is talk of class war, and people voting against their class interests, puts people off and perhaps labels those who say it as SWP-type placard wavers. Labour are going to have to find a better way to talk to these voters.
 

Oo0AahCantona

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,344
I think the problem for Labour is talk of class war, and people voting against their class interests, puts people off and perhaps labels those who say it as SWP-type placard wavers. Labour are going to have to find a better way to talk to these voters.
I agree but it doesn't change reality.
 

RamblingRebel

Hitler dead!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
1,429
Location
Ireland
Supports
Burnley
First time in this thread, and was shocked at that poll. Im guessing there was a lot of tears this morning when you saw the results.

If it all gets too much for you, pop over to the transfer forum to cheer yourself up. Apparently Sancho is coming in January.
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
@Fiskey, you surely understand that non-EU migration will INCREASE after brexit? Surely?
You have common sense.
What do you not understand about what I'm saying?

If immigration is planned for and has democratic consent it can be a great thing. This has not happened in the past 20 years which has lead to lots of problems. This isn't controversial, it's accepted across party lines and in all mainstream discussion.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,899
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
What do you not understand about what I'm saying?

If immigration is planned for and has democratic consent it can be a great thing. This has not happened in the past 20 years which has lead to lots of problems. This isn't controversial, it's accepted across party lines and in all mainstream discussion.
You do realise that we could have had the same level of control over immigration within the EU as is being touted outside of it? All of our governments, including the Tories of the last 10 years have chosen not to because our economy is dependant on it.
 

DavidDeSchmikes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
17,380
Labour Mayor of London Sadiq Khan says the general election result is "nothing short of a catastrophe" for the Labour Party.

"For the fourth general election in a row the Labour Party has failed to put forward a compelling case to the British people," he says in a post on Facebook.

"It is no consolation that we performed so much better here in London.

"If we are truly honest with ourselves, we knew in our hearts that Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership was deeply unpopular with the British people and that we were extremely unlikely to form a Labour government last night.

"Labour now stands more politically and culturally removed than ever before from many of the people our party was formed to represent and that means asking ourselves some very difficult questions."

[BBC]
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
You do realise that we could have had the same level of control over immigration within the EU as is being touted outside of it? All of our governments, including the Tories of the last 10 years have chosen not to because our economy is dependant on it.
No we couldn't, David Cameron goes into detail as to why in his book. But that isn't the point here.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,899
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
One thing that’s really starting to wind me up is this idea that if it’s not Corbyn it has to be a Blair like centre right candidate. There’s a whole spectrum of personalities out there.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,833
What are you talking about? You're taking 2+2 and getting 11.

Scandinavia thrives on a socialist model because they were able to set up for it after WW2. We were not, so we can forget adopting that model. We can raise taxes but with 60%+ of the population receiving welfare and 30% dependent on it, there is only so far we can go. Taking it too far inhibits the private sector growth that pays for it, and the only region that has managed to have both high taxes and an unhindered private sector is you guessed it... Scandinavia.
As the unhindered private sector and the high economic freedom demonstrates, Scandinavia doesn't actually have a socialist model.

"Only so far" and "taking it too far" implies that there is a certain limit in taxation, after which it is counterproductive. Which is true. What you take for granted is that Britain has already reached that limit and higher taxes would inhibit growth in the private sector. This idea, that lower taxes = more growth, is a truism of "supply side economics" that is taken as gospel despite never having been actually proven.

And as I said, this World War 2 talk is silly. Countries changed their entire economic model and recovered relatively quickly.
 

nickm

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
9,214
I agree but it doesn't change reality.
Also, I'm not sure it's the right analysis. I'm just not sure politics is class based anymore, despite the financial crisis. I think it's about identity. The collective is dead, it's been fractured by economics and technology.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,899
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
No we couldn't, David Cameron goes into detail as to why in his book. But that isn't the point here.

Where admission is permitted, an EU citizen may remain in the UK for up to three months from the date of entry, provided they do not become a burden on the social assistance system of the UK.

If an EU citizen does not meet one of the requirements for residence set out in the Directive [employed, self-employed, self-sufficient, student] then they will not have a right to reside in the UK and may be removed.”
 

Redlambs

Creator of the Caftards comics
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
42,335
Location
Officially the best poker player on RAWK.
One thing that’s really starting to wind me up is this idea that if it’s not Corbyn it has to be a Blair like centre right candidate. There’s a whole spectrum of personalities out there.
That's what I've been arguing all night.

But if you aren't full left, you are evil and should vote Tory. There's no compromise, that's for idiots.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.