Bruno Fernandes | Signed

Status
Not open for further replies.

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,077
Location
Canada
Tbh I dont give a feck when we overpay. We've penny pinched for ages. I'd rather spend the money than not if the player is worth it. We are financially capable to do what it takes to sign a player if it's possible, and we should. We are desperate for midfielders, so should do what's needed. Pretending like we won't pay up and arent desperate isnt going to make us play better. Getting the player in will make us play better.
 

LJJT

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
1,536
Location
North West
Thank feck you have as much say in running the club as all of us. feck all. What a weird idea
What’s so mad about just paying up and getting the deal done? I’m normally a bit funny about how we pay over the odds but sod it let’s get this done. We are lucky at the minute no one else wants him, if Chelsea decide tonight they need to score and create more (as they do they are on a similar path to us) we would all shit ourselves and odds are they’d get the deal done whilst we still fanny about
 

Stretfordender

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
1,096
Thank feck you have as much say in running the club as all of us. feck all. What a weird idea
Funny. Weird idea, spending money on a player or keeping it within the glazers pockets/control . Jog on you right belter, I know what I’d chose.
 

Stretfordender

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
1,096
What’s so mad about just paying up and getting the deal done? I’m normally a bit funny about how we pay over the odds but sod it let’s get this done. We are lucky at the minute no one else wants him, if Chelsea decide tonight they need to score and create more (as they do they are on a similar path to us) we would all shit ourselves and odds are they’d get the deal done whilst we still fanny about
Totally agree, we’re in with a shout of champions league, it will only strengthen our position if we get him in. Get fourth and UCL we’ll make the money back no worries. Don’t get him in and potentially it’s Europa league again and no UCL to tempt players to sign in the summer.
 

chrysolite

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Messages
11
Location
Earthrealm
Pogba might end up staying if we get Bruno and he performs very well thus reducing the need for a massive overhaul in the summer. Why can't Woodward see that?
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,954
We need bodies especially in midfield. The fact the player seems to want to come is a major bonus, over players that pick us as a last resort and a fat paycheck. He is 25 bangs in goals and creates loads of assists. £13 million extra is feck all to Utd. Get it done!
 

ArjenIsM3

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
5,643
Location
Netherlands
Funny. Weird idea, spending money on a player or keeping it within the glazers pockets/control . Jog on you right belter, I know what I’d chose.
What you want isn't good for the club at all. We need to rid ourselves of the reputation that we'll pay whatever clubs want, not strengthen it. It's nothing to do with the Glazers.
 

pauldyson1uk

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
55,363
Location
Wythenshawe watching Crappy Fims
I was confident on Thursday, he would be our player before the Liverpool game and be watching from the stands, after reading on here, various news outlets, I have no confidence what so ever that he will even be a United player, this transfer window or any other.
 

Starkie_1

Affluent and Likeminded
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
2,898
Location
Failing a Jib anywhere, anyhow
Funny. Weird idea, spending money on a player or keeping it within the glazers pockets/control . Jog on you right belter, I know what I’d chose.
You old enough to know what happened at Leeds? We’re a lot bigger but so are the sums we spend. You don’t run a club by buying players at double their worth.... when they aren’t players you are desperate to sign. Regardless of the state of the owners and their investment. It’s just common sense. Belter indeed kid
 

Bondi77

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
7,344
You sure?

Mangala £42m(sold for nowt/zilch/£00.00)
Walker £52m
Mendy £53m

It helps if there is no accountability and you can just meet the asking price to close the deals with the minimum of fuss but City spent circa £150m on three defenders and only one, and that's debatable, has improved the team.
Stones £50m
Cancelo £50mil
Ottamendi £35mil
Laporte £56mil

Add this quartet to the above and I would say only Walker and Laporte could be called hits and not misses so the wasting of money here is mind boggling.
 

Starkie_1

Affluent and Likeminded
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
2,898
Location
Failing a Jib anywhere, anyhow
What you want isn't good for the club at all. We need to rid ourselves of the reputation that we'll pay whatever clubs want, not strengthen it. It's nothing to do with the Glazers.
Spot on. Fans who do feck all but moan about transfers and investment have absolutely nothing supportive about them whatsoever. Wanting constant new players is the opposite of supporting the team. Weird
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
Tbh I dont give a feck when we overpay. We've penny pinched for ages. I'd rather spend the money than not if the player is worth it. We are financially capable to do what it takes to sign a player if it's possible, and we should. We are desperate for midfielders, so should do what's needed. Pretending like we won't pay up and arent desperate isnt going to make us play better. Getting the player in will make us play better.
Penny pinching is exactly the opposite of what we’ve done.
It’s safe to say we’ve been taken to the cleaners over Maguire, Fred and AWB( as good as he is)
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
£43 million + £17 million in bizarre bonuses is a disgrace of an offer, where has Judge and Woodward pulled that valuation from? Some shitty excel formula? They're nowhere near qualified enough to put an accurate price on a football player. £55 million straight up would have made a lot more sense.
55.5 I reckon.
 

Footyislife

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
977
I'm curious, is that judgement off a number of his games or just the one? Or is one pushing it?
Sorry, my scouting methodology is my trade secret. Though I'm sure you can inferd that it would be impossible to judge a player without actually seeing them play mate.
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,796
It's not about money in the bank. It's setting a precedent that we aren't going to be fleeced in the market anymore.
Why aren't we? We have the same setup as far as I'm aware, so clubs will rightly look at us the same way.

Negotiate yes, but it'll only be ourselves we hurt if we walk away players we want to sign, and desperately need.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,668
Why aren't we? We have the same setup as far as I'm aware, so clubs will rightly look at us the same way.

Negotiate yes, but it'll only be ourselves we hurt if we walk away players we want to sign, and desperately need.
In this case no, it hurts Sporting more.
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
Why aren't we? We have the same setup as far as I'm aware, so clubs will rightly look at us the same way.

Negotiate yes, but it'll only be ourselves we hurt if we walk away players we want to sign, and desperately need.
We don’t desperately need Fernandes. It’s that mistaken belief that is directing Sporting’s stance. They can feck off.
 

Stretfordender

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
1,096
You old enough to know what happened at Leeds? We’re a lot bigger but so are the sums we spend. You don’t run a club by buying players at double their worth.... when they aren’t players you are desperate to sign. Regardless of the state of the owners and their investment. It’s just common sense. Belter indeed kid
Totally different situation to what occurred at Leeds United, we are making so much money in comparison to what they were making and spending. Therefore that point is irrelevant. Let’s be honest here, no of us know what figures are being touted around be Woodward in the Fernandes deal and I’m not saying pay massively over the odds, but if it’s stalemate over 5m,10m, 15m, just get the deal done as its money spent on players and not in the greedy hands of the Glazers. Having watched Fernandes, on several occasions albeit on the tv, imo he’s currently better than anything we’ve got at present in that midfield. With him in the team it would improve us and potentially seal UCL qualification for next season and all the financial rewards that brings the Glazers. Cheers kidda
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,796
We don’t desperately need Fernandes. It’s that mistaken belief that is directing Sporting’s stance. They can feck off.
Don't we? Ole is very picky it seems, but obviously wants him, we are desperate in midfield, he is available, and wants to be here, so not sure why people are seeing this as some sort of moral victory for us.
 

Offside

Euro 2016 sweepstake winner
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
26,749
Location
London
Definitely off. We are incapable of wrapping up transfer deals and it’s one of the many reasons we have a bang average team.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,425
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
Why didn’t we negotiate in fecking December I just wonder? Everyone fecking knew that we needed reinforcements since May and here we are negotiating in January.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
The fans as should get organised with Protests, boycotting our merchandise and sponsors, mass walk outs etc. What I surely won't do is believing their lies. But hey its a free world so do what you want
The problem is, as proven by the green and gold campaign, organised protests have little to no effect. The only way we will ever be rid of our current owners is if/when they get brought out.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,958
Location
Editing my own posts.
They both are tbh. Stupid wages attract mercenary players and stupid fees mean we overpay, bring a target in with a huge money burden to live up to on his head and the chance for the media to slam us for paying x many hundreds and not showing much for it.

Just look at Fred. Not his fault he was 50m in transfer fees but these dickhead commentators love bringing it up and twisting the knife in.
Sure, but media ribbing is way down on the list of things that should potentially scupper a transfer we might actually need!?

We’re stuck in this weird post-Fergie limbo land where we’re so unused to the normality of how other clubs have been run in the time we had one, mercurial, 26 year manager, that everyone is now deathly scared of doing anything because we’ve failed at it once!

Can’t sack Ole because we’ve already sacked 3 managers, and even though that’s a normal occurrence these days and both Liverpool & City have sacked just one less in the same time, it’s new to us, and thus we should naturally pivot straight back to the norms of 1986 and blindly trust in “patience” now..

Can’t hire an accomplished manager because we’ve already had 2 of them fail, and even though that’s also a normal occurrence at a big club, it’s still new to us, and thus we should be super reactionary and shoot straight to the furthest possible opposite instead! Making sure to blame any poor performances on the lack of playing staff...

But we can’t sign any big players either though, because we’ve had a few of them fail, and even though that’s par for the course these days, again, and even Fergie himself signed a shit load of flops and broke multiple transfer records, we should absolutely legitimise the Glazer’s frugality and build our entire future on youth prospects and bargains, like Ferguson never once even remotely did, despite still being one of the most profitable clubs in the world!

As increasingly pessimistic as I am, I’m still pretty open to giving Ole a chance (especially as he’s obviously not going anywhere this season) but I’m finding myself endlessly frustrated by the maddening mental gymnastics needed to convince oneself that we’re going in the right direction by trusting in a novice manager because he doesn’t have the appropriate players, whilst simultaneously accepting that we shouldn’t overpay for any of these players, despite being in a globally known position of weakness, because the other managers who didn’t work bought some other players who didn’t work, and despite our poor results under Ole being entirely down to his weak and inexperienced squad, it’s important to be principled and not add to that squad if it will cost too much (despite the global notoriety of those poor results virtually necessitating a price hike) or even - according to some actual arguments I’ve seen! - inhibit the potential progress of youngsters in that position!!

Why has everyone gone fecking insane this season!?

If we need Fernandes (and it seems like we do) and Ole genuinely wants him (and it seems like he does) - just fecking buy him. FFS. We’re not Everton.... yet.
 
Last edited:

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
In terms of transfer money, we're not penny pinching in the last 5 years.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/fuenfjahresvergleich/wettbewerb/GB1

City, -601.78m
United, -435.38m

Not to mention our wages, which is among the top 3-5 of the world.

I know which club i'd rather United be.
It's not the spending so much but how we've gone about it. We spent big chucks of that on a few players but we went years ..years....without buying a midfielder. With playing failed wingers at full back rather then looking for a great full back etc. We should have been spending but we stopped and the moment when we lost crediblity is when we sold Ronaldo..announced it...and then went in the bargain basement. The owners need to go because they cannot compete.
 

Irrational.

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
32,928
Location
LVG's notebook
I'm sure we can get better for £80 million. I'd rather wait until the summer than get taken to the cleaners. For £80 million I'd expect a Saul Niguez or a similar calibre of player.
 

Brightonian

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
14,103
Location
Juanderlust
Don't we? Ole is very picky it seems, but obviously wants him, we are desperate in midfield, he is available, and wants to be here, so not sure why people are seeing this as some sort of moral victory for us.
We are currently in desperate need for any midfielder because of injuries to McTominay and Pogba. But you don't spend £60m+ to cover individual injuries. The midfielders we might actually be described as 'desperate' for, or at least in need of, are first a foremost a defensive midfielder to replace Matic, and secondly a creative midfielder who can scheme his way through defensive set-ups against smaller teams, creating chances against parked buses. Fernandes is neither - he's a goalscoring midfielder who is creative in transitional and breaking situations, which is something we already do well.

Yes, of course he'd be an upgrade on Pereira (albeit who has put in some really improved performances recently), but only in situations where we are already very dangerous. And he'd add goals from midfield, which would also be a plus. But neither of those things is something we're 'desperate' for, and spending £60m+ would surely impinge on our ability to fix the aforementioned more serious holes in our midfield in the summer.

I want Fernandes, and I'm happy for the club to spend whatever amount they deem sensible on him. But if they don't manage to negotiate what they consider a sensible fee, I won't be distraught. The DM and block-breaking AM they need to buy in the summer are much more important.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Tbh I dont give a feck when we overpay. We've penny pinched for ages. I'd rather spend the money than not if the player is worth it. We are financially capable to do what it takes to sign a player if it's possible, and we should. We are desperate for midfielders, so should do what's needed. Pretending like we won't pay up and arent desperate isnt going to make us play better. Getting the player in will make us play better.
So Sporting can literally ask what they please and we should pay it?
 

C'est Moi Cantona

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
8,796
We are currently in desperate need for any midfielder because of injuries to McTominay and Pogba. But you don't spend £60m+ to cover individual injuries. The midfielders we might actually be described as 'desperate' for, or at least in need of, are first a foremost a defensive midfielder to replace Matic, and secondly a creative midfielder who can scheme his way through defensive set-ups against smaller teams, creating chances against parked buses. Fernandes is neither - he's a goalscoring midfielder who is creative in transitional and breaking situations, which is something we already do well.

Yes, of course he'd be an upgrade on Pereira (albeit who has put in some really improved performances recently), but only in situations where we are already very dangerous. And he'd add goals from midfield, which would also be a plus. But neither of those things is something we're 'desperate' for, and spending £60m+ would surely impinge on our ability to fix the aforementioned more serious holes in our midfield in the summer.

I want Fernandes, and I'm happy for the club to spend whatever amount they deem sensible on him. But if they don't manage to negotiate what they consider a sensible fee, I won't be distraught. The DM and block-breaking AM they need to buy in the summer are much more important.
You think we're 100 % planning to do that? I'll believe it when I see it.

We had no doubt made zero plans to buy anyone this month, hence us going for a player that has been offered on a plate to us, (but apparently didn't want in the summer), because we are desperate, Sporting know it, and are rightly trying to rinse us, there is no moral high ground for us to take here imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.